Categories
EXPOSING THE BIAS

BLACK ON WHITE OPPRESSION

Trolls go to war on Facebook.

Do trolls operate by a code of rules?

You know, those people who eviscerate others for their views on social media and news outlet comment sections?

If not, then why not, when every other person on the planet has to play by a set of rules?

Who are they? Anonymous isn’t an identifiable person. Using fake names does not equal an identifiable person.

Dare I ask the race, ethnicity, gender, age, political affiliation, location, who they work for? Do they receive compensation, get paid get laid, oops. Or do they volunteer their services?

What’s their psych profile? They hide, work in the shadows, behind the scenes, under the camera, beneath the window sill. They don’t climb trees, but they’ll find you if you’re in one? Do they have hacking skills?

What’s the deal? Why the secrecy? Is somebody, some group, some nation planning a holocaust against trolls? Are they really robots pretending to be humans?

Do they drink, drug, eat or smoke while they troll? Or do they intentionally deprive themselves while engaging in the hunt, the slaughter and ultimate cannibalistic feast?

How do they so deftly rip your organs from your body before you even know your organs are gone?

“We know who they are” I’ve occasionally heard over the airwaves, yet nobody ever said who they are. What does that mean? Their names or affiliations can’t be uttered from the lips of humans? They are that privileged a class of humans that nobody is allowed to see their faces or speak their names?

Do they have a country? A people? How do they appear in every country using identical methods to search, destroy, cannibalize? What’s their population numbers?

Why is the world so afraid while at the same time accepting of the evisceration techniques trolls use to destroy your work through your own mind? Why does the world allow them to remain anonymous?

Shouldn’t they have to register or apply for a license like hunters do? They seek to kill using words as their weapons, and who knows how many lives they take anonymously.

At the very least, it’s a premeditated emotional assault that leads to physical illness, that can take days from which to recover from the hit. Without consequences? A premeditated attack designed to silence a person’s freedom to speak their truth?

Isn’t that terrorism? Isn’t that war? Who is the enemy? Don’t we all deserve to know?

Where do we draw the line? Government historically defends the bully and punishes the victim. They say walk away. But when forcing someone to walk away aren’t the victim’s civil rights being violated? These social platforms are a means for all people to communicate, yet government acts as if only the bullies can communicate, since the government tells the victims to stand down.

” We know who they are” is code for Jews, since every Jew knows if you call a Jew a Jew, the big Jew God will swoop down from the sky and carry them off to prison somewhere. Is that why they cover their heads? So their God can’t find them and make them stop?

That’s why they make a living hell out of anybody’s life who calls them a Jew – because a non-Jew is telling their God their location by saying Jew. So much for trusting their own God to cover their crimes. So they know it’s wrong. But they do it anyway. They can’t help themselves I’ve heard for decades.

But they keep telling the world that nobody stops them.

Then I say, now is the perfect time.

Trolls locate your soul, contain it, paralyze it, then feast on it while you watch, destroying a part of who you are. They consume you. Chew you. Break you. Spit you out.

Is there a law protecting identity of trolls? Worldwide? Every country has the same law? You can’t tell the Jew God where a Jew is located? What if they’re lost? They’re not.

Can you hire a troll? Political campaigns? Advertisers? Businesses? Where does one go to hire a troll? What’s the going fee? Do they have 401Ks like most hackers? What are the terms? Why don’t governments know all this?

Am I requiring a history lesson yet? See how easy it is to find you?

Trolls are hit men and women hired to destroy by evisceration, human beings they want to silence on social media – for political, socio-economic, religious, racial privilege.

They’re hired guns.

Trolls are starting a global war on Facebook. The goal is to disrupt the world. To whose benefit?

Advertisers are threatening to take their advertising dollars elsewhere. Where? Black Lives, NAACP and Anti-defamation league are threatening to boycott Facebook by forcing companies to pull ads, because of too much hate directed at their corresponding groups.

The hate I see is coming from democrats, Black lives, and Jews. Nobody can criticize them without being charged with a hate crime. These organizations are silencing free speech, except their speech that is filled with hate toward all white people.

They’ll walk away with nothing, People are already leaving Facebook because of all the anti-white hate-filled rhetoric circulated by these very groups. There will never be a conversation as long as the oppressors of white people control the narrative.

Suppressing one group’s speech to make another group’s speech louder and the only message heard is oppression. Black on white oppression.

These groups don’t understand, because they don’t want to understand, that truth or criticism isn’t hate. But even if it was, people have the right to love, like or hate anything and anyone they want.

It’s when they seek to destroy through evisceration methods where lines need to be drawn. Anti-white lives groups, that have been around for a long time, have yet to make any effort to stop the abuse toward white people on social media. Therein lies their prejudice followed by discrimination. Next step, enslavement.






Categories
Q&A

Why is there so much racism in America when you’re all immigrants?

Q.

A.

The so-called indigenous are immigrants too. 

People like to wander, discover, and crave new adventures. They’re not coming to build a country; it’s already built. They’re a little late to the party so-to-speak. 

Most people here now are born from separatists, people who didn’t, or didn’t want to, fit in where they previously lived. It’s no surprise that they exhibit separatist traits. Those wanting to live here illegally (or outside the law) are also separatists. They have no plans to integrate.

People are by nature suspicious of strangers for survival reasons. Would you let a stranger walk into your house or backyard? Many people think of America as home. They fear people they don’t understand. You can’t just call somebody a racist and expect that ‘uncertainty’ to disappear. 

In fact, those who scream obscenities and slurs and isms and ists at those who want everyone accounted for in the country where they live, raise not lower that fear level. 

