Side Effects Of Overusing Words

Watering down prejudice and discrimination via name-calling. There’s a side effect aka adverse reaction to overusing words to describe objectionable behavior or to accuse people of certain objectionable behaviors. The professional media, as well as trolls of social media, are actually desensitizing the world to prejudice and discrimination by calling out everybody under the sun, more particularly half the human race, depending on which side of the fence you stand, for thinking and/or acting in a prejudicial and/or discriminatory way. Racist, misogynist, sexist, anti-gay, bigot, homophobe, ageist, including body-shaming and shaming of all types and on and on.

Obsessive name-calling has become the standard response to being criticized. It’s not just one name, it’s a whole barrel of names delivered shotgun-style to anyone whose opinions someone else doesn’t share. At some point, and we’ve probably reached that point, everyone gets hit or verbally beaten up by someone for having a view somebody else doesn’t like. Rather than address the issue, it’s a lot easier to shoot somebody with a bunch of names to discredit their entire being and entire lives and everything about them. Talk about overkill. Well, actually nobody is recognizing the effect of the overkill. Not yet.

Eventually, those words will lose their sting. The strategy of repeating the same word over and over, trying to shut someone down from speaking their view will eventually shut the person down who’s using it for being over-bearing and manipulative,

Okay, so it all got tossed up into the air – this new way of communicating one’s mind. Now as it settles think about how to renegotiate with yourself to communicate more effectively – the type of communication that produces results. Right now, everybody is on the negative side of the scale. They’re acting like the world is going to end tomorrow and they have to fix their lives right now. Well, if the world is going to end tomorrow, then why bother?

Focus on that urgency and break that down into smaller components.

WHY is Donald Trump the target of everyone’s obsession; think why only one person? Why do we think he can fix whatever happens in the world? Be honest. You wouldn’t be screaming at him if you thought anybody else had the answers, or the power or the will or the flexibility that you obviously think he has. That’s a huge tell, right there.

Nobody is going after any congressperson or governor or senator or mayor or otherwise public figure. Maybe you have unrealistic expectations and that’s what’s making you all insane. Who else is there? If Hillary or Barak had any answers, don’t you think the responsible thing would be to circulate their solutions in detail to the populace? They know all the questions. Yet they don’t provide the answers. They want you to put them back in power or someone like them before they’ll help you with your social issues. What is that strategy all about? Getting elected. Period. They don’t have any answers, that’s why they can’t share them with the populace. They were already in office and they didn’t have the answers then.

Hey, they say they couldn’t get it done. That’s a defeatist attitude. What they want is for the Republicans to all become Democrats, so they can all agree on what the Democrats want. But the Democrats don’t know what they want; that’s why they always delay. Big business writes the proposals, the bills, the laws. They’re like the pharmaceutical industry. They send out sales reps to all doctor offices and hospitals and clinics to sell a product after it’s been developed, tell the doctor the main benefits, side effects, offer a few personal perks, then they leave and the doctor/hospital/clinic passes it all on to the patient/consumer – except for the perks of course.

The populace intuitively knows that Donald Trump is the only answer. There is nobody any better on the horizon. The USA government is sorely lacking in effective negotiators.

Go ahead, ask Hillary for a detailed solution. Ask any person from any party for a detailed solution to any problem that exists – then and now. You will not get an answer that’s responsive to the question asked. You’ll get political posturing.

Work with that knowledge for a while, then regroup.






 

Advertisements

Free Press – A Strategy

Some people are using racial, ethnic and gender slurs to get free press. “Any press is good press”. Keeps the person’s name current. It’s so funny to see all these people apologizing in public just to keep their names in lights.

Most of the people whose careers were ruined for saying or doing something unsavory wanted out of their contracts. Another coup!

So many people have been called racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, child molester/pedophile, retard, whitey, cracker, white boy, white trash, nigger, spic, gringo, terrorist, pussies, dicks, pricks, cunts, sluts, asswipes, bitches, towel heads, Hitler, that the terms lost their sting already.

Nobody even cares about nigger anymore. There’s something about calling yourself, your family and friends a racial slur that turns white people off. Black people in Cleveland do it ad nauseam. It’s like they don’t know any other word. Wherever they gather, you hear that word more than any other. If they had to not say it, I think there wouldn’t be much else said. It has about a thousand uses.

Nazi? Really? Okay, I used it – once publicly. At a fur store protesting skinning animals alive. Weiss Furrier.

The Holocaust against all non-human animals is the longest-running mass murder operation and most globally destructive force executed on a daily basis that forms the economic foundations of all countries. That will end.

