Tag: discrimination

NOW DO YOU KNOW HOW WE FEEL?

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS, ME

What? We? Who’s we?

Are you one person or a multitude of like-minded people in one person?

How would I know how you individually feel and then how a multitude of like-minded people inside of you feel?

How would I know that? Did you tell me, specifically, or even generally, how you feel about anything?

How about me. Do you know how I feel? Do you care how I feel?

Why would I care how you feel if you don’t care how I feel?

Oh, you want to punish me and then say, yeah, now you now what it feels like?

So you think I’ve never been punished by anyone, by any group, by any demographic, by life itself, by prejudice, discrimination, enslavement and torture? So how could I possibly know what it feels like?

Prejudice leads to discrimination, which leads to enslavement, which leads to torture, which leads to slaughter if left unchecked. In other words, if not stopped.

I’m up to slaughter. I’ve lived through all the other stages.

So, what are you really asking?

You want me to feel your pain?

Are you ready to feel mine?

Oh, you want me to feel your pain, then you walk away without feeling my pain.

What do you call that?

PayPal-ME-300x300.jpg

 

Advertisements

EXPOSING YOUR SKIN

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in EXPOSING THE BIAS

EXPOSING YOUR SKIN

When I write an opinion-piece about what’s going on in the world that involves human beings or specific groups of human beings I am invariably asked ‘why don’t you like brown people; why don’t you like black people; why do you hate Jews; why are you anti-immigration?’.

When you criticize someone or some group that is making news by dumping on white people, and a white person has the audacity to respond, they call it hate; it’s moronic; it’s whatever grotesque and hurtful name that a person could think of calling someone.

Everybody claims to want a conversation, but when the conversation begins it’s always minus the white person. The brown or black want to play all the roles in the conversation – even the white person’s part.

That’s controlling, manipulative, dictatorial, oppressive behavior.

They want to control the entire narrative – from start to finish. It’s discriminatory and fake news when you assign an agenda-driven cable news commentator the role of white person representing the so-called white view. It’s a lie just based on the way it’s all set up. They get paid to do what they do. They are given their opinions by the CIA Media.

I don’t like or dislike a person based on their color. I have never judged a person by the color of their skin.

‘Well then why don’t you support us’?

Does that mean that as long as I don’t care what color you are, I should support you? How does it follow that whatever a brown or black person does, white people should support and if they don’t it’s because of the skin color and if they don’t care about color, then it’s a no brainer, you’re with us?

It appears to me that those who think white people should support them because of their skin color are the prejudicial people. They’re the real racists.

It’s difficult to talk rationally to someone who only sees skin color – theirs.

Hispanics are not minorities in Mexico, the island communities, Central America, South America. They are the majority in all those places. Yet, they still act like the minority, seeking pity from the entire world and anyone who will listen. Why is that? All these years they lived in places where everybody was about the same.

Were they thinking with their skin then? Or is it only when they come to the USA that they’re told to play up their skin color; accuse the white man of hating you for your skin; you’ll get lots of free stuff that way; white people don’t like it when you call them racist or black or brown haters. They’ll give you whatever you want to shut you up.

It’s one or the other: White people are being played, or brown and black people are the real racists, thinking white people should support their skin color; and if they do, then they automatically support the brown and black view – no matter the content of the view.

Actually it’s not one or the other, it’s both.

It’s becoming clear that skin color is used as a DISTRACTION STRATEGY to keep you off-balance, so the real issues don’t get debated. Keep attacking the opponent on an emotional plane, so nobody gets to the substance of the issues. They don’t want to debate; if they debate they could lose. Keep it about the color.

Oh, they’ll debate color, as long as they provide the lines for all sides.

Keep pushing that color button.

How does it work?

FEAR. They use fear of what will happen to you if you don’t cave their way.

And we see what happens all over the news.

It’s scary stuff. They crossed the terror threshold a long time ago. They’re instilling fear across the globe. They want a war.

This is terrorism.

PERMISSIONS \ orders from GOD

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in POWER PLAYS

God gives every being on the planet permissions/orders to refuse to enslave, torture and slaughter any other being, past, present and future. God orders further that all existing orders/permissions to engage in, or state, or make, or carry out, acts of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and/or slaughter are overridden and superseded by these original/new orders.

In refusing to order, direct, outsource, participate in prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter, any and all beings will be protected against prosecution by evil-doers who force through order or intimidation the application of the Five Fatal Flaws: prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

One infraction of this order, and all previous infractions will be added to the existing infraction to be charged against and prosecuted against the existing being, who ordered and/or committed and/or communicated via courier/electronic or battery device said orders and/or acts of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

GOD

 

THE FIVE PRINCIPLES

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in CORE STORIES

FIVE PRINCIPLES TO A BETTER LIFE:

No Prejudice, Discrimination, Enslavement, Torture And Slaughter against any/all being(s)

PREJUDICE:  

Dislike of an individual or group based on their characteristics or attributes.

DISCRIMINATION:  

Preferential treatment of an individual or group over the lack of equal treatment of an individual or group.

ENSLAVEMENT:  

Taking away the free-will of an individual or group.

TORTURE:  

Imposing physical, psychological, economic or spiritual discomfort and harm onto an individual or group.

SLAUGHTER:

The taking of life, of an individual or group through sinister, and/or self-serving, group-serving or nation–serving reasons.

If you can discover a more precise or meaningful definition of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter, by all non-prejudicial means do so. This is all about the evolution of thoughts, actions, and yes, how we define those thoughts and actions.

Challenge prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter with truth, respect, action and persistence.

I don’t talk much about patience. Too often people equate patience with inactivity, which leads to a lack of will to change, hoping that things will simply work out on their own. In doing that, you unintentionally give away your power as an individual.

I don’t talk much about love either. Love is such a personal matter, that for me to impose my personal views on what love is or isn’t or should or shouldn’t be would be over-reaching on my part. Just as there’s a fine line between a flaw and a principle, there’s often a fine line between love and hate. Nobody has to love anybody, but if you say that you love someone as you send them to slaughter, I will on behalf of the one being slaughtered intervene with an opinion.

THE FIVE PRINCIPLES BECOME FIVE FLAWS

when we say YES to prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Prejudice leads to discrimination, discrimination leads to enslavement, enslavement leads to torture, torture leads to slaughter if left unchecked.

Prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter are five flaws that promote destruction and dying, by blocking a being’s freedom to exist and thrive, thus creating a worse life.

No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter are five principles that promote building and living, by facilitating a being’s freedom to exist and thrive, thus creating a better life.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

 

Groups Are Over-rated

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ME, WW DNA

I don’t really want to be connected to a group. I don’t know why I’m that way. I love to be around people. All kinds of people. It doesn’t even matter if they’re nice. Maybe because my DNA matches so many regions around the world – and I draw on all of them by the way – I prefer living in a multi-ethnic environment.

I don’t have to like particular features of your culture and don’t tell me to accept your ways as a condition of anything. I accept only your humanity and right to exist, not the parts of your culture that demean the human creature or any other creature.

Those whose ancestry is limited to one region probably prefer to be with people from only that region. It’s a preference predetermined by one’s DNA (deoxynucleic acid).

Discriminating against someone or shaming someone or a group of someones, because they prefer the company of people from a particular region of the world is exactly as stated – a discrimination. It works both ways however. For a group that is more comfortable with those who look, talk and eat like they do, to discriminate against everybody else is as stated – a discrimination.

By you shaming or blocking or isolating them serves no useful purpose. Name one beyond the joy of psychological torture when you’re the one inflicting the pain.

For me, the whole group thing doesn’t allow me the freedom to be me. Groups do that. There are rules of conduct that reflect certain views, that if not adhered to or followed, then excommunication from the group results. That’s the discrimination that occurs within the group. All groups are the same in that regard.

There are always people within those isolated singular-ethnic groups, who experience the surge of wanting to see what’s outside their world on the other side of the invisible fence. They’re called explorers for that reason. All cultures accept those members of their respective groups who do that. They return with knowledge of different places and Peoples and habits.

