BORDER PEOPLE

BORDER PEOPLE

Nobody’s dropping bombs in Mexico, Central America or South America. Nobody is at war.

So why are 15 million people from these regions living underground in America with no plans to assimilate? What war ravaged country, or state in the United States of Mexico are they fleeing?

There are no war-ravaged countries in these regions.

Why are we supporting mass immigration of people who want dual citizenship and if they can’t have it, then they live in one of the countries illegally, and that country is always the USA?

The Nancy Pelosi’s of the country accepted the offer of a slave labor force long ago. Upon getting a conscience and admitting the wrong, a decision was made behind the backs of the American people to compensate the slave labor force off the books by keeping the borders open so as to keep the slave labor force intact.

A slave labor force means fewer social service resources for the remainder of the population, as well as higher taxes for everybody. Rich people can still live a rich life while absorbing the increase; those in the middle and poor classes sink deeper into debt because of it.

A PARADOX

In trying to keep the slave labor force intact by keeping the slaves marginally satisfied, they put the rest of the country’s citizens at a higher risk for crime, disease, a lowering of standards in all areas of life plus the most important being the Arab populations that have sprung up across these regions over decades, posing a potential threat from rogue Arabs wanting a pound of flesh for the sins against Iraq, and breaching our border to commit it.

The rich aren’t the ones paying for their own poor judgments, managerial mistakes and financial blunders made in the past. The poor and middle classes of the present are the ones paying, as they always do, for rich people’s mistakes – in all countries, not only the USA. These are the same people who claim that everyone not as rich as they are must be stupid; so let’s exploit them like the stupid people they are.

Stupid is trying to force-feed a nation and a labor force into accepting a slave labor force by declining to build a security wall and apparatus to keep the slave labor force out.

Now that’s stupid.

You mean, we’re all racist for being against slavery?

Now that’s stupid.

Thirty-two states in Mexico, seven countries in Central America and 12 countries in South America are all proslavery?

Now that’s stupid.

The USA congress decided to leave our entire southern border open to future attack after 9-11.

Now that’s stupid.

Whose feelings are they afraid of hurting?

The potential slaves. They still need them. They even want to make the slaves legal by giving them driver licenses, by giving them social security numbers, but no citizenship. And even if they offered it, too many people say no because too many people want to maintain ties to their country of origin.

So where does the part about ending slavery come in?

Prices will go up if we pay them what we pay everybody else. Or, fifteen million more people will be out of work. Families devastated. Massive numbers of small businesses will go out of business. Well, maybe they shouldn’t have gone into business if they couldn’t make the figures work at the current employment rate. You mean they planned a business around the use of slave labor? That was done behind the American back. They call that freedom?

Now that’s stupid.

BORDER PEOPLE don’t go to the USA for a better life, because living underground is not a better life; it’s a lonely deviant life style.

BORDER PEOPLE go to the USA because they’re told to go.

They’re followers, easily influenced, do what their leaders tell them to do. Yet, when they get over the border, they’re in your face, dominating your every word and move. And then they want to dominate your family and everything they think, say and do. So why didn’t they do that at home? It’s easier to manipulate foreigners? Manipulating foreigners in their own country. Now that’s stupid.

They were told to do it. They know how to manipulate meek people afraid to be called racist.

Offspring of border people grow up to be bitter adults.

BORDER PEOPLE have been underground so long, or have protected others who are underground, that they don’t know how to be sincere. Their minds are programmed to deceive – since birth. They’re actors playing a part. Their whole life is an act.

DECEIT is their HALLMARK TRAIT.

That’s no way to live.

Still, their anxiety and anger levels are off the charts. Worried that they’ll lose their slave labor status and the privileges that go with it, they’re ready to battle for the border.

They strive to make enemies not friends. Without enemies you can’t wage a war.

No, no. We defeat them on social media.

No one is defeated on social media. Those attacked, simply withdraw to regroup and come back to lodge their own attack, that they weren’t even planning on doing till they were attacked.

When you beat someone up you make an enemy. That doesn’t translate into defeating them or into winning anything. It’s a useless strategy that works against those using it.

You can’t make friends if you’re incapable of being sincere.

BORDER PEOPLE claim to be fleeing lawless nations, yet they choose to illegally enter a nation of laws only to reject those laws. They don’t like laws and they don’t like walls. Period.

That’s who they are. Yet millions of them live underground, where I’m suspecting, in their minds, there are no walls. Since they’re anonymous they don’t have to abide by any rules – unless they make them. That’s a sickness, that it appears the USA government exploited. Most humans could not live that way.

Maybe the conditions are ripe for a war that blows the lid off of all of it. I believe that they believe if they can just keep everything as it was, then they’ll be okay. But that’s them thinking only of them. Isolated people tend to be self-centered, while drawing outsiders into their dramas to coerce them into fighting for them.

National security must come first and they’re not getting the ‘being part of a nation’ part. Because in their mind they’re not. Not this nation. Not the USA.

All of their strategies serve the political aspirations of one group. The ones here legally need a rank and file, and these slaves have been chosen by their own people to fulfill that purpose. Only one group with no consideration of how their demands will affect the nation of people whose border they’re attempting to breach – all to be underground slaves in America. It’s an act.

It’s an ideological Trojan Horse.

The USA is supposed to be the home of the brave, not the home of the stupid.






Advertisements

NO JUSTICE NO PEACE?

When justice means revenge I don’t support it.

When people scream NO JUSTICE NO PEACE they threaten violence if you don’t meet their demands for revenge.

Maybe in Africa that works, but in the USA we stopped allowing mobs to hang people a long time ago.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight






 

Deciding Whether to Impose Sanctions On Foreign Countries For Disseminating Propaganda

THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION are the USA against Iran’s Propaganda Machine.

How would the USA determine in Iran what is false news and what is not false news? It’s difficult enough in the USA to fact-check the lying fact-checkers.

It really isn’t our business to be proof reading the news stories in a foreign country, or to be issuing sanctions based on what Iranians report in their news programs. What have we become the professor of the world, grading every country’s homework? That’s an over-reaching manipulation, dictator-style tactic that we accuse everybody else of doing, yet we engage in the same behavior. It’s a waste of time, effort and money.

Yes, propaganda (fake news) is bad, but freedom of speech appears to allow it. So either believe nothing or believe everything and the propagandists will finally get the picture – that their lying news stories are not influencing the views of those whose minds they want to control – for personal or political or social benefit. In fact if one believes everything and nothing it deletes all efforts to influence. People are smart enough to make up their own minds.

Dissidents disseminate their own propaganda. So who is fact-checking the rhetoric they claim as facts? All dissidents of any nation want with a fervor to take down the existing leader and existing system of governance, yet nobody has a plan for what happens next. It’s all piece meal. Every individual in the movement has a suggestion as to what the country needs, but no one has a solution on how to make it happen, except to unseat a leader and a governing system.

They think erroneously that somebody else will step in and know exactly what to do and how to do it. Look back at Egypt and Libya and Iraq and Syria. Do you really think the USA had a plan of action beyond taking down a leader? How successful has the USA been In Palestine? Everybody thought all they had to do was get rid of Yasser Arafat, then Ariel Sharon, yet look where we are now? The same place. Nowhere.