And when it does who’s going to be there who can truthfully say, “I was with you all along. Every day in every way known to me I was there.” Can you say that? You who fault everybody else for not stepping up and stepping in to stop the Holocaust in Europe. You blame them to this day. Well, don’t think the souls of the ones you ate won’t remember. ‘Everybody else was doing it’ is not justification for joining in and continuing the Holocaust. The world won’t excuse you, because they think you of all people should have led the way, knowing what it was like. There is a moral equivalency there and I know that you know that’s accurate.

If you’re going to make a production and a strategy out of name-calling or restricting word usage by some people and not others, then you need to resign yourselves to living in a chaotic place. It’s best not to engage, but it beats pummeling someone. Remember, names hurt. However, exploiting them to destroy people is unacceptable.

We destroy with greater vengeance and harm inflicted on the lives of people we don’t like, than punishment is meted out via the courts for actual crimes. We convict in the public square, then carry out the punishment when no crime was committed, just because somebody called us a name and we couldn’t handle the criticism.

What kind of democracy is that? It started with the Jews, didn’t it? You couldn’t call a Jew a Jew. Well, you’re not getting that one from me. You set a horrible example that now the world is following to disrupt a nation, the most powerful nation on the planet.

No. Jew is not a slur. Not Ever.

It’s not true that Israel is the vegan capital of the world, is it? You mean all those Russian Jews who you sold Palestinian land to turned vegan? You may have more vegan-option restaurants in Tel-Aviv, but that’s it. You don’t get the title before you earn it. When you create conflict thus prejudice by controlling speech for political or financial gain, a condition of oppression emerges and spreads through all ranks.

You did sell the land, right? You didn’t just give it to Russian maybe-Jews after you bulldozed the Palestinians off of it by bulldozing their structures. Did you?

Yeah, overuse tends to water-down the impact – of anything. Words are no exception.

Did you know that the ones diluting the message and impact by overusing the accusatory words, toward their targets, are the ones offended most by the words? The Jews are the ones calling everybody a Nazi. Nobody really cares anymore; it’s done so often in just about any circumstance where there’s disagreement on an issue. It’s like saying shit or damn. Jews are the ones offended by the word and they use it publicly against their targets more than anybody else.

The Blacks keep saying, “It worked for the Jews; it will work for us”. So, you’re the cause of all these people’s careers being ruined because they call someone a name they call themselves.

So this is the BIG thing to do. Announce to the world that you’re taking the words Jew and Kike (not that anyone uses Kike anymore) off your terrorism watch list. Your need for exclusivity has run its course and is of no further value to the State of Israel. So everybody in the world is free to walk about the cabin.

People still won’t use it, they’ll be afraid of consequences, but they have that option to include Jews into their discourse, instead of hinting by using other words or exaggerated facial expressions to let everybody know who they’re talking about. In addition, it will settle down those late night political puppets who are so far off the planet that they need to lose some of their security to bring them back to reality.

I’m working on a wave effect, no ripple. Low, wide, slow-moving, massive wave.

STRATEGY PLACEHOLDER. If that simple exercise in bringing people back to the planet isn’t instituted quickly, I reserve a space for a  strategy I was planning to use elsewhere.


Animal-eater. That’s my favorite new name. I made that one up. I use it freely. I want to see more of that by others. I wanna hear some screaming. Not in person or in public; on social media only. One name only: animal-eater.

I don’t want to see anybody verbally assaulted and terrorized when they go about their daily lives. Social media only.

ANIMAL EATER!!!!!!!!!!






 

RE: Trump calls Omarosa ‘that dog’

  • Avatar
  • Actually, that’s an African-American phrase. They call people dogs all the time. Dumb animal, dog = common usage in Cleveland, Ohio. There’s so much name calling now, that to pin it on one person would be impossible and discriminatory. Many think we should expect more from our president and elected officials than we expect from ourselves. I disagree. We need to raise our own standard of behavior, instead of blaming somebody else for lowering those standards. We relinquish our own power over ourselves when we give others credit for our actions.






Xenophobia isn’t really a phobia

PHOBIA 

A phobia is a type of anxiety disorder, defined by a persistent and excessive fear of an object or situation.

The phobia typically results in a rapid onset of fear and is present for more than six months.


All those rapid-fire name callers popping up all over social media confuse dislike and self-preservation with fear.

Some spiders are poisonous. Cockroaches startle and carry diseases. Our limbic systems may not be designed for heights in some people.

To hear these name callers calling everybody xenophobic, who won’t line up in support of people they don’t even know, sounds more like everybody is fearful of people from places unfamiliar to them – except of course the name calling bullies.

Most people don’t fear other people unless they pose a threat to their security, well-being, peace of mind, way of life.