It’s the explorers who bring the world together, but as people migrate or emigrate they bring their invisible fences with them and set up their congregations where they land. They develop networks that shuffle people to new locations where similar people have settled. It makes perfect ancestral sense. People want to be with their living ancestors.

What the world fears is assimilation. I don’t want their culture. They don’t want yours. So the invisible fences stay.

No one to date has found the key to unlock that fear. People don’t want to change the way they are. They want everybody else to change to their way. Unfortunately the oldest civilizations are the most resistant to change.

That’s why it’s called resistance. Half the USA wanted change that created a better more organized less wasteful, less fearful country sixteen years post 911. The other half wanted things to stay the way they were, chipping away, while holding onto the “never going to actually get there or by the time we do nobody will care mentalities. Slowpokers I call them now.

Slowpokers over time become high maintenance.

Somebody who makes a feverish attempt at staying slow is resisting the inevitable faster pace required for meaningful positive progress.

The world needs a common cause. That’s the key.

Animal Rights has been selected.

 

Religious Doctrine Based On Faith Not Fact

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

Using religion as a reason and a basis to refuse service or other freedoms afforded others equals discrimination on the basis of religion or creed.

Religion is a creed. Religion is a philosophy. Religion is an ideology.

The provisions of the law must work both ways – to prevent discrimination against one who is practicing their faith and to prevent those who practice their faith, in an otherwise free society, from discriminating against others not of their beliefs, based on that faith.

Imposing religious beliefs upon members of society not of a particular religious persuasion must at all times be discouraged.

American freedoms must exist for all Americans, otherwise we become like oppressive religious regimes. When each faith demands compliance by those not of their faiths in order to be accepted, and when compliance doesn’t occur, isolation emerges robbing people of their freedoms.

In public arenas all people of all religions, creeds, philosophies, and ideologies must be treated equally. For each religion to impose its own rules upon everybody else creates chaos in all sectors.

A view is a view, whether religious, political, philosophical, ideological. A view is a creed.

It is the view under scrutiny that discriminates, not its origin nor the group that worships and espouses it. People worship an idea, not an entity. Religions are based on ideas not facts.

Religion itself equals community. Without a community, there is no religion, except independent thought. As independent thinkers, we can’t all impose our personal creeds onto all other individuals.

Religious doctrine is based largely on faith not fact. To deny someone freedoms there must be a factual component, which by their nature, religions lack.

 

The Beginning Of Discrimination

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in MUSCULAR VIEWS

Pity is a precursor to prejudice.

Nobody likes those they pity.

Thus the discrimination begins.

 

Clean Up Your Culture

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

Mouthing off isn’t freedom of speech. It’s incitement.

I never witnessed a white person taunting or in any way disrespecting or abusing a black person. Neither have I ever witnessed a black person standing, sitting, kneeling or running in fear of a white person. I lived in many places among many cultures.

Black Lives talking heads are all over T.V. crying and screaming about being abused by white people. Rich football players are standing up to these so-called abusers of black people who come to watch their football games, wanting them to feel the pain of being abused, by ‘taking a knee’ to them or raising clenched fists to signal battle preparedness.

It appears that black people don’t like being pulled over by police officers for broken tail lights, or for swerving when driving, speeding, running red lights or stop signs, driving on sidewalks, driving without a license, registration or insurance etc. They apparently think it’s okay to drive drunk or drugged. Then they mouth off, deny and negotiate when stopped, which rarely leads to a good place.

You’re not supposed to negotiate with a police officer or argue your case. That’s for the courtroom. In our apartment lease it states that a tenant can be evicted for being argumentative. It’s new – an addendum. Seems there must have been a lot of so-called negotiating going on in the building regarding violations to the lease. Yet, Black Lives think it doesn’t apply to them.

What part of ‘follow instructions’ do black people not understand? Is this all blacks, or some blacks or a certain nationality of blacks or a particular intelligence level of blacks or a specific socio-economic group of blacks?

Black Lives talking heads on T.V. are inciting white people by screaming, using exaggerated face, hand and arm movements. They either speak too loudly and rapidly or too loudly, distinctly and slowly to make their exaggerated claims of abuse against them by white people, which heightens the anxiety, thus fear, level of whoever happens to be watching it. And it’s intentional.

A Black Lives talking head on the Tucker Carlson show on T.V. became ecstatic when he expressed feeling fear when the NFL Green Bay Packers ‘took a knee’ on the football field during the singing of the National Anthem in response to President Trump calling one who disrespects the flag and the National Anthem a son of a bitch.

She even made him repeat it, so she could enjoy his fear a little longer while her eyes glistened with perverse pleasure at seeing someone afraid, then closed the deal she was somehow making with her devil by saying very slowly and distinctly and measured and long and drawn out, “now you know how we feel”.

For some odd reason I’m beginning to think that blacks have isolated themselves from anything white for so long, that they actually think white people don’t feel pain or suffer or have problems, or that they’re all rich and privileged. I also find it odd that they seem to be pitting the poor black man against the rich white man in all of their discussions on race.

So the goal here is to make white people fear black people as well as to fear the disenfranchised white people who have answered Black Lives call to arm. I feared too, when the Green Bay Packers ‘took a knee’ in front of the entire world to disrespect the country that made them rich. They did it in such a slow, intense, angry way, and then the way the camera panned for greatest effect enhanced the fear.

If they had been a bunch of golfers or tennis players nobody would have felt fear, but these guys are killing machines by the sheer build of their bodies via training and growth hormone supplementation. That display of force on the field was specifically engineered to elicit fear and provoke a response. Nobody who pays to see a football game wants to be made fearful by the players.

President Trump responded appropriately to that fear by calling them sons of bitches. Fear mongers do not belong on a football field, in a place of entertainment, with children. Long ago I wrote that it was okay to call a terrorist a disparaging name. Name-calling isn’t usually my mode of communication. However, I join President Trump’s peaceful response to the terror I know he felt too as he witnessed that display of force week after week by a bunch of killing machines hijacking the media from a sports stadium to send a signal of battle preparedness around the globe.

Simultaneous. There is nothing more powerful than that. And frightening.

So what do you call these killing machines that hijack a stadium and the media to send a terror message simultaneously around the globe disrespecting the country that made them rich?

I call them sons-of-mothers-without-manners. Don’t disrespect the dog. It’s time to clean up your culture by acting civilized. Stop punching your girlfriends, wives, children, dogs. Tame your own rage. We’re not going to feed you any more white people to satisfy your cannibalistic politics. Go to the library and take out a book on manners.

Blacks do not fear whites. Whites already fear blacks. You accomplished that – for decades now – by burning cities – villages they call them in Africa. The purpose is to terrorize the people or simply wipe them all out. If you keep abusing white people, they will eventually pop. And you already showed them what to do and how to do it.

Clean up Chicago. That’s your job. You created that hell.

When in America, one must obey the laws in America. It concerns me that black leaders tell black ministers to tell their congregations to run when confronted by police, knowing full well that they’ll be shot. Getting shot and probably killed while unarmed has become Black Live’s method of raising socio-economic discrepancies between races. Human shields Israel would call them when referring to the Palestinians.

It’s always between poor blacks and rich whites – the injustices they cite. How about between rich blacks and poor blacks? That doesn’t count? There’s no discrepancy there?

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that because the world mostly sides with Palestine, that they will continue to do so absent any contribution by the Palestinians. The Puerto Ricans tried that trick, wanting the USA do all the work, while contributing nothing to the process of recovery after being hit with two hurricanes.

The world is quickly losing patience with the Palestinians who dig their heels in, and contribute nothing to the peace process. Continually making a group of people fear you, will result in the last-straw bomb-dropping method of solving a problem that could have been solved peacefully, had one party been more willing to find a solution. Chicago is nearing that point.

The world will not side with American blacks who have it all. You should have made your cause about peaceful blacks, instead of going the criminal route using the quick Nigerian scam route of hijacking stadiums and media outlets. Everybody sees right through it. Don’t think because you’re given your fifteen minutes of fame on all those 24/7 news shows that you’re winning something by terrorizing a nation.

You’re losing. Terrorists always lose.

When I’m stopped by the police, I don’t talk. I do whatever they ask. I answer only the question. I look straight ahead. I don’t try to engage them for the purpose of getting away with whatever they pulled me over for.

