Who was in Europe to greet the black Africans when they emigrated, given that the anthropologists are correct and all life began in what is called Africa today??
Who was in Europe to greet the black Africans when they emigrated, given that the anthropologists are correct and all life began in what is called Africa today??
I wonder if Spanish speaking people claimed minority status in their countries and Islands of origin, when they or their families lived there? The Spanish speaking people from Mexico, Central America, South America who come to America, did they also claim minority status in the countries they left?
Did current black African immigrants claim minority status in the African countries they left to come to America?
Do the Arabs and Muslims coming to America claim minority status in the countries they left?
I wonder if Asians like being called yellow people by Hispanics. I wouldn’t think so.
Do native Indians like being called red people by Hispanics?
Just today, Russell Contreras an Associated Press race and ethnicity writer referred to people by color category as if everyone does it. Africans demanded to be called black. Hispanics demanded to be called brown. I don’t think anybody else demanded to be called a color.
It appears that the people who come to America en masse, do so because in their own countries they didn’t have the benefits of minority status.
I’m pretty sure that Asians who collect social benefits in America get deported. I never saw them protest being treated differently than the other color peoples who demanded to be called a color.
All groups and races enjoy privileges at different times and under different or similar situations.
Poor white people receive fewer privileges than any other group. They are barely recognized as existing anywhere beyond Appalachia, which proves that they’ve marginalized into the shadows of every other poor group.
White people don’t have a leader or an organization that fights on their behalf to get them benefits. No one marches for them or burns businesses and neighborhoods for them, or torches cars for them. They basically are fed the leftover crumbs after all other poor people receive their privileges. They’re not big complainers. They accept their condition and blame fate rather than some other race for their status.
When competing for social services, there’s a hierarchy: African, Hispanic, European, Asian. Out of all the poor people, Africans and Hispanics scream the loudest and utilize threats of mass actions in order to go to the head of the line. Asians work the hardest, while going without all the amenities, to achieve greater goals of personal achievement.
Hispanics now have overtaken the Africans, which angers many black leaders, who in turn strike out against white people. Strange isn’t it? One would think they’d strike out against Hispanics, but they need them on their side, should they decide to join forces in the future against white people.
Historically there has been a disdainful relationship between Africans and Hispanics. It will be interesting to see how that plays out and if they can indeed unite for the inevitable war against all whites. White people will surely be outnumbered, unless they join forces with the Asians.
Except for the very rich of all races and their families, most people get what they work for.
If you go to a country not speaking the language of that country and demand free everything and get it, that’s one heck of a massive privilege.
If your ethnicity is anywhere beyond the borders of Europe, you receive preferential treatment in the USA – unless you’re Russian. The Russians lay low; they have the same poor problems as do poor Europeans born and bred in the USA.
They call criticism HATE. That’s what our democracy has become.
Our government tells the populace what, who and how they are allowed to criticize.
Basically it boils down to none at all, because you can’t mention the name of the individual or group you are criticizing. But the people who pushed this resolution against hate rag through congress criticize freely those they rule.
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” is often attributed to Voltaire, the French Enlightenment writer, historian and philosopher.
Jews scream HOLOCAUST and the world stands still for them.
Criticism is what stopped the holocaust, not Jews screaming.
Blacks scream SLAVERY and the world stands still for them.
Criticism is what stopped slavery, not blacks screaming.
Think about that the next time you ruin somebody’s life and the lives of their families because you couldn’t handle criticism.
The world is weary of your screams.
You’ve been free a very long time.
Now free somebody else.
Blacks and Hispanics force white people to fight their battles for them. They do it with their dogs and gamecocks too – force them to fight, for the purpose of monetary gain. It’s always about the money.
Blacks and Browns like to watch people and other animals tear each other apart in an arena they control. There is no exit plan for the fighters. They’re put into the ring to fight or die. They know they’re going to die, if not this fight the next one.
Fifty states outlaw the brutal blood sport. But so do they outlaw slavery and trafficking of children for sex.
Blacks and Browns treat white people like their dogs and gamecocks.
Do you know how many white people died or sacrificed everything but their lives to help black Africans gain their freedom from slavery and then to support their efforts to achieve equality? Too many to count?
Yet nowhere during black history month is their sacrifice acknowledged. Now that is an ungrateful demographic of people who are too smug to say thank you for your service to freedom. Yet, the outspoken members of Black Lives Matter Terrorist group admonished the president of the United States for not saying enough about black history during black history month.