Obama supposedly issued sanctions on Iran regarding their media propaganda machine, but made a private deal not to enforce those sanctions, an action the USA often takes when trying to satisfy all voting members of representative parties when in the process of forming an agreement or legislating laws. It accomplishes nothing but confusion, and confusion leads to chaos.

We criticize Russian Nationalists for trying to sway the USA populace via propaganda efforts prior to USA elections, but we in turn do the same in foreign countries – all countries where we have an interest in who wins an election. We support the foreign candidates in their respective countries whom we believe we can work with on common goals, or who will work with us. And we go to great lengths – corrupt lengths – to get them elected.

In essence we want these elected officials in foreign countries to put the interests of our country before the interests of their own, and yes we will and do pay a lot of money for that type of commitment. But in the end, what self-respecting country would make such a deal? It’s a slave-master relationship that the USA propagates all over the planet and punishes severely those who won’t go along with the program – Russia is one that refuses to be the slave of the USA. Ukraine on the other hand would give the keys to their country to the highest bidder for a tin of caviar.

Right now the USA is trying to overthrow a leader in Iran by giving comfort and financial support to its dissidents. How is that different from Russian Nationalists trying to influence American elections? A lot different. A lot worse. A lot more intrusive and dictatorial. We need to stop acting like the gangsters of the planet.

President Trump is going to have a problem deciding on any action he takes regarding sanctioning Iran for disseminating propaganda due to his own frustration with the democratic propaganda machine in the USA that dominates most of the news and opinion shows designed to take down the current USA president.

The dissidents are equally corrupt in the theatre of telling lies. They again erroneously think that the end justifies the means, that whatever lies it takes to unseat a dictator will be forgiven and in fact are necessary, because they regard the populace in the same way governments regard the populace – too stupid to make smart decisions, so the government aka dissidents work hard to make their minds up for them.

The smart move is to stay out of it. Let the Iranians sort out their own fake news issues. The USA government cleans their own stories the same as Iran or any other country cleans theirs. Words are cheap right now and there are no word battles worth fighting that any side on any issue can hope or claim to win.

Everything anybody says is meaningless in a chaotic climate.

Speak with actions not sanctions. People aren’t believing words right now.






 

WAKE UP PRESIDENT OBAMA

President Obama says that there are sixty countries in the USA led coalition fighting ISIS, which begs the question, why haven’t they been defeated yet?

With all the bombs he dropped on Syria, you mean he didn’t kill any civilians? Russia drops a few bombs and everybody gets nervous about civilians being killed. Where was that concern when the USA dropped bombs – many months of bombs?

Obama claims there are only two countries in the Assad coalition: Syria and Russia. Well, Syria hasn’t been able to stop the civil war. The rebels and other terrorists are armed to the hilt. So who is providing those arms during this four year civil war? It can’t be Iran, if Iran is backing Syria. Four years is a long time to sustain a war without an endless supply of weapons and ammunition. Assad would have defeated them by now if he was able.

So in walks President Putin of Russia. He’s going to have a go at it. Sixty countries including the USA failed, President Assad failed, we’ll see if Russia fails too.

I wonder if rebels in the USA attacked all the capitol cities in all fifty states along with the capitol in D.C. what Obama’s strategy to defeat them would be? He wouldn’t surrender, step down from office and live the rest of his life in exile, or be charged with war crimes against his own people, because he chose to fight back, and then probably be put to death, before he could be properly tried and convicted in a court of law. Once the rebels win, the laws change, the constitution changes.

He’d fight to stay in office with his entire military backing him – or maybe many of them would desert and join the rebel/terrorist cause.

What’s Syria going to look like if the rebels/terrorists win? A nightmare.

Sure, it’s a nightmare now, but that’s the fault of the CIA propping up the rebels/terrorists and giving them false hope for a better future. How many people already died because of that false hope?

Two hundred and twenty thousand people so far.

Obama is walking in a dream somewhere refusing to wake up.

When Palestinians rise up against the Israeli apartheid regime, Obama motions to Palestine to live under the Israeli thumb in peace. He doesn’t try to oust the dictator. Strange.


UPDATE 10-03-2015 The hypocrisy here is startlingly disturbing. After the hospital notified NATO of its coordinates, the USA bombed it anyway. They use the same defense as Israel (Hamas was hiding in the school, so they bombed a school full of children): Taliban was hiding in the hospital. President Obama is surely walking in a dream, but now it looks like it’s Netanyahu’s dream he’s in.

At least 16 killed at Afghan hospital after U.S. air strike

By Hamid Shalizi and Andrew MacAskill

KABUL (Reuters) – An airstrike hit a hospital run by Medecins Sans Frontieres in the Afghan city of Kunduz on Saturday, killing at least 16 people in what the U.S. military called possible “collateral damage” in the battle to oust Taliban insurgents.

Frantic MSF staff phoned military officials at NATO in Kabul and Washington after the attack, and bombs continued to rain down near the medical facility for nearly an hour, one official from the aid group said.

At least 37 people were wounded and many patients and staff still missing, it added…Almost 200 patients and employees were in the hospital, the only one in the region that can deal with major injuries, said Medecins Sans Frontieres, which raised the death toll to at least 16 by late on Saturday….

READ MORE > http://news.yahoo.com/hospital-hit-three-staff-killed-bombing-afghan-city-040548282.html



BLACK STRIPE

To President Vladimir Putin,

“Lithuania: Stay calm in case of foreign invasion”

That’s the name of the article. Right after the Olympics, the USA was screaming about Lithuania as if the USA knew what you were going to do when they were shocked that their plan failed.

I understand fully the rhetoric. However, just in case there are seeds of truth in the rhetoric, and frankly I don’t believe any of it, hands off Lithuania. You know more than anyone on this side of the war game that’s being played out in public, created by USA and NATO interests, that Lithuania wants to be free, after too many countries over too many years controlled them.


 It doesn’t matter who owns Lithuania now – that they can’t see – what matters is that they, and they alone make their choices.


Just like the people in Crimea made their choice to be with Russia, the Lithuanians chose  to be free of oppression. Had the Soviet Union been different at the time they were a part of that union, things might be different now. But they weren’t and they’re not buying into that program again – no matter how hard you might try to persuade them that there is a new Russia, or no matter how hard other forces might try to fear-monger them into supporting their own national interest causes.

I recall a little too clearly, when Lithuania came to the USA to ask for support in their efforts to gain independence and they were turned down. Who do you think came to their rescue?

Do you really think that the USA, the European Union and NATO are going to bail out Ukraine from all their financial woes? No.

They want Crimea; they don’t want Ukraine. They want Russia to bail out Ukraine, while Crimea stays under Ukranian control. The only way the USA can gain control of Crimea is to gain control of Ukraine, which has had and continues to have weak leadership. The USA exploited that weak leadership for their own national interests in the region.

Now, they’re doing the same with Lithuania. Lithuania is also weak. Those who promised them the sun and the stars never delivered. Now the USA comes in to be their protector.

Let it go.


Lithuania: Stay calm in case of foreign invasion

Associated Press

VILNIUS, Lithuania (AP) — Lithuania’s defense ministry is advising its citizens how to react in case of war, reflecting jitters over neighboring Russia’s intervention in Ukraine and a recent increase of reported airspace violations in the Baltic region.