There is as much so-called racism in countries where there is the greatest diversity. In the Middle East or Africa or India where people are pretty much the same, they find other reasons to shun people who otherwise look and act like themselves.

I don’t see any mystery. 

Understanding something doesn’t equal condoning it. If nothing else, it lowers somewhat the anxiety level of the individual, group and ultimately the masses. 

When some group wants to excite the masses, they usually start rumors they know in advance will have that effect.






Categories
EXPOSING THE BIAS

FISA WARRANTS FOR PROFIT

Whatever did or didn’t come out of the meeting between President Trump and Mark Zuckerberg, CEO and co-founder of Facebook multibillionaire isn’t as important right now as the fact that the meeting took place and, to the outside observer, appeared cordial and respectful. That’s the way professionals ought to conduct themselves.

That Zuckerberg wants to produce his own currency and essentially become a bank should alarm those concerned about the privacy rights of Facebook users. Banks are meticulous, or should be, in matters of privacy. Mark Zuckerberg hasn’t shown the public to date that he can handle privacy issues with the seriousness they require.

Giving advertisers unfettered access to Facebook contacts, private messaging and emails should alarm everybody, friend or foe. He conveniently sidesteps the fact that he’s a multibillionaire because of those practices, and instead focuses on the ‘cost’ of connecting the world, which is supposedly his so-called lofty goal which is the foundation of all of this corruption that made him filthy rich.

Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t have the experience nor track the record in protecting the privacy of his customer base to make a jitter-free business transition from social media to establishing his own currency.

He is jumping too quickly into a banking field he knows little about, before he has adequately dealt with the haphazard way he runs his current companies with little oversight or accountability. Acting naive as he does to the inner workings of Facebook isn’t going to cut it in the banking world. It isn’t enough in that world to operate from an ‘adequate‘ model or from an ‘arrogance’ model that puts everybody but himself in a category of too stupid to understand what he knows and they don’t.

Attempting to connect every individual in the world to each other for his own financial benefit, on the backs of those customers whose privacy he knowingly invades and violates, would land other people committing similar deeds in jail. Others would see him as messianic – king of the world. The only reason I see for doing it, when he isn’t much of a social guy himself, and when the CIA is operating within that system, is for the purpose of spying on the entire world. In other words, it’s a lot easier to spy on individuals who all gather at the same place. They already spy on governments, with individuals it’s not as easy, especially in other countries. And it is costly. Facebook makes it easy.

Protecting a person’s rights against unlawful search and seizure of their personal space and property when executed by advertising agencies for the purpose of profit has not been adequately dealt with by Mr. Zuckerberg, the USA congress or the Supreme Court. We all know what search means, but the seizure definition given by Zuckerberg is not adequate, because it doesn’t fit. When someone copies my private personal material against my knowledge and/or will and then uses it in undisclosed ways for profit, that’s seizure. It doesn’t matter that the original documents remain with the customer, as he claimed. That’s not the point here.

The point is the copying and the usage of those documents which corrupt the originals, since they are no longer free from a corrupt money-making scheme, that could be attached to sex trafficking or drug money laundering or slaughtering animals. Name a money-making scheme or endeavor and your personal information is connected to it via the Madison Avenue Spy And Steal Mode Of Operations For Profit.

What is Madison Avenue paying Facebook customers for that unfettered invasive access and retrieval of their private information? I don’t want MASAS to have access to my mother and her friends and neighbors for the purpose of using their names and everything about them to sell their products or for any other purpose.

Why should MASAS be given authority, that law enforcement or intelligence agencies in the USA have to go to a FISA court to get approved? Why is Facebook immune? Why is MASAS immune? These are all legitimate questions that need answers now.

Why is congress stalling on this? To give Facebook CIA time to cover or erase their tracks? Where is Nancy Pelosi on this? Oh right, because she doesn’t know anything about Facebook, how could she know anything about FISA warrants for profit.

Yes, FISA WARRANTS FOR PROFIT is what MASAS’s actions amount to. Madison Avenue has a FISA WARRANT FOR PROFIT with no expiration date against every USA citizen and dare I imply every world citizen. No wonder China doesn’t want Facebook in it’s country. Who would, knowing the CIA operates within it. That’s what the CIA does. They spy. They spy and manipulate people.

Zuckerberg’s disclaimers essentially stating that that’s what these advertising companies do, and the customer has to either agree to let them continue or stop using Facebook, when he actively took measures using CIA manipulation tactics, to addict people to the process, is illegal and immoral. It’s communism at it’s height of arrogance.

Communism is not our system of government. It is not supported by the USA Constitution or Bill of Rights. Nowhere in the Constitution or Bill of Rights or Amendments to the Constitution does it say or imply that advertising agencies have special rights to spy on their prospective or existing customers and to make copies and steal the impressions to use for profit or for any other reason.

Facebook is not an advertising agency. Mark Zuckerberg is not an advertising agency. Customers of Facebook are not customers of advertising agencies.

Breaking and entering is what it’s called, when high-powered technology dives into specifically targeted data, breaching privacy walls. And they always say they’re making your lives easier by bringing to you what you like to buy. I don’t want people to know what I’m buying. I just bought a pair of socks, I go to Facebook to catch up and sock ads pop up all over. Why? I already bought the socks, and Facebook wants me to buy more, even though I can’t afford it? What are they going to do to me if I don’t? Or I talked on the phone regarding socks I need to buy for my husband, I go to Facebook to catch up and ads pop up all over the place regarding socks. Whoa. That is scary.