An apology for your lapse in etiquette would be appropriate. A sincere recognition and appreciation for white people’s contribution to the abolishment of slavery is in order. If tables were turned as they are in other countries, black Africans would not risk it all to free whites enslaved by blacks. That’s black supremacy in play.
Now who comes knocking again, this time to force white people, through humiliation and life-ruining war tactics, to fight for their causes? Blacks again. Oh yeah, and Browns.
Really, how rude – and selfish. Isn’t the mass exploitation of any race by another race illegal? It should be.
The laws people break as their right are not only the petty theft or grand theft laws, or cheating the social service system, traffic violations, assault, they’re the big laws, the ones outlawing grotesque, despicable behaviors.
Those are theirs to break is their answer proved by their actions which facilitate the practices. They say they don’t support it, but they do nothing to stop it when it happens within their own race in their own neighborhoods. Turning a blind eye = facilitation.
They force white people to politick for new laws and/or to change policy regarding the enforcement of existing laws that favor them financially, rather than do it themselves, which indicates they want white people to think and act for them. But they want to lead.
What kind of people do that? Dictators. Despots. Oppressors. Kings. Queens.
I have to chuckle when I hear Black African talking heads on cable T.V. say so glibly, ‘It worked for the Jews; it’ll work for us’.
The Jews destroy somebody’s life for calling them what they call themselves – Jew.
The Blacks destroy somebody’s life for calling them what they call themselves – Nigger.
My question was always, to what end? What did they gain by destroying somebody’s life?
An ally? No.
An enemy? For sure, for life, the whole family and beyond.
Jews created terror in the hearts and minds of every non-Jew on the planet.
Blacks created terror in the hearts and minds of every non-Black on the planet.
If the Jew population is as they say, which it isn’t, 1/10th of 1 percent of the world census, that makes an extraordinarily small base from which to effectively instill terror into the remaining 99.9 percent of the world population.
And where are their main bases of operations? In the USA.
Anything to do with money in America is controlled primarily by Jews, sometimes out front, mostly from behind the scenes.
When Hitler conducted his factory experiment by rounding up Jews to work his war factories in Europe during World War II he exterminated the sick, the weak and those of low commodity value.
His desire to create a superior race turned out to be a race made up of talented Jews. The ones who survived the factory camps were hand-picked for their intellectual value, their psychological and physical traits as well as their DNA-generated talents. After the defeat of Hitler and after the war, the Jews who survived the factory camps went on to procreate, producing high value offspring.
That is the reason why Jewish families could pick a child any child and assign a profession to that child without any concern as to whether the child could handle the job. They mated among Jews.
Doctor, lawyer, accountant, engineer, architect are all professions requiring high intelligence. Pick a family any family – a Jewish family – and that’s how it went, without any thought given to ability.
Times have changed with the cross-breeding of ethnicities, but that was the end result of Hitler’s experiment on designing a superior race. It started with the Jews as subjects and ended with the Jews as liberated – with a whole lot of brain power with which to go forth and procreate.
With African Black slaves it was a different history. Brain power or DNA-generated talent were not considered of value for slaves. Physical prowess is what was needed to work the fields in America – and elsewhere. Those who sold their children didn’t sell the best of the brains; they sold the physically strongest.
One might think that with all the brains left in Africa, that they would have done more with them, considering their procreation rates and the massive operation of separating people by physical vs intellectual criteria. The slaves in America actually fared better than the non-slaves higher in intellectual capacity in their homeland countries in Africa.
If slaves who were sold or stolen from primarily the Ivory coast, it would be of interest to see if those regions produced children of higher intellect and lower physical prowess abilities.
I’ve never been to any African country, but in viewing those in America, their physical superiority in areas of strength, stamina, speed and agility are far superior to almost all non-Africans living in the USA.
If they fared better on the intellectual scale, than those left in Africa, then it may be a function of cross breeding, whereas with Jews, crossbreeding long after the war led to a reduction in intellectual capacity – in theory.
We’re at the gates right now, with the social engineering people wanting to create another slave race in the USA – this time made up of Hispanics. Although it already exists, this next wave of development is going to make the first wave seem insignificant in comparison.
These wannabe slaves who are now coming to the USA by breaching its southern border have brains. Of concern to the business people of the world (and this does affect trade everywhere) is whether they are as physically equipped to do slave-type labor as those slaves of the past, and whether they can do it absent an agenda to undermine the economy for the purpose of gaining political power?