The 98-page booklet, entitled “How to act in extreme situations or instances of war,” is to be distributed next week in Lithuania, a NATO member that was under Moscow’s rule from 1940 until 1991…

Read more here > http://news.yahoo.com/lithuania-stay-calm-case-foreign-invasion-101213526.html

iT’S NOT FUNNY bARACK oBAMA

Since 8 March 2014, when passengers and crew aboard Malaysian fight MH370 disappeared while in flight to Beijing I’ve been waiting for Barack Obama to say something publicly about the disappearance of a Boeing 777 jet and all aboard. Nothing.

I stayed glued to the television set, day after day after day. Nothing from Obama. No concern, no words of comfort to the sometimes screaming families begging for answers, tormented by the bizarre and sudden disappearance of an entire plane and everybody on it. The majority of the passengers on that flight were Chinese. There were no offers of help from the USA, no infamous drones sent to search the ocean surface. Nothing. Only when there was no longer any hope for survivors did the USA send what amounts to a remote controlled flashlight to supposedly map the ocean floor, but only because that part of the Indian Ocean had never been mapped.

Then on 3 May 2014 it happened, he finally broke his silence on the night of the White House Correspondence Dinner making jokes about CNN’s expansive coverage of the missing plane and all on board. He made jokes about having to go to Malaysia, jokes about CNN ‘searching’ for their seats.

How unbefitting of a president claiming to rule the world (we’re the most powerful nation on earth is the forever refrain); how unbefitting of a human being (president or not). Some thought it was because there were only three Americans on board that flight, most of them Chinese, and Obama didn’t want to cut the Chinese any slack, since they’d been having disputes with Japan over the Senkaku Islands and disputes with the Phillipines and Vietnam over islands in the South China Sea. There are always strings attached to any help the USA gives any country. That’s why the USA makes the demand that the country needing the assistance ask for it.

Once asked, the USA makes further demands of that country, usually in the form of concessions to one of their enemies in a dispute. Most people call it extortion. And since the USA is the most powerful nation on earth, technologically speaking, they’re the ones always holding the gun (or in many cases the bomb) to another country’s head.

Now, flash forward to 200+ girls abducted In Nigeria. Obama’s all over it. Yet, none of those abducted are Americans. A spokesperson for the State Department, in the beginning, as a response to why the USA wasn’t doing anything to help (after all, Obama claims on a regular basis to be Black) said, “unfortunately they didn’t ask”. It didn’t take long though before news outlets reported drones being sent to Nigeria to find those girls.

Obama didn’t waste any time either in stating publicly on television his reason for helping to locate these abducted girls – because he has two daughters, that’s why. He could relate to the daughter thing. It also helped that the abducted girls were Black. But he couldn’t relate to the Chinese thing, because he evidently doesn’t have any Chinese children. Even his wife, Michelle Obama, is all over it campaigning for the release of 200+ girls. Where was she when that plane disappeared? What side of the fence was she on? Obviously not the side of the passengers on that jet. She laughed all night at her husbands despicable, insensitive and racially charged jokes about that missing plane from Malaysia and all on board and CNN’s coverage of it.

Donald Sterling lost a ball team because he didn’t want to rent to Blacks (that’s the real reason). Obama cheered. That ship sails both ways. Maybe this country and all its inhabitants should be taken away from Barack Obama and his wife Michelle. Their joint racism is glaringly obvious, but because he’s the president with a gun to every citizen’s head, who would dare say it?

When it’s a Black kid, they’re on board. When it’s a Chinese kid, they joke about the tragedy. The President of the United States cannot insert levity into the disappearance of a plane and all those on Malaysian flight MH370, when they’ve yet to be found.

Aside: When reporting on CIA prisons referred to as CIA ‘black sites’ in other countries (no, Obama did not close all CIA prisons), while simultaneously reporting on a person making the claim that he was taken to one of the ‘black sites’ by airplane, yet when flight records were checked by ‘authorities’ a flight did not match up to the person’s claim of date and approximate time, John Sifton made this observation:

“John Sifton, the Asia advocacy director at Human Rights Watch, who has spent more than a decade investigating the CIA’s rendition, detention and interrogation program testified before the commission last year and said “the fact that the flight records of CIA aircraft that are public do not include a flight that matches Mr. al-Asad’s trajectory is not indicative of anything in and of itself.””

Sifton said the CIA could “easily circumvent data collection” and “aircraft used by the CIA could easily be rendered untraceable while flying in and around Djibouti.”

Link to article here > http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/5/2/djibouti-senate-cia.html

[After all, the secret CIA prisons wouldn’t remain secret if there were records of rendition flights and if those flights could be seen on radar or via satellite. The USA is the most technologically advanced country in the world.

What country commandeered flight MH370 that night? The USA can disrupt Iran’s nuclear computers from the USA. What other country has the technological might and the will to do it – commandeer a plane? Israel? According to President Bush, the Palestinians attacked America on 9-11 because they laughed about it (well, they were treated as if they attacked America). See where that laughing at other people’s tragedies and misery gets you? 

Barack Obama owes an apology to the families of all those on Malaysian flight MH370. And then he needs to step down. He can’t Benghazi this one away.]

Funny isn’t it, how no satellite images existed for the plane that disappeared – hazy at best – as CIA controlled news agencies kept laughing at China finding a ‘ping’ sound in the ocean. But when 200+ Black girls are abducted, crisp, high resolution pictures via USA satellites popped up all over the internet.

No, it isn’t funny, it’s tragic that the USA would pick and choose whose lives are relevant, whose lives matter and whose don’t. That’s called racism.

PALESTINIANS ARE ENSLAVED BY JEWS

Every USA person in the House of Representatives, every person in the Senate, every President, not exempting the current President of the USA, whom all claim to be against slavery, support the enslavement of Palestinians by Jews.

I don’t care anymore about a greater cause, that has yet to be defined, that will get you re-elected, and you promising in your own mind that you’ll do something for those enslaved, particularly the Palestinians, even though you ran against them, because you know as I know that it is on their backs that you get to feel that power again of being in charge.

The next person coming down the pike, once your term limit expires, will think and do the same thing as their predecessor. How does that make you feel? Probably good, since if you couldn’t do it, you certainly don’t want anybody else to accomplish what you couldn’t.

And don’t you after all, once your term limit is up, have to be concerned about the next person in your party, of whom you’re so publicly proud, but in private despise? You have to campaign for a person in the likeness of you? And what does that accomplish? If you couldn’t get it done, why would you expect that somebody just like you can get it done?

The Brookings Institute or something like that recently gave as a reason to stay in Afghanistan (and I’m paraphrasing here) ‘there’s nothing they (meaning Afghans) would like better than knowing we couldn’t go the distance; essentially we couldn’t stay long enough to whip their asses.’

Frankly all the think-tanks cry the same story line, so what’s the use of having think-tanks, people smarter than anybody else, who all think the same, who aren’t changing the world for the better; they all advocate bombs to make individuals, neighborhoods, nations succumb.

Succumb to what?

To what, is what I keep asking myself?

The Palestinians have the audacity to fight back. If the world thinks that every ‘people’ have a right to defend their honor, their land, their families against an aggressor, then why not the Palestinians? Why are they not allowed? Enslavement is why. Those enslaved don’t have that universal right.

Nelson Mandela can rise up and make Black people rise up against their oppressors, the white people, using horrific torture methods of “necklacing”, and he’s Obama’s hero.

When the Palestinians rise up, not in unison because of fear, but one at a time, they’re called terrorists.

