Mark Zuckerberg CEO Of Facebook Justifies Peeping For Profit

Mark Zuckerberg Submits Opening Statement In Writing Prior To Testifying Before Congress…

…To the very members of congress who will be asking him questions regarding the illegal and immoral sharing of personal data of Facebook members.

How rigged is that?

The members of congress even told him what to say when he testifies.

How rigged is that?

I’m assuming here that many members of congress and their rich friends own stock in Facebook, thus should be recused from participating in and/or acting on behalf of their stockholders by watering down the gravity of Mark Zuckerberg’s offenses against members of Facebook who are led to believe that they have security and privacy, when they don’t.

Facebook sold that information. They made huge profits off of perversely peeping into the private messages of Facebook members. Mark Zuckerberg even knows which members he peeped on according to the nightly news reporting that Facebook would be notifying many millions of account holders that their private messages were compromised.

Intentionally compromised.

For Profit.

Tampering with the USA mail is a crime – a federal crime.

People don’t much send letters anymore. They rely on private services to communicate quicker and they are encouraged to do that.

We’re not talking hackers here.

We’re talking about the founder, CEO and Chairperson of Facebook himself who made these [what I call] criminal and immoral decisions for profit.

Full disclosure and transparency will never happen with Facebook as long as the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is working the bowels of that ship.

Testifying before congress is a sham. Facebook’s stock tanked and the stockholders are going crazy losing all that money, so they want Zuckerberg to ease their money worries by apologizing to the victims of his peeping for profit scam.

Am I the only one who sees the corruption here? Zuckerberg acts like his form of corruption is necessary so poor people around the globe can gain access to his corrupt mail service.

Are you kidding? No one in impoverished nations is going to want to gain access to Facebook knowing they’ll be spied on and their personal data sold to the highest bidder as a common course of operating procedure.

All they’re going to do is try to sell you merchandise and services that you can’t afford anyway. But in addition, they’ll sell your privacy to anybody who has an interest in you.

Bad people…

…who will ruin your life if they choose, or hold over you for their own profit embarrassing stuff that no one has a right to know.

Before long people won’t feel at ease talking about personal issues in the privacy of their own homes.

Mark Zuckerberg over-bloats the importance of Facebook. He after all designed it by humiliating people. He’s a sociopath put in charge of your private messages and gloats about stealing and selling your private thoughts as a necessity.

He even now, while he’s supposedly under investigation, has gone so far up the pole that he wants you to start paying him for your privacy. Facebook just lost round about sixty-seven billion dollars in its stock value – a company that has essentially no overhead. How did they get that wealthy? He doesn’t manufacture a product. It’s all fluff. You can’t even contact Facebook when you have a complaint. Everything is done by automation.

What does his employees actually do, except spy on it’s members?

Now he wants you to pay him not to spy.

Just put your ads on Facebook. You don’t need to know what someone is saying to their friend. What, you think people private message about products for sale? They private message about private stuff. Private messages do not reflect nor predict buying habits. Stop with the lying and the insanity.

Zuckerberg’s net worth is 63.9 billion dollars. Again, what does he produce? What does he sell? How do you ship his product? What’s his overhead?

Facebook is one of the biggest scams of all time.

People lie on Facebook. They embellish just about everything – or just plain make stuff up. But somehow Mark Zuckerberg has convinced the advertising industry that they can take to the bank anything any Facebook member writes on Facebook – especially the private stuff…

…And he thinks it’s legal to tamper with people’s mail.

Peep for profit is evidently legal in the USA and congress evidently supports his actions – since they are treating him in a way that no other person being called to testify before congress would be treated, by allowing him free access to those individuals who will be questioning him before he’s questioned. The citizens of the world should have access to those conversations.

How rigged is that? Was there a court reporter present?

Does any truth come from anything as rigged as that?

