This post has been banned by Facebook for hate speech

Banned Post:

Laws People Think Are Theirs’ To Break Are Major Ones

 

Blacks and Hispanics force white people to fight their battles for them. They do it with their dogs and gamecocks too – force them to fight, for the purpose of monetary gain. It’s always about the money.

Blacks and Browns like to watch people and other animals tear each other apart in an arena they control. There is no exit plan for the fighters. They’re put into the ring to fight or die. They know they’re going to die, if not this fight the next one.

Fifty states outlaw the brutal blood sport. But so do they outlaw slavery and trafficking of children for sex.

Blacks and Browns treat white people like their dogs and gamecocks.

Do you know how many white people died or sacrificed everything but their lives to help black Africans gain their freedom from slavery and then supported their efforts to achieve equality? Too many to count?

Yet nowhere during black history month is their sacrifice acknowledged. Now that is an ungrateful demographic of people who are too smug to say thank you for your service to freedom. Yet, the outspoken members of Black Lives Matter Terrorist group admonished the president of the United States for not saying enough about black history during black history month.

An apology for your lapse in etiquette would be appropriate. A sincere recognition and appreciation for white people’s contribution to the abolishment of slavery is in order. If tables were turned as they are in other countries, black Africans would not risk it all to free whites enslaved by blacks. That’s black supremacy in play.

Now who comes knocking again, this time to force white people, through humiliation and life-ruining war tactics, to fight for their causes? Blacks again. Oh yeah, and Browns.

Really, how rude – and selfish. Isn’t the mass exploitation of any race by another race illegal? It should be.

The laws people break as their right are not only the petty theft or grand theft laws, or cheating the social service system, traffic violations, assault, they’re the big laws, the ones outlawing grotesque, despicable behaviors.

Those are theirs to break is their answer proved by their actions which facilitate the practices. They say they don’t support it, but they do nothing to stop it when it happens within their own race in their own neighborhoods. Turning a blind eye = facilitation.

They force white people to politick for new laws and/or to change policy regarding the enforcement of existing laws that favor them financially, rather than do it themselves, which indicates they want white people to think and act for them. But they want to lead.

What kind of people do that? Dictators. Despots. Oppressors. Kings. Queens.





Recently Removed for Community Standards Violations

See recent content that was removed for going against some types of Community Standards. Pages that repeatedly post content that doesn’t follow the Community Standards could be unpublished.

Your post goes against our Community Standards on hate speech.

5 days ago

See details

This post isn’t available right now. Visit the community standards to learn more about what is and isn’t allowed on Facebook.



Note: 5 days ago somebody at Facebook flagged the above post accusing me of using hate speech, which is a hate crime, and not acceptable on Facebook.

Facebook gave me two options: accept their determination or appeal it by requesting that someone review it. The post would still appear on my Facebook page, but only I could see it.

I appealed Facebook’s decision by clicking a box and haven’t heard back, except that now I noticed it’s been banned and they removed the post altogether, saying it no longer is available (my own post).


a little bit of history:

On 25 Aug. 2016:

Facebook just forced me to set up a Facebook page claiming that I was misrepresenting myself on my profile. That I really was a business.

“Keep Growing with a Facebook Page

It looks like you’re using your personal Facebook profile to represent an organization, business, brand or public figure. It’s against the Facebook Terms to use your personal account to represent something other than yourself. In order to follow the Facebook Terms, you should create a Page based on your profile.”

I had no choice. They locked me out of my Facebook account.

I’m a home chef. I’m not a business nor a public figure, nor do I represent an organization. I am an artist, author and animal-free chef. That’s all that I am. And all that I do I share for free with the world. For Facebook to claim that I am representing something other than myself is libelous.

I feel like I’m being enslaved. I guess this way my posts can’t reach anybody.




back to the present:

Well, if they libel you once, they’ll libel you twice.

I’ve been censored in a country that advocates free speech as a cornerstone of its constitution. Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are responsible for that breakdown in social media culture.

