AP Explains: Brownface part of racist face makeup history.

AP Explains: Brownface part of racist face makeup history.

So says a so-called race and ethnic specialist on a race and ethnic team of the Associated Press who failed to give the white color people’s view on face makeup. There’s a monumental surge to demean white color people for dressing up as brown, red, or any other color people at costume parties – decades ago, which can only mean they are trying their mightiest to dig up what is currently so-called dirt for the purpose of destroying anybody running for office, or thinking of running for office, or simply famous people with a lot of money, who don’t kneel to their agenda of ruling the planet with white color people’s money and influence.

White color people are the minority on this earth, not all the other color people. That’s the trick, to fool all people into thinking white color people are the majority, then to shame white color people for the color of their skin. Otherwise they wouldn’t keep mentioning the color of their skin.

So, why is Associated Press wanting to sway public opinion on color, when the public opinion they’re trying to implant in your brain is prejudicial toward all white color people? Report the news, and place opinion with the opinion news outlets. If you keep giving the opinion, where then do people get the facts – all the facts – not just the side of every group with a different hue that the author cites as the only authority? Frankly? Justin Trudeau looks more hued, than white. 

It’s creepy to realize that news people are searching people’s yearbooks, looking for costume parties or plays where so-called white people dressed their faces up a different color than their own. That’s what Hollywood is all about, man. Making believe, making fun of, art reproducing life as it is, not as you want it to be. Why so many rape scenes in movies? Why any? Art imitates life, Hollywood explains.

This article by the racist division of Associated Press aka race and ethnicity team, reporting from or stationed in Little Mexico of all places (it’s difficult to know, since he omits facts), reeks of the ‘opportunity scams’ that so many darker hued people are playing on lighter hued people for political, social and economic benefit.

I’d say, if he reported from New Mexico, then he should have reported on actual news from New Mexico, since Associated Press is a major resource for all other news outlets, that take the story AP prints as fact, and then they put their slant on it. Unfortunately for the so-called news business, AP, is now editorializing the news for those who once relied on it’s authenticity. I’d call it prejudicial news. I’d say this guy, Russ Contreras (is it Russell or Russ or something else?)

Oops, Russell it says on his twitter face profile, but Russ he uses for the first part of his twitter name. Guess Russ is shortened from Russell, sort of like a nickname, or it takes too long to say Russell (two syllables). R.C. looks CIAish. He also looks very white colored, but skin color can fool you. Former president Barack Obama looked black color, talked black color, walked black color, yet he was half white color. R.C. actually looks more Mossadish than CIAish. They’re the ones who often pose with phones in hand – not always, only when they want to be seen.

I’d say, get out of the past, stop exploiting people’s color and move forward, that is, if you have anything of substance besides your color scams with which to move forward. Maybe the CIA and Mossad did some bad stuff in the past and now decades later decide to feed white color people to all other color people, instead of being honest about who did what, why and when.

It doesn’t look good for Russ Contreras in the position he supposedly holds to be hiding behind shades, for those viewers who see him for the first time.

I’m not afraid of my color. I don’t care what other people say my color means to the entire world or to them personally. I don’t answer to them or to the rest of the world. I answer to me. Yet the Russ Contreras’ of the world want all white people to answer to all other color people. 

If you want to talk real violence, instead of the supposed violence of dressing up like somebody else, white color people on the whole are less violent and less grotesque in their violence than all other color people. Let’s start there next time, rather than doing the creepy stuff of peeping through people’s yearbooks looking for an opportunity scam.

Voyeurs is what they used to call them. Peeping Toms before that. Now they’re race-baiting reporters looking through the life of any shade other than their own, that they can exploit for all the wrong, discriminatory reasons.

Hey, take a tape recorder into any black barber shop or any black bar or any black church and report on what you hear. That you don’t peep on all the other color peoples and only white color people proves you discriminate against white color people. My mother or father and all my relatives never called me white, they didn’t even call me poor even though they by most standards were poor.

Hollywood is at the root of most of it. Go there for your next story. I want to see how you protect the Jews. You can’t justify the past or change the past or make right the past by staying in it. It’s like quicksand. It devours you so you lose sight of everything right by focusing on only one variable, color. Go ahead, try to take my color away from me one more time. 

I am a color and don’t you ever forget that, no matter who you really are, I don’t really care. Live your own life and stop telling a certain color to live it for you.

The next time you go to a bull fight a cock fight a dog fight a slaughter house or yard or fur farm tell me more about race and color, see if I care about what you do with your face. Aren’t you the people who cut human’s heads off whom you don’t like and put them on land turtles to scare white people away? Or torture and mutilate your own people, then hang them from bridges to terrorize your own people. I mean I don’t have a people, but every other color people claims to have a people.

What do you call white people? Any racial slurs you can think of, or that roll off your tongue when you think you’re with like-minded people of a certain color? Your color?

Yeah, thought so. It’s all my fault, because I remind you of somebody else white who didn’t like you. That’s called prejudice and that’s your right. But don’t bring it to my back door and call it news. If you’re human you have prejudice. It goes with the organism and the nervous system.

Who do other color peoples dress up like at costume parties? Any white people everybody knows? How many white color people have you degraded in your life time?

Oh yeah, just the ones who deserved it, right.

Hypocrisy is blind and always leads to blood if the hypocrite doesn’t wake up to it. You can’t level the playing field by falsely accusing an entire race of people for something they didn’t do, or by trying to change their intent decades later, so you can publicly humiliate them for something they did in private that showed no malice.

Who’s the oppressor, enslaver, master now? Stop accusing people of doing what you do yourself. There wouldn’t be so many rich black color people, if all black color people were oppressed. The same is so for every other race and/or ethnicity. They all have billionaires and millionaires. Heck, even Gaza has multi-millionaires and that’s a war torn region, like Syria, war torn, yet all these rich people of all these other colors, calling white color people the reason their ‘people’ suffer mystifies the entire world psyche.

You can”t tell someone who to like or love or hate. It’s all normal behavior.

You can’t blame an entire race of people for anything, so stop before these false accusations start popping people more than they already have. Oh, then they’re white supremacists? Because they popped? But when other color peoples pop, it’s always the white color that popped them.

So other color peoples have a no-fault insurance policy that they gave to themselves.

That’s a huge discriminatory policy all other color peoples gave themselves. And who pays for that insurance? White color people. That’s enslavement.

Torture followed by slaughter come next.

JUSTIN TRUDEAU
JUSTIN TRUDEAU 2
RUSSELL (RUSS) CONTRERAS





Advertisements

WHY AMERICA FIRST?

World leaders lose their tempers when America says ‘America First’. In their minds America is saying that all other countries don’t matter, that they come second or third or way down on the ladder or nowhere on the ladder.

Nobody respects a father or mother who puts outsiders first, rather than their own. Nobody on earth does that and at the same time are considered competent and respected heads of their families.

Some say, we can all be one happy world family. Just let us in, or give us your money, or your scientific and technological knowledge, open it all up to us. It’s going to take too long to get what you have and we don’t want to spend all the required time catching up.

So all these decades you all were enjoying the life of leisure swinging in your hammocks, while others, worlds away, were working to make the earth a better place to live – easier for everyone. You wanted your way in your culture in your region in your time and everybody leave us alone you’d shout with your fist to the sky. We don’t even want all that modern stuff. What happened? Now you do. And you’re still wearing loin cloths and sandals and beating your wives and causing wars that keep you all in the cave.

Your superior/supremacist attitude held you back. Your egos, big as cave openings, wouldn’t let you out. You think the more somebody acquires the more supremacist they are. It’s the ones who refused to change in order to move forward who are the real supremacists. They are the ones who think the old way is the only right way, and why can’t we exist with dirt roads and no medicine absent heated and/or air-conditioned living spaces. Your culture, not invention, ingenuity and progress, came first. You clung to it like a baby who clings to a blanket.