Let me tell you something. I have never gone to Facebook to shop for anything. I shop where they sell product. That they spy and then show me what they think I want to see does not impress nor help me in any way. It is a huge irritant that they tell me what to buy after I’ve already bought it.

It’s called unlawful search and seizure, because there is no crime committed by the Facebook user. Yet, Facebook is acting like the FBI, combing everybody’s data and using it for who knows what purpose in addition to monetary gain. It’s like absolving a doctor from malpractice claims before the surgery is performed.

There may be a law stating it is legal, because corrupt lawmakers passed such a law, but it can’t stand up to constitutional correctness, when someone’s rights for compensatory damages due to negligence or due to purposeful infliction of damage are blocked, thus violated, for the purpose of monetary gain or for the purpose of excusing without consequences negligent behavior, for which other people in similar situations would get prison-time.

Mark Zuckerberg may have the protection of the CIA in his shadowy enterprises that allow him to give MASAS operatives unfettered access to his customers with impunity, but does the world want the CIA to be controlling their banking systems as well? Wherever Facebook goes, there goes the CIA.

Referencing as privacy missteps, the intentional actions by Mark Zuckerberg to allow advertising agencies to search and seize, spy and steal on and from Facebook’s customers is naive and arrogant by those who claim to be concerned about those rights.  In my mind of privacy rights afforded under the USA Constitution, its Amendments and Bill of Rights those missteps are constitutional felonies, and Mark Zuckerberg is thumbing his nose to his customers, since those policies are still in practice.

What changed is now they admit it and give the customer the option of staying and complying or leaving. All social media platforms do the same. On Word Press, each time you click you have to agree to be used for their purposes or you can’t proceed.

This cannot go on as is. It must be addressed. The advertisers have no inherent right to any of your information that isn’t on public display, and even then everything a person creates is protected by copyright. MASAS operatives totally disregard copyright laws for the purpose of monetary gain using your material in undisclosed ways.

Nancy Pelosi and her gang of violators are naive and arrogant if they think they are above the USA Constitutional authority. Try infringing on one of their copyrighted works and see who’s cringing now.






Categories
EXPOSING THE BIAS

BRENTON TARRANT – Terror Triangle

Ethnic-Based Revenge Attacks

Muslims around the world who engineered and executed violent attacks against those they perceive as their enemy, plus the militant wing of the Palestinians, claim that because they don’t have a military, they are justified in committing attacks against their enemies using their bodies as bombs or using explosives and/or hand held guns to create mayhem and destruction in public places to kill innocent people caught unaware, for the purpose of making everybody else fear, thus hear them.

Except for the Palestinians living in Palestine, all other Muslims reside in countries that have militaries and long standing established governments.

So that argument is not valid for any Muslim living outside of Palestine, since Palestine doesn’t have a military to protect itself from invasion.

Why do you think Israel invades and occupies Palestine? Because they can. Simply put, Palestine doesn’t have a military with which to defend itself against aggressors and invaders.

In addition to Palestine not having a military, there has not been one single nation, of all the nations in the world, who ever came to the defense of the defenseless Palestinian people against military invasions and consequent occupations by Israel.

Israelis on some level truly believe that they not only own the land of Palestine, but own the Palestinian people as theirs to do with whatever they choose.

Jews have the same history of using their bodies as weapons to attack their enemies, because again, they claimed to have no nation nor military to rely on for self-defense or for offensive occupation purposes. In 1948 that all changed with the formation of the Israeli Defense Forces making that argument no longer valid.

Before the Jews had a global home base they called Israel, they all lived in established nations with long standing governments and militaries.

So it appears that both Muslim and Jew think of themselves as global nations of peoples who reside within other nations.

Palestine does not yet have an independent nation status. Israel has nation status but is not recognized by the majority of the world, since both Arabs and Jews did not agree to the proposed plan by Britain introduced by the United Nations to partition Palestine into Arab and Jew states.

When the Arabs did not accept the proposed partition, the Jews decided to simply take their portion by force, so there was never an agreement per se. In 1948 Israel declared themselves the Nation of Israel and at the same time formed a military. And that’s where they are today.

Even though the Middle East is primarily populated by Muslims and controlled by Muslims, they are for the most part Arab states, except of course Iran, the Persian wing of that particular Muslim population.

It appears that Muslims in Arab countries express more unity with their religion than their governments. So it’s not surprising that the global Nation of Islam carries more weight in global and domestic matters.

The global Nation of Israel acts in much the same way, though around the world there are more non-practicing Jews than there are non-practicing Muslims.

Brendon Tarrant the twenty-eight year old ethnic British Isles male, forced by parentage to be born and raised in Australia, that the British government primarily populated by occupation aka colonization, killed a few score of Muslims in neighboring New Zealand as payback for the innocent lives Muslims took throughout Western Europe in recent terrorist attacks.

It’s odd how the Muslims got hit and the Jews keep trying to make it about Jews, anti-semitism and hate.

Actually there’s a terror triangle operating here – a terror triangle based on revenge.

Invading a peoples’ homeland and putting them under occupation, forcing a foreign, hostile culture onto those under siege is terrorism.

Britain basically tried to colonize the entire world, entire continents in fact, and was highly successful. Others did too. The Spanish got most of South America and now they’re moving northward with their socialism aspirations in tow.

The British are everywhere. I’m even British – a lot British.

Colonizers use the same recruitment tools that religions and governments use. They find a people with problems that they can solve. They nurse them back to normalcy, then indoctrinate them into their way of thinking and acting.

Hate is too simplistic a response or a cause. People hate lots of things and lots of people and lots of situations, but they don’t blow people apart because of it. They usually adjust or avoid, which are smart measures for increasing one’s survival advantage.