When the morality of a slave labor force (regardless of race) is put into the question, it replies that a slave labor force undermines the morale and self-esteem of its workers and their families. History has taught us that these traits of low morale and self-esteem are past from generation to generation, even after the slave camps are dismantled.
If indeed a strong nation is made up of strong individuals, then the slave labor force undermines the strength of a nation – any nation – as well as those nations not participating, but benefiting from another nation’s slave labor force.
So the answer is No.
There’s no way the present-day African Blacks living in America can do it like the Jews did it. ‘If it worked for them, it will work for us’.
I would advise against anybody wanting to repeat the history of the Jews to get to where the Jews are today. That is one of the laziest and most stupid remarks I’ve ever heard anybody say on television to the world, ‘It worked for the Jews; it will work for us”.
No. The paradigms are completely different.
Hitler kept the brightest most talented. Slave-traders took the physically strongest.
There’s a big difference between Jews and African Blacks: Blacks in the USA aren’t systematically exterminated based on value or any other reason.
Humans use extermination techniques to rid the planet of species they deem threatening to their survival or quality of life. They also exterminate for the purpose of consumption or to transform into various other modalities goods which humans use to make their lives easier.
Black people aren’t on either of those menus.
The only thing Jews and Blacks have in common is that they both make white non-Jews pay through the nose for crimes against humanity that they didn’t commit – long after both demographics gained their independence.
That’s a sin that will be addressed in time.
And now, both Blacks and Jews are supporting a new wave of a slave labor force entering the USA illegally from its southern border. Hispanics.
Blacks don’t use metaphors.
When a white person says, “I would have beat the shit out of somebody”, they usually don’t mean it literally. It’s how they feel – what they felt like doing, but they don’t (not usually).
When Lebron James, a black person, says, “I would have whooped his ass”, referring to the Cleveland Browns football kicker Zane Gonzalez after missing four kicking attempts that contributed to the loss of the game, he means it literally.
Zane would have been beaten up by Lebron James and probably by a lot of other players piling on after the game out of site. In fact, Lebron James was giving the order – a basketball player telling a football team to beat up one of their own players. How manipulative and controlling is that?
Blacks use fear to make other blacks perform and then carry out the punishment when they don’t.
That’s an issue for the unions that’s not being addressed – out of even more fear for snitching. Some of those concussions may not have occurred on the field, but instead off the field as punishment for losing a game or otherwise not performing up to par.
Nobody in any workplace setting as the result of poor performance (or any other reason) deserves to be beaten up – physically or mentally – but that’s the way blacks do it. They think that nothing speaks louder than an good ass whoopin’. Who would even refer to a violent act as ‘good’? Now who’s the bum?
It’s common in black households, black schools, black neighborhoods, black playgrounds that look more like fightgrounds, throughout entire black communities – nationwide.
When you see black mothers punching their black kids, they always aim for the head, as if by punching the heads of their kids, it will knock some sense into them. It doesn’t work that way. How many black children show up at their first day of school with a long list of concussion experiences already on their resumes?
This punching to communicate and to force blacks to behave must stop. If you keep saying that’s part of your culture and white people just have to accept us the way we are and all will be right with the world, then don’t call the police out when the violence escalates out of control.
We don’t have to be civilized because you say so. Besides, that is civilized. Our kids don’t listen unless they’re belted. And it’s not your business anyway. We could be shooting each other.
You have a short fuse. Recognize it and work on your other strengths to neutralize that fuse. That short fuse is what gets a lot of you arrested. You can’t turn yourself off. You have the mechanism, you just don’t feel like using it. It feels better to beat the guy/gal or kid till you’re physically and mentally satisfied, than to step back, shut up and take stock of what you just did, why and how it cannot happen again – without assigning blame to make your contribution to it all appear irrelevant.
…Till next time and you start your madness cycle all over again always at somebody else’s expense, and it’s always somebody else’s fault. And the common denominator in the aftermath of it all, while blood is being mopped, is white people. It’s always the ones who aren’t in the room who can’t defend themselves, while all the violent players simultaneously and instinctively come together over their hatred of an entire race of people who have nothing to do with your short fuse or your violent culture.
Now you can make peace with each other, because of the no-fault clause among blacks that you have written like stone into your culture. Always blame the white people – those they deem weaker than themselves. The tears and rants are all a hoax. Blacks do not fear whites.
But that short fuse you all accept as being normal for you, the black rage that frightens your self-proclaimed enemies into submission, lands you in a lot of prison cells where you claim you don’t belong.