You said leave us alone; get out of our spaces. Go back from where you came. Yet here you are losing your tempers because America finally said “America First”. We didn’t put America first for a long time. We shared our knowledge; our people paid with their wages to send people with skills, knowledge and supplies to help you build your nations, but still there were too many who wanted the old life – a life where people die young, where they suffer without knowledge on how best to survive.

You didn’t want to be catapulted into the modern world. The issue was the catapult; it was too sudden. But it didn’t have to be if you had stopped with all that culture supremacy that really means nothing. There’s not much value in anything that comes under the label of culture. It’s a bunch of traditions that hurt more than help – in almost every instance. Everything else comes under the labels of ‘living’ and ‘progressing’ or ‘dying’.

In short, you didn’t want to do the work of it, even when you were shown how and given the tools and the funds. You still found a way to muck it up.

So what have you all done for America, except make continuous demands on America’s people, their resources, knowledge and experience?

There’s a growing trend that wants America to become a welfare state absorbing the poor people of other nations, while financially supporting those nations as well as others.

If America becomes filled with people with low paying jobs, because nobody can speak each other’s language, and everybody gets the same benefits, how will these Americans pay enough taxes to send money and other aid to all the countries it currently subsidizes? Socialism can only sustain it’s own people for a limited amount of time before turning to other states for handouts.

World leaders need to think twice before attacking the American system that helps to feed their own people and keeps them free by providing subsidies off the backs of the American worker.

Yes. In order to keep sharing what we have with the world, we need to keep progressing and to take care of our own first. It is the citizens who pay out of their pay checks in taxes to supplement economies of over two hundred nations worldwide. Regionally, Africa receives 32 percent of all U.S. aid, followed by the Middle East at 31 percent and South and Central Asia at 25 percent. Afghanistan receives the most.

In the meanwhile, all classes of working Americans subsidizing the economies of other nations, so they can survive and thrive, deserve a thank you from all those countries benefiting from their hard work and sacrifice.

So, again, what have you given the hard working American people, except your demands and disrespect? Calling them supremacists. You sure got that one backwards, true to your fixed culture-based nature I’d say.

Think on that.

Then the next time you walk out of the cave, show some respect for a world built by human beings working together.






PREDATOR ENTERTAINMENT

STOP BULL FIGHTING

It’s the cruelest form of entertainment that begs to be banished from the earth. Putting live animals in a stadium and slowly murdering them and cutting out their tongues to tell the world they have no voice, while the audience cheers, tells you something horrible about the people who host the events as the pride of their nations.

This is what happens when societies separate themselves from the world. They bend toward their base natures instead of aspiring to overcome their sadistic urges against those who can’t fight back. Why? Because they can get away with it.

So we, the civilized ones, must fight for those who are dismembered in an arena for entertainment purposes.

Money. It’s about the money, which is even more abhorrent. Are the Spanish speaking people so numb to another’s pain, that they can’t attract tourists in any other way? Build your economies with integrity. There is no integrity in staying stuck in the past.

Basque Country? You’re not a country. Real countries don’t do that. You’re a prison. All your people are enslaved by tradition.

Why blame the tourists who come to see you humiliate yourselves by humiliating defenseless creatures? Sure they’re as bad as you. But you host the events and purposely appeal to a human’s most evil nature.

The European Union raises the bulls under conditions of enslavement and torture for the sole purpose of being killed in the arena.

The European Union must speak in one voice against the holocaust coliseums of the past. Replacing a human animal with another animal is not civilized. It’s even more uncivilized, since the animals did nothing wrong to deserve such a harsh and lethal and long-suffering punishment.

It’s not a sport. Matadors preying on society’s most vulnerable beings is not a sport. Trained to kill an animal who can’t escape. It’s only a matter of time. You cut their tongue out as they beg you to stop the carnage, but you delight in the massacre.

The world is turning on you and you will be in that stadium with no escape door, while the audience turns their backs. And there won’t be any bull in there with you.

Those bulls are a part of your society. Treat them with the respect they deserve.

Don’t expect the world to pay you to stop. You wanted to be separate, so figure out solutions to your own economic woes. Or are you one of these parasite countries, that feeds off of the suffering of others?

Try healing. Raise up the worthiness of the animals by banning slaughter in Basque Country. There are lots of options in the plant-based industries. Explore them and find one that fits you.






NOW DO YOU KNOW HOW WE FEEL?

What? We? Who’s we?

Are you one person or a multitude of like-minded people in one person?

How would I know how you individually feel and then how a multitude of like-minded people inside of you feel?

How would I know that? Did you tell me, specifically, or even generally, how you feel about anything?

How about me. Do you know how I feel? Do you care how I feel?

Why would I care how you feel if you don’t care how I feel?

Oh, you want to punish me and then say, yeah, now you now what it feels like?

So you think I’ve never been punished by anyone, by any group, by any demographic, by life itself, by prejudice, discrimination, enslavement and torture? So how could I possibly know what it feels like?

Prejudice leads to discrimination, which leads to enslavement, which leads to torture, which leads to slaughter if left unchecked. In other words, if not stopped.

I’m up to slaughter. I’ve lived through all the other stages.

So, what are you really asking?

You want me to feel your pain?

Are you ready to feel mine?

Oh, you want me to feel your pain, then you walk away without feeling my pain.

What do you call that?


PayPal-ME-300x300.jpg






 

BAGEL OUT. ENGLISH MUFFIN IN.

I tried and tried to like that bagel. It just wouldn’t let me. It’s too tough, break your teeth, bite the inside of your lip trying to chew the dang thing. I developed recipes, nice ones, knowing other people worshipped the ugly thing trying to be a bun and a donut in one. No originality. Flavorless even when flavored. My dog daughter uses them like toys. Rolly Polly we call them, when Steve brings one home for Lilly Belle.

The bagel trying to be a sandwich is the biggest joke of all. I did it, tried it, it’s my way to expeiment. I succeeded by covering the hole with something that wouldn’t push through when biting into it. Spreading the thicker condiments on the lettuce rather than the bread. Some bagel-makers made a softer, more gentler, easier to stomach bagel, but they don’t stick around long. The big bagel-makers push them out.

I engineered my recipes for the head-in-the-sand bagel-eaters. They’re happy. But I can’t keep using a product that I have to alter so much in able to eat it. And they only stay fresh for one day. Hey, this isn’t in the category of a French baguette, where you know in advance to eat the day you buy.

Poppy seeds give pregnant women a positive opioid test and babies get taken away from their rightful mothers based on the results of that test.

On the ‘everything’ bagel they appear like tiny black dots all over it. That’s what bagel-eaters want, ‘everything’ so they don’t miss out on ‘anything’.

What they should have added is ‘everywhere’.

Strategy-wise, bagel-eaters don’t like to choose. Again, they’re afraid they’ll miss out on or lose something by choosing one or more over the others.

Did the bagel-makers stop putting poppyseeds on the bagels? NO. They relished in the attention, making the bagel even more appealing to addiction prone bagel-eaters. No high yet, but keep trying and it could happen if your body likes opioids, and many bagel-eating bodies do. Opioids gravitate to where they’re liked.

But those poor mothers whose babies were swiped away from them put into foster homes right from birth, because of that test. Babies bonding with strangers all because of the bagel-maker not wanting to change the recipe.

Now comes the sesame seed being highly allergic in allergy-prone people, which is a lot of people, since the number of people with allergies and sensitivities are rising through the roof. Yes, the sesame seed also appears on the ‘everything bagel’.

Still, that they kept the poppyseeds on… and washing doesn’t help much, since if you wash poppyseeds they clump together, so have to be dried, and that makes a mess and costs a whole lot more, so everybody makes light of it. Funny isn’t it? Bagel-maker too lazy to wash the poppyseeds. Change the test not the bagel, they say as they seeth through yeasty nails dug deep into their piles of dough.

That even one baby got swiped from his/her mother, and father too, is one family too much. Your baby sees some strange person first and bonds with that stranger, knows that stranger’s smell, cries for that stranger that isn’t you, just because you had to have an ‘everything’ bagel, knowing that the bagel had opioids that show up in a urine test when you go to the hospital to give birth.