When blacks start mouthing off or talking rapidly when confronted by police, it signals guilt. Just accept the ticket. If you were right and the officer wrong, take it to court. That’s the process in America. With all the supposed contact by police that blacks claim to have, they should know that. You can’t short-cut the law. You can’t flail your arms, bug your eyes, get in the officer’s face, bare your teeth and not expect the officer to instinctively go into self-defense mode.

They’re not robots. They’re feeling, thinking human beings with families who are not breaking the law by the way. They’re not pigs. They’re human first. It is not their job to babysit your kids or you. They were not put on this earth to sacrifice their life for an out of control black person who still after all this time doesn’t know how to follow instructions.

This whole thing about comparing rich white people who get off for the same crimes that poor blacks go to jail for is getting old. Rich blacks get off all the time. It’s not about race. It’s about money. Hey, if you can’t pay the fine, don’t do the crime.

Try policing yourselves. See how that goes.

Clean up your culture, then clean up Chicago.

All cultures need a major culture cleaning. An overhaul. Throw out what no longer works. Stop clinging to the past that does not exist. There is no legacy. You make your own future. It is not my job nor my place to live your life. Live it yourself.

That whole thing about the legacy of slavery is something that white government people made up to satisfy blacks in the short-term. Africans invented slavery. All cultures participated by stealing people outside of their tribes and making them subservient. Slavery exists all over the globe, and in America too. Ask all those rich, privileged ball players how many times they entertained themselves with human sex slaves – underage human sex slaves.

Like I said, clean up your culture. White people are going to be dropping bombs where black people and sympathetic white people gather, just like blacks did to them. Burn cities. You taught them how to do it.

Antifa (anti-facsist) people advocating violence to suppress free speech don’t have a clue as to what they’re up against. To say on one hand that you’re against dictatorial-styled governments, then on the other hand that you advocate silencing the voice of opposition makes no sense whatsoever.

Antifa appears to be advocating for communism or Islam or socialism or bits of all three. They don’t even know. They tell you what candidate to vote for – like Michelle Obama did to women.

This era is starting to resemble the 1970’s only the social causes are to suppress free speech and open the gates to the prisons. Guess we’ll see how that goes.

New phrase: culture cleaning

Remember: No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter. One leads to the other if left unchecked.

Nobody can eliminate prejudice from somebody else. It comes from within. Prejudice is normal until you start to discriminate unjustly. Hey, if you’re not qualified for the job and somebody else is, it’s the qualified person the job needs to go to.

 

PowWow This

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

Just because there’s no science to support a particular claim, doesn’t mean the claim is not true or accurate.

‘No science to back it up’ many times connotes a hidden agenda to maintain the status quo by advertently keeping the science out, which in turn becomes beneficial to a particular ideology, group or individual or business.

Agendas are rampant in the scientific community – hidden or not. Look how long it took for the scientific community to finally connect cigarette smoking with lung disease, particularly cancer? The USA still does not ban the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, even though they are deemed poisonous to the body.

The Insurance Industry powwowed with the Tobacco Industry and then they both powwowed with Congress to make a deal whereby all sides benefitted, except the smoker, except anybody who ever smoked even one cigarette, except anybody who was ever in the same room with anybody else who smoked a cigarette.

If it’s a killer ban it. If it costs billions of dollars a year for health services, lost wages, lost families ban it. If it’s that bad, and all now agree that it is, then stop manufacturing cigarettes. If nicotine has a medical benefit, then find a different delivery system than an inhalant.

Why are nicotine patches so expensive? Why is nicotine-laced gum so expensive? Don’t these industries have enough money? Can’t they come up with a more creative way – like the marijuana industry did – to deliver their drug without having to inhale it?

Because the tobacco industry wants to grow tobacco. It’s the tar that destroys the tissues. They know it, that’s why they invented electronic cigarettes, but there are too many glitches and people still go back to the smoke, because it’s still sold everywhere.

Oh, and they export cigarettes to other countries, wanting to addict them and make them keep wanting that which makes them sick, so they can keep profiting from their tobacco fields. Of course if they sell it abroad they have to sell it here. They don’t want to look like hypocrites.

I’m seeing too many circles here.

You can’t keep having it all ways, every way, your way. Let tobacco go the way of the dinosaur. Extinct it. If a person wants to grow tobacco in their own yard, then okay, let them do it their way. It’s a plant. They can shove it up their noses if they want to, but Not For Sale. Not to make profit from another person’s harmful-to-the-body addiction.

The Insurance Industry needs to stop punishing smokers when they’re the ones who made a deal with the Tobacco Industry that keeps them in business. Congress bought into all of it. Take the blame away from Tobacco, Insurance and Congress. Keep tobacco growing in the fields, keep manufacturing cigarettes, keep the poor slobs addicted, raise their premium rates and punish them financially forever – even if they smoked even one cigarette their entire life, because the Insurance Industry found the science that supposedly proved that one cigarette could cause cancer – even if you smoke it fifty years ago. So they can deny you benefits based on their science.

You smoke at your own peril. After they addicted you, they drop you flat. No one gets punished except the smoker or quitter or those exposed to second-hand smoke.

What’s the first thing that shows up on your medical record under your name? Your smoking history, which means you are discriminated against by the Healthcare Industry based on your smoking history. Doctors are trained to trick you when asking about that history. When did you quit smoking is the question, not do you smoke?

No one asks you, when did you quit drinking alcohol or coffee? No one asks you about drugs, since that’s what doctors do, they prescribe drugs, not cigarettes, alcohol or coffee. But then again, no one tries to smoke alcohol or coffee either. Maybe there’s a way, but it’s not in the public domain yet. They both do a lot of harm. But the harm is downplayed.

So it looks like if you can drink it, it’s okay. It’s both legal and encouraged.

Let’s make some nicotine drinks then. Good sell. Great idea. People love to drink. They can’t stop drinking. They always have a beverage of some sort in their hand.

Make it healthy with a healthy dose of nicotine. Varying doses. Do it before Canada does it.

NIC-O-TEEN TEA. NIC-O-TEEN JUICE. Not tiny little bottles that they sell at the check out counter. Those make you look like an addict. Build a display in-store on the floor, end cap. Sell sell sell.

Contain No Animal Products. That’s the deal-breaker.

Then ban the production and sale of cigarettes in the USA inserting the personal use clause. If you really don’t want to be a hypocrite, that is.

I think I could benefit from nicotine. Old people, especially. I would definitely give it a try.

 

Go Back To The Prejudice

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in EXPOSING THE BIAS

Meaningful solutions cannot be found at the levels of discrimination, enslavement, torture or slaughter, unless you first understand the prejudice.

It is in the area of prejudice, before one discriminates, that we must revisit to find the cure for what later became discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

What caused a movement within the prejudicial realm, based on whatever reason(s), to evolve into discrimination and then to move forward from that? This type of inquiry responds less effectively to brain-storming (since that’s a prejudicial thought process in itself) and more effectively to thoughtful non-emotional examination devoid of blame.

It’s not like a no-fault insurance policy, and it’s not suggesting equal blame nor equal participation, only an open examination of all the facts absent the investigatory prejudice inherent in any investigation.

We all prejudge – every thought, every action, everything. It’s our animal nature to do that.

If the prejudice in question goes back to the beginning of time, well, we can’t revisit that. So that’s when you start from here. You start from now absent the blame. Absent the emotion. It is possible once you decide to take that path.

Many people think they’re vested in something – some issue whereby they believe and act as if they have a vested interest in it, when they really don’t. But even if they do, take the money or the land or the benefit off the table and start from there.

You can’t cure a prejudice, because by nature we all have them. All you can do is understand it. If you refuse to understand a prejudice, then you stay stuck in a bad place, unable to move beyond the prejudice to start eliminating the discrimination resulting from it, even though you might abhor it. Usually when you abhor it is when you refuse to understand it. So you wallow. You wallow in your endless meaningless words and commentary offering no solutions only more chaotic outbursts claiming everybody to be unfair.