Mark Zuckerberg Submits A Written Opening Statement And Conducts His Own Voir Dire (getting a feel for the people who will be judging him) Prior To Testifying Before Congress…

…To the very members of congress who will be asking him questions  and judging his actions regarding the illegal and immoral sharing of personal data of Facebook members.

Did he submit a notarized copy to congress?

In an opening statement each lawyer representing each client talks to the jury before witnesses actually take the stand. They are not held to the truth in any manner. They are allowed to omit, embellish, prejudice the jury members, say anything they want to say – and do.

So in absence of a trial, Mark Zuckerberg’s lawyers decided on a trial by public opinion, purposely designing it that way. They also, knowing they had the attention of the world, decided to tell the world of their plan to charge Facebook members for privacy. I guess now they’ll only sell private information of those who can’t afford to pay. So why again, does Madison Avenue want to sell products to those they know can’t afford to buy their product?

It’s a scam. Wake up FBI. WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

It’s all a game using people’s intellectual material as their own – to sell to other people who want it, who then pay for it. Anonymously of course. Except you. You’re not anonymous. And why should their ads pop up in your message box, which is the same as a mail box?

THEY SHOULD BE PAYING YOU.

Stealing your intellectual material is copyright infringement. Whatever you write is protected by law.

Nobody has a right to look at it unless you give them that right. Nobody has a right to steal your intellectual material. Nobody has a right to sell your intellectual material. Nobody has a right to pay for somebody else’s intellectual material that isn’t their’s to sell.

How can you believe that it’s only for advertising purposes, when the people doing it lied about everything else? They knew they were doing something illegal, that’s why they kept their actions private. It didn’t work though did it?

The world does not need Facebook. It’s filled with lies. Nothing gets looked at, liked or shared unless it’s outrageous, or manipulated. People have to invent, create outrageous. The CIA creates too many posts as social experiments at the expense of leaving real people’s posts out of your news feed. It’s basically government and Madison Avenue trying to amuse you or abuse you into toeing their lines or destroying individuals they don’t like.

Any time I want to learn about a product I see on television or elsewhere, I never go to the corresponding Facebook page. I go directly to their website. Facebook pages tell you very little about a product. They’re too manipulated by Facebook.

One must wonder about all those Facebook suicides and what roles the CIA played in creating the on-line environment that resulted in those tragic deaths.

FACEBOOK IS A SEWER that needs to be eliminated. It grew into a monster because it was created and designed by a monster.

Mark Zuckerberg should not be getting special privileges from congress.

Why all the privacy around a meeting with those who will be questioning and judging him?

Because the government is involved. Any time the government is involved, the government protects the government.

Why isn’t the USA government raiding the offices of Facebook and Zuckerberg and everybody else involved? Seems like they’re giving them time to hide their self-incriminating evidence.

How rigged is that?

Websites are free these days. Easier to use, fewer restrictions. More space to be creative. Fewer complications. Facebook Pages are dinosaurs that have become extinct. Facebook forced me to create a page even though I didn’t have a business. They locked me out of my account until I created one. There was no one I could complain to. Then they want to charge me 5$ for each post so more people would see it.

At 5$ a post x 7 websites (1 post per day) x 365 days in a year = 12,775$.

I tried it once. Out of over 3000 people who liked my page, it only reached something like 35 people. Most of my posts reach around 5-10 people. These posts don’t fly by themselves. They’re placed.

Who can afford it? Evidently big businesses. But does it work? Just because it lands in somebody’s feed doesn’t mean they’ll see it. They might scroll right by it. So then Facebook manipulates the scroll, to make you look.

Nobody likes being manipulated. They went too far too long and now they’re gone. It’s a waste of precious time for the sole purpose of making some sociopath so rich he thinks he controls the planet.






 

Advertisements

The Power Of Donald Trump

Frankly, I’ve never witnessed in my lifetime the power that one man has over the emotional responses of so many people worldwide – instantaneously. This is no slow burner. He pops people. One person does all that with a tweet – less than 144 characters.

