One Land One People One Language

ONE LAND ONE PEOPLE?

ONE WORLD. ONE LANGUAGE?

The British use a lazy form of English. When I watch British films I use subtitles. I can’t understand what they’re saying and it’s not only me, Steve can’t either. Our own language has become foreign language to us. 

Why do they give everyone and everything nicknames? Maybe it takes too much effort to remember the names assigned by others, so they correlate the image with a name of their own – like their own personal filing system, that only they can understand?

They use a lot of unts and grunts and skate over words and syllables. It’s as if it takes too much effort to talk normally. It’s like they just rolled out of bed with a huge hangover then start jacking themselves with high octane coffee so the unts and grunts get delivered with precision speed, minus the content.

The Irish, Welsh and Scots do the same thing.

I’ve got a lot of British, Scot, Irish and Welsh packed into my DNA, yet I can’t hear them, because I can’t understand them. Looking back I recall speaking with breakneck speed and less than stellar pronunciation, softly spoken though. Nobody could understand me either. Every now and then I revert to my old ways over a glass of something mind-opening or mind-numbing as some might call it.

Still, one might think that me being a partial tribe member to the White Island People, that it would inherently and automatically facilitate the comprehension of those whose language I share. But it didn’t. So hear I am deficient in my only native tongue.

Maybe because my DNA is common to peoples of so many countries, there’s some language-confusion going on in my brain.

Hey, the English invented the language. They can do whatever they want with it. 

They dumped it on everyone they colonized, then refused to adhere to the same rules of diction and enunciation that they imposed on others. I can see that becoming an irritant.

They’re not the only ones though. Some Puerto Ricans sound Chinese to me when they slang-talk on the phone. Some Spanish people look Chinese to me. Except for the color, some black people look white and some white people look black. For a long time I could see Jew in everybody.

On the other hand, when Indians and Pakistanis speak English, they enunciate perfectly every syllable, and when spoken with accelerated speed, as is most always the case, it’s difficult to understand. Add to it, the musical component that accompanies the female Indian or Pakistani voice and one is not sure of the intent of the message.

I’m beginning to see differences in the female and male voice across cultures and similarities among all peoples, which further leads me to think the world would be better off if we all spoke the same language. 

Just yesterday while attending a tenant meeting at the building where I live, one of the women approached the manager and asked if there was going to be an interpreter. The manager looked a little stunned and replied, no, no, we don’t have an interpreter.

The woman who asked (in English) has lived here many years. The guy who set her up to ask, hasn’t lived here long and has been from the beginning an agitator regarding race. The woman who asked is Spanish as is the man who set her up. The manager is African. 

The Spanish woman knew there would be no interpreter. Her handler wanted to make a social injustice point in front of everyone. The woman walked out.

I say Cqueba. He says Cooba. Who’s right? 

What’s important is that people understand what others are saying and what they mean. Reading someone’s real motives or the real truth into their words is only helpful if accurate. 

If I say Cqueba and he corrects me by saying, it’s Cooba accompanied by a big smile, then it should be obvious that he understood what I said and what I meant. The purpose of the smile is to disarm me while he controls me. Nobody likes to be corrected when they are known to be understood. Nobody likes the insincerity of a smile meant to control your mood.

The public staging of the interpreter request is part of a greater movement toward accommodating Spanish speaking people who don’t speak English in the USA. 

It takes a long time to learn a language, and since there are so many Spanish speaking people at a disadvantage, through their own choice of nation-selection through nation-shopping, they feel that the USA should provide them with interpreters. 

For anyone to think that Spanish speaking adults who come to this country either legally or illegally will learn to speak English is naive. That happens at the child level when they attend English speaking schools.

For the adults, the massive numbers would require massive numbers of teachers. 

And how many bilingual people are there who want to teach in the first place, and then who will pay for the salaries, supplies and school room space? It’s a huge endeavor. It takes years to achieve proficiency or fluency in any language.

There are two languages right now that dominate the globe. English and Spanish.

Since it’s the Spanish speaking people who want to come to the USA to live, then the responsibility is on them to learn English. It’s not on the host country. 

