Tag: terrorism

Ethnic-Based Revenge Attacks

Muslims around the world who engineered and executed violent attacks against those they perceive as their enemy, plus the militant wing of the Palestinians, claim that because they don’t have a military, they are justified in committing attacks against their enemies using their bodies as bombs or using explosives and/or hand held guns to create mayhem and destruction in public places to kill innocent people caught unaware, for the purpose of making everybody else fear, thus hear them.

Except for the Palestinians living in Palestine, all other Muslims reside in countries that have militaries and long standing established governments.

So that argument is not valid for any Muslim living outside of Palestine, since Palestine doesn’t have a military to protect itself from invasion.

Why do you think Israel invades and occupies Palestine? Because they can. Simply put, Palestine doesn’t have a military with which to defend itself against aggressors and invaders.

In addition to Palestine not having a military, there has not been one single nation, of all the nations in the world, who ever came to the defense of the defenseless Palestinian people against military invasions and consequent occupations by Israel.

Israelis on some level truly believe that they not only own the land of Palestine, but own the Palestinian people as theirs to do with whatever they choose.

Jews have the same history of using their bodies as weapons to attack their enemies, because again, they claimed to have no nation nor military to rely on for self-defense or for offensive occupation purposes. In 1948 that all changed with the formation of the Israeli Defense Forces making that argument no longer valid.

Before the Jews had a global home base they called Israel, they all lived in established nations with long standing governments and militaries.

So it appears that both Muslim and Jew think of themselves as global nations of peoples who reside within other nations.

Palestine does not yet have an independent nation status. Israel has nation status but is not recognized by the majority of the world, since both Arabs and Jews did not agree to the proposed plan by Britain introduced by the United Nations to partition Palestine into Arab and Jew states.

When the Arabs did not accept the proposed partition, the Jews decided to simply take their portion by force, so there was never an agreement per se. In 1948 Israel declared themselves the Nation of Israel and at the same time formed a military. And that’s where they are today.

Even though the Middle East is primarily populated by Muslims and controlled by Muslims, they are for the most part Arab states, except of course Iran, the Persian wing of that particular Muslim population.

It appears that Muslims in Arab countries express more unity with their religion than their governments. So it’s not surprising that the global Nation of Islam carries more weight in global and domestic matters.

The global Nation of Israel acts in much the same way, though around the world there are more non-practicing Jews than there are non-practicing Muslims.

Brendon Tarrant the twenty-eight year old ethnic British Isles male, forced by parentage to be born and raised in Australia, that the British government primarily populated by occupation aka colonization, killed a few score of Muslims in neighboring New Zealand as payback for the innocent lives Muslims took throughout Western Europe in recent terrorist attacks.

It’s odd how the Muslims got hit and the Jews keep trying to make it about Jews, anti-semitism and hate.

Actually there’s a terror triangle operating here – a terror triangle based on revenge.

Invading a peoples’ homeland and putting them under occupation, forcing a foreign, hostile culture onto those under siege is terrorism.

Britain basically tried to colonize the entire world, entire continents in fact, and was highly successful. Others did too. The Spanish got most of South America and now they’re moving northward with their socialism aspirations in tow.

The British are everywhere. I’m even British – a lot British.

Colonizers use the same recruitment tools that religions and governments use. They find a people with problems that they can solve. They nurse them back to normalcy, then indoctrinate them into their way of thinking and acting.

Hate is too simplistic a response or a cause. People hate lots of things and lots of people and lots of situations, but they don’t blow people apart because of it. They usually adjust or avoid, which are smart measures for increasing one’s survival advantage.

Hate is an anger emotion. You can’t tell people they can’t express their emotions when somebody or some thing offends them. It’s part of human nature. It’s normal.

If you focus on the hate – the emotion – then you don’t have to account for why something happens. ‘It was hate that caused it’. No it was not hate that caused that man to engineer and execute a plan to kill a specific group of people.

When people hate, they’re repulsed by those or what they hate. They want nothing to do with that which they hate.

Revenge. An eye for an eye. Why doesn’t anybody call revenge the ‘hate’ word? I’ve never heard anyone do that before. Never. Not out loud. Not a whisper. Not in print either.

Justice. Everybody raises up the ‘justice’ word as if it was sent from heaven or certainly some kind of holy place in the universe of most people’s minds.

JUSTICE FOR ALL. Even me? Even him? How about her? Us? We? Everybody? Yes to it all.

And what is justice if it isn’t payback, revenge, an eye for an eye, spend the rest of your life in jail. And oh, we become so angry when the offender gets out of jail early on good behavior. Pay back, pay up, just pay for your sins.

We want an arrest, we want an inditement, we want a jury trial, we want a conviction and if we don’t get it, all hell will break loose.