Usually it’s a massive government operation designed to sway the population of a people into thinking for the purpose of behaving in a pre-designated way over time, that eventually gets the attention of the populace as being overly manipulative.

What he does – is a pop. He punches back when he gets punched. Everyone said he couldn’t be president with such thin skin, but as it turns out, the skin of the opposition is thinner. Much thinner. Hysteria type of thin. So, my suggestion is to practice what you preach. Don’t throw the first punch. Get control of your emotions.

You punch him, then you go hysterical when he fights back. You all do it like clockwork. It makes for great theatre if you like that kind of theatre – angry, popped heads jumping off your necks, eyes lobbing all over the place as if you’re covering all your bases with your faces as you shout non-stop your highly charged name-calling rants – the very behavior you tell him to stop doing, you’re doing.

Wake up. Startle yourself. Step away from yourself. See yourself looking and acting like you tell him not to look and act. Who do you think you are, his mother? You are too emotionally involved with this man whom you desperately want to control, who doesn’t want to be controlled. By YOU? Really? What delusional fantasy drug are you taking whereby you would even think that your job as a journalist was to control a president? What a president thinks, says and does? Or you’ll bring him down? That’s crazy talk.

You don’t get to beat somebody up, then tell the one you beat up to just walk away. Listen to yourselves. You get paid to keep your cool, to report the news, not to make the news by making it clear that your job now is to take down a president.

Hillary Clinton engaged in the same mud-slinging behavior. She lost the election because she repeatedly disrespected a foreign leader during her campaign, then lectured white people on racism to make black people vote for her. If she thought she was going to be president, she wouldn’t have been playing on a Russian prejudice that evidently didn’t exist in the USA. And, Blacks don’t respect people who turn on their own. They use them. They don’t trust them. She used prejudice to win and lost.

Donald Trump is one person. When he speaks, he speaks alone. The pile-on by news analysts and journalists and commentators and people who have their own shows, after he speaks anything, is nothing like I’ve ever witnessed. It’s pure ugly. It’s the devil, the evil, in all of you being unleashed on one man, one person, the President of the United States. He is supposed to turn the other way when you pile on the abuse – according to you. That’s the protocol. That’s how the system works. That’s how the system has always worked. Well, if that is so, and I’m not denying it, then the system of governing is rigged. It’s fake out front in view of the populace for the purpose of keeping the populace from knowing what’s really going on in their government.

Donald Trump triggers you, because he won’t let you control him. That’s on you. He triggers you when he responds at all. That’s on you. He knows what you’re doing. The game you’re playing.

I don’t want to watch wimps lie on T.V. Hysteria is a wimp response. A component of hysteria is filling in the blanks with anything that comes to mind that is also destructive. Hysterics are not reality based.

Responding in kind is also a wimp response.

This all goes for you too Mr. World Leader.


Set the example without saying you’re setting the example.

When you say you’re taking the high road, everybody knows the high road isn’t familiar to you, that you’re faking being nice.

To congress and all public officials, I’m sick of seeing you expose your ugly. It serves no purpose except to incite the populace into a frenzy, whereby they turn on family, friends and associates. Donald Trump isn’t doing that, you are.

If somebody can’t work with Donald Trump, they can’t work with anybody. Fire all the asses who refuse to work with the President of the United States. He likes and wants results. You all like to delay, delay, delay till the next election. I don’t care who else did it. We’re here now. I don’t expect any further delay from any of you.

Politics in America has a new face – and it’s way overdue.

Accept it and work with it.






 

HOLD CONGRESS LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR CORRUPT LEGISLATION

Two-thirds of U.S. Corporations Did Not Pay Federal Income Tax From 2006 to 2012 according to World News Report-EIN News.

Congress keeps passing laws that make what these corporations do to avoid paying taxes legal. For anyone else it would be criminal. That’s discrimination and discrimination results in enslavement – the enslavement of ninety-nine percent of the world.

It’s legalized fraud. Congress needs to be held accountable and punished when they violate their responsibility to serve all of the people – not just the one percent whom they now serve. Legislating is a serious action.