If Americans were to migrate to a Spanish speaking country, then it would be on them to learn Spanish. It would not be the responsibility of the host country to teach them or to offer them interpreters wherever they go.

To solve this problem I suggest that all Spanish speaking countries teach English as a second language, to ease migration when it occurs.

What? One land, but not one language?

What? No walls on land, but build them into speech instead?

We can talk in front of you and you can’t understand what we’re saying?

That’s a wall. That’s a huge wall.

So yeah, you like walls, but only when you make them.

If you go to a country that speaks like you do, everybody there will understand what you’re saying – you’ll be equal in ability to communicate.

Your people, your leaders, don’t want equality They want advantage on their terms.

You want that language wall, that language barrier, because it protects you from having to abide by the same rules as everybody else.

It’s a prejudicial tool you use to exploit English speaking people, whose country you invade.

You don’t really mean one land is big enough for everyone. 

If that’s true, then you would agree that one language is good enough for everyone. 

You want to stay separate, so that eventually you can turn the USA into a Spanish speaking country. That’s the long term goal for which your people will make the long term sacrifices to achieve.

The English speaking people will be required to learn Spanish in your one land, one people, one language paradigm. There will be no interpreters for English speaking people.

Your plan to provide all Spanish speaking people with interpreters is a short term plan to a achieve a long term goal.

One Land One People One Language.






Advertisements

The Border Is An Illusion A Mirage In The Desert

Wouldn’t it be better to stop an attack before it happens by discouraging or at least by making it difficult to accomplish?

Stopping an attack not only protects the country targeted, but protects the country from where the would-be attackers came. Do you think we would have carpet bombed Afghanistan and Irag if we weren’t attacked on 9-11 and consequently caused all that suffering and damage to mind, body and soil?

It’s better to be prepared than not prepared.

We were surprised by the Japanese and twice when the New York Towers fell under the spell of deviated minds.

Better safe than sorry?

Yes, especially since we have a track record of trusting world citizens and entities – friend and foe alike – only to be taken unawares by horrific deeds that force us to fight, to spend our treasure to protect what remains of the rest of us including those souls in lands not connected to ours who only benefit if we fight back when we’re attacked. If the most powerful nation in the world doesn’t fight back, then where does that leave the less powerful countries, except even more vulnerable to the same deviated minds?

The oceans east and west create a natural border protected easily by ships. To the north is a friend and the terrain complicated making the USA not easily accessible, except through established portals of entry.

The southern border is wide open to deceit proven by fifteen million people who simply walked or were driven in to live in the USA undocumented with no plans of becoming a loyal citizen, but instead to reap the benefits of living as outlaws.

The USA is their cash cow benefiting citizens and governments of their countries of origin laying wide open for exploitation and potential harm those who actually built this country. And again, judging by the rhetoric of hate toward our system and our leaders, we have just cause for concern and just reason to expect rapid action to diminish our vulnerabilities at our southern border.

The mentality of those who cross into the USA illegally is one of entitlement, privilege and disrespect for the citizens of the USA and their so-called boundaries.

It’s just a fence. Who put it here anyway? There’s no fence up ahead. What does it mean?

No one demands entry unless there is an unspoken threat that accompanies the demand if not met.

Historically immigrants did not make such demands. They came to build not to tear down. They didn’t come with the purpose of living underground. They helped their neighbor; they didn’t hide from them.

The immigrant from the south is not intellectually capable of respecting a border it cannot actually see, that immediately tells them they are at the border of the USA and physically blocks them from entering unless they meet the criteria of the laws of that nation.

The military cannot effectively protect a border that has no physical structure identifying it as a border. A sign directs traffic it doesn’t stop it. A person will stop only if they fear getting caught. So, a sign absent a physical structure in a wide open space is an invitation to come in, even if the sign says not to.

The USA southern border is unique in that millions of people have over many years flowed unabated into the USA illegally and legally, for the purpose of politically changing the demographics of this country to match their countries of origin and turning the USA into a Spanish speaking nation.

Most countries don’t have that issue to deal with. We have millions of undocumented people in the USA right now, who are being led by political groups and criminal entities down a path that returns our country to the Mafia days, only this time with Spanish roots, because we did not have a physical contiguous structure at the line of demarcation.