Most people don’t get to satisfy their need for revenge except in small ways. Most of the time that’s all it takes – small gestures from anywhere to lower the anger level. But some grievances are so big and attacks so atrocious that little placations and appeasements, to soothe the psyche and deplete the desire to blow up what the aggressors blew up, only in their backyard this time, become ineffectual.

Massive grievances fester when people aren’t shown that measures were meted out against the aggressors and a better world emerged.

A better world did not emerge after 9-11. We took a revenge hit. We hit back, again out of revenge, yet we didn’t hit the people who hit us. We did not target Muslims or countries where the hijackers lived.

To me it always sounded like a team the Israelis put together. But what do I know, except their history of finding non-Jews or Jews from other countries to commit assassinations that they think will advantage Israel.

The USA executed an opportunistic set of moves against people and countries that had nothing to do with the attack against the people in the USA. – and had a lot of Israel input when congress sat paralyzed by the enormity of the hit.

From that miscalculation and our own committed atrocities around the globe grew a need for revenge from the people we struck who didn’t commit the crime.

When you falsely accuse and abuse people for something they didn’t do, they will eventually find a way to strike back if not appeased in some way prior to that happening.

And for those living in the USA who didn’t feel the satisfaction (because by then it was practically a crime to criticize a Muslim), that lack of closure, because of all the secrets surrounding everything, festered.

People think a lot, they work things out a lot in their minds. Often governments treat the populace of any country as if they’re a bunch of non-thinking and non-feeling people. Yet they expect all of us to be fearless in absence of knowledge, which is incredibly naive.

Governments think that only military personnel need to avenge those who commit atrocities against the populace. They do the avenging; they get the satisfaction. If that were actually the case, then there would not be so many damaged military personnel coming home from war zones. The populace gets revenge vicariously?

A better world would be the best revenge.

Forcing foreign cultures onto other foreign cultures without warning or some sort of preparatory teaching is bound to create havoc. We’re brought up a certain way, then boom a whole town of people enter your backyard and you’re supposed to be fine with it all, even though you know nothing about them. It is like an invasion.

Everything you ever learned about how to behave gets tossed, because these new people don’t share the same history, raising and values.

Everybody’s world changes without warning. It isn’t a smart strategy for change, to simply uproot massive numbers of people and relocate them all over the globe. For what purpose? How will they assimilate? It’s as bad for the newcomers. Nothing looks or acts normal to them.

I recall one time Ariel Sharon (Prime Minister of Israel at the time) seriously suggesting that the Palestinians be uprooted and shipped to Siberia.

This is globalization? To make everybody feel better? About what? Who they are? Who they’ll become? How they’ll adapt to a different culture? Forward or backward? Nobody cares? Why?

It’s about the bottom line. Money.

Globalization is not a feel good movement to get all the people in the world talking to each other. We all speak different languages. Translation services don’t work very well and cause more confusion and frustration than no translator.

It’s about opening new markets to make more money. It’s like colonizing the world all over again.

So get ready for more ethnic-based revenge attacks – from all sectors. It’s not about hate. It’s about crashing and clashing cultures. It used to be called culture shock.

It’s become much more than that. It has become institutionalized by each country’s need to increase their national income to remain viable, whereby governments mock and shame those who resist the manipulation.

It’s not about hate. It’s about governments not properly preparing their people for changes imposed upon them. The social engineering departments failed miserably. You can’t just tell everybody to accept what they don’t understand, because governments don’t want the people to know what they’re doing to them or with them.

Admit it. Globalization is an experiment. It’s not appropriate to punish people who were made into subjects against their knowledge, thus their will.

The media plays a big role in dehumanizing people they don’t like or who don’t fly their way, by humiliating them. They do it to their own elected officials. The elected officials do it. It’s become pathological. It’s like social communication disease, that’s communicable.

It’s already been announced that Facebook will be looking for people criticizing Muslims and will handle them.

You don’t need to take away people’s freedom of speech. That’s already being done by Facebook employees who encourage bullying of anybody whom they think might support President Trump on any issue. Facebook is part of the problem. Their type of social engineering will only make matters worse.

There’s a cultural divide among Facebook employees that they take out on unsuspecting Facebook users.

Besides, people don’t usually mock those who were attacked. If that’s happening, it’s the NSA rearing their ugly social engineering heads in the wrong direction as usual.

The British will be the first ones out, trying to act like the world police. They need to stop instigating problems in other countries. They just can’t get that colonization bug out of their systems.

I can always tell who’s British on Facebook, no matter the colonized country they live in. They call everybody cunts and dicks.

Muslim, Jew, Christian. The axis of terror. Based on revenge.