What a heartache – a heartache that the entire world feels for that mother and that baby and that father and the families of both, whose smells will be strange to that baby when that baby is rightfully returned to it’s real family.

The Jews did that. And they’re still doing it.


Yes. The English Muffin is definitely superior to all bagels, seeded or not. It’s just the way life made it. Nooks and crannies is an English term, but the holes in the muffins are like basins or craters that hold liquid, that slowly seeps into the risen dough like syrup on pancakes, instead of holes where liquid falls straight through to your lap.

I’ll take the English muffin over the bagel any day of the week. I don’t have to find ways to like it. It’s perfect the way it is. Frankly I prefer my plant burgers on a lighly toasted English muffin rather than a burger bun. It’s sturdier and doesn’t fall apart as easily, but tender at the same time. Soft in the middle and lightly crisped on the edges when lightly toasted. That’s the only way I eat an English muffin, toasted.

Animal-Free is my only requirement – no milk or whey or any part of the animal disguised as a plant.

The chefs on Food Network turned their noses up at the English Muffin, but then again the bagel-makers butter their buns, plus they eat animals – the whole animal, raw, bloody, alive sometimes, insects too, so you know where their taste buds lie – at the bottom of the sewer of humanity. They laugh a lot – too much for culinary comfort. Not that it’s their fault – they can’t help themselves.

They keep telling people to stop them as they whistle past the graveyards of those they ate, to eat some more, but nobody does, because they know they’ll fight back with a vengeance few have seen in modern day. They want you to stop them as an excuse to release their brutality once more upon the world. Go ahead, I dare you.


So, the English Muffin wins hands down.

ENGLISH MUFFIN IN. BAGEL OUT.

 BOYCOTT BAGELS GLOBALLY






BLACK AND BROWN SUPREMACY COUP

BLACK AND BROWN SUPREMACY COUP

Blacks and browns being allowed to publicly display their hatred toward all white people via mass media with impunity, via a collective of black and brown supremacists with a collective manifesto, under threats of harm if the white targets won’t turn their color, is the new racism that is quickly becoming a national security risk.

By allowing black and brown supremacists to escalate the public evisceration of anything white as the only acceptable racism, this democratic republic will fall to the hands of the black and brown terrorists among us whose only agenda is to turn this country into Spain and Africa. There is no room for white people in America, unless they denounce their color.

The blacks and browns have taken over the media, one of the first actions an invading force does before they stage a coup.

There is no hate talk toward blacks and browns that the blacks and browns didn’t create themselves by their anti-white rhetoric all over the media 24/7 – for years now. White people can’t talk back in America. People’s lives get ruined for having an opinion. It’s all about getting the white man, the white guy, divide and conquer the white man and white woman.

This state of affairs flourished under Barack Obama when he allowed blacks and browns to burn cities and break the laws with impunity as a means of economic and social revenge. No one can expect white people to forever stand down when they are constantly under attack in all sectors of their lives. White people cannot be expected to continually absorb the hateful attacks by angry mobs of black and brown supremacists.

This is what happens when blacks and browns forever receive preferential treatment in all economic and social categories by the US government and through the media which the US government controls.

The revenge of black and brown people against the white people who spread democracy around the globe, assisting all peoples of all ethnicities build their nations to become self-sufficient in a modern world is an affront to human rights and human dignity.

That the angry floods of supremacist mobs seek to take over that nation of all nations is an inexcusable and unforgiveable attack against all civilized peoples.

For a past president to blame domestic terrorist attacks on a sitting president, when one is black and the other is white, demoralizes that country and destabilizes that nations security.

Democrats involved in this coup-attempt have lost their moral compass. Revenge always does that. Like the revenge holocaust against the German people by the Jews after the Jews were freed, it always hits and destroys those not deserving of the punishment. Thus revenge always fails to produce positive, forward moving results. Instead, it keeps the cycle in continuous motion.

If you want somebody to feel your pain, then you need to stop holding onto your pain so tightly. Only then will your life improve. That you left your so-called loved ones on their own to fend for themselves against your own people whom you feared, for a cheap ticket away from them, shows your own lack of integrity and loyalty.

Don’t tell white people to love your families as you burn their cities and ruin their families.

Millions of people living in the USA undocumented put politics and money before family, God and country. That is not a civilized group of individuals.


ISRAEL

Every time there’s a tragedy in the USA of a massacre magnitude, Israel pops up all over the media, as if to take vicarious credit, always pushing the Israeli agenda.

Look, each time Israel disrupts the Middle East and the rest of the world with ritualistic sacrificial actions toward the Palestinian people who have no defense machinery in place with which to protect themselves from the invasion of the Israelis, the world pops in predictable ways.

Jewish supremacy is in play in Palestine and the entire world feels it.

Even if the world is not cognizant of the slaughter of the Palestinian soul, it knows something’s dying and they think it’s in themselves. Pop. Pop. POPOPOPOPOPOPOPOP…..

Black and brown supremacists in the USA repeatedly declared on public broadcasting outlets that if Israeli [revenge] strategy worked for the Jews it will work for them in America. That alone should give the world sufficient reason for pause.

The black and brown supremacists don’t have an organized movement that can be investigated. They are the movement – every one of them answers to the group. There are no individual opposing views coming out of either camp, black or brown. That’s the proof.

This isn’t going to end easy nor quickly. Put the focus where it belongs. All eyes on Palestine.

Correct what needs to be corrected.

Simmer the Israeli forever-revenge-holocaust machine down.






BOYCOTTING BAGELS

I’m Boycotting everything Bagel until Israel ends the illegal extermination, displacement and occupation of the indigenous Palestinians on Palestinian Land.

When the Palestinians began boycotting Israeli products made in occupied territories in lieu of isolated attacks against Israelis, the Mossad teamed up with intelligence agencies around the globe to punish the boycotters.

Really, the only means poor people have to protest being enslaved is to boycott the offenders products. Shame on all of you for stripping the citizens of the world of their right to protest with boycotts instead of violence. Where are your heads located?

Benjamin Netanyahu even traveled to the USA to make deals with governors to punish anybody boycotting Israeli products by denying them government contracts.

Yes, these governors colluded with Israel against a person’s free speech rights in the USA and their right to protest via boycotts.

Jews do it all the time. They boycott anything and anyone who opposes their agendas. They then proceed to destroy their lives.

Frankly I was surprised that the other intelligence agencies were so afraid of the Israelis.

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, recently stated regarding Iran that sanctions work.

I’m going to see if they do, by boycotting everything and anything to do with bagels.

BOYCOTT BAGELS GLOBALLY.


BLOCKBUSTER PALESTINIAN PLAN

IT’S A TRAP. ISRAEL APPROVES Palestinian construction in West Bank – Don’t Take That Deal

RESERVATION SYSTEM FOR PALESTINIANS = ISRAELI PEACE PLAN

BOYCOTTING BAGELS






 

BlockBuster Palestinian Plan

SEVEN YEARS AGO:

Quake-hit Iranians facing harsh winter

Two August earthquakes left 100,000 homeless, and many remain living in unforgiving conditions as winter approaches.

The twin quakes rendered more than 100,000 people homeless and destroyed almost 12,000 houses. Exactly four months after the temblors struck, most people in the remote village of Hiag are still without permanent shelter – despite government promises that their demolished houses would be rebuilt.

7 years ago on Al-Jazeera English 11 Dec 2012


WW response to that article:

The USA does the same thing. We spend trillions on never-ending wars all over the globe, on huge pay offs to countries to gain their support, on developing new sophisticated nuclear weapons and adding to our existing WMD stockpile of over a hundred thousand tons of poisons (how could any country possibly need that many toxic agents?).

We spend huge sums of money exploring space, going to Mars looking for water and now we want to colonize the moon.

Over 50% of people in the USA live below poverty level, without medical care and essential services needed to get them out of poverty.

Our unemployment rate and national debt and murder rate are staggering.