Remember: Prejudice leads to discrimination – discrimination leads to enslavement – enslavement leads to torture – torture leads to slaughter – if left unchecked.

There needs to be consequences when they abuse their legislative power. There needs to be a legal mechanism by which to hold members of congress legally responsible. Impeachment, fines and/or jail time. See how they like those ‘for profit prisons’ they’re so hot to send everybody else off to, whom they consider a threat to society, for committing a minor offense. See how they like being confined to a 9 x 9 foot cage for a few years – with a bunk mate.

What congress is doing is not a minor offense. What congress is doing adversely effects ninety percent of the world population. Even when, every now and then, corporations are made to pay via a law suit brought by the Federal government, congress who passed the laws to pave the way for the corruption are left untouched, and the money procured by the judgment doesn’t go to the people it hurt, it goes to the government. That needs to change too.

There needs to be an independent body that oversees members of congress – not made up of congresspeople. That’s like telling the criminals to oversee themselves.

There’s a lot to be said for the phrase: ‘They’re all a bunch of crooks’. We’ve all been saying that for decades and nothing has changed. We accept what we can’t change, because we’re told it’s too complicated. Congress always has more pressing issues to address. But what do they really address? Anything that helps ‘we the people’ ends in a stalemate – in grid lock – while the laws passed that benefit the rich slide through with ease. There’s no debate. ‘We the people’ never even hear about it.

I often wondered why once people get elected, most of them become rich. I guess now I know. They’re all a bunch of crooks.

It’s time to change all that. It’s time to shake up congress. We can’t blame the lobbyists. We need to blame the elected officials who can be bought. Notice how congress always shifts the blame away from themselves?

Campaign finance reform is at issue here, prior to being elected, but once elected there are no controls in place, no rules that even define corruption, no code of conduct even – except lie, cheat, steal, don’t get caught.

We call out every other nation on their internal corruption, except our own. It’s time to look at our own system and how it’s degrading our country and every other country with which we do business.

It’s time to make congress pay for their abuses against ‘we the people’.

Better now than later. It’s only going to get worse.

Ever wonder why congress can pass laws dictating who can’t be sued? It’s not their right as legislators to determine who can and can’t be sued. Too big to fail? More like too big to be sued.

Now that’s a dictatorship begging to be overthrown.

‘We the people’ are the majority – a big majority – a huge majority – yet we’re treated like a tiny minority.

The USA is ripe – for a revolt by ‘we the people’.





WE NEED MORE EDWARD SNOWDENS

Edward Snowden, a private contractor working for the NSA (National Security Agency), an agency that for years has spied on every American, and on every citizen anywhere in the world, leaked documents to the press that proved it. Where’s the news there? We all knew it anyway.

Sure the government would say it’s only emails and no content, and no they weren’t spying on the content on people’s private computers, or accessing their phone conversations, they weren’t accessing hard drives and couldn’t see what you were writing offline, and no they weren’t listening to anybody in their homes or cars or the places they frequented, and they didn’t know anybody’s names and were only looking for trigger words that might lead the NSA to a terrorist with plans to blow up the USA, by searching for trigger words like United States, Obama, bomb, Jews…but we all knew they had that capability and we all knew they were using that capability. Where’s the news in that?

We, the people in the USA, knew it, so why did foreign countries not know it? Are they so naive, holding the important positions they hold, knowing the computer technology the USA possessed, or did they fall for the propaganda line the USA fed it’s own people? After all we stand for freedom rights for all peoples, even them, whoever they are, so why would the USA do it? Why would they spy on the United Nations, on private communications among world leaders and whomever they were communicating with as people do when they go to any meeting? Probably to gain an advantage; if they know what everybody is saying to their advisors on any issue, then that would give the USA a leg up on countering their positions. They’d know in essence the cards they were holding that nobody is supposed to see, their weaknesses, their strengths, their bargaining power.