You can’t have it both ways, President Obama, though as a dictator now you think you can. All dictators think they know it all, that they know what’s best for their country and the world. And all dictators use horrific methods to achieve their ends – ends that never really accomplish much. Nothing really. In the end nothing.

In the best interests of the USA? Palestinians didn’t take those towers down in New York city. A son of Saudi Arabia took those towers down. Saudi Arabia knew their son; they knew he would do it. They made no attempt to stop him. None.

Is anybody enslaving anybody in Saudi Arabia? It’s not about women; they support their enslavement; it’s not about children; they were born into the life. It’s about the Kingdom. It’s about one of the most vile Kingdom’s on earth.

The Kingdom in Saudi Arabia is afraid – yes afraid – not of Iran as an aggressor, but that Iran will become liberated. Next stop Saudi Arabia. And the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia will not, on any terms, accept that. They’d rather team up with Israel than relinquish their Kingdom, because Israel knows all about enslaving those they view – a startling view – as inferior, thus not worthy of freedom to be.

Barack Obama (this is Mama talking; that’s what the CIA calls me among other more hurtful names), you don’t have to free the Palestinians with bombs; they don’t want any more bombs dropped on them.

Israel already does that on a regular basis.Each time they’re rejected by the world community for who knows what any more, they commit massacres against the same enslaved  ‘people’. Their gardens  are dug up, because of Israeli paranoia, that if you plant food, there’s a bomb or a gun in the soil beneath.

Barack Obama, you can free the Palestinians with words.

Yes, President Obama, you can free the Palestinians with words.

You’ve yet to use them. I know those words are in you. Do not continue to succumb to the “necklacing” approach to peace. There is no peace in torture.

Free the Palestinians with words. Free them from your own clutch. Free them from the clutches of Jews worldwide whom support the enslavement. I know the words are in you. Use your words.

Would you have told Blacks in South Africa that they had to earn their freedom?

Would you have told Blacks in America that they had to earn their freedom?

Israelis call Palestinians ‘sand niggers’. Jews think they’re white, which translates to superior to all other colors. It’s becoming abundantly clear that John Kerry (SOS) and Barack Obama (POTUS) think Palestinians are ‘sand niggers’ too. Otherwise they wouldn’t let the Israelis use them as a bargaining chip to advance other unrelated agendas.

The Wall

Warm greens, more crystal than moss-like surround me with promises of days freshened by new life (because there must be new life if we are to survive) born from new ideas as window sills turn to marble, black and navy blue sparkles with smooth glass-like scents of velvet gray skin, waiting, always waiting, while the life of earth family and universe merge, exploding in tiny and gross serenity.

A drip here a spot there never far from longing, gnashing and never forgiving, because you can’t and the world blames you not – not even your most harmful enemy blames you when you turn against yourself, but their pain, in their eyes, is greater, because a wall rising from seemingly nowhere blocks their freedom – a wall of the mind more excruciating than being blown apart – for at least when a bomb goes off in your heart you can feel it.

A wall has no feeling and that is the most devastating enslavement of all.

I feel not – as the wall rises in God’s name, I think no God would require this of me.

I am a Jew, not because I was born of earth and salt and promised a land of milk and honey (ha! no God would enslave and torture the cow and the bee for a Jew), but because I know the wall. That’s what separates me from you. You’re free and I’m not. And I will never be free – until God removes the chains of revenge that keep me enslaved.

The difference between me and you is that even if I could remove those chains I wouldn’t. They keep me anchored, even if to a hell of my own making. I need the anchor of control revenge gives me. That is the only certainty in my life. If I am offended I can strike back in the most unmerciful ways to reclaim my position – a position I need in this chaotic world where Peoples have no homes.

It matters not that I take the home of another. And no, they don’t have the same right to respond. Why? Because my pain is greater than theirs. I am the favored one. I need to be favored. That’s part of the wall: the sickness of not feeling others’ pain. I have no compassion. That’s why Jews hate Jesus. He had what we lacked. At least I’m honest about it. They call me traitor for exposing their lie. One man was half of all of us. He reminded us of the half we were missing. We said, ‘We’ll take care of our own; that’s compassion’. But he said, ‘no, take care of others’. We couldn’t do as he offered, so we killed him. Or, we made it easy for somebody else to kill him.

A phone call is all it takes in today’s world. All Jews belong to the same network – throughout the world. No matter how seemingly menial the task, we’re all connected by the seed that makes us call ourselves who we are – different from you. And since different to us means better, and since we must survive as a superior race, we will use any means to accomplish that end. So, when the call comes to preserve the race, whether it’s a simple – alter a document request, or a much larger – poison the water – request, we know we were called because we are placed in a position to carry it out. If we’re asked we must comply. It’s like a Mafia family only much bigger.

If we’re in a leadership position we sense what to look for and what to attend to when something extraordinary presents itself. The phone is our weapon of choice. We can destroy any person in the world – or group or nation. We’re positioned to take over the entire world, while the most powerful nation on earth sits by and watches. Why? Because we’ve infiltrated that nation to such a successful extent that they’re paralyzed by our command of them. We’ve hypnotized the entire USA by our communications networks, so when we tell them to move or not to move they do just that. It’s not that the USA can stop Israel simply by telling them to stop; that’s only a ruse to make the USA appear strong – a fringe benefit, a perk. The USA has no authority over ‘Israel the people’.

Now this woman shows up claiming to be God’s daughter and at first we laughed, knowing she wasn’t a Jew, but she liked us – odd. And she knew us – odd. And she understood us – even more odd. So we tested her. If she is who she claims to be, then let her God rescue her from us. God didn’t rescue Jesus. But then Jesus has lived on because of it. What will God do with her? At first we didn’t think she was talking to God – only talking to herself. We didn’t think it was God responding – only her responding to herself. Then she showed how to find God’s message in our own answer, then went further to show us how to find God’s answer in a properly phrased question. We were intrigued and remain so. If not for her, we wouldn’t be in her essays. She cares enough not to exclude us.

Still…we torture her. We can’t help it. And no one will stop us. That’s the rub. We can’t stop ourselves. And everyone fears us enough not to try to stop us – even though through our actions we beg for it. How outrageous do we have to become before somebody takes action? She’s the only one who will stand up to us. And we destroy that which we love. The rub again. She should have been dead by now. But she keeps getting up, keeps bouncing back. It’s almost as if we enjoy her survival maneuvers – before, during and after each hit – that that in itself keeps us torturing her. If the world could only see, Hollywood would dry up. She should have called this essay ‘the rub’, not ‘the wall’. But we’re careful not to step on her writing. We leave that to the Feds, whom we also control. We are the Feds – another rub. That’s our common ground with her. If she’s not God’s daughter, she’s the closest thing this world will ever get to seeing God, while still alive.

WE NEED MORE EDWARD SNOWDENS

Edward Snowden, a private contractor working for the NSA (National Security Agency), an agency that for years has spied on every American, and on every citizen anywhere in the world, leaked documents to the press that proved it. Where’s the news there? We all knew it anyway.

Sure the government would say it’s only emails and no content, and no they weren’t spying on the content on people’s private computers, or accessing their phone conversations, they weren’t accessing hard drives and couldn’t see what you were writing offline, and no they weren’t listening to anybody in their homes or cars or the places they frequented, and they didn’t know anybody’s names and were only looking for trigger words that might lead the NSA to a terrorist with plans to blow up the USA, by searching for trigger words like United States, Obama, bomb, Jews…but we all knew they had that capability and we all knew they were using that capability. Where’s the news in that?