If you’re seen as a threat to the well-being and safety of other individuals in society, then you deserve to be separated from that society.
It’s all on you and how well you control that short fuse.
All actions have consequences. An ass whoopin’ to you is assault and/or attempted murder to the ones who live outside of your violent culture.
Eric Holder, Attorney General under Previous President Obama, publicly called for the kicking of white people by the entire black race – a violent act that will only get more of you jailed. It appears that he can’t control his violent urges either, so is giving you all an excuse so he can derive vicarious pleasure and satisfaction when the kicking begins: When they go low, we (meaning the entire black race) kick them.
Yeah, we know what kicking a person when they’re down means. It’s a pile on and most blacks do it. It starts as kids in the fightgrounds of America. One person gets punched and knocked to the ground, and almost all the others pile on this one person, kicking and punching till they achieve their physical release – or as in Somoa, the victim dies. The others stand and watch.
Just how Eric Holder defines what is ‘low’ and how Michelle Obama defines what is ‘high’ is a mystery. Neither can define their ‘highs and lows’ in specific terms. That’s because it’s meant to be generalized, like terrorists do – you never know what they want, because they don’t tell you. The implication is that you figure it out and when you do, the pain will stop. But it never does.
Right now their goal is to turn white people against white people using fear. Using fear is not a new strategy. Their entire culture is built on violence and fear. That’s why the black African race sees with one set of eyes, hears with one set of ears, thinks with one brain and speaks with one voice.
That is a mighty power. One to be feared for sure. The foundation of fire and fists is their call to arm and harm. Everybody knows the destruction that causes.
The world will respond commensurate with the threat.
John Lewis, African legislator in the USA, went on international television and called the President of the United States a racist. He wasn’t crying per usual. He wasn’t speaking rapidly, spitting as he spoke per usual. He wanted finally for the entire world to believe him, even though he couldn’t hide the lie from his face, and take action against the President of the United States. He knew his audience and knew they’d respond to his call to assassinate an American president.
I know the call. He knows the call and he knows that someone, somewhere in the world will answer that call.
He can’t take it back. All he can do once exposed is to pray that he isn’t held responsible. He lawyered it prior to the call to assassinate. He knew his audience of terrorists wanting the hide of a powerful white man. He knew he could get away with it, that nobody would think anything of it. Wrong. I took notice.
Words are powerful. Calling a white person racist is like calling a black person nigger. There’s no difference, except that there are repercussions for the white person labeled a racist that don’t come with the label nigger.
He did it, he’d do it again. And for him the sooner the better, not the quicker the better. There is an assassin in our midst. John Lewis, African Legislator in the USA, is their leader.
The slowness and deliberateness with which he spoke the word racist proves the premeditated factor.
So why do blacks think that calling a white person racist will force them to join the cause of blacks, when calling a black person nigger wouldn’t force them to join the cause of whites?
So what is the cause of whites? Right now to stay safe from being murdered by blacks.
The call to assassinate was aired on Martin Luther King Day by an irresponsible press sanctioned by the CIA. Wrong move.
John Lewis needs to reflect on his hatred of white people who refuse to submit to him based on his color and race. All Africans need to reflect on their collective hatred of all things white and their insatiable need for white people to kneel to them.
Calling for an assassin to act against a president should be a crime. It’s scary how half the people in the USA have turned against a president like peoples from Third World dictatorships suffering centuries of oppression. Blacks in America are more free than I am. They receive more privileges than I do. Why do black people keep wanting white people to solve their cultural problems for them? It’s your culture. Live with it or change it. Stop expecting white people to do your dirty work.
Now that John Lewis, African legislator in the USA, is on my terrorist watch list he’ll never get off of it. That’s how I fly. He can’t walk it back. That beast is out of the cage.
Black America has been radicalized. And it’s spreading like a virus via the media. Madison Avenue will pay for allowing mass numbers of terrorist recruiters on their shows for the sole purposes of increasing ratings and making money.
~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight
Nothing is being done to Blacks in America that they can’t fix themselves by changing their own ideology and behavior from anarchy to civilized, especially where laws and procedures are designed to protect responding officers from harm by people who think the law shouldn’t apply to them due to their race and culture.
Blacks in America want affirmative action for crimes committed and to be treated under the Constitution of the USA as a protected class of people, based on their race and their self-proclaimed innate inability to understand thus follow or obey the laws of the land.
The American African seeks privilege outside the law based solely on their race.