You can’t sue a person because they have a prejudice against you. Prejudice by the way rarely means hatred. People have likes and dislikes, strong and not so strong feelings about everything and everyone. It cannot be a crime to be prejudiced, when we all are in the same category.

Discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter are the easiest to fix. You recognize the injustice and unfairness directed at whomever or whatever group is under scrutiny. You stop the offending action, then repair the damage by passing new laws and by enforcing those laws. Then you clean up the mess caused by the unfair treatment and put regulations in place to prevent a similar occurrence in the future.

The United States still doesn’t have an equal rights amendment for women. There comes a point, and that point is now, that change must be imposed and then enforced. Discrimination against women is a global problem and must be tackled globally as well as on the national and regional levels – all levels. We can’t wait anymore for evolution to take its course – that’s for lazy people without solutions who want to procrastinate at the expense of someone else.

The solution is in front of you. Stop the discrimination. If you don’t know how, then why are you in a problem-solving position? Quit. Now. You’re not the right person for the job.

 

Your Message vs My Message

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

We’re different organisms, so the message you get will be expressed differently through your organism than through mine.

Different = Not the same.

However, there is only one constant, one base, one foundation.

The Five Principles.

Adhering to and living the Five Principles is the only way for life to survive and thrive on this planet.

No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Start with the big stuff and work backwards till you get to prejudice, then decide what features of prejudice actually lead to discrimination.

If you’re new in town, people will treat you with a wary eye. That’s prejudice. It’s also a survival mechanism till they get to know you and trust that you won’t do them harm. It’s all about safety.

Black Lives Terrorists don’t understand that concept of acceptance. It’s a process. You can’t threaten someone into accepting you and your ways.

When you keep threatening white people if they don’t see something your way or go your way or join you in your cause with no benefit to them, except maybe you won’t beat the shit out of their dog and then their mother and then finally them, don’t expect a good result.

Certainly don’t expect that the prejudice against you will end on a threat. That’s when it begins. It’s the perceived threat. Black Lives terrorists keep making that threat mistake. If you keep screaming in their ears, they will reinforce that wall of protection they need around them to survive and leave you out in the cold. That’s where discrimination arises.

I’m talking about the human animal now, not the innocents whose lives you take as your own to do with as you see fit for you.

 

Abuse Is Not Political; It’s Abuse

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

When you hate and mock every single thing a person does, and then extend that to all family members, that’s a prejudice.

Mocking how a person talks and walks, and acts, and thinks, and tweets and the clothes he wears, where he eats and on and on till there is no end to it, is a major prejudice.

The supposed anti-prejudice party is showing all the signs of a real prejudice against one person who is the leader of the Republican party and the president of this country that they all claim to honor.

The democrats, at least the ones all over T.V., criticize everything. No matter how good it is, they hate it and they hate him and as a result they attack all of his distinguishing features. The way he looks? Really? The way his wife looks? Really? Jeeze, all I hear is black women blaming white people for their bad hair days and how white people made them straighten their hair. Are you kidding? Then you have the audacity to complain about the president of the USA’s hair style? It’s not your business. His skin color? Too orange for your tastes? Oh my God.

I think you’re all jealous. He wants to get things done and all you want to do is slo-mo your way through every issue so that nothing gets done.

The supposed party of unity is showing all the signs of discrimination by refusing to work with the president – unless they can dominate. Whatever happened to the Clinton Compromise?

Enslavement comes next. Frankly, their perpetual anger is enslaving and torturing the American people. Anger is contagious. The 24/7 news cycles with angry talking heads from left leaning shows are popping their own people. I can’t watch it any more.

Slaughter comes next.

Let’s call it what it is. Saying abuse is political so you don’t have to accept responsibility for your bad behavior is not intellectually honest. Abuse is abuse.

Clean it up.

 

Massage My Guilt And I’ll Massage Yours

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in WRITTEN IMAGES

Discrimination is discrimination. It doesn’t matter who you discriminate against or for what reason. It is what it is.

We’re all killers. All humans are killers. We discriminate against all other species – including our own. That’s how bad we are. We enslave, torture and slaughter all other species, including our own. That is bad – Not bad-ass.

Yet, we pass judgment on everybody and everything else. Because we think we’re better, we’re superior to all other creatures including all other humans.

God made us that way is our excuse. Everybody else does it is our excuse when the first one doesn’t satisfy. Hey, they let us do it. They didn’t fight back – another lame excuse.

Somehow it sounds less offensive to say we’re all sinners, we’re all in the same insanity boat – made by God by the way – than to call ourselves what we are – killers.

Massaging our guilt does not allow for change of the offensive behavior. It actually perpetuates it.

Oh-h-h massage my guilt. That feels so-o-o-o good.

Now massage mine, okay?? Okay???

Are YOU sleeping?

I’ll massage your guilt tomorrow….

Promise? PROMISE.

okay….

 

Timing Is Everything

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

TIMING IS EVERYTHING

The easiest part is changing people’s minds.

The toughest part is implementing the change that nobody knows they want because they were brainwashed into wanting something that is not yet available.

Governments like to prepare their people for change before that which they’re changing is logistically ready to be changed. Preparation on the ground. Have the product before you try to sell it, otherwise you’re selling a ghost that nobody understands. We think this will work? What??

You need a plan before you start the process. You need planners who know what they’re doing, and not just winging it.

Five Principles To A Better Life are always available to everyone. They never change. It’s the gold standard by which to judge everything else. It’s always the same.

No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Prejudice leads to discrimination;

discrimination leads to enslavement;

enslavement leads to torture;

torture leads to slaughter…

if left unchecked.

Societies can not survive – they are not sustainable – when embracing the Five Flaws: prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Stop letting the drug addicts and alcoholics run the social engineering program at CNN and every other so-called news outlet. These outlets have caused a lot of damage by nobody knowing what they’re doing, why they’re doing it, and what the plan actually is and nobody cares beyond how to make it to their next alcohol, drug and/or gambling fix.

Conduct random drug and alcohol testing before those talking heads get on the air to spew their hatred through prejudicial ideology, while calling to action terrorists all over the globe – all in the name of making life better for whomever the talking head is representing at any given moment.

Have a separate program called Tabloid Fake News that those degenerates can use to spew their manifestos and plans for how quickly they can destroy the planet and reverse positive progress that took centuries to accomplish.

You don’t decide whose time it is to benefit from anything. The forces of nature determine that. So do your job unencumbered by drugs and alcohol or go to the Tabloid Fake News Channel and work through your addictions there.

I’m sick of looking at your blood-shot glassy eyes while you stumble through the homework you didn’t do the night before. How much do you get paid to drink and drug at work? Rachael Maddow has a bar in her office? Oh, the CIA guy or gal talking in your ears has your back? They write the scripts, we’re only the puppets? I rest my case. I guess they’d need a liquored up drugged up human to do that job. So, you’re the same as a high-priced whore? Blame the CIA for social engineering through cable and network news in the USA using high-priced whores as their mouth pieces. And they all came from high-priced colleges and universities?

 

A Flaw In The Law

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in MUSCULAR VIEWS

A word isn’t racist depending upon who uses it. That’s a flaw in the law, a flaw based on fear, which means coercion through the application of fear, which means terror tactics used to achieve an end or to support an agenda, which equals terrorism.

Making a claim that only certain types of people can say a word, while others cannot, is an act of prejudice and discrimination. If it’s based on race, then it’s racist. If it’s based on gender, then it’s sexist.

If you threaten somebody with harm to their person or career, who uses a word that you use, you’re the one committing the hate crime, not the other way around.

Currently to be called a hate crime an individual must say a word that others are allowed to say. That’s the flaw in the law. Flaws are always prejudicial and discriminatory.

 

Face-Talking

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, MUSCULAR VIEWS

Somebody tell Angela Merkel to wear sunglasses in public or stop face-talking when others have the floor. It’s rude and creepy, and shows she lacks discipline and fine manners.

Talking about face-talking. Oh my. There are two black guys on CNN, don’t know their names except one has a show of his own and wears glasses and the other used to be a congressperson or something. If they can’t shout you down – meaning a white person – and they always shout them down under the guise of wanting a fake conversation, theirs, then they’re face-talking while the other person speaks and the camera is always on the face-talker.