We, the people in the USA, knew it, so why did foreign countries not know it? Are they so naive, holding the important positions they hold, knowing the computer technology the USA possessed, or did they fall for the propaganda line the USA fed it’s own people? After all we stand for freedom rights for all peoples, even them, whoever they are, so why would the USA do it? Why would they spy on the United Nations, on private communications among world leaders and whomever they were communicating with as people do when they go to any meeting? Probably to gain an advantage; if they know what everybody is saying to their advisors on any issue, then that would give the USA a leg up on countering their positions. They’d know in essence the cards they were holding that nobody is supposed to see, their weaknesses, their strengths, their bargaining power.

Now comes the threat factor. Government officials in other countries are now succumbing to the prodding by USA officials not to accept Snowden’s requests for asylum, because every world leader is now thinking to themselves, what else do they know about me, what I said or did in private that could prove embarrassing, and being in public office it doesn’t take much, as shown by the current administrations going on a witch hunt for anybody who might have heard George Zimmerman say the trigger nigger word, so the Justice Department can bring hate crimes charges against him for the political purpose of securing the black community’s vote in upcoming elections.

The USA government is forever telling the American people that if they have nothing to hide, then they have nothing to worry about. That’s not true, we’ve all seen how the government skews the facts, and often outright lies about the facts to get what they want. Criticize the policies of  the USA or Israel and they’ll make stuff up if they have to, just to get you to shut up or to plain out ruin your reputation and life if you pursue along that path of criticism. Employers do it to, they’ll look at your private stuff and make determinations on whether to hire you or not. Somebody criticizes Israel and they get on the no hire list. Somebody criticizes a public figure and that somebody gives the name of the person and email address to the NSA and you’re essentially destroyed.

President Obama spoke to the nation after Snowden released his article through the Guardian and said, if you can’t trust Federal judges, if you can’t trust Congress, if you can’t trust me, your President, if you can’t trust the FBI, then we’re going to have some problems here. Sounded like a threat, an ‘or else’ scenario. Or else what? In his early days he didn’t trust any of those institutions, now he wants ‘we the people’ to blindly trust all of them, just because he says so, after it was proven that not only the NSA, but other surveillance programs as well, were spying on all of us, that these intelligence gathering agencies were collecting the content of every communication any person has ever made via a text, a computer, a phone or in their private living spaces or their offices.

These communications will be saved forever. What for? To use as ammunition against any citizen for any reason they deem advantageous to them. Blackmail is what it used to be called. There are laws against that in the USA, but then the USA can break its own laws for whatever reason they want, all they have to cite is national security reasons. Or maybe not even that. The content is there forever, in case somebody at some point in time needs it to take a few words or sentences out of context to destroy you, or your future grandchildren.

Well, if we all have nothing to hide, thus nothing to worry about, then if the USA has nothing to hide, they have nothing to worry about. Let the world see the extent to which you’ve spied and lied and let them decide. The world isn’t trusting you right now. If you do have something to hide, then you must have done something wrong is the underlying meaning of what the government tells ‘we the people’ in an effort to make everyone fearful of criticizing the surveillance. Well, now the government is in effect, for keeping all these files forever, falling into the same pit they pushed every world citizen into.

Even in the private, secret Fisa court, they have a bar set to keep over-zealous officials from procuring a spy warrant for anyone they don’t like or anyone who criticizes them. A signed affidavit, under penalty of perjury, requesting an invasive search, where authorities can surveil you even from your own body, requires probable cause and evidence that you’re connected to terrorism and that you are a national security threat with imminent plans to carry out an attack against America. That’s the test.

Eric Holder signs those affidavits often, knowing in advance that he’s signing a false document. Should we trust the Justice Department? No, not unless you trust someone who knowingly perjures himself, thereby lying to the court with the purpose of stripping someone of their civil privacy rights.

Eric Holder claims he has no choice. He claims he has to write that statement if he wants an invasive warrant. He wants to change that, so that the Justice Department can obtain warrants on people they get a gut feeling about. Well, we all know where leads, as evidenced by the witch hunt he is currently leading against George Zimmerman.

No one causes nor requires the Justice Department, nor any individual within the Justice Department, to commit perjury to obtain invasive search warrants. The law requiring that language is in place so that innocent people aren’t scrutinized unlawfully for political or otherwise frivolous reasons.

The Federal judges are fully aware of what the Justice Department is doing, but instead of asking for proof of allegations, they simply approve the warrant. Should you trust Federal judges? No. The judges in effect are also committing perjury, lying, knowing full well that’s there’s no evidence to support the claim, thus allowing the USA government, through their actions, to strip you of your civil privacy rights.

I’ve been the recipient of invasive searches for years. In order to get a warrant they had to claim there was probable cause that I was a terrorist and had imminent plans to attack America. What judge, federal or otherwise, would believe that? Because the Justice Department told them. What President, member of Congress, Justice Department could believe that? Or maybe they didn’t get a warrant. I continue to be invasively searched/surveilled and everyone, from the President on down supports those actions. And when does the search begin to disrupt a person’s life. The minute they decide to do it.

Does the CIA ask for warrants? They do everything in secret. I get a kick out of the CIA for wearing kerchiefs and disguises over their faces so no one can identify them–but ‘we the people’ shouldn’t have anything to hide from a bunch of bandits with killing privileges.

Citizens of any group or nation should not be in the trusting business when others are determining their degree of freedom, and making decisions regarding their well-being or status as an individual within a group or nation. For Obama or any leader to think and expect the people to trust them on blind faith in matters that concern their lives is tantamount to a master/slave relationship, a dictator/subject relationship.

That tone in that last phrase, ” then we’re going to have some problems here” was a threat by any standard. He can’t wash it away like he tried to do with Trayvon Martin looking like his son, which he changed  to, “that could have been me“. That tone, those words, were an ultimatum, not to himself, Congress, Federal judges and the Justice Department, it was an ultimatum to the American people. Back off or else I’ll make problems for you. That’s a typical response from someone who got caught spying and lying.

Congress has between a nine to fourteen percent approval rating on any given day. Should you trust Congress? The low rating speaks for itself.

‘We the people’ don’t want nor need to be threatened by the President or any other government agency. What are you going to do to us if we don’t trust all whom you tell us to trust? Get back at us, hurt us, arrest us, go on a witch hunt, target us for invasive content surveillance?

Stand down Mr. President. We don’t need your anger, we as a people need to be respected through your actions, not your threatening words. We demand our civil liberties, whether you think we deserve them or not. Seems you’re not thinking too objectively these days, maybe you never did. Does the Mosad request a court ordered surveillance warrant before they spy on USA citizens? Didn’t think so. If you give them one, what does that say about you? It says that you sell like slaves every American the Mosad holds up on the auction block as being a threat to Israel, exempting of course members of Congress and the executive branch. Anyone else exempted Mr. President?

Does Obama or the Justice Department or the CIA or the Mosad or Steven Speilberg or whoever’s responsible get a court issued warrant before the content of your private communications are released to Hollywood to use in their sit-coms, movies, T.V. series, news talk shows? Obama said himself that and Speilberg are best friends. How so and why? Are ‘we the people’ to trust Obama, Congress, Federal judges, FBI, CIA and Hollywood with our private content material– all whom know about it and support that Hollywood Connection? Years ago, Diane Feinstein said they were supposed to destroy the tapes after they use them. Do they? The greater question is why do they have them in the first place? These aren’t emails, they’re actual content of voices, what you say in your private living spaces. They can even see you on your own T.V. or computer screen if they want to.