According to Facebook, when the truth becomes uncomfortable, it gets dumped into Facebook’s hate speech and hate crime category, and censorship thus the denial of one’s constitutional protections are the result. It’s because I’m white and being white is not popular right now.

Facebook discriminated against me as a white animal rights person.

Facebook should accept that there are multiple points of views on all topics, not just the views of minorities that matter – and not just the views that make certain demographics feel good about themselves. Perhaps if the CIA working the bowels of Facebook stopped social-engineering everybody, people would feel more free to voice those views, and it wouldn’t seem so startling when someone like myself has the courage to expose and face  uncomfortable truths in a direct, non-manipulative and malice-free way.

The only hate in the post is the strategy used by blacks and browns to make humans and animals fight for them when they don’t want to. They do it by using hurtful and aggressive coercive means – horrible name-calling all over Facebook and the ruining of peoples careers thus lives, and by ruining the lives of the other animals they force to fight.

A British gal once remarked on a bullfighting post of mine that I can’t single out a particular group for animal abuse, since all groups on earth participate.

Although it is true that all cultures abuse other species in grotesque ways, not to call out individual cultures or individuals on those atrocities for fear of hurting their feelings, since everybody does it, results in the acceptance of the behavior.

And nothing ever gets done about it. Nothing changes. One can’t change behavior by accepting as normal what everybody does, when it involves committing atrocities against other creatures.

So no I don’t agree with the British woman who tried to negate the effectiveness of that particular post by claiming me to be discriminating against the Spanish people. The real discrimination was against the bulls but no one wanted to see that truth or the truth of the cause of inaction being normalizing behavior that everybody participates in.

I will not back down on this post. My civil rights have been violated by Facebook in defense of cultures and peoples who commit atrocities against innocent creatures for pleasure and monetary gain.

This same pattern of behavior runs over into the treatment of humans they regard as inferior to them, people they can intimidate into fighting for their causes by using humiliation, aggression and career-destruction tactics – as a means to instill terror into the hearts and minds of the white populace.

We all deserve rights. Forcing people to fight for your causes out of fear of having your life destroyed if you don’t is not one of those rights. Exploitation and extortion is not acceptable and should be against the law.

Facebook committed a hate crime against me, and sought to intentionally ruin my reputation as a writer and an artist, by posting on my Facebook page that I published material that was judged by Facebook to be hate speech.

They also disengaged my connection between Word Press and the above referenced Facebook page without telling me.



PayPal-ME-300x300.jpg






 

BIAS-FREE

BIAS-FREE

Machines have the same biases humans have.

Humans design the machines. Humans design the programs used on computers that provide automated services.

Just because an operating procedure or method is automated doesn’t mean it’s bias-free. It isn’t. Humans insert their biases into the programs.

Is bias-free the same as a lottery system? You have to do something to get into the lottery system in the first place, something that gets the individual or the group noticed and judged worthy enough to participate in the lottery.

This lottery system in a socio-political-economic sense refers to whatever an individual or group seeks and wants or wants more of.

For instance, if only first language Spanish-speaking people born in countries south of the USA border, or by individual countries south of the USA or island communities, or countries in any other continent are allowed legal entry into the USA, then at some point they had to petition for that lottery.

Nobody is going to be included in a lottery system who doesn’t want to be there. Or if by mistake they are included, then they would be given the opportunity to decline whatever it was being offered.

It is at the point of petition that biases are made, just as it is with machines and those who program them. Biases have been petitioned for insertion if they have made it all the way to the consideration process.

Then with the consideration process, comes more bias.

Even if you have a big jar with names in it, whereby the names pulled are by an automated random procedure, there had to be a process of bias to determine which names made it into the jar.

All names?

As many as were provided.

That’s it right there. ‘As many as were provided’, and of course we couldn’t fit them all, the program was designed for a ‘limited number of applicants’ – that’s another bias right there.

Well, we just got overwhelmed, we didn’t think so many would apply. So yes, we just put in as many as would fit, throwing our hands up into the air. It was chaotic in that lottery room.