Stop it. I can’t watch you anymore. I turn off the set or change the channel. It is so rude and lacking in conversational discourse. You all look mentally ill waiting to set a bomb off some place. Show some self-control. How do you get shows of your own?

I’m not even going to look these guys up to find their real names, the two who claim to be experts on prejudice and communication skills and leaders of black people. If I see their faces I get a visceral reaction.

Stop face-talking. You act like terrorists where it’s your voice and only your voice and when somebody else talks it’s your face that keeps talking over them. Who are you trying to convince of what?

You know what? I don’t even care what your voice is saying, what your face is saying or what your agenda is. It’s all bad to me.

You know what else? People aren’t watching the television like they used to. The T.V. might be on, but they’re not in the room. How do you like those results Madison Avenue?

 

EXTRAPOLATING THE FIVE PRINCIPLES

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in EXPOSING THE BIAS

You don’t have to like old people just because they’re old.

You don’t have to dislike old people just because they’re old.

Not all old people are the same.

No they’re not.

Old prejudice leads to new disdain.

Disdain leads to new discrimination.

 

THE HORSE SAID, GET OFF MY BACK

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS, EXPOSING THE BIAS

Vegans are always lamenting over the bad treatment toward nonhuman animals by humans (the human animal).

We’re all animals, so why no camaraderie toward other species? Why no professional courtesy?

The vegans trolling Facebook are always angry at the human, why, why, why, followed by bad-name-slinging and insults. Yet, when they’re criticized they can’t handle it. They run like the little mischief-making trolls they are back to a safe place.

If these trolls are really vegan – and you know that in this world they weren’t always vegan and even when they became vegan – they slipped up plenty of times just because it’s impossible to be totally vegan in a world that has yet to accept it.

So all they had to do was retrace their own steps. Retrace the process. Then go back and think about how they wanted to be treated before they even knew anything about other animals deserving rights.

They think, erroneously, that abusing a person will make that person do what they want them to do, while at the same time wanting to be their sponsor. It’s like raping someone then asking them out for a date in a rape culture.

It doesn’t work that way. Even if it worked for some of them, it won’t last, because all it does is make the abused want to abuse others like they were abused. It eventually becomes nothing about the cause and everything about the ego of the individual human wanting to be the one who forces change, because change was forced on them.

Yes, some actually treat the adoption of veganism like the adoption of sobriety or getting clean. They can’t stay a vegan unless they’re sponsoring other might-be vegan candidates, helping them along the process, but doing it in an abusive way. Vegan humans, like alcohol and drug addicted humans, fall off the wagon – a lot. They prefer to call it cheat. But it is what it is – a giving into temptation. And temptation is everywhere, more so than alcohol or drugs. I mean it is everywhere.

You don’t need to go to confession by telling the whole world you had a non-vegan meal when you ate out at a restaurant, because they didn’t serve vegan and all your friends wanted to go where the crowd goes and they like the food and drink.

When you’re brought up your entire life eating, wearing, using, other animals, and after you see the light of reality upon your own awakening, and everybody else is still doing what you now know to be horribly wrong, and you can’t convince them, because they haven’t woken to your understanding, because they do what they’ve always done, and nobody is going to tell them not to, because they can’t tolerate being wrong, then accept your role as the awakened – not the awakener.

Nobody awakened you, no matter how vehement you are in your own knowing, that a specific event was responsible for you becoming a vegan. That is extremely rare.

That would be like you not paying attention to any part of your life, because after all animals were apart of all of it, for your entire life, and suddenly some external event like being kissed by a toad woke you up to the rights of animals?

Oh it was a film. What? you blindly went to see a film that nobody talked about prior to you seeing it, you didn’t know the title nor what it was about, somebody blind-folded you, kidnapped you and planted you in a movie theatre and forced you to watch a movie about animal rights? They even had a gun to your head?

Wow, why didn’t you add that part to your story? It would have been a lot more interesting. But I’m sure that once safe, you forgot all you promised to your captors in order to gain your release and have only bad memories and worse nightmares about the entire encounter. You did fear for your life didn’t you? Blindfolded, kidnapped, guns, forced to watch a slaughter movie?

Did your kidnappers all want to be your sponsor, tell you how to withdraw from the flesh and blood, especially milk that makes the cheese, seemingly all by itself in the back of the grocery store?

Did they say they’d be there for you, and how healthy you’d be, and confident and slim and fit and the animals will love you, and this is really all about compassion, and they’re sentient beings, after all.

[You really need to scratch that elitist word. Non-vegans don’t know what it means. It’s not your job to send them to a dictionary. Feeling animals, emotional animals, animals with nervous systems, animals who feel pain when abused. Anything but sentient. Stop being so lazy with language, where you want only one word to describe a complex process.

Why don’t you call humans sentient beings?].

Did they tell you where the animal-eaters anonymous meetings are held on a regular basis – in your town? Did they all give you their cell phone numbers to call them when you’re tempted?

It was an indoctrination.

Do you like being abused? Do you like it when people rub your nose into the dirt, when you’re wrong about something?

Do you have a conscience? Oh, you’ll stop abusing them when they become vegan?

Please, please, all they have to do is stop hurting the animals, and I won’t hurt them. I’ll even help them?

I don’t know who came up with this theory of change and how to make others do what you want them to do, but I can guarantee that the government played a role, for the purpose of failure not success. The elite are the most easily manipulated.

Psychological torture, physical torture. You’re a long way on the continuum of the Five Principles: prejudice leads to discrimination; discrimination leads to enslavement; enslavement leads to torture; torture leads to slaughter if left unchecked.

You’re all the way to torture. No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter. These principles developed by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight are a proven reality of cause and effect, action and reaction.

The first thing you can do to continue on your vegan journey is to get off that high horse you’ve been sitting on for way too long. That horse doesn’t belong to you. The horse belongs to itself. That horse does not like you.

I rest my case.

Don’t ask me. I don’t want to add lazy to your list of flaws. Figure it out for yourself. If you can torture, then you can find a non-torture method to achieve the same end.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight, animal rights activist

Fighting fire with fire, prejudice with prejudice – where have our brains gone?

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in MUSCULAR VIEWS

Black on white prejudice is just as ugly as any other prejudice. Fighting prejudice with prejudice only creates more discrimination.

Stop trying to even a score when you weren’t even in the game. It doesn’t work that way.

If prejudice solved prejudice, then discrimination would have been eliminated a long time ago.

Prejudice doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It needs a partner to survive.

If everybody expected as much from themselves as they do everybody else, think where we would all be right now?

I guarantee you in a safer place.

Black on white or white on black it all stinks the same when one demeans the other in order to force the other to conform to their views.

Unless it’s good for everyone it’s good for no one.

 

SENTIENT BEINGS

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in QUOTES

Animal-eaters will often hear animal rights activists/advocates/vegans refer to all animals as sentient beings.

What sentient means is the capacity to perceive, sense and feel. Thus all animals can think, feel emotion (joy through sadness and grief), and experience pain and/or a sense of well-being. It comes with having a nervous system.

Non-human animals suffer the most prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter than any human or group of humans on the planet.

And they suffer it by the hands of humans.

It is the largest, longest running Holocaust in the universe.

People of religion and atheists alike, blame that condition, that State Of Affairs, on God.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

BLACK STRIPE

EARNING RESPECT

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in QUOTES

If I have to earn your respect, then your respect isn’t worth having.

Forcing someone to earn your respect is an act of prejudice that becomes a process of discrimination.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

WORDS MATTER

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS

1 Jan. 2015 I just saw this headline on Yahoo News via Chicago-Sun Times Entertainment on 2 Jan. 2014:

“DEAR ABBY: TEENAGER KNOCKED UP BY FAMILY FRIEND”

I couldn’t believe I actually saw that phrase ‘knocked up’ in print. I thought it must mean something different these days, than what it meant many decades ago, so I clicked it on to make myself current. Nope, it still means somebody got pregnant. It’s a derogatory term used toward women, usually very young women, and usually but not always unmarried women, and almost exclusively used by men and said in a surly, demeaning, degrading way, usually but not always accompanied by ‘dirty’ laughter, meaning a men only joke.