Stealing, that’s what it’s called. The USA government is stealing our written and vocal words–words that only we should own. They’re doing it without your knowledge or permission. They’re not doing it to protect us, they’re doing it to oppress us. When they steal our written and vocal words they steal our thoughts, again an act of oppression. What they’re saying is, “we own you”. The FBI even said, and there’s probably even a law that supports it, that the FBI owns everybody’s intellectual material. How repugnant is that?

If the FBI is interested in you for whatever reason they can hear whatever you say, whenever you say it, to whomever you say it to. All you have to do is open your mouth to speak or use an electronic devise to write.

I know because it’s done to me. It’s no way to live. You can trust that.

Maybe the government should read and listen to the content of elected or appointed officials. Yeah, wire tap their offices, homes, cars, electronic devices, follow them around using GPS capability and keep tabs on where they go, who they meet and what they say, to see who they’re making private deals with wielding the power of their public official status that adversely affects the American people. Bet they’d find a lot there.

Government officials should not be exempt from the net that’s cast on the rest of ‘we the people’.

WHISTLE BLOWERS. Law enforcement loves whistle blowers, snitches they call them on the Street. Just recently in Cleveland, Ohio after Ariel Castro was arrested for enslaving three women in his home for more than a decade law enforcement went to that same street, the American Street, to plead with ‘we the people’ to be law enforcement’s eyes and ears in order to solve crimes that they can’t solve. But when it comes to snitching on law enforcement or government officials that’s a different matter, then you become demonized, deranged, trouble, disgruntled.

Law enforcement wants ‘we the people’ to trust them, their good judgment and pure motives. After all, it’s for us they do all that they do. Serve and protect. What history and current on the ground scenarios keep telling us, showing us, is that that type of trust in absolute control, absolute power leads to corruption at every level. Try bringing to justice, their kind of justice, a corrupt cop, FBI agent, Congressperson, spy or President. It’s next to impossible no matter how many eyes and ears on the Street, or in the office, or within a company witness that corruption.

Nobody scrutinizes the background or motive of a snitch helping law enforcement, but when the tables turn and law enforcement is under fire the snitch becomes the criminal. How dare anybody question the authority, motives and actions of those whose job it is to keep you safe? Law enforcement doesn’t keep anybody safe, they show up after the crime is committed. They can take criminals off the street to prevent them from committing more crimes, but that’s about it.

Loads of  laws that facilitate corruption are passed unbeknownst to ‘we the people’–laws used to undermine the Street’s ability to protest what they consider oppressive or just plain wrong. Provisions are slipped into a bill going to Congress in the middle of the night when no one can read them unbeknownst even to other Congress members for the purpose of aiding a special class of citizens, usually the rich.

Corruption abounds at every level in every facet of life, including and especially at those levels that wield the greatest power over ‘we the people’.

In a democracy we appoint and elect a few people to serve ‘we the people’, not ‘we the few’ or ‘we the majority’. The majority only applies to the voting process. Since when does banning law suits against GMO (genetically modified organisms) companies, or banning occupy wall street or banning protests in front of slaughterhouses fulfill the right to peaceful assembly or the right to fight in court what ‘we the people’ deem is in the interest of ‘we the people’?

When ‘we the people’ lose our right to protest and our right to take to court an offending party we are no longer a people who decide what’s best for us, we’re a people ruled with an iron fist by the few. That’s called a dictatorship.

Oversight committees are comprised of the few, the privileged, the powerful who wield their power by supporting the corruption policies of their own, thus they become meaningless. Agencies that police their own are the same. One or two offenders may be used as examples to make the other criminals toe the line, but no effort is made to prosecute the many offenders within the ranks. We see that in the way the military handles sexual assaults. Don’t ask, don’t tell. Snitch and you’re ostracized. No promotion for you. Checks and balances are a myth.

Trust? Whoa Mr. President. Slow down with your threatening demand of trust or else. You sound like the police. Snitch on us and guess who won’t show up when you make that 9-11 call?

Basically with this multi-billion dollar tax payer spy program in every state in the Union, Obama and his co-conspirators (dictators always have them) are doing what amounts to a lot of guess work. They claim not to know your name, address or anything about you, but they can go to a secret court in front of secret judges claiming to have probable cause that you’re involved in terrorism, pose a national security threat with imminent plans to carry out an attack against America, under penalty of perjury and get that invasive warrant. Sounds like a witch hunt to me, based on nothing but somebody’s gut that has a gripe against you.

Edward Snowden saw gross corruption within the NSA and CIA. He went through all the channels available to address an egregious wrong against every American citizen and every citizen of the world. The USA government gave Snowden no other option than to release the proof of these sweeps and illegally obtained warrants through perjury for invasive searches.

Don’t repeatedly lie to the American people, then force us by the power of your office to trust you or anybody else.  I trust the whistle blower. We need more Edward Snowdens.

MY COUNTRY TIS A VEE. HOW DO I LOVE THEE?