Now comes the threat factor. Government officials in other countries are now succumbing to the prodding by USA officials not to accept Snowden’s requests for asylum, because every world leader is now thinking to themselves, what else do they know about me, what I said or did in private that could prove embarrassing, and being in public office it doesn’t take much, as shown by the current administrations going on a witch hunt for anybody who might have heard George Zimmerman say the trigger nigger word, so the Justice Department can bring hate crimes charges against him for the political purpose of securing the black community’s vote in upcoming elections.

The USA government is forever telling the American people that if they have nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about. That’s not true, we’ve all seen how the government skews the facts, and often outright lies about the facts to get what they want. Criticize the policies of  the USA or Israel and they’ll make stuff up if they have to, just to get you to shut up or to plain out ruin your reputation and life if you pursue along that path of criticism. Employers do it to, they’ll look at your private stuff and make determinations on whether to hire you or not. Somebody criticizes Israel and they get on the no hire list. Somebody criticizes a public figure and that somebody gives the name of the person and email address to the NSA and you’re essentially destroyed.

President Obama spoke to the nation after Snowden released his article through the Guardian and said, if you can’t trust Federal judges, if you can’t trust Congress, if you can’t trust me, your President, if you can’t trust the FBI, then we’re going to have some problems here. Sounded like a threat, an ‘or else’ scenario. Or else what? In his early days he didn’t trust any of those institutions, now he wants ‘we the people’ to blindly trust all of them, just because he says so, after it was proven that not only the NSA, but other surveillance programs as well, were spying on all of us, that these intelligence gathering agencies were collecting the content of every communication any person has ever made via a text, a computer, a phone or in their private living spaces or their offices.

These communications will be saved forever. What for? To use as ammunition against any citizen for any reason they deem advantageous to them. Blackmail is what it used to be called. There are laws against that in the USA, but then the USA can break its own laws for whatever reason they want, all they have to cite is national security reasons. Or maybe not even that. The content is there forever, in case somebody at some point in time needs it to take a few words or sentences out of context to destroy you, or your future grandchildren.

Well, if we all have nothing to hide, thus nothing to worry about, then if the USA has nothing to hide, they have nothing to worry about. Let the world see the extent to which you’ve spied and lied and let them decide. The world isn’t trusting you right now. If you do have something to hide, then you must have done something wrong is the underlying meaning of what the government tells ‘we the people’ in an effort to make everyone fearful of criticizing the surveillance. Well, now the government is in effect, for keeping all these files forever, falling into the same pit they pushed every world citizen into.

Even in the private, secret Fisa court, they have a bar set to keep over-zealous officials from procuring a spy warrant for anyone they don’t like or anyone who criticizes them. A signed affidavit, under penalty of perjury, requesting an invasive search, where authorities can surveil you even from your own body, requires probable cause and evidence that you’re connected to terrorism and that you are a national security threat with imminent plans to carry out an attack against America. That’s the test.

Eric Holder signs those affidavits often, knowing in advance that he’s signing a false document. Should we trust the Justice Department? No, not unless you trust someone who knowingly perjures himself, thereby lying to the court with the purpose of stripping someone of their civil privacy rights.

Eric Holder claims he has no choice. He claims he has to write that statement if he wants an invasive warrant. He wants to change that, so that the Justice Department can obtain warrants on people they get a gut feeling about. Well, we all know where leads, as evidenced by the witch hunt he is currently leading against George Zimmerman.

No one causes nor requires the Justice Department, nor any individual within the Justice Department, to commit perjury to obtain invasive search warrants. The law requiring that language is in place so that innocent people aren’t scrutinized unlawfully for political or otherwise frivolous reasons.

The Federal judges are fully aware of what the Justice Department is doing, but instead of asking for proof of allegations, they simply approve the warrant. Should you trust Federal judges? No. The judges in effect are also committing perjury, lying, knowing full well that’s there’s no evidence to support the claim, thus allowing the USA government, through their actions, to strip you of your civil privacy rights.