Back in the ’70’s that man would have been called a ‘chauvinist pig’ (I, being an animal-rights activist, object to the word ‘pig’ being used in an insulting way, just as I object to cops being called pigs, or to Joni Ernst, a republican hog castrator from Iowa who won a senate seat, saying she was going to Washington to make them squeal – a reference to the pain of castration and ‘cutting the pork’, meaning removing from the budget, that which republicans deem unnecessary).

This is 2015. Is a man writing the Dear Abby column? I stopped reading these columns decades ago when I found out that the two sisters (Abigail Van Buren and Ann Landers, now dead), who wrote the two columns appearing in newspapers across the nation for decades made up the questions, and that they were written for Jews, instructing them on how to behave when in the company of gentiles (non-Jews) – addressing every imaginable facet of behavior – so Jews wouldn’t be seen as odd – a form of assimilation/integration into American society.

They did this without ever addressing Jews directly as Jews. Although I was very young then, I never agreed with any of their advice, so I don’t know who they were getting their answers to their own questions from. Experts they always claimed.

‘Knocked up’ is inappropriate (just like a ‘bun in the oven’ is inappropriate). It’s not funny. It’s disrespectful to women. It is never said in an endearing way. It’s uncivilized and offensive.

It’s strange how we as a society have become increasingly politically correct in our speech and actions toward any and all minority groups. But for the most discriminated against humans – women – of every race, nation, culture, socio-economic group, religion, political party… that has not happened.

Insult a Jew, a black, a gay, a handicapped person publicly and your career will be ruined. Insult a woman and everybody laughs. It’s not taken seriously. Even raping a woman isn’t taken seriously.

Bill O’Reilly announced on his ‘no-spin’ show the other night that the war on women is over. I guess because he says it’s over, it’s over. The fact that he didn’t ask a panel of women if the war on women is over should be proof enough of his own sexist slant.

Perceived superiority of an individual or group over another individual or group is one of the basis of prejudice. It’s not simply about not liking an individual or group. Anybody is free to like or dislike any individual or group for whatever reason. We all have our preferences. It’s when we discriminate based on a prejudicial mindset of superiority that the war begins.

The war on women will be over when women start fighting back against that which keeps them oppressed. Winning the war against women – on a continuum – is in its infancy.

Half of the human race – women – have and continue to fight for every other groups freedom rights. Where are these same groups when it comes to their freedom rights? Where’s the other half of humankind – men – when it comes to the freedom rights for women?

Start by correcting your own language, regardless of what your prejudicial thought process, no matter what your muscle memory is telling you to say, just because that’s how you’ve always thought and said it.

Stop the repetition of bad language and your brain will get the message. Form new habits of correct, respectful words and those words will create new pathways of correct, respectful actions.

You change the world by changing yourself. The world will take notice.

SOCIAL JUSTICE SUCKS

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in QUOTES

Social Justice is all about discriminating against the grandchildren of those who oppressed your grandparents, when the grandchildren didn’t commit the oppression. It’s wrong. IT SUCKS. Stop Now.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

BABY TO ADULT

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in QUOTES

No baby can control their sex, color, who their family is, what socio-economic condition they’re born into, nor what genetic predisposition for disease they’re born with, so stop the prejudice and discrimination against the adult that grows from that baby.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

DON STERLING AND DON LEMON SWIM IN THE SAME PREJUDICIAL SEA

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS

I find it odd that not one Black basketball player, coach etc. wimpering on T.V. over Don Sterling’s racist words (especially Doc Rivers) said one thing about the trashy, sexist way Sterling talked about women, making them into nothing more than sex objects. Who’s supposed to be a role model for women here? They’re basketball fans too. The NFL Network recently reported that about forty percent of all football fans are women. Magic Johnson had unproteced sex with thousands of girls/women (his own words from years ago) while he had HIV. I wonder if he contacted all of those girls/women to notify them. But he didn’t know their names, so he just announced it on T.V. figuring that would cover it, then they were on their own.

Don Lemon and Anderson Cooper (of CNN) didn’t seem to care about sexism (prejudice/discrimination against girls/women), which was the other half of the story they chose not to focus on. Girls/women make up half of the world’s population and they suffer prejudices more than any other segment of the human race in every facet of their lives from the moment they’re born until they die. Maybe it’s because Lemon and Cooper are gay and they can’t relate. Maybe it’s because they harbor sexist views that they don’t want the world to know about. Maybe it’s just too frivolous a topic for them. Who cares anyway? Young women are getting raped on campuses and in the military every day and nothing of consequence is done about it. Blame the women for the male sexist views. Even some women blame the women. In fact the word sexism never comes up when reporting on the news about the flood of rapes committed against them.

Don Lemon said Sterling should “spend the rest of his life” making up for the tape recorded words about Blacks [coming to his games on the arm of his girlfriend.] by doing good deeds for all Black people. Other Blacks representing the Black community came on T.V. to say the same thing. How arrogant.

Arrogance is the foundation of all prejudice. I never heard of a court handing down a sentence of ‘Community Service for Life’, but I guess that’s Don Lemon’s Court. He wants a billionaire to be the slave of all Black people. Let’s see how much money we can get from this old rich guy to finance social programs for the Black community. Looks like a Nigerian money-making scam. Get a lot of money quickly without lifting a finger to earn it.

Why is it that no one will broadcast the name of the person who gave the tapes to news outlets? Why does all that investigative reporting all of a sudden stop when the question is raised of who handed over the tapes? These aren’t state secrets. It’s beginning to sound more and more like extortion, with a racist label to justify the crime.

Anderson Cooper evidently thinks that having HIV makes a person a hero and nothing that person does privately or publicly has any bearing on that status, in other words they become beyond reproach because they have HIV. Well if Sterling has cancer, given Cooper’s rule for the making of a hero, then Sterling qualifies for hero status as well.

Think before you speak your double standard prejudices on national and international T.V.

Omitting the sexist focus is a prejudice that Lemon and Cooper wear with self-perceived righteousness. The way men talk about women is disgusting. It’s prejudicial and discriminatory. It’s hurtful and harmful to the advancement of their cause which is equality, not just under the law, (we still don’t have an equal rights amendment), but in the public and private sectors of life. It’s in every T.V. program, in every movie, and sprinkled in subtle ways all over the news channels, meant to influence the masses and relegate women to a status of irrelevancy, which promotes enslavement.

Extorting Sterling for the Black cause is enslavement. Destroying a person’s life (as they did with Paula Deen) is torture. Next comes slaughter. But wait. If we kill them, the money won’t go to us, so keep them alive, under our thumb, forever in our servitude. Yeah that’s it. That’ll work. Back to enslavement and torture.

To the basketball players, get a grip. If you think you’re slaves, then you’re free to go anywhere in the world with the millions of dollars you get paid to compete and have fun. Maybe you’ll be tape recorded by someone you trust or by some prostitute you think doesn’t matter to anyone. The die has been cast by you jumping on that bandwagon. It is open season and you all just turned on that proverbial fan. I think everyone knows what’s coming next. One has to wonder how many basketball players participated in the sex slave trade by buying underage girls, then bragging about it to their friends. The NSA knows who you are.