Hate is an anger emotion. You can’t tell people they can’t express their emotions when somebody or some thing offends them. It’s part of human nature. It’s normal.

If you focus on the hate – the emotion – then you don’t have to account for why something happens. ‘It was hate that caused it’. No it was not hate that caused that man to engineer and execute a plan to kill a specific group of people.

When people hate, they’re repulsed by those or what they hate. They want nothing to do with that which they hate.

Revenge. An eye for an eye. Why doesn’t anybody call revenge the ‘hate’ word? I’ve never heard anyone do that before. Never. Not out loud. Not a whisper. Not in print either.

Justice. Everybody raises up the ‘justice’ word as if it was sent from heaven or certainly some kind of holy place in the universe of most people’s minds.

JUSTICE FOR ALL. Even me? Even him? How about her? Us? We? Everybody? Yes to it all.

And what is justice if it isn’t payback, revenge, an eye for an eye, spend the rest of your life in jail. And oh, we become so angry when the offender gets out of jail early on good behavior. Pay back, pay up, just pay for your sins.

We want an arrest, we want an inditement, we want a jury trial, we want a conviction and if we don’t get it, all hell will break loose.

Most people don’t get to satisfy their need for revenge except in small ways. Most of the time that’s all it takes – small gestures from anywhere to lower the anger level. But some grievances are so big and attacks so atrocious that little placations and appeasements, to soothe the psyche and deplete the desire to blow up what the aggressors blew up, only in their backyard this time, become ineffectual.

Massive grievances fester when people aren’t shown that measures were meted out against the aggressors and a better world emerged.

A better world did not emerge after 9-11. We took a revenge hit. We hit back, again out of revenge, yet we didn’t hit the people who hit us. We did not target Muslims or countries where the hijackers lived.

To me it always sounded like a team the Israelis put together. But what do I know, except their history of finding non-Jews or Jews from other countries to commit assassinations that they think will advantage Israel.

The USA executed an opportunistic set of moves against people and countries that had nothing to do with the attack against the people in the USA. – and had a lot of Israel input when congress sat paralyzed by the enormity of the hit.

From that miscalculation and our own committed atrocities around the globe grew a need for revenge from the people we struck who didn’t commit the crime.

When you falsely accuse and abuse people for something they didn’t do, they will eventually find a way to strike back if not appeased in some way prior to that happening.

And for those living in the USA who didn’t feel the satisfaction (because by then it was practically a crime to criticize a Muslim), that lack of closure, because of all the secrets surrounding everything, festered.

People think a lot, they work things out a lot in their minds. Often governments treat the populace of any country as if they’re a bunch of non-thinking and non-feeling people. Yet they expect all of us to be fearless in absence of knowledge, which is incredibly naive.

Governments think that only military personnel need to avenge those who commit atrocities against the populace. They do the avenging; they get the satisfaction. If that were actually the case, then there would not be so many damaged military personnel coming home from war zones. The populace gets revenge vicariously?

A better world would be the best revenge.

Forcing foreign cultures onto other foreign cultures without warning or some sort of preparatory teaching is bound to create havoc. We’re brought up a certain way, then boom a whole town of people enter your backyard and you’re supposed to be fine with it all, even though you know nothing about them. It is like an invasion.

Everything you ever learned about how to behave gets tossed, because these new people don’t share the same history, raising and values.

Everybody’s world changes without warning. It isn’t a smart strategy for change, to simply uproot massive numbers of people and relocate them all over the globe. For what purpose? How will they assimilate? It’s as bad for the newcomers. Nothing looks or acts normal to them.

I recall one time Ariel Sharon (Prime Minister of Israel at the time) seriously suggesting that the Palestinians be uprooted and shipped to Siberia.

This is globalization? To make everybody feel better? About what? Who they are? Who they’ll become? How they’ll adapt to a different culture? Forward or backward? Nobody cares? Why?

It’s about the bottom line. Money.

Globalization is not a feel good movement to get all the people in the world talking to each other. We all speak different languages. Translation services don’t work very well and cause more confusion and frustration than no translator.

It’s about opening new markets to make more money. It’s like colonizing the world all over again.

So get ready for more ethnic-based revenge attacks – from all sectors. It’s not about hate. It’s about crashing and clashing cultures. It used to be called culture shock.

It’s become much more than that. It has become institutionalized by each country’s need to increase their national income to remain viable, whereby governments mock and shame those who resist the manipulation.

It’s not about hate. It’s about governments not properly preparing their people for changes imposed upon them. The social engineering departments failed miserably. You can’t just tell everybody to accept what they don’t understand, because governments don’t want the people to know what they’re doing to them or with them.

Admit it. Globalization is an experiment. It’s not appropriate to punish people who were made into subjects against their knowledge, thus their will.

The media plays a big role in dehumanizing people they don’t like or who don’t fly their way, by humiliating them. They do it to their own elected officials. The elected officials do it. It’s become pathological. It’s like social communication disease, that’s communicable.

It’s already been announced that Facebook will be looking for people criticizing Muslims and will handle them.

You don’t need to take away people’s freedom of speech. That’s already being done by Facebook employees who encourage bullying of anybody whom they think might support President Trump on any issue. Facebook is part of the problem. Their type of social engineering will only make matters worse.

There’s a cultural divide among Facebook employees that they take out on unsuspecting Facebook users.

Besides, people don’t usually mock those who were attacked. If that’s happening, it’s the NSA rearing their ugly social engineering heads in the wrong direction as usual.

The British will be the first ones out, trying to act like the world police. They need to stop instigating problems in other countries. They just can’t get that colonization bug out of their systems.