Everybody is in the prejudicial box. It’s human nature to judge – everything, everybody, all the time.

When we decide who to discriminate against, by petitioning to insert biases, corruption enters the process of selection.

Then there is that question that nobody answers. Who are WE?

The ones who petition on behalf of the petitioners, the ones receiving the petitions and the ones forwarding the petitions.

You mean their names.

Well, could be anybody. Only insiders know and they are the ones who inform their constituencies. And as before, the constituencies have representatives with names only certain people know.

And, what process do these petitions go through along the way? Selection or rubber stamping.

Which Petitioner Representative gets a face-to-face meeting with members of the these socio-political-economic lotteries. And which don’t?

They’re not randomly selected, that’s for sure.

The conclusion drawn is that the socio-political-economic lottery system is filled with biases at every juncture.

When you insert the human factor into a lottery system, whereby the balls you’re picking are humanoids, it’s not the same as a money lottery.

There are always ways to fix the numbers (cook the books) when dealing with machines, and every state does it – legally of course. The laws that govern fixing odds or the equivalent are mostly out of view of the public.

Actually it’s easier than fixing a horse or dog race or sports game, because it’s always done to increase funds that go to the government. Of course they don’t call it ‘fixing’. They make laws that benefit themselves by claiming the laws reduce fraud from individuals.

It’s similar to Facebook, if you post more than a handful of posts in succession, they’ll tell you to slow down or be blocked for a period of time as punishment.

This happens to me often, since Facebook stopped automatically posting my posts from Word Press to my profile page.

They only post by automation to my Facebook business page. Everything else has to be manually posted. So, I wait a bit and do my manual posting all at once – which is more efficient for me, given I maintain eight websites, plus engage in social media, which invariably leads to warnings, then I stop. But then I also forget to get back to it, because I’m doing a zillion other things.

So my posting behavior is corrupted by Facebook, interrupting my free speech rights that they claim to support, based on their machines selecting me to be discriminated against, based on the biases of their programmers’ judgment on what constitutes a spammer. I’m not a spammer. Never have been, wouldn’t even know how to do it. Have no desire to do it.

Bias sounds like a more neutral word and process than prejudice, but it isn’t.

Machines are the middle man from the past. Everything goes through the middle person. There’s the maker of the product (programmer) the distributer of the product (machine) and the buyer of the product (you).

If you program a bias into a procedure the machine or procedure will produce a biased result.

Most biases in business are based on statistics. In trying to make one size fits all, you end up with a size that doesn’t fit anybody very well. ‘IT’LL DO’ is their statistic mantra. It’ll do us fine. We’ll make money on most people not being satisfied, but it’s not so bad. The outliers on the ends of the continuum, well that’s why we have disclaimer labels and instructions for dos and don’ts.

People want to buy and they want to buy cheap. There are so many odd sized humans all over the globe with odd sized multiple needs, that we have to settle.

Everybody settles to get their product out. Many settle too fast in order to beat the competition, but then they have to regroup and redesign a product that was released before it was fully developed.

Sometimes that works if a segment of buyers are forgiving, but just as many times they’re not forgiving until years later when they try the product again. Imagine the sales lost due to the premature release of a product?

I got side-tracked a little here on bias, since it just occurred to me that it is a gentler, kinder way of addressing what we all were created to do anyway: judge, judge and prejudge.

The word prejudice has become loaded and bogged down with everybody’s agendas, to the extent that it’s difficult to discuss its process or access its value in any given situation or condition.

There are values to some biases. Although there are also values to some prejudices; it has become impossible to discuss them without people going off the rails.

So I’m going to shelve prejudice for a while and focus on bias.






Clean Up Your Culture

Mouthing off isn’t freedom of speech. It’s incitement.

I never witnessed a white person taunting or in any way disrespecting or abusing a black person. Neither have I ever witnessed a black person standing, sitting, kneeling or running in fear of a white person. I lived in many places among many cultures.