  • MY COUNTRY TIS A VEE. HOW DO I LOVE THEE? President Obama has no right to forgive the CIA or any other government agency, association, contractors, bureaus…for torturing people. Only the ones tortured can do that, and because institutions did it, they don’t have to forgive those institutions. Whether they forgive the individuals who designed, ordered or did it is wholly up to them. You, Mr. President, cannot absolve any one of their sins unless those sins were committed against you personally. To let torture slide can never be an option. To let torture slide because it’s inconvenient is condoning the torture. The torturer will torture again, because torturers are serial offenders by nature. To call rape: sexual humiliation, and not the torture that it is, proves that you’ve been brainwashed into thinking it’s all a game, nobody gets hurt, no lasting effects. You’ve been desensitized to horrific acts. You probably, mentally, put your own family in situations to motivate you to act like a Hawk, when dealing with outsiders–everybody does. For instance, what if a Muslim terrorist captured this or that one and did this or that to them? Well, yeah, that’s pretty scary to say the least. But you only do one half of the equation. What if your own country did this or that to this one or that one in your family? Would you be as motivated to prevent it, to stop it once in progress? If it were your own country doing it, would you feel the same hatred? Whoa. You’d better slow down.
  • Because it’s controlled it’s not torture? So, as long as it’s video taped while the rape is happening that makes it okay? Better back up. That’s what torture is: total control over another human being whereby you can do anything you want to do to that human with impunity. How many torturers are in jail, or even got brought up on charges of torture instead of something sanitized to make it look like a college fraternity party prank?
  • It’s strange how in interrogation the Feds will ask if you love your country. Define love first. Can you love a country? What in particular makes up a country? People, land, buildings? Do you love the people who live inside the borders delineated by wars, which contain buildings and parks and roads built by it’s inhabitants? Do you love all of the people no matter what age, socioeconomic status, gender, race,  religion or political affiliation? Do you love all of the land, all of the buildings, even the ugly, vacant ones? Do you love all the laws, political parties, religions, holidays, work? Do you love to work? Do you love all types of work? Do you love all the animals that make up your country and all the trees? Do you slaughter animals? Whoa. Do you love the slaughterhouses and the experimentation labs? Do you love the prisons, crime, judges, juries? Do you love the military and spy agencies? Do you love all the elected officials that form the foundation of your country? Do you love your neighbor?–all of them? Do you love it when your country invades another country unprovoked, slaughters the children like lambs then refuses to bury them, in order to make the adults submissive to their global financial plans? Do you love that too? Do you love gouging people’s eyes out, raping children, do you love forcing children to have sex with their fathers while you tape record it? Would you torture, rape and kill for this country you love, so that some other country doesn’t come in and steal it, like you stole it from the people indigenous to the land, because they didn’t have deeds and dividers and real estate laws like yours?
  • Do you love your country? I’ve never seen another country move, have you? You know, like one country moving into another? Can that geographically happen? Individuals decide to enter a country and take over the government, thus the populace, by military force or suicide bombers or by mass immigration. Do you love your country enough to burn someone alive who isn’t harming you? Do you enjoy dismembering people, children too, animals too? Do you enjoy the screams, the squirms, the look of horror on the faces of your victims? Do you get pleasure from hearing people beg, or from humiliating people in public or in private?
  • Do you love your country? Do you love a country that allows the intelligence agencies of other tenuous governments, terrorist nations, to disrupt individual’s lives to keep them silent and submissive to their terrorist whims? Do you love freedom? Do you love a free country? Define free. Free to control through subversive, tortuous, disruptive practices ‘all that breathes’ in support of the: “there will always be war” ideology? Do you love that freedom?
  • Do you love your country? Will you kill your neighbors, or your neighbor’s dogs if your country asks you to? Will you let us use your house to spy on your neighbor; can we use your garage? Which neighbor? You know, the really nice ones, the ones who go to your children’s birthday parties, hockey games, graduation, the ones you call on when you need help. Will you spy on them for your country you love? Will you rape your neighbor for your country? Do you love the flag? Do you pledge allegiance to your flag and country? Can you murder for this piece of fabric–and all it stands for?
  • Do you love your country? Will you open your tenant’s apartment for your country and let us install listening devices and cameras and will you let our actors into your building so we can defray costs by making movies and sit-coms about the ones we’re spying on? Do you love the terrorists or do you love your country? I said, DO YOU LOVE YOUR COUNTRY? Do you love it unconditionally no matter what? Do you love your family unconditionally, your neighbors, employees, strangers–all unconditionally?
  • Do you love the land, the buildings, the parks and roads–all unconditionally?
  • Do you love your country unconditionally–no matter what your country does, even if it tortures–you? Do you love your torturers too? You mean if together we defeat the other torturers and the families of the torturers and the families of them, and of them, and of them, until we reach every single individual life-form on the planet?
  • Can a country commit torture? Can a piece of land, a border, a building, a park, a road commit torture? Can a person commit torture? Is a person a country? Did I make you torture me because I didn’t agree with the aforementioned doctrine? Can you reform me? You know, to see it your way? To go back to the enemy torturers, who are my family, and torture them?
  • Do you love your country?
  • Yes sir. I’m a person, a country and I love to torture. And I’ll do it all unconditionally.
  • Sign ‘er up. You are now a bona fide Patriotic American.
  • MY COUNTRY TIS OF THEE. SWEET LAND OF LIBERTY. Sweet land of lib-er-ty…sweet land of lib-er-ty. I wonder what that means?
  • It means you’re a person, a country and you love to torture, which means you love your country. GOD BLESS  YOU AND MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA.

PALESTINE, CHINA, DUBAI, a dream that can come true!

IT AIN’T KOSHER

The Israelis claim that because the Palestinians didn’t pay for the land they’ve inhabited since before the time of Jesus, that that gives the Israelis, who migrated to Palestine after World War II, the right to force them off that land, bulldoze their homes, leaving them homeless and landless, then turn around and give that land away – for free – to Jews from foreign countries, or anyone claiming to be a Jew, whom they actively recruit to live on those properties, called Jewish settlements or colonies. It’s the same model of displacement imposed by foreign Americans against the Native Indian Americans in the USA. Although Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama spoke out publicly against it, there were never consequences to back up their words, which of course to the Israelis meant a wink, and a green light to continue their displacement policies against the Palestinian people.

Just recently, while visiting France, Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel,  made a public plea and invitation to French Jews to come to live in Israel. Of course everybody knew what he meant – on Palestinian land – free land.

The practice of recruiting Jews, or anyone claiming to be a Jew, from foreign countries to inhabit bulldozed properties in contested territories does not constitute “natural growth”, which Israelis claim as their reason for expanding settlements by stealing land from Palestinians. Natural growth refers to the increase in population of any group through procreation means. Even so, if for example the people of Rhode Island overpopulate their state, the government of Rhode Island can’t force people out of it’s neighboring states, Connecticut and Massachusetts, in order to expand the borders of their own state of Rhode Island.

That’s why Israelis won’t define their borders. If there are no borders, then nobody can accuse them of going into other people’s territories. Ask what their borders are and they won’t tell you. Yet the world has seen year after year concrete fences erected by the Israelis where they take a segment at a time, till there’s hardly any land left for the Palestinians. They’ll erect a fence around Gaza, not caring about their natural growth, penning them in from land, air and sea, hoping that Egypt will finally absorb them.

The Israelis make the USA start wars in the Middle East, in order to open the Middle East to Israelis, that they being the only so-called democracy in the region will inevitably control. They make our young men and women fight their battles, while not one Israeli soldier lifts a finger or gets injured or killed. Israelis are already asking the USA to bomb Iran for them, and if ground forces are necessary, it will be the USA sons and daughters who will pay that price, not the Israelis. This is all done under the guise of Iran developing nuclear power plants to generate electricity. Israelis don’t want, and as their extension, neither do the USA politicians want, Middle East countries to come into the twenty-first century regarding cleaner energy sources. Even the Iranians know that the oil taken from the ground won’t last forever. There is a point beyond which that layer of oil, becoming too thin from extraction, will compromise the structural integrity of the planet.

The Israelis’  incessant screams about Iran getting a nuclear bomb is a ruse to cover the real reasons of wanting to dominate the Middle East – in every way. With continual bombing threats toward Palestine and Iran, and given the USA’s ease with which they totally decimate foreign nations that had nothing to do with 9-11, a nuclear bomb deterrent from Iran may be the only course, in order to stop the bullying actions of Israel and the USA in the entire Middle East region.

After the last war against Gaza, four years ago, where Israelis massacred over one thousand people, Shimon Perez was asked by Chris Matthews what he, meaning Israelis, wanted. Shimon Perez replied, “building contracts’. He couldn’t get those contracts from Gazans, since they’re all poor and over half the population is under eighteen years old. He wanted foreign countries to pay Israelis to rebuild Gaza. They didn’t do that though.

PALESTINE, CHINA, DUBAI, a dream that can come true!

Encouraging signs are coming out of China. Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi held talks with Bassam al-Salhi, an envoy of President Mahmoud Abbas and also General Secretary of the Palestinian People’s Party in Beijing, capital of China, November 23, 2012. China supports full statehood for Palestine and has pledged humanitarian aid to Palestine. Hopefully, China will get more involved and participate in the rebuilding of Palestine by Palestine people and engineers from China, who know well how to build in densely populated areas.