“THE SYSTEM DIDN’T WORK FOR US”

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS
  • “The system didn’t work for us”.
  • The system wasn’t supposed to work for “us” the black community of America. The system was supposed to work for Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman–only two people–not their parents, siblings, friends nor groups with agendas to raise social issues.
  • Black parents are now worried about what to tell their teenagers about wearing hoodies and buying Skittles and Arizona Iced Tea, according to one of the black community’s many spokespeople.
  • You tell them not to punch people, not to beat people up that they racially profile as (pervert) creepy ass cracker (white old man) (dirty fuckin) nigger (my slave). Do the math. The only ones with hate in their hearts that evening were Trayvon Martin and Rachel Somebody.
  • ‘If you don’t hate white people you’re not one of us’ is the racial underbelly of the black community toward individuals within the black community.
  • You don’t get to use an innocent man to advance your social-political agendas. You picked him because he was meek and looked white. The black community wouldn’t have gone after a big Rambo-type in your own face with your own prejudices type guy. They would have backed off, found somebody else, somebody like George Zimmerman.
  • The prosecution, the US government, played on every prejudice they thought the six member jury panel may possibly privately harbor instead of trying the facts of the case based on the evidence presented. Their never-ending attempts to prejudice the jury in favor of their client, Trayvon Martin, by using what they perceived as the individual jurors prejudices just didn’t work–not this time–not this day.
  • Jesse Jackson complained that there wasn’t a man on the jury, not enough blacks. That’s prejudicial coming from him–the prism white people are supposed to look through to do their daily check on their own prejudices. The prosecution wanted all women in order to get the sympathy vote. The judge instructed the jury not to base their verdict on sympathy, but that didn’t stop the prosecution and the talking heads on T.V. from trying to convince the world of Zimmerman’s guilt by using poor, grieving mother scenarios. Those prejudices didn’t work either–not with this jury–not this time–not this day.
  • Thank God that this time–for this trial–the jury was sequestered so they couldn’t hear all the distorted interpretations of the testimony spewing from the mouths of these so-called well-educated, intelligent talking heads. Night after night Steve and I repeatedly remarked that they couldn’t have watched the trial, yet they all claimed they had. “That wasn’t the testimony, that’s not what she or he said”, is what we said repeatedly night after night. We knew exactly what the witnesses said and remembered it (not bad for two “creepy ass crackers, fuckin niggers” living in a senior residence).
  • The jury being sequestered didn’t stop Sunny Somebody, on CNN’S Anderson Cooper Show every night, from using her psychic powers to channel the jury as she sat beside them every day of the trial. She read them, down cold she said. Guilty, guilty, guilty. She knew beyond a doubt that the mothers on the jury would find Zimmerman guilty, simply because they were mothers. She insulted every mother in the world, thinking  they would think and do as she would think and do–disregard the evidence and go straight for the jugular of Zimmerman, because he murdered their son. That may be what prosecutors do, disregard the evidence, skew the evidence, lie about the evidence to convict those they’ve charged. That’s not what mothers do–not on this jury panel–not on this day–not in that way.
  • It’s not racial profiling when people in your neighborhood have been robbed by black youth, and you see what looks like maybe a black youth hovering about between houses, looking in windows in the rain, in the dark. Dark matters, that’s when people are most fearful because everybody’s inside. Robbing is not just called robbing, by the way, it’s called  breaking and entering and terrorizing the people inside. A teenager couldn’t have been thinking about doing that though, because he bought Skittles and Arizona Iced Tea? What kind of fuzzy logic is that?
  • Martin didn’t drink his tea or eat his bag of Skittles. Guess he wasn’t thirsty or hungry. I know what teenagers do with a can of tea and a bag of Skittles. They put it in their pocket to make it look like a bad ass gun.
  • The black leadership keep saying they want a dialogue. With whom? White people don’t have a leader, no NAACP counterpart. All I hear is a one-sided argument with one-sided demands. President Obama and the Justice Department met their demands of an arrest which turned into demands for a trial, which turned into demands for a murder charge, which turned into demands for a guilty verdict. Contrary to what anybody thinks, including President Obama, you can’t demand a verdict–at least not this time–not with this jury–not on this day.
  • George Zimmerman had as much right to leave his car, to walk in his own community as Trayvon Martin had. He had a right to look to see where Martin was going. And he had a right to have a concealed weapon on his person. Unless the rules of concealment have changed, a person isn’t required to leave their gun in the car when they leave the car.
  • I live in Cleveland. My husband and I care about our security. We care about the people in the building where we live. People slip in the building behind me as I use the buzzer system, then they run ahead of me. And yes, so far all of them have been black. Daytime not so concerned. Nighttime always concerned. When nobody else is around, I’m on high alert.
  • I often have asked people who weren’t supposed to be in the building, who were delivering flyers, which is not allowed, if they lived here. They always say yes, even though this is a senior building, and they’re young. Once somebody knocked on my door, two young black females with strings around their necks with identification cards said they had authorization to be in the building and talk to me. Turns out they didn’t. I called the office, the office tracked them down and escorted them out of the building, or so they said. At night I wouldn’t have that call option. If they were at lunch or showing an apartment I wouldn’t have that call option.
  • The media and black community are simultaneously claiming that Zimmerman was negligent in getting out of his car. What this presupposes is that Zimmerman (and obviously all of them) knew that Martin, because he was black, because he was walking between homes looking in windows, because it was dark and raining and he seemed to be not going in any particular direction that he was dangerous, that he was violent. Zimmerman was supposed to assume that, according to them. Yet, Zimmerman didn’t assume what the media claims his responsibility to assume. Zimmerman only stated that he thought he might be up to no good. Zimmerman didn’t profile him as a killer or a potential killer. Nobody yet had been killed in the commission of a break-in in that gated community. For all we know now, maybe Martin was one of those children (they keep calling them children) terrorizing the neighborhood with breaking, entering and stealing.
  • Social issue concerns need to be raised in social forums, not in a court room where somebody is on trial who could spend the rest of his life in prison.
  • I kept wondering why all the cable talk and network news shows were pro-prosecution. Everyone on T.V. that night skewed the testimony given that day in trial. I know because I watched the trial. Guess we know now that a lot of people didn’t watch the trial day to day, they were working, they had jobs to go to, so they relied on the nightly news and their favorite cable news talk shows to fill them in, at the end of their day, on what they missed. Well they didn’t get the real story, the accurate testimony. The media all failed miserably. Talk about prejudice! Who wrote their scripts? If you need more than one guess, then you’ve allowed yourself to be brainwashed.
  • One must wonder if all the news outlets are favoring the prosecution, then somebody, somewhere isn’t giving the real story, or at least the other side’s perspective. Why is it that the country is divided, but the media and the government aren’t? Sounds like media-fixing to me.
  • People in prison are being released almost daily based on DNA evidence which proves they didn’t commit the crime for which they were charged and convicted. A lot of these prisoners being released are black. If the government, the media and the black community had their way and got their conviction, then one more innocent person would be entering that prison system. But he’s white–at least that’s how the media, government and black community are forcing us to see him, and we don’t care if an innocent white man goes to prison, we just don’t want any innocent black men to serve any time for crimes they didn’t commit. Well that’s your prejudice now isn’t it?
  • So why are so many young black men, and yes there is not a seventeen year old male teenager anywhere in the world who would refer to themselves as a child, in jail for drug related offenses? More blacks go to jail for drug related offenses than whites because blacks aren’t as careful in their transactions. They make a lot of bone head mistakes. They don’t know how to be discreet. It doesn’t matter their age, they think they’re invincible, they won’t get caught or if they do they won’t be charged, they’ll be let go–and often they are let go in a sweep. Whites fear getting caught, blacks don’t. Fear keeps you cautious.
  • Trayvon Martin didn’t fear George Zimmerman. He was experienced in throwing down a person and pounding them (ground and pound). Even Rachel said he thought it was just a fight, meaning Martin had been in fights before. He was obviously experienced in overcoming a target, a weak target, a meek target, because that’s what he did. But Rachel lied so many times on the witness stand, changing her testimony minute to minute, that it’s hard to decipher which of her answers were true. Maybe when Martin was telling her to ‘get off’, he was telling her to hang up.
  • I saw Martin’s mother watching Rachel as Rachel testified. She grabbed the white string around her neck and brought it up sharply to her right–like a noose. Shocking that a grieving mother had the presence of mind to remind Rachel who she was, where she came from and who Zimmerman was by that one gesture.
  • At some point Trayvon Martin knew George Zimmerman had a gun. He had him straddled tightly, it had to be tightly in order to keep Zimmerman on the ground. Trayvon’s inner thighs could feel the gun. But even before that, you mean while Martin was throwing Zimmerman to the ground Zimmerman’s outer clothing stayed neatly in place? Maybe it did. But Martin felt that gun with his legs before Zimmerman was able to shoot him. Of course Martin was reaching for it.