Our war veterans are treated like trash, yet our leaders keep telling us that we’re doing fine and we’re the greatest and most powerful nation on earth. How is [it] that such a nation has so many of its own people suffering?

In my view the test of a powerful nation is how they treat their own. The USA doesn’t have much power at home. They don’t buy us off like they do the rest of the world. They can’t afford it.


That was seven years ago. Where do we stand now?


Why do we always have to be thinking about Iran?

Because the Jews do, and when they do something, they demand everybody do it with them.

Okay then. I’m on it – I’m thinking about Iran.


BEST APPROACHES:

Stop all monetary sanctions against Iran NOW. Return the money the USA stole from Iran. When you take somebody’s money it’s called stealing.

The USA Congress passed a defense bill curbing the president’s war powers, which essentially backed the president down from striking Iran. They protected their president from an embarrassing red line defeat. NOW it’s Iran’s turn to stop nuclear weapon development and proliferation.

“Death to America” is why Iran can only use nuclear for energy. The oil is drying up. Scientists know that.

Team up with Iran to promote alternative energy sources. Sell coal to Iran. Share alternative technology for free.

The USA does not believe that Iran won’t use nuclear weapons against non-Muslim states. Iran doesn’t honor contracts. Neither Iran nor Israel play well with others. Only Iran and Israel can change that or be forever enemies.

1- A country that cuts itself off from the rest of the world cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.

2- A country that won’t allow International Atomic Energy Agency inspections cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons.

3- A nation that displaces and/or subjugates indigenous people through occupation cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. I don’t trust Iran, Israel, North Korea.

4- Monetary sanctions create war not peace.

5- Occupation and displacement of indigenous people creates war not peace.


  • Iran gives up their nuclear weapon aspirations and Israel simultaneously dismantles theirs. It’s time for North Korea, Israel, Iran to make a deal with the world and open their countries up for business.

People living in isolated communities anywhere in the world cannot be trusted. I don’t trust them. Humans need oversight. It’s their nature to offend those they deem weaker than they. Whether it be in communes or countries, the women, children, elders, handicapped and those discriminated against for their gender identity need world protection.

  • All nations must belong to the United Nations. NOW. All territories. All occupied peoples.

Should the world accept ambiguity on whether a country possesses nuclear weapons or not? NO.

Ambiguity is the same as a lie. The world cannot trust a group of people who lie about possessing nuclear weapons.

Does the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) have protocols in place to inspect all nation states suspected of having nuclear weapons? NOW is a good time.

Don’t think that Israel won’t strike first. I don’t believe that they won’t. Provoking the USA to strike Iran for them is the same as striking first.

“The IAEA was established as an autonomous organization on 29 July 1957. Though established independently of the United Nations through its own international treaty, the IAEA Statute, the IAEA reports to both the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council. The IAEA has its headquarters in Vienna, Austria.”

  • The displacement of indigenous people cannot be allowed to continue unabated anywhere on earth. Palestinians live in Palestine. It’s not called Israel. Palestinians did not participate in world wars. Jews had no right to wage a war against an indigenous people who had no military to defend itself, for the purpose of stealing land to make themselves a country.
  • The Palestinians get all of Jerusalem. Israel is dividing Jerusalem like the Soviets divided Berlin. It won’t work. You cannot put up a wall that runs through a city and expect peace.

Russian and Polish Jews ran concentration camps in the Soviet Union and elsewhere during and post war. Descendants of these Russian Jews flocked to Israel when Ariel Sharon needed strength in numbers to build a nation to displace Palestinians and take the land as their own.

Israel gave asylum to one of the worst Polish concentration camp commanders, Salomon Morel (a Jew), who committed massive atrocities against Germans after the war. The Jews hunted Nazis for decades, but turned a blind eye to their own holocaust against the Germans after WWII. The “Savage Peace” exposes Jewish concentration camp commanders in the Soviet Union during the war and in Poland when they took over the camps after the war.

Don’t forget lest it happen again?

  • If the Jews were anti-holocaust, then they’d be anti-holocaust for everybody. Yet they are not anti-holocaust for everybody, since they committed a holocaust against the German people after the Jews were freed at the end of WWII.
  • After fleeing to Palestine, they committed another holocaust against the Palestinian people, stealing their land and resources in a brutal war against a people who had no defense system in place with which to fight back. They still don’t.

Every year or so the Israelis satisfy their holocaust urges by bombing the infrastructure in Palestine, to make the world pay for rebuilding while giving Israelis building contracts, only to be bombed again once completed.

Israel is a pathological nation of holocaust makers who force people from the land they covet while simultaneously forcing the world to fight on their behalf under threats of destruction if they don’t.

My concern is not that Iran gets a nuclear weapon, it’s that Israel will use theirs if they have them. The entire world needs to push Israel, via invasion if necessary, to see for themselves if they do or if they don’t have a nuclear weapons program. Iran is a distraction – a diversion Israel uses as they inch toward dominating the Middle East.

  • Any nation purposely ambiguous about their nuclear weaponry is a rogue nation and must be dealt with in the swiftest of terms to bring them into compliance with the IAEA.
  • Israel is slowly exterminating the Palestinians in Palestine through state sponsored terrorism.
  • There are more Palestinians than Jews. They need a larger space than Israelis.
  • A holocaust Made by Israel is coming to the Middle East. Transparency from Israel NOW.

Jews will say the same as they always said. We don’t know why the world lets us do it. Why don’t they stop us? They could stop us.

Well…

Obviously you need your mind made up for you.


Jews don’t have friends, because they don’t want friends. Friends don’t pay. Enemies pay.

That the Jews did what was done to them and then to  the Palestinians not even involved, is worse because they, the Jews, knew how it felt and proceeded to do it anyway, in the most brutal of ways to others they encountered.

Jews don’t negotiate. They take what is yours that they think they own using ‘the chosen ones’ and holocaust as leverage. Then they give back a portion of what they took and call it a painful sacrifice.

The Jews get caught stealing, then in a sign of Jewish faith they offer some of it back to get something else they want.

It’s the same as stealing your money, then loaning it back to you at high interest rates.

That’s why the world hates them – they say. Hate comes from fear. The world fears their brutality and disproportionate responses to just about everything.

  • Jews are not peace seekers, that’s why the occupation of Palestinians in Palestine by Jews cannot be cured with a peace plan. There is no peace with occupation, brutality and stealing land and resources. There is no peace when borders and walls surrounding Palestinians keep them locked off from the rest of the world.

Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations DANY DANON says to the world: recognize Israel as a nation and the Palestinians will get much more money than without it.


I don’t care what Israel does outside of Palestine. Fight with whom you want. Hands off Palestinians. They are not your pawns. And YOU are NOT their caretakers. Are you kidding me with that caretaker talk? Wake up to yourself. See the horror in that proposition?

Whose money? Who is going to give Palestinians money? And through whom? YOU??

  • Israel gets no money from any country as a reward for stopping a holocaust they created and for displacing an indigenous people.

Jews take care of Jews and do tiny favors for big steps made by non-Jews in the interest of Jews.

To allow Israelis to care for the Palestinian people after they raped, killed and pillaged them is like letting Hitler care for the Jews after WWII.

sldt

The world cannot stand by and allow that to happen.

Stop stealing Iran’s money, only to return it for huge favors in the interest of Israeli dominance in the Middle East.

Israel is a friend to no one. They will give you nothing for all you do for them.

Neither IRAN nor ISRAEL nor the USA nor EUROPE nor RUSSIA nor CHINA can be trusted to do what’s in the best interest of Palestine. They all want something from each other and they use Palestine and the indigenous Palestinian people as pawns to achieve their own goals.


PALESTINE IS MINE. Sharon’s Rose.

Jews claimed a ‘right to return’ to Palestine after WWII, even though they were living throughout Europe long before the war. That ‘right to return’ was based on a lie.