Black Lives talking heads are all over T.V. crying and screaming about being abused by white people. Rich football players are standing up to these so-called abusers of black people who come to watch their football games, wanting them to feel the pain of being abused, by ‘taking a knee’ to them or raising clenched fists to signal battle preparedness.

It appears that black people don’t like being pulled over by police officers for broken tail lights, or for swerving when driving, speeding, running red lights or stop signs, driving on sidewalks, driving without a license, registration or insurance etc. They apparently think it’s okay to drive drunk or drugged. Then they mouth off, deny and negotiate when stopped, which rarely leads to a good place.

You’re not supposed to negotiate with a police officer or argue your case. That’s for the courtroom. In our apartment lease it states that a tenant can be evicted for being argumentative. It’s new – an addendum. Seems there must have been a lot of so-called negotiating going on in the building regarding violations to the lease. Yet, Black Lives think it doesn’t apply to them.

What part of ‘follow instructions’ do black people not understand? Is this all blacks, or some blacks or a certain nationality of blacks or a particular intelligence level of blacks or a specific socio-economic group of blacks?

Black Lives talking heads on T.V. are inciting white people by screaming, using exaggerated face, hand and arm movements. They either speak too loudly and rapidly or too loudly, distinctly and slowly to make their exaggerated claims of abuse against them by white people, which heightens a person’s anxiety thus fear level, of whoever happens to be watching it. And it’s intentional.

A Black Lives talking head on the Tucker Carlson show on T.V. became ecstatic when he expressed feeling fear when the NFL Green Bay Packers ‘took a knee’ on the football field during the singing of the National Anthem in response to President Trump calling those who disrespected the flag and the National Anthem son of a bitches.

She even made him repeat it, so she could enjoy his fear a little longer while her eyes glistened with perverse pleasure at seeing someone afraid, then closed the deal she was somehow making with her devil by saying very slowly and distinctly and measured and long and drawn out, “now you know how we feel”.

For some odd reason I’m beginning to think that blacks have isolated themselves from anything white for so long, that they actually think white people don’t feel pain or suffer or have problems, or that they’re all rich and privileged. I also find it odd that they seem to be pitting the poor black man against the rich white man in all of their discussions on race.

So the goal here is to make white people fear black people as well as to fear the disenfranchised white people who have answered Black Lives call to arm. I feared too, when the Green Bay Packers ‘took a knee’ in front of the entire world to disrespect the country that made them rich. They did it in such a slow, intense, angry way, and then the way the camera panned for greatest effect enhanced the fear.

If they had been a bunch of golfers or tennis players nobody would have felt fear, but these guys are killing machines by the sheer build of their bodies via training and growth  hormone supplementation. That display of force on the field was specifically engineered to elicit fear and provoke a response. Nobody who pays to see a football game wants to be made fearful by the players.

President Trump responded appropriately to that fear by calling them sons of bitches. Fear mongers do not belong on a football field, in a place of entertainment, with children. Long ago I wrote that it was okay to call a terrorist a disparaging name. Name-calling isn’t usually my mode of communication. However, I join President Trump’s peaceful response to the terror I know he felt too as he witnessed that display of force week after week by a bunch of killing machines hijacking the media from a sports stadium to send a signal of battle preparedness around the globe.

Simultaneous. There is nothing more powerful than that. And frightening.

So what do you call these killing machines that hijack a stadium and the media to send a terror message simultaneously around the globe disrespecting the country that made them rich?

I call them sons-of-mothers-without-manners. Don’t disrespect the dog. It’s time to clean up your culture by acting civilized. Stop punching your girlfriends, wives, children, dogs. Tame your own rage. We’re not going to feed you any more white people to satisfy your cannibalistic politics. Go to the library and take out a book on manners.

Blacks do not fear whites. Whites already fear blacks. You accomplished that – for decades now – by burning cities – villages they call them in Africa. The purpose is to terrorize the people or simply wipe them all out. If you keep abusing white people, they will eventually pop. And you already showed them what to do and how to do it.