Their stated desire to make friendships with police takes us back to the days of the Mafia, when friendships meant not having to obey the law. If I’m your friend you can’t arrest me. If you’re my friend you have to turn the other way when I commit a crime.
I never wanted to be friends with a police officer. I was brought up to fear them. Blacks on T.V. get all damp-eyed when telling stories about telling their kids to fear the police. What is THAT all about? My mother told us that if we were ever arrested she’d let us rot in jail. She didn’t expect us to be friends with police nor for the police to raise us. She would have had a fit if she discovered that I was playing ball with a stranger who was also a police officer. And if we did something wrong it would be all on us, not on society or the other kid’s fault or the fault of their parents.
Adult American Africans really do act like children. Our own president and first lady act like children, getting all upset over being Black. What’s the big deal. Grow a pair. Oh, somebody looked at me funny when I entered a store. Yeah, well they look at me funny too. I don’t get all teary-eyed thinking it’s my race. So what if it is.
Blacks always preaching to everybody else on how to act, crumble like a dry cookie when somebody looks at them. What’s that all about? Ever see how they look at white people?
Stop trying to skirt the law. Stop all that fake emotion too. Nobody has to like you because of your color.
If you want to be liked and respected, then act likable and respectable.
You can be handicapped by prejudice. You can’t be handicapped by race.
When the news media allows someone or some group to continuously vent without questioning their thoughts, ideas or motives, they oppress them.
Someday when the venters wake up to how ignorant they sounded, they’ll blame you for not guiding the interview in a more intelligent exchange. After all you’re the professional.
But more importantly, they’ll feel humiliated.
If you lick your wounds too long, you’ll make them worse.
~ lesson from a dog
Affirmative Action known as positive discrimination in Britain, employment equity in Canada and equal opportunity employment in the USA is fundamentally flawed, because it’s based on prejudice.
One could argue that because blacks were discriminated against in the job market, that an equally prejudicial law was required to open the job market to those persons experiencing said discrimination.
The better solution would have been proper education and training in the fields where blacks were discriminated against, rather than accepting into those fields blacks who lacked the proper skills and qualifications to perform those jobs.
Be that as it may, decades have passed, educational opportunities and acceptance into those jobs have risen sufficiently to a level, whereby the continuation of Affirmative Action would only serve to excuse those now covered under the law from obtaining proper skills and qualifications necessary to effectively perform those jobs.
The current Affirmative Action rule by its nature discriminated against persons more qualified and skilled to fill those positions. Many whites in a lower socio-economic situation who had higher test scores than black applicants were passed over for those positions simply because they were white. In effect, Affirmative Action pitted black and white poor people against each other.
However, it was also prejudicial in that if two applicants, one black and one white, were equally qualified the job went to the black individual.
Federal and state governments were the main employers of blacks under the Affirmative Action rule, evidenced by the long-standing disproportionate ratio of blacks vs whites in those government jobs. The USA post office was a primary offender of discrimination against white applicants.
Affirmative Action based on race, specifically skin color, needs to be eliminated. Had the rule from the outset been applied to all people in the lower socio-economic situation it would have been less prejudicial, since rich people don’t customarily apply for the same positions that poorer people apply for, thereby the rich people wouldn’t feel discriminated against.
There is only one application of the Affirmative Action rule in present day that is both necessary, and non-prejudicial regarding skill and qualifications. That one application should be veterans–those whom have already shown to have passed qualification testing by the very nature that they served in the military, have already achieved the level of discipline, ability to follow orders and learn new assignments that any job once out of the military requires.
There is no reason why federal and state governments cannot apply the Affirmative Action rule to these discriminated against veterans based on veteran status, as they did the previously discriminated against blacks based on their skin color.
Given that the unemployment numbers of veterans remain high even with monetary employer incentives to hire veterans, Affirmative Action for veterans becomes a necessary and vital solution to keep our veterans employed with dignity after they leave military service.
Since veterans have an employment history, by nature of their military training and service, it makes perfect sense that the government they worked for in that capacity provide as an option continued employment by said government in a civilian role, based on job discrimination against veterans in the private sector.
People of all races will be included within the category of veteran, as long as they are a veteran, but rather than give preferential consideration based solely on skin color, consideration will be based solely on said veteran status.
It is further recommended that anti-discrimination laws based on color, sex, national origin and religion include veteran status in that statute. “A person cannot be discriminated against based on veteran status.”
Update 1.1.13: Congratulations to Walmart, largest employer in the USA, for offering any United States veteran a job during the first year after leaving military service!