They didn’t simply descend on Palestine. They had a war plan in place for years – one that displaced the Palestinians Permanently, never to see home again. Push the Palestinians from the land, confiscate it and turn it into the Nation of Israel, then wall it off so the Palestinians couldn’t return after the war of 1967, which really wasn’t a war; it was a holocaust against an indigenous people.

The WAR of 1967 was a HOLOCAUST against the INDIGENOUS PALESTINIAN PEOPLE.

sldt

THERE IS NO ISRAELI PLAN. This is a Palestinian Plan. Israel is not under siege. Israel is not under occupation. Jews have not been displaced by the Palestinians.

The Palestinians didn’t steal Jewish land and give it to the Russians to build up their population numbers. Jews by choice long ago in search of a land of milk and honey migrated to Europe and then to most of the rest of the world. What they discovered was that cows, sheep, goats and bees lived everywhere. So did they.

Jews didn’t have a land to return to in the Middle East. Any land after WWII would have been in Europe or elsewhere.

Hitler did not go to the Middle East and recruit Jews for his war factories.

All eyes must be on Palestine only.

Jewish Entertainment: When WWII ended, the Jews rounded up German men, women and children, staged public events in sports stadiums, where they released  German men, women and children to angry mobs of Jews who tore them from limb to limb.

In the concentration camps run by Jews, the Germans were starved and as they died, were fed to the live Germans as their only food.


1- Borders go back to pre 1967 war, which was an illegal war. It was a holocaust against the Palestinian people with the purpose of exterminating them, stealing their land and creating a Nation of Israel. They then turned to Russian Jews inviting them to settle on said designated stolen properties.

Even Ariel Sharon once said he didn’t even know for sure if they were really Jews. It didn’t matter; they needed high numbers to stack the deck.

2- Palestine controls it’s borders.

3-  Palestine controls its own goods and services. Nothing gets filtered through Israel first.

4- Palestine has the same sea rights as any other nation bordering the sea.

5-  Israel’s capital city is in Tel Aviv. Israelis are going to have to move the USA embassy back to Tel Aviv. Frankly, I don’t care where you put it, as long as it’s not in Palestine.

6- Palestine gets all of Jerusalem as part of Palestine. Maybe you want to rename it: Sharon’s Rose. A suffer-free zone, meaning no slaughter within city limits. People living there can stay, but under Palestinian rule. I don’t care where you put your capital or USA embassy (once you get one and you will).

Israel created a Berlin wall in Jerusalem. Take it down. Families suffer when divided. No city should ever again be divided, yet it is exactly what the Israelis did. Jews should have known better, but it seems that not forgetting doesn’t mean it won’t happen again, when all one cares about is what is done to them and not what they do to others.

7- The USA builds a military base in Gaza to be the protector and defensive arm of Palestine, under unique treaty agreements with Palestine only. And, as a negotiating location for all Middle East states, sort of like the United Nations of the Middle East. Sorry Arab League, but you didn’t do much to secure the peace in your region.

     No stalling over details. The Jews and/or Israelis cannot have a say in it. They cannot be trusted after the holocausts they designed and committed as revenge, and then again against the indigenous people in Palestine without a means to defend themselves.

8- Occupation ends. Palestine becomes a sovereign nation.

9- There will be no “savage peace” as the world allowed the Jews to do with impunity after WWII and to the current day 19 July 2019.

Palestinians and Jews are not one people, nor are they the front face and back face of the same coin. Jews and Israelis made that abundantly clear when the Jews tried to exterminate the Palestinians while stealing their land and resources. The world needs to understand that.

One cannot expect those enslaved and impoverished to be perfectly mannered people. The Jews have everything, they already own the world through threats of making hell out of the lives of those who oppose them, and look how badly they act.

It’s time to see the truth and act on it.






Global Violent Outbursts Spreading Like Contagions

GLOBAL VIOLENT OUTBURSTS SPREADING LIKE CONTAGIONS

I believe that.

Nancy Pelosi knows Trump is going to win in 2020, so all her efforts are directed now at destroying him rather than forming a viable plan for the future. No matter the plan, she’s knows he’ll still win, which puts her on a search and destroy course of action.

She’s not worried that she’s doing nothing for the country, because she knows he is, so let him keep doing it, while she sets out using cunning and morally corrupt strategies to take him out.

She plans on staying, She can handle those girls. She’ll come to their defense even when it’s a lie, so they’ll back off and let her at him her way.

Yes, they’re little girls in women’s jobs who don’t know how to behave in public and who don’t know how to represent all the people. All they want is for all the people all the time to support their race, religion or gender. They are not for all. If so they would be for white people and they clearly are not. They use white people as their slaves and whores to work or fight for their rights and nobody else’s

There are more poor white people in the USA than all other groups combined. They’re not organized. If they were they’d be called white supremacists – another hate name lobbed at whites who want to preserve their race and who have white pride or who simply are more comfortable among their own. All groups are more comfortable among their own and generally prefer to procreate among their own. There is no crime there.

Forcing people to procreate with other demographics is enslavement. Leave people alone to be with whom they want, instead of doing what some social engineers say is good for all when it isn’t. Stay out of my love, like and hate life.

Hate is a natural human emotion. To legislate emotions is slavery. To pass a law telling people who or what they can love, like or hate is total enslavement of the human mind.

Nancy Pelosi way overstepped her boundaries as a liberal politician and can’t find her way back. She is Stuck in Mussolini Mode. She needs to clean up her own talk and walk before calling somebody out in public to humiliate them – another dictatorial move. She’s trying to colonize the world by having the world come to her. Mussolini tried to expand the Roman Empire by going to the Middle East: Libya, Somalia, Ethiopia, and Albania to name a few of his conquests.

Humans who can’t hate or love are considered mentally ill, which means Nancy Pelosi and her cohorts want to legislate mental illness by humiliating in the public square anyone who expresses their right to love, like or hate anything or anyone they want. It’s a universal expression of pleasure or displeasure on a continuum.

Gays often say you can’t tell someone whom to love. That is correct. I say You can’t tell someone whom or what to hate. People hate for valid reasons, usually when under threats of the perpetrator’s making. So back off legislating emotions. It is not appropriate to dictate to anyone how they should feel. It’s not your place. I’ve seen more hate come out of the democratic party than I’ve witnessed during my seventy years on earth and in a very short time.

Breaking News: Massive amounts of hate directed at white people across the USA and the world – all because a white man said America comes first to Americans. Yes, we take care of our own citizens first. Maybe the rest of the world needs to do the same and stop asking that crazy uncle sam you all love to hate to open his pockets for you. How dare you disrespect our nation, our people that way.

Hey globally, white people are the minority. China, Japan and all the Asians, India-Pakistan, Africa, Middle East, South America, Central America, the United States of Mexico, all the island communities and territories fall under the category of dark skinned people. They got the huge numbers. Europe is all that’s left and that’s quickly changing color. Soon white people will be an endangered color. It’s a scientific fact; stop denying it and calling it racist.

Right now South America is in a mess – always has been. Middle East is a mess and always has been. Africa also a mess. India a mess. Asia a mess.  Pakistan helpless. They all want to self-govern and keep the white face out, after the whites build their nations for them. And then when the white face leaves, they all make a mess of it. Too many pull out and migrate to other places to repeat the same story, usually to where the white faces live. But their goal is always the same – turn the new place into the old place and keep the cycle of corruption in play.

There’s a color war in the USA government, thus not a fully functioning government body. It hardly functions at all. That’s what happens when dark colors seek self-rule to the exclusion of everybody else. ‘Join Us’ they all say. But when you do, you’re left behind when the color wheel spins and you notice the color white isn’t on it.

Trump is the only one working for the American people – for all the American people – regardless of color or gender, or religion or status of handicap.

Every dark color group wants Trump to be their private dictator, and if they sense that some other color is getting his attention they go berserk in public communicating through violent, obscene, disturbing gestures and shouts of destruction their demands, like terrorists, like strange creatures mysteriously surfacing out of imaginary lagoons in the middle of every street in America. Then it spreads like a contagion throughout the planet via the media.