Clean up Chicago. That’s your job. You created that hell.

When in America, one must obey the laws in America. It concerns me that black leaders tell black ministers to tell their congregations to run when confronted by police, knowing full well that they’ll be shot. Getting shot and probably killed while unarmed has become Black Live’s method of raising socio-economic discrepancies between races. Human shields Israel would call them when referring to the Palestinians.

It’s always between poor blacks and rich whites – the injustices they cite. How about between rich blacks and poor blacks? That doesn’t count? There’s no discrepancy there?

Don’t make the mistake of thinking that because the world mostly sides with Palestine, that they will continue to do so absent any contribution by the Palestinians. The Puerto Ricans tried that trick, wanting the USA do all the work, while contributing nothing to the process of recovery after being hit with two hurricanes.

The world is quickly losing patience with the Palestinians who dig their heels in, and contribute nothing to the peace process. Continually making a group of people fear you, will result in the last-straw bomb-dropping method of solving a problem that could have been solved, had one party been more willing to find a solution. Chicago is nearing that point.

The world will not side with American blacks who have it all. You should have made your cause about peaceful blacks, instead of going the criminal route using the quick Nigerian scam route of hijacking stadiums and media outlets. Everybody sees right through it. Don’t think because you’re given your fifteen minutes of fame on all those 24/7 news shows that you’re winning something by terrorizing a nation.

You’re losing. Terrorists always lose.

When I’m stopped by the police, I don’t talk. I do whatever they ask. I answer only the question. I look straight ahead. I don’t try to engage them for the purpose of getting away with whatever they pulled me over for.

When blacks start mouthing off or talking rapidly when confronted by police, it signals guilt. Just accept the ticket. If you were right and the officer wrong, take it to court. That’s the process in America. With all the supposed contact by police that blacks claim to have, they should know that. You can’t short-cut the law. You can’t flail your arms, bug your eyes, get in the officer’s face, show your teeth and not expect the officer to instinctively go into self-defense mode.

They’re not robots. They’re feeling, thinking human beings with families who are not breaking the law by the way. They’re not pigs. They’re human first. It is not their job to babysit your kids or you. They were not put on this earth to sacrifice their life for an out of control black person who still after all this time doesn’t know how to follow instructions.

This whole thing about comparing rich white people who get off for the same crimes that poor blacks go to jail for is getting old. Rich blacks get off all the time. It’s not about race. It’s about money. Hey, if you can’t pay the fine, don’t do the crime.

Try policing yourselves. See how that goes.

Clean up your culture, then clean up Chicago.

All cultures need a major culture cleaning. An overhaul. Throw out what no longer works. Stop clinging to the past that does not exist. There is no legacy. You make your own future. It is not my job nor my place to live your life. Live it yourself.

That whole thing about the legacy of slavery is something that white government people made up to satisfy blacks in the short-term. Africans invented slavery. All cultures participated by stealing people outside of their tribes and making them subservient. Slavery exists all over the globe, and in America too. Ask all those rich, privileged ball players how many times they entertained themselves with human sex slaves – underage human sex slaves.

Like I said, clean up your culture. White people are going to be dropping bombs where black people and sympathetic white people gather, just like blacks did to them. Burn cities. You taught them how to do it.

Antifa (anti-facsist) people advocating violence to suppress free speech don’t have a clue  as to what they’re up against. To say on one hand that you’re against dictatorial-styled governments, then on the other hand that you advocate silencing the voice of opposition makes no sense whatsoever.

Antifa appears to be advocating for communism or Islam or socialism or bits of all three. They don’t even know. They tell you what candidate to vote for – like Michelle Obama did to women.

This era is starting to resemble the 1970’s only the social causes are to suppress free speech and open the gates to the prisons. Guess we’ll see how that goes.

New phrase: culture cleaning

Remember: No prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter. One leads to the other if left unchecked.