An imaginary line in the sand is not a deterrent to people entering the USA illegally. The border thus becomes an abstract idea rather than a tool to aid in legal entry.

The store owner locks his/her doors at night to keep out thieves and those who through a deviated mind seek to do damage for damage sake.

A castle has a moat around it so those within can sleep at night and children can play at day and women can be at peace while working on behalf of their families who want to survive and thrive, not die for an historically proven paradigm that claims to create major social change only through violent means or in conjunction with dialogue.

Those paradigms are obsolete. The reason we still need the moat around the castle and the lock on the merchant’s door is not because we’re cruel and selfish, but because that deviated mindset still exists in humankind. That mind lives to operate for the thrill of disruption and the purpose of destruction.

Wiping everything out and starting over is their game plan. Fair doesn’t enter into the plan. It’s based on disruption rather than cooperation supposedly to make the world a safer place, yet SAFE has never been on their radar or a component of changes they propose.

A huge suffering they always cite as necessary prior to significant meaningful social change. Why? Because they’re too intellectually lazy to devise a new plan, a different way, staying instead with what the world knows from the past.

So I would say, what then did we learn from the holocausts of the past that makes us want to repeat them for the purpose of creating a climate for significant meaningful social change now?

Nothing? How is the world better if we’re still dropping bombs and blowing up theaters and stadiums and massacring children?

The letting of the blood is not the cure for deviated mindsets, though we keep spilling it thinking it worked in the past. It has never been the cure. Otherwise we would not be in the same place. That was a psychological construct based on faulty logic resulting in experimentation that proved ineffective.

It’s an illusion.

The border is an illusion absent a physical structure to prove its existence to the deviated mindset. To them It’s A Mirage in the desert that disappears when approached, whispering to the deviated mindset that God once more parted the sea in the middle of the desert just for them, allowing them to pass without first gaining permission into a foreign land for exploitation purposes. They’re not coming to build a life; they’re coming to build a kingdom. Otherwise they would live above ground. Strength in numbers is their rallying call.

Build with haste and care. Spare no expense.






 

Asylum

I thought a person is supposed to apply for asylum and be accepted before making arrangements to move to that respective country.

Since when did the Spanish speaking people of the world take that to mean just show up and you get automatic asylum? Who said the door is always open?

What if fifteen million non-Spanish speaking people from the USA just showed up in Mexico or any country in South America saying open the door, we’ll work for nothing? We want to be your slaves. How do you think any one of those countries would respond? We’ll do the work your people don’t want to do. We’ll work for low wages. We have very few needs, but we need to send some money back home so our families can eventually join us. It’s a win-win.

There is a huge translation gap between English and Spanish that needs to be closed.

Slavery is always wrong, whether you claim to want to be enslaved just to get your foot in the door or not. It’s wrong. It’s vile. Anyone who engages in that process is responsible for the promulgation of enslavement around the globe.

Spanish speaking people have a lot to answer for by agreeing to be enslaved, by doing jobs they convinced everybody that only slaves would do, so someday they could be free, rich and powerful and overtake those they hoodwinked.

When the black Africans were freed in America, the Spanish speaking people of the world saw an opportunity and seized upon it. Hey, we’ll be your slaves. You still have fields that need tending, crops that need picking; we’ll do it. Just let us in.

The rest is a long sordid history that should have been resolved long ago, if not for those wanting to be slaves in a country other than their own.

If somebody tells you to enslave them, you don’t do it.

There needs to be laws prohibiting enslaving people who want to be enslaved for future financial and political gain, and those laws need to be enforced.

Yeah, I get it alright. You say you’ll do a job only slaves can do, and you do it long enough so eventually the country where you’re enslaved needs you, it can’t function without you, thus has to accept you finally as a non-slave equal to everybody else.

The perversity that Spanish speaking people imposed on countries where they wanted to live, but couldn’t afford to, has grown like a devastating cancer that hurts every person in the country where they made offers to business people that were not refused.

One slave group replaced another slave group in one country and now both groups threaten the well-being and existence of everyone not in those groups.

Those countries of origin are equally to blame, yet they too want to destroy everybody in America not yet enslaved. White people they call them.