Humans imitate each other. It’s their nature to do that. It doesn’t matter the race, religion, culture or gender or anything else. Imitation is the one common denominator we as humans all share. We copy one another’s behavior patterns. I don’t need science to tell me that. I observe it.

So the American people suffer a little under Pelosi’s tyranny, but so what, Trump’s doing a darn good job. She just wants to be boss at any cost. She’s not boss with Trump. She’s boss with a democratically elected president. Trump outplays, outshines, outworks her.

White people are people of color too. White is a color. Nancy Pelosi on a regular basis slams white people; Barack Obama did the same thing. The little girls she keeps protecting from the big bad white guy slams white people. Those girls put white people on the table for the world to humiliate, kill then eat.

Not unlike the bullfighting they all support as a necessary tourist attraction for the brown people in Basque and the dog fights for the black people,  and the cock fights for the Asians, forcing white people to fight for them has become the world’s favorite blood sport.

Yet, there is no hate speech law that protects white people – only black, brown, yellow, red – every skin hue except white. Therein lies their glaring prejudice and racism.

No, Donald Trump is not a racist. Nancy Pelosi and her gang of bullfighter girls are the racists. Trash-talking white people, holding white people hostage to their flimsy social plans to transform America into their countries of origin, making poor white people go to the back of the line and pay for other people’s crimes through preferentially based social programs are all racist moves.

All because they couldn’t find the courage to stand up to the dictators in their own countries of origin. Instead, they came to America to stand up to the white people they loved to hate and the public officials whom the citizens of the USA legally elected. They’re too accustomed to coups to work methodically to achieve good things for all citizens. They want it now, and they want it for themselves, so they put all their individual and collective energies into unseating whom they hate and replacing the seat with someone they control.

Donald Trump really doesn’t have a racist bone in his body. His opponents who all want his money are racist against all white people.

Don’t ever tell someone whom you hate that they can’t hate you back or you’ll destroy their lives.

Hating someone isn’t the same as racism. Hating someone is not a crime. Loving someone is not a crime. Liking someone is not a crime. Being angry is not a crime. Crying is not a crime. Being happy is not a crime. Fearing someone is not a crime. Who is trying to take all your defenses away from you? Who is trying to make you into emotionless human robots?

Wake up and get up. What’s wrong with you? Ah, those strange creatures from the imaginary lagoons are scaring you again?

Scare them back. Scare the hell out of ’em. They’re going to kill you anyway.

NSA is on my radar screen. If you have something to say, they’ll read it. Feel free, but be cautious.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

ARE ALL WHITE PEOPLE PRIVILEGED? I keep hearing that.

All groups and races enjoy privileges at different times and under different or similar situations.

Poor white people receive fewer privileges than any other group. They are barely recognized as existing anywhere beyond Appalachia, which proves that they’ve marginalized into the shadows of every other poor group.

White people don’t have a leader or an organization that fights on their behalf to get them benefits. No one marches for them or burns businesses and neighborhoods for them, or torches cars for them. They basically are fed the leftover crumbs after all other poor people receive their privileges. They’re not big complainers. They accept their condition and blame fate rather than some other race for their status.

When competing for social services, there’s a hierarchy: African, Hispanic, European, Asian. Out of all the poor people, Africans and Hispanics scream the loudest and utilize threats of mass actions in order to go to the head of the line. Asians work the hardest, while going without all the amenities, to achieve greater goals of personal achievement.

Hispanics now have overtaken the Africans, which angers many black leaders, who in turn strike out against white people. Strange isn’t it? One would think they’d strike out against Hispanics, but they need them on their side, should they decide to join forces in the future against white people.

Historically there has been a disdainful relationship between Africans and Hispanics. It will be interesting to see how that plays out and if they can indeed unite for the inevitable war against all whites. White people will surely be outnumbered, unless they join forces with the Asians.

Except for the very rich of all races and their families, most people get what they work for.

If you go to a country not speaking the language of that country and demand free everything and get it, that’s one heck of a massive privilege.

If your ethnicity is anywhere beyond the borders of Europe, you receive preferential treatment in the USA – unless you’re Russian. The Russians lay low; they have the same poor problems as do poor Europeans born and bred in the USA.






 

A SLAVE LABOR FORCE in the USA? Again?

illegalslonglinebrush

It’s not up to politicians, law makers and breakers to tell the populace what to do without, unless they are willing to do without the same benefits, and all sides vote on measures endorsing the recruitment of mass numbers of immigrants to fill vacant jobs that supposedly poor, middle poor and upper poor Americans don’t want.

Yes, it’s time to put the vote to the people, since the lawmakers aren’t listening to ‘we the people’ and certainly are not conducting the business of government in the best interests of those who make this country great – it’s citizenry.

When millions of people are urged to populate the USA in the shadows, while draining social resources from the poor who reside here legally, someone made a decision on what ‘we the people’ must do without in order to support massive immigration.

‘We the people’ deserve and demand a say in government policies that force us against our will to downsize our personal economic lives that we worked hard to achieve over time, for agenda-ridden public officials who do not make the same sacrifices.

For people we don’t even know. For people who publicly express hatred for the USA as they climb our walls to enter illegally. For people who, if the tables were turned, would not do the same for us.

It goes like this: Bring us your huddled masses who don’t speak English and don’t want to progress beyond fruit and veggie picker and we’ll give them social service privilege status including for all their family members plus protection from deportation, while letting their extended families into the USA under the radar, to disappear into the shadows, except when collecting their benefits.

They can break all the local rules regarding housing etc., then they can send half their pay checks to their countries of origin to increase the national gross income of those countries, while increasing buying power to their families ten times what the money is worth in the USA.

How do you like that deal?

In order to pay for all of that – for millions of people – we will increase the tax burden on everybody else, with of course the lower classes absorbing most of that burden, plus the usual stuff associated with socio-economic favoritism of one poor class over another poor class resulting in malcontent and criminal activity.

How do you like that deal?

Anybody here have any problems with this?

One of the problems with this strategy to maintain a slave labor force is that it’s a slave labor force. When you give federal, state and local benefits in place of increased income from the private companies they slave for, you rob from the poor to give to the poor, using public funds.

That’s the travesty here.

Another problem is that no one is happy with the arrangement, except the governments who benefit by an increased national income through its citizens working in foreign countries who send back half their paychecks to their families, so the corresponding governments do not have to take care of their own poor people population.

Plus a few growers benefit in the countries that don’t use sophisticated machinery or robots, thus need humans to fill the jobs nobody but slaves want. Those are their claims, the ones I keep hearing repeated on television regarding why we need to support a slave labor force – in the interest of globalization. In essence, the world needs a slave labor force to fill the low paying jobs only slaves want, as long as the public will provide free social services that everybody else pays for.

Who are you trying to kid?

The rich are the only ones not pulling their weight; it all falls on the poorer classes by the rich classes to intentionally keep them from rising out of the poorer classes.

Increase the pay and let them provide for their own needs. Look, almost as much, maybe more, vegetable and fruit that is picked on the farms ends up in the garbage, so fix that problem by lowering the price at market.

If you want to fix the problem, you’ll move the produce, instead of pricing it so high nobody buys it causing the vendor to deduct a loss, which must be more lucrative than selling it at a lower price. So who makes the laws that pay the vendor more for a loss than a sale?

Historically, and that counts up until present-day, many people sold themselves into slavery, wanting to enter a job market that also took care of their personal needs. The non-slave category of people were not offered the same benefits package, so they didn’t want those jobs. Who would?

So, those in the poor people category figured it out a long time ago. It’s not that they didn’t want the jobs, it’s that the slaves were in effect getting paid more than non-slaves by receiving better benefits and greater leniency for bad behavior. Plus their paycheck went further, when half of it was sent to their country of origin to support their families at a better monetary conversion / exchange rate.

When do the American people get to have their vote counted in all mattersregarding slavery?

‘We the people’ do not trust members of congress to act in the best interest of its citizenry. Why should we lose money in a booming economy, because other nations can’t solve their own political, thus socio-economic issues?