I can always tell who’s British on Facebook, no matter the colonized country they live in. They call everybody cunts and dicks.

Muslim, Jew, Christian. The axis of terror. Based on revenge.






 

Categories
EXPOSING THE BIAS

BIAS-FREE

BIAS-FREE

Machines have the same biases humans have.

Humans design the machines. Humans design the programs used on computers that provide automated services.

Just because an operating procedure or method is automated doesn’t mean it’s bias-free. It isn’t. Humans insert their biases into the programs.

Is bias-free the same as a lottery system? You have to do something to get into the lottery system in the first place, something that gets the individual or the group noticed and judged worthy enough to participate in the lottery.

This lottery system in a socio-political-economic sense refers to whatever an individual or group seeks and wants or wants more of.

For instance, if only first language Spanish-speaking people born in countries south of the USA border, or by individual countries south of the USA or island communities, or countries in any other continent are allowed legal entry into the USA, then at some point they had to petition for that lottery.

Nobody is going to be included in a lottery system who doesn’t want to be there. Or if by mistake they are included, then they would be given the opportunity to decline whatever it was being offered.

It is at the point of petition that biases are made, just as it is with machines and those who program them. Biases have been petitioned for insertion if they have made it all the way to the consideration process.

Then with the consideration process, comes more bias.

Even if you have a big jar with names in it, whereby the names pulled are by an automated random procedure, there had to be a process of bias to determine which names made it into the jar.

All names?

As many as were provided.

That’s it right there. ‘As many as were provided’, and of course we couldn’t fit them all, the program was designed for a ‘limited number of applicants’ – that’s another bias right there.

Well, we just got overwhelmed, we didn’t think so many would apply. So yes, we just put in as many as would fit, throwing our hands up into the air. It was chaotic in that lottery room.

Everybody is in the prejudicial box. It’s human nature to judge – everything, everybody, all the time.

When we decide who to discriminate against, by petitioning to insert biases, corruption enters the process of selection.

Then there is that question that nobody answers. Who are WE?

The ones who petition on behalf of the petitioners, the ones receiving the petitions and the ones forwarding the petitions.

You mean their names.

Well, could be anybody. Only insiders know and they are the ones who inform their constituencies. And as before, the constituencies have representatives with names only certain people know.

And, what process do these petitions go through along the way? Selection or rubber stamping.

Which Petitioner Representative gets a face-to-face meeting with members of the these socio-political-economic lotteries. And which don’t?

They’re not randomly selected, that’s for sure.

The conclusion drawn is that the socio-political-economic lottery system is filled with biases at every juncture.

When you insert the human factor into a lottery system, whereby the balls you’re picking are humanoids, it’s not the same as a money lottery.

There are always ways to fix the numbers (cook the books) when dealing with machines, and every state does it – legally of course. The laws that govern fixing odds or the equivalent are mostly out of view of the public.

Actually it’s easier than fixing a horse or dog race or sports game, because it’s always done to increase funds that go to the government. Of course they don’t call it ‘fixing’. They make laws that benefit themselves by claiming the laws reduce fraud from individuals.

It’s similar to Facebook, if you post more than a handful of posts in succession, they’ll tell you to slow down or be blocked for a period of time as punishment.

This happens to me often, since Facebook stopped automatically posting my posts from Word Press to my profile page.

They only post by automation to my Facebook business page. Everything else has to be manually posted. So, I wait a bit and do my manual posting all at once – which is more efficient for me, given I maintain eight websites, plus engage in social media, which invariably leads to warnings, then I stop. But then I also forget to get back to it, because I’m doing a zillion other things.

So my posting behavior is corrupted by Facebook, interrupting my free speech rights that they claim to support, based on their machines selecting me to be discriminated against, based on the biases of their programmers’ judgment on what constitutes a spammer. I’m not a spammer. Never have been, wouldn’t even know how to do it. Have no desire to do it.

Bias sounds like a more neutral word and process than prejudice, but it isn’t.

Machines are the middle man from the past. Everything goes through the middle person. There’s the maker of the product (programmer) the distributer of the product (machine) and the buyer of the product (you).

If you program a bias into a procedure the machine or procedure will produce a biased result.

Most biases in business are based on statistics. In trying to make one size fits all, you end up with a size that doesn’t fit anybody very well. ‘IT’LL DO’ is their statistic mantra. It’ll do us fine. We’ll make money on most people not being satisfied, but it’s not so bad. The outliers on the ends of the continuum, well that’s why we have disclaimer labels and instructions for dos and don’ts.

People want to buy and they want to buy cheap. There are so many odd sized humans all over the globe with odd sized multiple needs, that we have to settle.

Everybody settles to get their product out. Many settle too fast in order to beat the competition, but then they have to regroup and redesign a product that was released before it was fully developed.

Sometimes that works if a segment of buyers are forgiving, but just as many times they’re not forgiving until years later when they try the product again. Imagine the sales lost due to the premature release of a product?

I got side-tracked a little here on bias, since it just occurred to me that it is a gentler, kinder way of addressing what we all were created to do anyway: judge, judge and prejudge.

The word prejudice has become loaded and bogged down with everybody’s agendas, to the extent that it’s difficult to discuss its process or access its value in any given situation or condition.

There are values to some biases. Although there are also values to some prejudices; it has become impossible to discuss them without people going off the rails.

So I’m going to shelve prejudice for a while and focus on bias.






Categories
WW ESSAYS

Mark Zuckerberg CEO Of Facebook Justifies Peeping For Profit

Mark Zuckerberg Submits Opening Statement In Writing Prior To Testifying Before Congress…

…To the very members of congress who will be asking him questions regarding the illegal and immoral sharing of personal data of Facebook members.