  • Hold your ground? Learned or not learned from an online course that Zimmerman took. The Castle Doctrine is what it’s called, originating from the premise that a person’s home is their castle, anybody not invited who enters to do no good is subject to being shot.
  • Why do black people think it’s okay to break and enter and steal other people’s property? Why do black people think it’s okay to steal somebody’s car because they don’t want to take a bus? Why is every American to assume that if somebody breaks into your house while you’re there that the intruder won’t shoot you? I would always assume they had a gun and would always assume they would use it.
  • How about destroying evidence? That used to be a crime. How about Martin’s father deleting all of his son’s text messages from his phone? How about Rachel doing the same, passing  herself off as somebody else, not once, but often? What is she hiding? What unemployed, expelled from school seventeen year old has forty dollars in their pocket, hanging around in the rain with a bad ass looking gun in his pocket? Who’s he waiting for to show up? Not the white guy. Rachel profiled the ‘cracker’ as an undercover cop. That’s why she told him to run.
  • The black community and the United States government supported by the media used Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman as a platform to address the black community’s greater social equality gripes, that had nothing to do with the events surrounding this loss of life.
  • If the black community can’t raise their social issues without sacrificing a person of a different race to do it, then they are no better and every bit as prejudicial and discriminatory as the people and institutions that blacks claim discriminate against them.
  • President Obama destroyed George Zimmerman’s life and the lives of the Zimmerman family–forever. He tried to put an innocent man in prison so that black people could get on T.V. and tell the world once again about all their pains and sufferings and love for their children who are unjustly treated by the criminal justice system. Obama tried to fight a prejudice with a prejudice, just like he fights terrorism with terrorism. If President Obama has a problem with the justice system then he needs to address that system. He’s the only one with the power to affect change from the FBI on down to the local police. The FBI profiles people. That’s what they do. There won’t be any changes there.
  • Somebody named Cuomo, another talking head, who likes to use trigger words to incite white people or to shame them, says okay, we are where we are, so lets make this an opportunity to open a dialogue and bring people together. What people? Are you, the white talking heads of T.V., going to be the self-appointed leaders of the white people and talk on our behalf? Are the black talking heads going to be the self-appointed leaders of the white people and talk on white people’s behalf, telling the white story through their black prism?
  • You already indicated that you had to be a lawyer to understand the evidence presented at trial. You insulted the intelligence of every thinking American. You insulted the jurors. What, we have to accept your prejudicial interpretation, because we’re not smart enough to interpret it ourselves? No thank you. We’ve seen your skewing of the facts. That will never work, no matter how many experts you parade in front of us, speaking on our behalf. We don’t trust the media to be our spokespeople. We don’t trust the government that tried to hang an innocent man on behalf of the American people, simply because he looked white–not today–not on any day.
  • JUSTICE OR NO PEACE! Really? Convict the guy or we’ll make war against the entire country? There’s nothing peaceful about that message.
  • Oh, no, we don’t mean that. No, we just want a dialogue. Then say what you mean. Stop threatening white people with threatening words and gestures. Every politician in America is taking the black community’s side. Why do you think they’re doing that, because they think you’re right? No, because they fear what you’ll do to them if they don’t.
  • Stop fearing black people? Are you kidding? Black people act aggressively for the purpose of frightening people. But white people are to believe you don’t really mean it? Then stop doing it and maybe that fear factor won’t be an issue. Stop making white people fear you.
  • Bring together? Stop calling white people racists who don’t agree with you. That’s racism in itself. Stop excusing your own racism against white people as justified, while you scream racism at everybody else. Black people need to admit their own racism before any substantive dialogue can occur. White people are weary from being demonized by black people for being born white. Strange isn’t it how black people wanting their equality became those they once demonized as stripping them of theirs? The oppressed become the oppressor. Strange isn’t it how now white people are calling other white people racists for not wanting a guilty verdict for Zimmerman?
  • No amount of manipulating by the CIA via the media is going to change anything, because everybody sees the manipulation. Maybe the CIA should start with themselves and fix their own prejudices. Maybe Obama who is reported to love the CIA (the largest terror organization in the world) can start there. He’s got the power. Obama should shut down secret CIA prisons. He should shut down Guantanamo Bay Prison. He said he already did, but they’re still open. Do you really think that Obama cares about prison reform in the United States? Not a chance.
  • George Zimmerman didn’t violate anybody’s civil rights. Trayvon Martin violated George Zimmerman’s right to leave his vehicle. That wouldn’t come under the heading of civil rights though, because of Zimmerman’s skin color. Only a black person can claim civil rights violations, which means that white colored people don’t have any civil rights or they’d be laughed out of court, so it would never get to court–any court.
  • The same is so for hate crimes. Hate crimes can only be committed against Jews and blacks. When a Jew commits a crime against a non-Jew it isn’t called a hate crime, even when it is. When a black person commits a crime against a white person it isn’t called a hate crime, even when it is, nor is it ever even considered.
  • Hate, like prejudice works both ways. I believe Trayvon Martin violated Zimmerman’s civil rights in the commission of a hate crime. Of course that would have been laughed out of court too, had Martin lived. How about crimes against cops. Are those considered hate crimes?
  • Since when does it become the responsibility of George Zimmerman and his brother to bring blacks and whites together whom the President, the justice department, the black community and the media divided for the purpose of political gain, preferential treatment and  T.V. ratings? Do it yourself. Fix what you broke, don’t expect somebody else, whom you grossly offended, to clean up the result of your dirty tricks.
  • Experts on T.V. are cautioning the Zimmerman family on whose money they can accept and against showing any perception of having won something. The Feds are worried they might inadvertently accept money from an anti-black organization which in any court of law would make them guilty of racism. They’re afraid if Zimmerman is seen whooping it up after the court declared him not guilty that that action could rile blacks to the point of burning cities.
  • Nobody gave the blacks that instruction after the O.J. verdict, because the blacks won, or at least they saw it as their victory against white people oppression. Whites can’t on the other hand, when the shoe is on the other foot–aren’t allowed, based on some unwritten law and prejudice that makes everyone born white an automatic racist–think of the Zimmerman verdict as a victory for all white people. Yet, when a black person is exonerated  from a crime he/she didn’t commit the party begins. No mention is made of the person who lost their life and the killer who is still at large in somebody’s community somewhere.
  • It is this writers opinion that resentment fosters where what is allowed for one isn’t allowed for the other, simply based on their skin color and the degree to which they feel oppressed.
  • Note: Going to school in the United States is mandatory. It is this writer’s opinion that anybody facing expulsion from school should not be expelled unless and until such time that an alternative school setting is arranged for that person.
  • Regarding school, may I suggest that every talking head, including President Obama, the biggest talking head of all, go back to school and learn how to communicate accurately absent your own personal prejudices. All jurors are required to do that. Despite pressure–from the President, the black community, the Justice Department and the media–put on potential jurors and then the actual jurors, to act on the very prejudices the court, at least on paper instruction and in principle doesn’t allow–it didn’t happen–not on this day–not with this jury panel. Bravo.

SEXISM

Posted on by Sharon Lee Davies-Tight in ESSAYS
  • The pervasive nature of sexism in all cultures, at all levels of society by all males, makes it nearly impossible for males to recognize the fundamentally flawed foundation from which they base their interactions with females. This lack of awareness of their own prejudices makes growth in breaking down barriers nearly impossible to attain without great sustained and painful effort from all sectors of society. It’s painful, because males don’t want to relinquish their power, and don’t want to be treated in the same way, with the same disregard, they treat females.
  • Sexism is so common and rabid that it appears to have become innate through the process of oppressive and backward moving evolution. Even when females surpass the males with whom they compete, their accomplishment is considered less worthy of respect. Place one female in the company of two or more males, and no matter what the circumstance, no matter how noble or sophisticated the males, the behavior of ‘clumping together’ to pile on the female, always emerges to trivialize and denigrate the female.
  • The world has yet to scratch the surface of this cold, hardened and bitter prejudice that goes far beyond gender based stereotypical expectations of behavior. Interestingly, gender based prejudices pave the way for all other prejudices in society, and even more disturbing is that it is often the role of elder females to oppress their younger female underlings, which raises the expectation of submissive behavior among the peer groups of young females.

LINK TO A PLAN FOR THE PLANET