Hopefully, as well, some of the engineers that came from all over the world to build Dubai, designing what most would think impossible structures, could participate. Perhaps even some of the real estate owners in Dubai, all of whom are wealthy, could help fund the project. Partnering with China would be the best move forward, that the Palestinians could make. Partnering with Dubai would be equally as splendid.

BOMBING GAZA

The USA keeps bragging around the globe, that we’re the most powerful nation on earth, yet they keep demanding that other nations solve the Middle East situation. If the most powerful nation on earth with all it’s intelligence and resources can’t do it, why do they expect newly formed governments produced by the Arab Spring to do it? Don’t they have enough to deal with, their countries in ruins (Egypt and Libya), their governments in chaos?

Why do they expect Russia and Iran and China to do it, and Turkey and Tunisia to do it? The USA has now, after Israel destroyed the infrastructure of Gaza, said to the rest of the entire world, if you don’t solve it, we will give the order for Israel to completely decimate the Palestinians in concentration camps in Gaza.

The USA says that they are the supreme power, knows all, does all, protects all. The Israelis say the same thing. Why can’t they both solve that problem?

The European Union, that has for months called for this slaughter, can’t solve the problem either, and they are the Queen of colonization and occupation. Where are they, as smart as they keep telling the world they are? They’re all impotent. They want the slave nations to solve it. They want the slave nations to tell the slaves in Gaza to stop fighting back against Israeli bombs. Go figure.

HUMANS ARE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO ALL BEINGS, INCLUDING THEMSELVES.

People who protest the loudest and the most vehemently against the rights of non-human animals are the ones closest to accepting those rights as valid. Since birth, everything they believed in, that was formulated for them before they entered this world, via society’s prejudice against all that didn’t walk, talk and act like a human is in upheaval.

Approach their hearts, minds and souls with caution as they struggle to make sense of a life that they are coming to realize was based on a lie. Of course they’re going to fight that realization. Your entire life and all that you were taught by those you loved and respected was based on that same lie. You know the feeling. You never look at your family the same, the world the same, your friends the same, yourself the same. It’s a lonely place. When you say, “I still love them”, I know that you changed with that realization, otherwise you would leave out the word ‘still’.

Those who protest the loudest are the ones most conflicted and the ones struggling at the surface to make sense of that lie. Don’t forget the roots of who you used to be. When the foundation of enslavement, torture and slaughter cracks, don’t be the one to block that progress by killing the individual with your words. You’ll close that door to progress before it fully opens. Instead, destroy the flawed foundation from which those prejudicial actions emanated.

When you fight your wars the way governments fight theirs, you will lose that war in the long term. All governments know that, yet all governments make the same mistakes thinking naively that this time, just one more kill, just one more massacre, one more holocaust, one more tortured victim and the world will be righted. If you support animal rights and you don’t call yourself anti-war, then you have some more work to do. Killing humans with bombs is no different than killing any other animal through any other means. They’re all innocent.

What good are the animal rights activists sitting in prisons doing the animals? It’s not easy to rid a group of a terrorist label. I have that label on me. Did the government put that label on me or did those  espousing the killing of humans for their actions against non-human animals put that label on me? The USA is getting ready to bomb Iran for Israel, because the president of Iran said in anger and desperation at the treatment of Palestinians by the Jews, that he wanted to wipe Israel off  the face of the world. That’s how big the actions from the words get, where someone will drop a bomb on a country, because of words spoken in anger. Sounds like you talking about the animals you love and respect and want to protect.

Stop riling up people to kill on someone else’s behalf and then protect yourself from legal action by claiming your web site to be for entertainment purposes only. Channel your anger in more productive, constructive and instructive ways. Engineer your thoughts. Control your actions.

We all have more work to do, a lot of work to do. Pace yourself and savor the rare moment that you can actually call happy.

HUMANS ARE AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO ALL BEINGS, INCLUDING THEMSELVES. So, am I to drop a bomb on all humans to obliterate that threat? Should I starve them all into submission to my will? If my will is right, yet I impose that will through violence (and starving a nation or a race is violent), then my will is for only a segment of the population, not for everyone, which means my peaceful principle for some is flawed by not being for all.

Humans make the mistake of arguing details before they form a general principle that benefits all life. They act like their brains aren’t big enough, and their minds not capable of expanding far enough to include the entire picture. That couldn’t be further from the truth, yet we act paralyzed by the enormity of changing the entire world all at once, when all you need to do is change yourself.

Vegans will not be listened to unless they address their own prejudices against all those who enslave, torture and slaughter defenseless animals. That’s your Mom and Dad, aunt and uncle, brothers and sisters, friends and associates who enslave, torture and slaughter through their actions. That’s what your world is made up of, families. Would it be okay to kill those defenseless if they could defend themselves against your families?

Did every vegan in the USA vote for the anti-war Green Party, or did they vote for the two candidates who support war through preemptive strikes against peoples and nations they deem as inferior to them? Did anybody consider the non-human animals that get killed with every strike?

Do you support targeted assassinations against individuals in this country and around the globe who don’t support democracy, because they deserve it? Vegans need to rethink their principles and align them with a foundation that includes everyone, not a foundation that says ‘do it our way and we’ll let you live’. So far, your way only appears to include those you want to protect and leaves out everyone else. Humans are animals too.

When are you going to stop sending your own families off to war under the guise of protecting you? That’s murder too. The only difference is that no one eats them after the kill. When you ask the soldier to kill and die on your behalf, that’s prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Where are the wealthy vegans investing their money? The same places the non-vegans invest theirs. So what’s up with that? Where are their principles? Where are yours?

USA and Israel Threatening Nuclear Holocaust…

Israel and the USA emphatically state that if Iran develops a nuclear weapon capability, then Iran will launch that weapon against the USA, Israel and even Europe. Yet, both Israel and the USA are considering blowing up Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Blowing up a nuclear facility is the same as launching a nuclear weapon against that nation. That the USA and Israel are campaigning in public to go down that holocaust road makes one wonder what the Jews forgot about never forgetting the holocaust, lest it happen again.

Both USA and Israel are demonstrating to the world that they are the rogue, out of control terrorist nations that they claim Iran to be.

Stop terrorizing the world citizens with threats of a nuclear holocaust created by you. Curb your own terrorist ways and maybe the world will follow your lead and also act responsibly. Right now the USA and Israel are the only nuclear terrorists on the world block.

This isn’t about preventing a nuclear arms race, it’s about using those weapons, and so far Israel and the USA are the only ones threatening via the world stage to use them against Iran. The Israelis and Americans think they found a loophole by not actually launching a nuclear warhead against Iran. Again, using a non-nuclear weapon to blow up Iran’s nuclear facilities is the same thing as launching a nuclear weapon against that country. The threat in itself is an act of nuclear terrorism.

Attacking a country’s ‘nuclear computers’ is the same as launching a nuclear weapon against that nation. Disabling the computer systems that control operations will create a melt-down situation. Perhaps it wasn’t the tsunami that created Japan’s nuclear disaster. Perhaps the USA in their well-publicized campaign to disable Iran’s nuclear computers missed their mark.

Earlier this year the USA bragged to the world that Iran’s nuclear capabilities had been put out of business–disabled via their own nuclear sabotage efforts. Now they want to bomb them. So it looks like they did miss their mark. How many more ‘nuclear accidents’ is the world going to tolerate?

Who are the nuclear terrorists again?

Cease and desist.