How rigged is that?

The members of congress even told him what to say when he testifies.

How rigged is that?

I’m assuming here that many members of congress and their rich friends own stock in Facebook, thus should be recused from participating in and/or acting on behalf of their stockholders by watering down the gravity of Mark Zuckerberg’s offenses against members of Facebook who are led to believe that they have security and privacy, when they don’t.

Facebook sold that information. They made huge profits off of perversely peeping into the private messages of Facebook members. Mark Zuckerberg even knows which members he peeped on according to the nightly news reporting that Facebook would be notifying many millions of account holders that their private messages were compromised.

Intentionally compromised.

For Profit.

Tampering with the USA mail is a crime – a federal crime.

People don’t much send letters anymore. They rely on private services to communicate quicker and they are encouraged to do that.

We’re not talking hackers here.

We’re talking about the founder, CEO and Chairperson of Facebook himself who made these [what I call] criminal and immoral decisions for profit.

Full disclosure and transparency will never happen with Facebook as long as the CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is working the bowels of that ship.

Testifying before congress is a sham. Facebook’s stock tanked and the stockholders are going crazy losing all that money, so they want Zuckerberg to ease their money worries by apologizing to the victims of his peeping for profit scam.

Am I the only one who sees the corruption here? Zuckerberg acts like his form of corruption is necessary so poor people around the globe can gain access to his corrupt mail service.

Are you kidding? No one in impoverished nations is going to want to gain access to Facebook knowing they’ll be spied on and their personal data sold to the highest bidder as a common course of operating procedure.

All they’re going to do is try to sell you merchandise and services that you can’t afford anyway. But in addition, they’ll sell your privacy to anybody who has an interest in you.

Bad people…

…who will ruin your life if they choose, or hold over you for their own profit embarrassing stuff that no one has a right to know.

Before long people won’t feel at ease talking about personal issues in the privacy of their own homes.

Mark Zuckerberg over-bloats the importance of Facebook. He after all designed it by humiliating people. He’s a sociopath put in charge of your private messages and gloats about stealing and selling your private thoughts as a necessity.

He even now, while he’s supposedly under investigation, has gone so far up the pole that he wants you to start paying him for your privacy. Facebook just lost round about sixty-seven billion dollars in its stock value – a company that has essentially no overhead. How did they get that wealthy? He doesn’t manufacture a product. It’s all fluff. You can’t even contact Facebook when you have a complaint. Everything is done by automation.

What does his employees actually do, except spy on it’s members?

Now he wants you to pay him not to spy.

Just put your ads on Facebook. You don’t need to know what someone is saying to their friend. What, you think people private message about products for sale? They private message about private stuff. Private messages do not reflect nor predict buying habits. Stop with the lying and the insanity.

Zuckerberg’s net worth is 63.9 billion dollars. Again, what does he produce? What does he sell? How do you ship his product? What’s his overhead?

Facebook is one of the biggest scams of all time.

People lie on Facebook. They embellish just about everything – or just plain make stuff up. But somehow Mark Zuckerberg has convinced the advertising industry that they can take to the bank anything any Facebook member writes on Facebook – especially the private stuff…

…And he thinks it’s legal to tamper with people’s mail.

Peep for profit is evidently legal in the USA and congress evidently supports his actions – since they are treating him in a way that no other person being called to testify before congress would be treated, by allowing him free access to those individuals who will be questioning him before he’s questioned. The citizens of the world should have access to those conversations.

How rigged is that? Was there a court reporter present?

Does any truth come from anything as rigged as that?

Mark Zuckerberg Submits A Written Opening Statement And Conducts His Own Voir Dire (getting a feel for the people who will be judging him) Prior To Testifying Before Congress…

…To the very members of congress who will be asking him questions  and judging his actions regarding the illegal and immoral sharing of personal data of Facebook members.

Did he submit a notarized copy to congress?

In an opening statement each lawyer representing each client talks to the jury before witnesses actually take the stand. They are not held to the truth in any manner. They are allowed to omit, embellish, prejudice the jury members, say anything they want to say – and do.

So in absence of a trial, Mark Zuckerberg’s lawyers decided on a trial by public opinion, purposely designing it that way. They also, knowing they had the attention of the world, decided to tell the world of their plan to charge Facebook members for privacy. I guess now they’ll only sell private information of those who can’t afford to pay. So why again, does Madison Avenue want to sell products to those they know can’t afford to buy their product?

It’s a scam. Wake up FBI. WHAT ARE YOU DOING?

It’s all a game using people’s intellectual material as their own – to sell to other people who want it, who then pay for it. Anonymously of course. Except you. You’re not anonymous. And why should their ads pop up in your message box, which is the same as a mail box?

THEY SHOULD BE PAYING YOU.

Stealing your intellectual material is copyright infringement. Whatever you write is protected by law.

Nobody has a right to look at it unless you give them that right. Nobody has a right to steal your intellectual material. Nobody has a right to sell your intellectual material. Nobody has a right to pay for somebody else’s intellectual material that isn’t their’s to sell.

How can you believe that it’s only for advertising purposes, when the people doing it lied about everything else? They knew they were doing something illegal, that’s why they kept their actions private. It didn’t work though did it?

The world does not need Facebook. It’s filled with lies. Nothing gets looked at, liked or shared unless it’s outrageous, or manipulated. People have to invent, create outrageous. The CIA creates too many posts as social experiments at the expense of leaving real people’s posts out of your news feed. It’s basically government and Madison Avenue trying to amuse you or abuse you into toeing their lines or destroying individuals they don’t like.