Why should we share our already meager benefits with people we don’t know, don’t understand, who don’t respect us or our country, in fact who hate us before they even get here?

Once again, using the band-aid approach to solving problems has ended up with a huge bandage that’s getting ready to fall off and expose the multitude of maggots sucking on the pus-filled wound that multiple layers of band-aids created.

LAZY LAWMAKERS. That’s what I call them.

Nobody in congress loses money or benefits on the deals they make and the laws they pass. That should tell you something useful.






Sometimes It Takes A Dictator

You know what they say about too many cooks in the kitchen ruining the soup. There’s a lot of truth to that.

Hypocrisy is blind.

Hypocrisy is blood.

The Word Chef

Hypocrisy is created when one fails to see the same flaw in themselves that they see in another. This leads to perpetual stalemate, which eventually if not broken leads to the letting of blood.

Such is the hatred that comes about from seeing and understanding only one side of any view.

Yes, sometimes it takes a dictator using dictatorial moves to thrust a country forward out of the doldrum dumps when opposing sides refuse or fail to compromise or agree or present viable, alternative solutions.

The Word Chef

In the interest of all those who need and deserve a solution to whatever hinders them, a singular action by one person in place to execute that action, starts the forward moving process out of the ditch, that their resistance dug by standing still in a moving world.

It takes a lot of energy to stand still for creatures who were designed to move. Lost energy. Energy that digs graves for impending death instead of energy that moves mountains to build better communications to unite the world, at least by bringing the world together to hear all views.

Yes the views of the populace too. They are the most important, since the politicians decide their fate by imposing laws they write onto people they’ve never met – except for a few populace-plants on the campaign trails in the places they visit. Frankly, I don’t want those hand-selected populace-people speaking on my behalf.

Resisting any movement at all is counterproductive to a functioning entity, be it government or business or in one’s private life. The operative word here is ‘functioning’. Without it there is no government nor entity. The purpose of all entities is to function.

Governments, if they’re smart and if they really care about the people they claim to serve, write into their constitutional laws a mechanism designed to break a stalemate, knowing the high probability that among passionate, ego-driven players, digging one’s heels in becomes a strategy rather than an honest vote.

That’s when the person elected to break stalemates when they occur is allowed by the laws of the constitution to make dictator-moves in order to keep the country functioning as an entity.

Perpetual blame leads to inaction, thus the blame-game becomes in reality the blame-strategy used to keep an entity standing still.

The Word Chef

Dictator-moves are crucial when lawmakers are too obstinate or too tired to lead effectively.

The populace wants and deserves the deployment of that option when their elected officials fail them by not working on the projects that make their lives better than they were before. Not just a little better – that’s as bad as stalling until the next election just to get re-elected.

Big, bold moves is what my heart, mind and soul want – moves that benefit us all, not more for the rich, because they have more money and ten percent of five million dollars is more than ten percent of fifty thousand. So they give everybody the same percent, which makes us all equal?

NO IT DOESN’T make us all equal.

Biased ratios are used to discriminate not level the playing field.

The Word Chef

Why use that biased mathematical ratio? It helps only the rich get richer. The rich can invest their ten percent or $500,000.

The poor need their meager ten percent or $5000 just to survive.

The math is accurate; it’s the application of it that discriminates against the poor (in this instance).

Eliminate The Biased Mathematical Ratio






One Land One People One Language

ONE LAND ONE PEOPLE?

ONE WORLD. ONE LANGUAGE?

The British use a lazy form of English. When I watch British films I use subtitles. I can’t understand what they’re saying and it’s not only me, Steve can’t either. Our own language has become foreign language to us. 

Why do they give everyone and everything nicknames? Maybe it takes too much effort to remember the names assigned by others, so they correlate the image with a name of their own – like their own personal filing system, that only they can understand?

They use a lot of unts and grunts and skate over words and syllables. It’s as if it takes too much effort to talk normally. It’s like they just rolled out of bed with a huge hangover then start jacking themselves with high octane coffee so the unts and grunts get delivered with precision speed, minus the content.

The Irish, Welsh and Scots do the same thing.

I’ve got a lot of British, Scot, Irish and Welsh packed into my DNA, yet I can’t hear them, because I can’t understand them. Looking back I recall speaking with breakneck speed and less than stellar pronunciation, softly spoken though. Nobody could understand me either. Every now and then I revert to my old ways over a glass of something mind-opening or mind-numbing as some might call it.

Still, one might think that me being a partial tribe member to the White Island People, that it would inherently and automatically facilitate the comprehension of those whose language I share. But it didn’t. So hear I am deficient in my only native tongue.

Maybe because my DNA is common to peoples of so many countries, there’s some language-confusion going on in my brain.

Hey, the English invented the language. They can do whatever they want with it. 

They dumped it on everyone they colonized, then refused to adhere to the same rules of diction and enunciation that they imposed on others. I can see that becoming an irritant.

They’re not the only ones though. Some Puerto Ricans sound Chinese to me when they slang-talk on the phone. Some Spanish people look Chinese to me. Except for the color, some black people look white and some white people look black. For a long time I could see Jew in everybody.

On the other hand, when Indians and Pakistanis speak English, they enunciate perfectly every syllable, and when spoken with accelerated speed, as is most always the case, it’s difficult to understand. Add to it, the musical component that accompanies the female Indian or Pakistani voice and one is not sure of the intent of the message.

I’m beginning to see differences in the female and male voice across cultures and similarities among all peoples, which further leads me to think the world would be better off if we all spoke the same language. 

Just yesterday while attending a tenant meeting at the building where I live, one of the women approached the manager and asked if there was going to be an interpreter. The manager looked a little stunned and replied, no, no, we don’t have an interpreter.

The woman who asked (in English) has lived here many years. The guy who set her up to ask, hasn’t lived here long and has been from the beginning an agitator regarding race. The woman who asked is Spanish as is the man who set her up. The manager is African. 

The Spanish woman knew there would be no interpreter. Her handler wanted to make a social injustice point in front of everyone. The woman walked out.

I say Cqueba. He says Cooba. Who’s right? 

What’s important is that people understand what others are saying and what they mean. Reading someone’s real motives or the real truth into their words is only helpful if accurate. 

If I say Cqueba and he corrects me by saying, it’s Cooba accompanied by a big smile, then it should be obvious that he understood what I said and what I meant. The purpose of the smile is to disarm me while he controls me. Nobody likes to be corrected when they are known to be understood. Nobody likes the insincerity of a smile meant to control your mood.

The public staging of the interpreter request is part of a greater movement toward accommodating Spanish speaking people who don’t speak English in the USA. 

It takes a long time to learn a language, and since there are so many Spanish speaking people at a disadvantage, through their own choice of nation-selection through nation-shopping, they feel that the USA should provide them with interpreters. 

For anyone to think that Spanish speaking adults who come to this country either legally or illegally will learn to speak English is naive. That happens at the child level when they attend English speaking schools.

For the adults, the massive numbers would require massive numbers of teachers. 

And how many bilingual people are there who want to teach in the first place, and then who will pay for the salaries, supplies and school room space? It’s a huge endeavor. It takes years to achieve proficiency or fluency in any language.

There are two languages right now that dominate the globe. English and Spanish.

Since it’s the Spanish speaking people who want to come to the USA to live, then the responsibility is on them to learn English. It’s not on the host country. 

If Americans were to migrate to a Spanish speaking country, then it would be on them to learn Spanish. It would not be the responsibility of the host country to teach them or to offer them interpreters wherever they go.

To solve this problem I suggest that all Spanish speaking countries teach English as a second language, to ease migration when it occurs.

What? One land, but not one language?

What? No walls on land, but build them into speech instead?

We can talk in front of you and you can’t understand what we’re saying?

That’s a wall. That’s a huge wall.

So yeah, you like walls, but only when you make them.

If you go to a country that speaks like you do, everybody there will understand what you’re saying – you’ll be equal in ability to communicate.