I’ve been the recipient of invasive searches for years. In order to get a warrant they had to claim there was probable cause that I was a terrorist and had imminent plans to attack America. What judge, federal or otherwise, would believe that? Because the Justice Department told them. What President, member of Congress, Justice Department could believe that? Or maybe they didn’t get a warrant. I continue to be invasively searched/surveilled and everyone, from the President on down supports those actions. And when does the search begin to disrupt a person’s life. The minute they decide to do it.

Does the CIA ask for warrants? They do everything in secret. I get a kick out of the CIA for wearing kerchiefs and disguises over their faces so no one can identify them–but ‘we the people’ shouldn’t have anything to hide from a bunch of bandits with killing privileges.

Citizens of any group or nation should not be in the trusting business when others are determining their degree of freedom, and making decisions regarding their well-being or status as an individual within a group or nation. For Obama or any leader to think and expect the people to trust them on blind faith in matters that concern their lives is tantamount to a master/slave relationship, a dictator/subject relationship.

That tone in that last phrase, ” then we’re going to have some problems here” was a threat by any standard. He can’t wash it away like he tried to do with Trayvon Martin looking like his son, which he changed  to, “that could have been me“. That tone, those words, were an ultimatum, not to himself, Congress, Federal judges and the Justice Department, it was an ultimatum to the American people. Back off or else I’ll make problems for you. That’s a typical response from someone who got caught spying and lying.

Congress has between a nine to fourteen percent approval rating on any given day. Should you trust Congress? The low rating speaks for itself.

‘We the people’ don’t want nor need to be threatened by the President or any other government agency. What are you going to do to us if we don’t trust all whom you tell us to trust? Get back at us, hurt us, arrest us, go on a witch hunt, target us for invasive content surveillance?

Stand down Mr. President. We don’t need your anger, we as a people need to be respected through your actions, not your threatening words. We demand our civil liberties, whether you think we deserve them or not. Seems you’re not thinking too objectively these days, maybe you never did. Does the Mosad request a court ordered surveillance warrant before they spy on USA citizens? Didn’t think so. If you give them one, what does that say about you? It says that you sell like slaves every American the Mosad holds up on the auction block as being a threat to Israel, exempting of course members of Congress and the executive branch. Anyone else exempted Mr. President?

Does Obama or the Justice Department or the CIA or the Mosad or Steven Speilberg or whoever’s responsible get a court issued warrant before the content of your private communications are released to Hollywood to use in their sit-coms, movies, T.V. series, news talk shows? Obama said himself that and Speilberg are best friends. How so and why? Are ‘we the people’ to trust Obama, Congress, Federal judges, FBI, CIA and Hollywood with our private content material– all whom know about it and support that Hollywood Connection? Years ago, Diane Feinstein said they were supposed to destroy the tapes after they use them. Do they? The greater question is why do they have them in the first place? These aren’t emails, they’re actual content of voices, what you say in your private living spaces. They can even see you on your own T.V. or computer screen if they want to.

Stealing, that’s what it’s called. The USA government is stealing our written and vocal words–words that only we should own. They’re doing it without your knowledge or permission. They’re not doing it to protect us, they’re doing it to oppress us. When they steal our written and vocal words they steal our thoughts, again an act of oppression. What they’re saying is, “we own you”. The FBI even said, and there’s probably even a law that supports it, that the FBI owns everybody’s intellectual material. How repugnant is that?

If the FBI is interested in you for whatever reason they can hear whatever you say, whenever you say it, to whomever you say it to. All you have to do is open your mouth to speak or use an electronic devise to write.

I know because it’s done to me. It’s no way to live. You can trust that.

Maybe the government should read and listen to the content of elected or appointed officials. Yeah, wire tap their offices, homes, cars, electronic devices, follow them around using GPS capability and keep tabs on where they go, who they meet and what they say, to see who they’re making private deals with wielding the power of their public official status that adversely affects the American people. Bet they’d find a lot there.