Any time I want to learn about a product I see on television or elsewhere, I never go to the corresponding Facebook page. I go directly to their website. Facebook pages tell you very little about a product. They’re too manipulated by Facebook.

One must wonder about all those Facebook suicides and what roles the CIA played in creating the on-line environment that resulted in those tragic deaths.

FACEBOOK IS A SEWER that needs to be eliminated. It grew into a monster because it was created and designed by a monster.

Mark Zuckerberg should not be getting special privileges from congress.

Why all the privacy around a meeting with those who will be questioning and judging him?

Because the government is involved. Any time the government is involved, the government protects the government.

Why isn’t the USA government raiding the offices of Facebook and Zuckerberg and everybody else involved? Seems like they’re giving them time to hide their self-incriminating evidence.

How rigged is that?

Websites are free these days. Easier to use, fewer restrictions. More space to be creative. Fewer complications. Facebook Pages are dinosaurs that have become extinct. Facebook forced me to create a page even though I didn’t have a business. They locked me out of my account until I created one. There was no one I could complain to. Then they want to charge me 5$ for each post so more people would see it.

At 5$ a post x 7 websites (1 post per day) x 365 days in a year = 12,775$.

I tried it once. Out of over 3000 people who liked my page, it only reached something like 35 people. Most of my posts reach around 5-10 people. These posts don’t fly by themselves. They’re placed.

Who can afford it? Evidently big businesses. But does it work? Just because it lands in somebody’s feed doesn’t mean they’ll see it. They might scroll right by it. So then Facebook manipulates the scroll, to make you look.

Nobody likes being manipulated. They went too far too long and now they’re gone. It’s a waste of precious time for the sole purpose of making some sociopath so rich he thinks he controls the planet.






 

Categories
EXPOSING THE BIAS

FACEBOOK = mass incarceration of the collective mind

Limits people to 5000 friends, makes you ask to be a friend, rarely shows you what your friends are posting. With 4000 friends I should be seeing a whole lot of posts. Not so – hardly any. Repetitive posts through a 24 hour cycle and many times into the next day – the same ones? Too many ADS in my feed – more ADS than posts. Posts from people I have never ‘liked’ nor commented on appear in my feed incessantly, every time they post. That leads me to believe that they’re the CIA underground wanting to influence my views.

Nobody likes to be tricked. Once Zuckerberg let the CIA in the backdoor which he claims he doesn’t have the key to and in fact claims one doesn’t even exist, everything became fake, dishonest, generated for affect, purposely biased. One social experiment is one too many. Multiple social experiments are an abomination.

Hitler resurfaces as Facebook’s Dinosaur.

Facebook is going the way of magazines. Too many ADS. They pushed the limit over the limit and died falling from the weight of their own Madison Avenue Mania Mistakes.

Nobody gets excited over dinosaurs or Hitler or mass incarceration of the collective mind or Madison Avenue generated ADS which deceive and they all do.

They sensed something was awry and it made them uncomfortable. They didn’t even know why, but they don’t like Facebook anymore. So rather than be uncomfortable, they left for something that made them feel better about themselves.

Facebook is too manipulative in my view. Too demeaning, humiliating, too aggressive, too many trolls out to ruin your day, maybe even life. Too much con. Too much punching. It’s a by-product of a terror organization whose members kill their own families. So take your billions Mark Zuckerberg and do something productive absent the humiliation and terror factors, ’cause you’re OUTTA HERE. You lost your moral compass and now the world doesn’t want you.

Antifa365 went on vacation.

Antifa supports mass incarceration of the mind, enslavement, torture and slaughter of the body and the mind to achieve their dictatorial ends: the laws of anarchy put forth as the free exercise of personal/private judgment as the birth-right of all individuals.

Thou shall not be judged is their first commandment, except where and when it infringes on an individual’s right to self-rule. Their punishment could be anything – ruin your life, body, mind, maybe all three. It’s a violent ideology that keeps as a person’s birth-right the option to steal, rape, kill – or any number of disgusting behaviors a person at any given moment might engage in – with impunity.

The Law Of The Jungle is my-take-away from it all. No prisons. Walls everywhere so you and your family can sleep with both eyes closed, ’cause there’s nothing we the people can use to protect ourselves, but a wall.

https://theanimal-freechef.com/2017/07/29/stop-investing-in-facebook/






 

Categories
MUSCULAR VIEWS

Correlational Behavior

Some things you can have both ways, but most things you can’t.

If there is a correlation between ads bought by Russian entities in favor of each candidate for president and Hillary Clinton losing the election, then there is a correlation between violent movies, violent songs and violent behavior.

Monkey see monkey do.

Remember, don’t disrespect the monkey.






 

Categories
COMPLAININ' WALL

PEOPLE-EATING PEOPLE

What’s wrong with people?

I live in a gay area, a Muslim area, an Irish, black, Hispanic area and on and on.

I hear gays (men and women) using the ‘C’ word like they use any other word in their vocabulary – like most people say shit or damn or fuck you. If they’re mad at you or anybody or anything, you’re a cunt, they’re a cunt, it’s a cunt.

I’ve been called a cunt on Facebook, mostly by other women, by so-called friends who ask for my friendship, then the first time I say something they don’t agree with, it’s “you’re a cunt”. And if they really want to stab you harder, they say your name. “Sharon, you are a cunt”.