We all have the right to dislike whomever and whatever we want.

To punish, through public humiliation, someone who doesn’t like you or who fears you justifies the dislike and fear of that individual or group.

Judging by the number, frequency and intensity of public outbursts and proliferation of humiliation tactics, by people claiming to bear no fear, toward people they claim bear fear, makes it look like the accusers are the ones with the anxiety/fear producing phobia.

The so-called fearful (prejudicial) people are not the ones calling for the heads of the bullies (the fearless ones).  The bullies are the ones making all the noise and damaging all the people, and yes calling for the heads of the fearful people, who won’t let them have their way.

Nobody even knows what that way is. What do these bullies want? And why did the British and Spanish Bullies join a fight they can’t define, except to publicly humiliate and damage people in other countries they view as fearful of newcomers?

Probably because they don’t want them coming to their countries. Shame the Americans into opening their doors, so we can close ours. Who wouldn’t? They’re like a herd of screaming reptiles threatening to eat everybody alive if they don’t open their doors. Well, I for one would not open any door to any animal screaming to harm me if I don’t. They’ll harm me when I do. Anybody who doesn’t understand that predatory trick, is naive and knows nothing about self-preservation.

Let me in or I’ll huff and puff and blow your house down? Would you let the big bad wolf in? If you do, they take your house and throw you out of it.

Phobias are anxiety disorders. Right now, given that the world Believes the British and Spanish Bullies, claiming that one’s fear of unknown peoples from unfamiliar cultures and countries is a moral choice, thus punishable by mob justice, then it cannot be a phobia.

Phobias have nothing to do with morality or justice.

Victims all over the globe are being threatened, harassed, humiliated, punished and injured, their lives and careers ruined, for having a phobia that is an anxiety disorder.

You cannot have it both ways here. Either it is a phobia or it is not a phobia.

Mob justice committed against those who fear unfamiliar peoples, cultures and countries is enslavement and torture that will lead to slaughter if not stopped. The ones responsible for those deaths will be the bullies: the fearless people who squashed the meek. How’s that going to look in your history books? Oh right, you’ll just rewrite them in your favor. Gotcha.

If I don’t like you or your bully ways, don’t make an artificial phobia out of it, then justify killing me for a fascist/socialist political agenda. The meek are supposed to inherit the earth, remember? Not the bullies. So keep on bullying, a surprise evidently awaits right around that bully bend, over that bully hill.

Let me tell you something: Bullies don’t resist anything. That’s what bullies don’t do. There’s no discipline in a bully. They never hold back. They’re the first ones to scream, they’re the first ones to throw a punch, then when their victim screams and punches back they go hysterical. They can’t handle what they dish out.

How can you resist a fearful, weak person? You can’t. There’s nothing to resist.

All you can do with a bully is stand your ground. Most states in the USA have laws that protect bullies. You need an actual law stating that a victim of a bully can fight back. It’s called ‘stand your ground’.

‘We the people’ protect a bully’s right to pummel someone, but not the victim’s right to respond in kind. The victim is required to run like a coward, which of course continues the cycle of bullying. That’s the level of problem-solving in this country. It’s too hard to solve, so put the onus on the victim. It’s like blaming the woman for being raped. We can’t stop the bully; we can’t stop men from raping, so work on the victim to prevent or stop the crime.

Now that’s a messed up condition in a so-called free country. It’s free for bullies. And they are everywhere, at every turn. The victims are required by law to turn the other cheek to their assailant.

No wonder so many criminals want to live and work inside the USA.

The USA feeds people to bullies, like live bait.







 

Name Calling Won’t Produce Social Change

You think you can call somebody an ugly name and that will make them change into your way of thinking? Has it worked for you, when somebody called you nigger? Did you change your ways to satisfy the one calling you a name?

Calling someone a racist isn’t going to change them into a non-racist, since every group gives preferential treatment to people within that group, and if race is the parameter, then that preference will be based on race – name a race any race – it’s the nature of the beast people feel most comfortable around and in whom they place their trust, that they want to work with to achieve their goals.

Why would a white person trust an entire race of people who through their media leaders have violently expressed their hatred toward them, even gone so far as to call the white race an abomination that should be eliminated from the face of the earth, so that blacks could reign supreme – as their God’s will?

That trust is never going to happen under the threat of annihilation. I don’t know whose playbook you stole from this time, but it was the wrong book. And now you’ll have to suffer the consequences of jumping on and supporting such a blatantly racist and terroristic methodology for social change. All white people fall under your umbrella of mass annihilation?

Bombs have been dropped because of such hateful speech. Nations were reduced to rubble because of such hateful speech. Fire up the furnaces is the next step.

Think before you speak.