Government officials should not be exempt from the net that’s cast on the rest of ‘we the people’.

WHISTLE BLOWERS. Law enforcement loves whistle blowers, snitches they call them on the Street. Just recently in Cleveland, Ohio after Ariel Castro was arrested for enslaving three women in his home for more than a decade law enforcement went to that same street, the American Street, to plead with ‘we the people’ to be law enforcement’s eyes and ears in order to solve crimes that they can’t solve. But when it comes to snitching on law enforcement or government officials that’s a different matter, then you become demonized, deranged, trouble, disgruntled.

Law enforcement wants ‘we the people’ to trust them, their good judgment and pure motives. After all, it’s for us they do all that they do. Serve and protect. What history and current on the ground scenarios keep telling us, showing us, is that that type of trust in absolute control, absolute power leads to corruption at every level. Try bringing to justice, their kind of justice, a corrupt cop, FBI agent, Congressperson, spy or President. It’s next to impossible no matter how many eyes and ears on the Street, or in the office, or within a company witness that corruption.

Nobody scrutinizes the background or motive of a snitch helping law enforcement, but when the tables turn and law enforcement is under fire the snitch becomes the criminal. How dare anybody question the authority, motives and actions of those whose job it is to keep you safe? Law enforcement doesn’t keep anybody safe, they show up after the crime is committed. They can take criminals off the street to prevent them from committing more crimes, but that’s about it.

Loads of  laws that facilitate corruption are passed unbeknownst to ‘we the people’–laws used to undermine the Street’s ability to protest what they consider oppressive or just plain wrong. Provisions are slipped into a bill going to Congress in the middle of the night when no one can read them unbeknownst even to other Congress members for the purpose of aiding a special class of citizens, usually the rich.

Corruption abounds at every level in every facet of life, including and especially at those levels that wield the greatest power over ‘we the people’.

In a democracy we appoint and elect a few people to serve ‘we the people’, not ‘we the few’ or ‘we the majority’. The majority only applies to the voting process. Since when does banning law suits against GMO (genetically modified organisms) companies, or banning occupy wall street or banning protests in front of slaughterhouses fulfill the right to peaceful assembly or the right to fight in court what ‘we the people’ deem is in the interest of ‘we the people’?

When ‘we the people’ lose our right to protest and our right to take to court an offending party we are no longer a people who decide what’s best for us, we’re a people ruled with an iron fist by the few. That’s called a dictatorship.

Oversight committees are comprised of the few, the privileged, the powerful who wield their power by supporting the corruption policies of their own, thus they become meaningless. Agencies that police their own are the same. One or two offenders may be used as examples to make the other criminals toe the line, but no effort is made to prosecute the many offenders within the ranks. We see that in the way the military handles sexual assaults. Don’t ask, don’t tell. Snitch and you’re ostracized. No promotion for you. Checks and balances are a myth.

Trust? Whoa Mr. President. Slow down with your threatening demand of trust or else. You sound like the police. Snitch on us and guess who won’t show up when you make that 9-11 call?

Basically with this multi-billion dollar tax payer spy program in every state in the Union, Obama and his co-conspirators (dictators always have them) are doing what amounts to a lot of guess work. They claim not to know your name, address or anything about you, but they can go to a secret court in front of secret judges claiming to have probable cause that you’re involved in terrorism, pose a national security threat with imminent plans to carry out an attack against America, under penalty of perjury and get that invasive warrant. Sounds like a witch hunt to me, based on nothing but somebody’s gut that has a gripe against you.

Edward Snowden saw gross corruption within the NSA and CIA. He went through all the channels available to address an egregious wrong against every American citizen and every citizen of the world. The USA government gave Snowden no other option than to release the proof of these sweeps and illegally obtained warrants through perjury for invasive searches.

Don’t repeatedly lie to the American people, then force us by the power of your office to trust you or anybody else.  I trust the whistle blower. We need more Edward Snowdens.