These aren’t democrats or republicans or libertarians or atheists or orthodox people. These aren’t red state, blue state, any color state people. These are people-eating people within all races, genders, ethnicities, groups, nations, institutions, religions, schools. They’re not above ground, below ground, walk on water, soil-sniffing degenerates, they’re you, your family (even if your family is only in your mind), your friends (even if only in your dreams), your associates. That’s it!

Common Ground. You nailed it yourself by your own actions and reactions. Common Ground: We have that in spades. Look at it. Look at your ugly. It’s there. How come I can see it? Because my ugly sees your ugly.

Gotcha once, gotcha twice. Watch out for thrice. Three won’t be so conciliatory and friendly to all humans who slaughter all other species in a common ground name.

Told ya. I’d get the animals in on this parade. See how it’s done without malice?

Fill in the blank – in your mind, not out loud.

Cunt is the new bad word everybody is using to offend half the human race – even women are using it against women. And they enjoy using it – strange as that may sound.

It’s ugly. Prejudice, when used to demean, always is.

People-eaters. They want to eat you alive. Chew you up and spit you out. Tear you to shreds, cut you to pieces, rip you to ribbons,  from limb to limb, beat you to a pulp, set you on fire, then refuse to piss on you.

People-eating people. That’s the ugly in you.

The other ugly, that people-eating people proudly display, is taking down the weak and celebrating the enslavement, torture and slaughter of a defenseless creature – for pleasure, sport, food, need a new coat, pair of shoes, I think I want that cow’s hide on my car seats type of people.

Those animals are cunts to those who murder and eat them. Careful with that word and where it might lead – down the road toward your next ugly adventure as you search for common ground.






Categories
CORE STORIES

THE HUMANITY IN OTHER ANIMALS

When I first joined Facebook, being the animal rights activist I am, I saw a lot of slaughter photos/videos, posted by the friends I had on Facebook who were animal rights activists trying to educate the populace to the horrors of enslavement, torture and slaughter.

I wasn’t, however, accustomed to seeing up front and personal the actual physical reality of it, even though I had already written about it from the resource of my mind’s eye – knowing logically what happened through the process of enslavement, torture and slaughter. As it turned out I was accurate in my writing of what I saw – without physically seeing it.

I viewed EARTHLINGS, but when it came to skinning an animal alive, well, I couldn’t go there, yet.

I eventually did, when recently a video on my Facebook news feed. It was a short video, and as I clicked it on I talked to my personal God to help me see it, to help me view what to me was the most horrific torture any being could ever experience. It was not easy, but I knew I had to do it.

My God did that for me – even though It didn’t have to, since I already knew, and It already knew that I knew. Still…my personal God kept me quiet and helped me keep my eyes open as I kept saying ‘help me do this’.

When it was over, it didn’t change anything about me, except that I had the courage to finally view that which before I could not.

What I’ve seen on Facebook recently is a shift from ‘all slaughter photos and videos all the time’, to an insertion of saved animals, happy stories of people with their family animals enjoying life. Videos of animals showing compassion toward other animals. Animals grieving when their babies were ripped from them. Animals loving other species – playing with them with carefree delight.  Funny videos. Sweet videos. Angry animals standing up to their aggressors…and on and on.

“I believe that in many instances other species are more humane than humans, and those videos have shown that to me and to the world.”

I don’t know how that shift happened, that videos/photos on Facebook are now showing the humanity of other species, but I know that it is both appropriate and true.

So, to all those participating in that effort, to show the horror and the humanity – of other animals, I say thank you.

Thank you forever.

~ Sharon Davies-Tight






 

Categories
WW ESSAYS

THE DEMISE OF FACEBOOK

THE DEMISE OF FACEBOOK just became more probable. Recent study. Government is trying to undermine Facebook claiming that a person’s Facebook ‘likes’ can determine a person’s sexual orientation and emotional/mental stability. That’s an effective way to make people stop liking other people’s Facebook pages, comments and photos, which is what advertisers rely on to sell their products.

Advertisers can’t be too happy about this government funded research looking for mentally ill gay people by analyzing Facebook users’ ‘likes’. It’s a mean spirited ‘study’ to be sure, but isn’t that how Mark Zuckerburg (sp.) built his Facebook empire by being mean?…

People will stop ‘liking’ stuff on Facebook, which will reduce interaction among users (the focus of Facebook’s purpose of connecting people), thus reduce participation–thus the global demise of Facebook as we know it. If nobody is liking what anyone is posting, people will lose interest in posting, because liking something is what ultimately keeps us connected.

In fact, the government study driven more by vengeance than a desire to understand advertising as it relates to Facebook, left out a key variable: people will say they like anything, just so they’ll get a lot of stuff on their news feed from all of their friends. If you don’t participate by liking and commenting, you’re out of the loop and nobody shows up on your  feed.

Advertisers can’t really predict what Facebook users want to buy, precisely because they say they like things they really don’t, or even if they like something, they wouldn’t go out and buy it. Also what advertisers missed: just because you support gay rights, doesn’t make you gay, just because you support anybody’s rights or anybody’s cause doesn’t make you them. Because I support the rights of autistic children doesn’t make me autistic. Many men espouse strong anti-abortion feelings and beliefs, yet they’ve never had an abortion. Same is so for women. Being anti-death penalty doesn’t mean a person supports people killing each other in a lawless society. Because someone supports prisoners rights doesn’t make them a criminal. Because someone supports the rights of the mentally ill, doesn’t make them mentally ill.

The advertising industry isn’t doing a very good job at convincing people to buy products they don’t want. Why not sell products people want and you won’t have to do all this inappropriate and inaccurate labeling of Facebook people as payback to Mark Zuckerburg. Keep your private wars private and keep Facebook users out of the mean stream.