Nobody can eliminate prejudice from somebody else. It comes from within. Prejudice is normal until you start to discriminate unjustly. Hey, if you’re not qualified for the job and somebody else is, it’s the qualified person the job needs to go to.






 

THE SACRIFICE OF FREE SPEECH

There are some things that I cannot say and expect to live. That’s the country I live in.

Free speech isn’t free.

It costs – sometimes a lot.

Free speech according to norms set by the government is free and encouraged. Anything deviating from governmental norms is not free. It will cost you.

In America, anyone serving in the military who gets captured by the entity that America is warring against is automatically called a hero. If any American has a contrary opinion, and speaks freely that opinion – while debating themselves out loud about it – it will cost them.

So free speech is not always free.

If an American openly criticizes a federal judge, same thing, it will cost them. You won’t go to jail, but you will be scourged, humiliated and denied services that any other free American would not be denied. You may be audited by the IRS or a number of other choice moves the government makes to bring you back into line with governmental norms.

America prides itself on free speech. An American can criticize the president and not go to jail, as would happen to a citizen of Jordan who criticized the king. The American government instead sends you to a jail of a different design. One where people who work in the underworld shadows will be assigned to make your life a living hell, while keeping the government above the fray of that deceit.

It’s not against the law to criticize a president, a judge or a captured military person, but it is against governmental norms, and you will pay the price.

In other words, getting even is their mantra. They don’t have to make it illegal – they work behind the scenes to punish you for stepping beyond the boundaries they set for you.

The only people who can do it and get away with it are hired talking heads, and the only place where it is allowed is on television. They do it, supposedly on behalf of the populace, acting as puppets for governmental forces talking into their ear pieces telling them what to say, how to say it and when to say it to the throngs watching them on the screen.

The purpose is for the throngs to vicariously experience emotions regarding issues the populace cares about.

Airing those emotions through human puppets, so you don’t go out and kill somebody over the issue – because you don’t have an outlet for your frustration – and so that you will eventually align yourself with governmental views is the goal of the government via these hired, well-educated actors. Some work full time, others act as contributors. Lots of lawyers, lots of former prosecutors. Some former judges.

My kingdom for yours? I don’t see where they are much different. Go to jail or have your life ruined. It’s all based on dictatorial forces – the dictator vs the dictatorial group.

How we’re perceived by the rest of the world is the concern. We’re told not to care what the neighbors think, but our government cares what other countries think, and will sacrifice your rights by skewing that innocent, honest thought into a dishonest but favorable light.






 

YOUR RIGHT TO KILL WITH FREE SPEECH

TO THOSE WHO SEEK DEATH & REVENGE UNDER THE CLOAK OF FREE SPEECH:

No one is more expert at exacting revenge, inciting violence and killing through words than a satirist.

Words kill. Remember that the next time you humiliate somebody in public. When a cartoonist has to have ‘protection’ so that he can kill with the pencil, instead of the sword, something has gone awry with what our freedom to speak really means.

Don’t call for help, and make somebody else put their life on the line for you (possibly to get killed so that you can live), when you knowing and willingly put yourself in harms way to make a point that satisfies only your ego and selling a lot of newspapers/magazines, or gets you a lot of views/hits/likes/shares on websites or social media.

When you use your pen, pencil, paint brush or typewriter as a weapon for the purpose of killing, and you call it your right to free speech, then you might as well have a gun and pull the trigger, because the result is the same.

Whatever happened to the caricature – a long-lost more subtle approach to satirizing world leaders and events? When did cartoons become actual weapons of international warfare? Free speech? No, that’s not free speech, that’s free to kill, incite, and exact revenge with impunity, under the cloak of freedom rights, which has broad implications, whereby limiting one segment of free speech, could adversely affect all of what’s protected under the statute.

There’s such a thing as personal censorship. When you need to kill or destroy somebody in your thoughts, that’s not the time you should be writing or otherwise expressing your art. Take a time out and think about the innocent people who will suffer because of your need to do harm to whomever you think is the bad guy in the world.

Don’t blame the people who react, when that reaction is what you seek.