Your people, your leaders, don’t want equality They want advantage on their terms.

You want that language wall, that language barrier, because it protects you from having to abide by the same rules as everybody else.

It’s a prejudicial tool you use to exploit English speaking people, whose country you invade.

You don’t really mean one land is big enough for everyone. 

If that’s true, then you would agree that one language is good enough for everyone. 

You want to stay separate, so that eventually you can turn the USA into a Spanish speaking country. That’s the long term goal for which your people will make the long term sacrifices to achieve.

The English speaking people will be required to learn Spanish in your one land, one people, one language paradigm. There will be no interpreters for English speaking people.

Your plan to provide all Spanish speaking people with interpreters is a short term plan to a achieve a long term goal.

One Land One People One Language.






BRENTON TARRANT – Terror Triangle

Ethnic-Based Revenge Attacks

Muslims around the world who engineered and executed violent attacks against those they perceive as their enemy, plus the militant wing of the Palestinians, claim that because they don’t have a military, they are justified in committing attacks against their enemies using their bodies as bombs or using explosives and/or hand held guns to create mayhem and destruction in public places to kill innocent people caught unaware, for the purpose of making everybody else fear, thus hear them.

Except for the Palestinians living in Palestine, all other Muslims reside in countries that have militaries and long standing established governments.

So that argument is not valid for any Muslim living outside of Palestine, since Palestine doesn’t have a military to protect itself from invasion.

Why do you think Israel invades and occupies Palestine? Because they can. Simply put, Palestine doesn’t have a military with which to defend itself against aggressors and invaders.

In addition to Palestine not having a military, there has not been one single nation, of all the nations in the world, who ever came to the defense of the defenseless Palestinian people against military invasions and consequent occupations by Israel.

Israelis on some level truly believe that they not only own the land of Palestine, but own the Palestinian people as theirs to do with whatever they choose.

Jews have the same history of using their bodies as weapons to attack their enemies, because again, they claimed to have no nation nor military to rely on for self-defense or for offensive occupation purposes. In 1948 that all changed with the formation of the Israeli Defense Forces making that argument no longer valid.

Before the Jews had a global home base they called Israel, they all lived in established nations with long standing governments and militaries.

So it appears that both Muslim and Jew think of themselves as global nations of peoples who reside within other nations.

Palestine does not yet have an independent nation status. Israel has nation status but is not recognized by the majority of the world, since both Arabs and Jews did not agree to the proposed plan by Britain introduced by the United Nations to partition Palestine into Arab and Jew states.

When the Arabs did not accept the proposed partition, the Jews decided to simply take their portion by force, so there was never an agreement per se. In 1948 Israel declared themselves the Nation of Israel and at the same time formed a military. And that’s where they are today.

Even though the Middle East is primarily populated by Muslims and controlled by Muslims, they are for the most part Arab states, except of course Iran, the Persian wing of that particular Muslim population.

It appears that Muslims in Arab countries express more unity with their religion than their governments. So it’s not surprising that the global Nation of Islam carries more weight in global and domestic matters.

The global Nation of Israel acts in much the same way, though around the world there are more non-practicing Jews than there are non-practicing Muslims.

Brendon Tarrant the twenty-eight year old ethnic British Isles male, forced by parentage to be born and raised in Australia, that the British government primarily populated by occupation aka colonization, killed a few score of Muslims in neighboring New Zealand as payback for the innocent lives Muslims took throughout Western Europe in recent terrorist attacks.

It’s odd how the Muslims got hit and the Jews keep trying to make it about Jews, anti-semitism and hate.

Actually there’s a terror triangle operating here – a terror triangle based on revenge.

Invading a peoples’ homeland and putting them under occupation, forcing a foreign, hostile culture onto those under siege is terrorism.

Britain basically tried to colonize the entire world, entire continents in fact, and was highly successful. Others did too. The Spanish got most of South America and now they’re moving northward with their socialism aspirations in tow.

The British are everywhere. I’m even British – a lot British.

Colonizers use the same recruitment tools that religions and governments use. They find a people with problems that they can solve. They nurse them back to normalcy, then indoctrinate them into their way of thinking and acting.

Hate is too simplistic a response or a cause. People hate lots of things and lots of people and lots of situations, but they don’t blow people apart because of it. They usually adjust or avoid, which are smart measures for increasing one’s survival advantage.

Hate is an anger emotion. You can’t tell people they can’t express their emotions when somebody or some thing offends them. It’s part of human nature. It’s normal.

If you focus on the hate – the emotion – then you don’t have to account for why something happens. ‘It was hate that caused it’. No it was not hate that caused that man to engineer and execute a plan to kill a specific group of people.

When people hate, they’re repulsed by those or what they hate. They want nothing to do with that which they hate.

Revenge. An eye for an eye. Why doesn’t anybody call revenge the ‘hate’ word? I’ve never heard anyone do that before. Never. Not out loud. Not a whisper. Not in print either.

Justice. Everybody raises up the ‘justice’ word as if it was sent from heaven or certainly some kind of holy place in the universe of most people’s minds.

JUSTICE FOR ALL. Even me? Even him? How about her? Us? We? Everybody? Yes to it all.

And what is justice if it isn’t payback, revenge, an eye for an eye, spend the rest of your life in jail. And oh, we become so angry when the offender gets out of jail early on good behavior. Pay back, pay up, just pay for your sins.

We want an arrest, we want an inditement, we want a jury trial, we want a conviction and if we don’t get it, all hell will break loose.

Most people don’t get to satisfy their need for revenge except in small ways. Most of the time that’s all it takes – small gestures from anywhere to lower the anger level. But some grievances are so big and attacks so atrocious that little placations and appeasements, to soothe the psyche and deplete the desire to blow up what the aggressors blew up, only in their backyard this time, become ineffectual.

Massive grievances fester when people aren’t shown that measures were meted out against the aggressors and a better world emerged.

A better world did not emerge after 9-11. We took a revenge hit. We hit back, again out of revenge, yet we didn’t hit the people who hit us. We did not target Muslims or countries where the hijackers lived.

To me it always sounded like a team the Israelis put together. But what do I know, except their history of finding non-Jews or Jews from other countries to commit assassinations that they think will advantage Israel.

The USA executed an opportunistic set of moves against people and countries that had nothing to do with the attack against the people in the USA. – and had a lot of Israel input when congress sat paralyzed by the enormity of the hit.

From that miscalculation and our own committed atrocities around the globe grew a need for revenge from the people we struck who didn’t commit the crime.

When you falsely accuse and abuse people for something they didn’t do, they will eventually find a way to strike back if not appeased in some way prior to that happening.

And for those living in the USA who didn’t feel the satisfaction (because by then it was practically a crime to criticize a Muslim), that lack of closure, because of all the secrets surrounding everything, festered.

People think a lot, they work things out a lot in their minds. Often governments treat the populace of any country as if they’re a bunch of non-thinking and non-feeling people. Yet they expect all of us to be fearless in absence of knowledge, which is incredibly naive.

Governments think that only military personnel need to avenge those who commit atrocities against the populace. They do the avenging; they get the satisfaction. If that were actually the case, then there would not be so many damaged military personnel coming home from war zones. The populace gets revenge vicariously?

A better world would be the best revenge.

Forcing foreign cultures onto other foreign cultures without warning or some sort of preparatory teaching is bound to create havoc. We’re brought up a certain way, then boom a whole town of people enter your backyard and you’re supposed to be fine with it all, even though you know nothing about them. It is like an invasion.

Everything you ever learned about how to behave gets tossed, because these new people don’t share the same history, raising and values.

Everybody’s world changes without warning. It isn’t a smart strategy for change, to simply uproot massive numbers of people and relocate them all over the globe. For what purpose? How will they assimilate? It’s as bad for the newcomers. Nothing looks or acts normal to them.

I recall one time Ariel Sharon (Prime Minister of Israel at the time) seriously suggesting that the Palestinians be uprooted and shipped to Siberia.

This is globalization? To make everybody feel better? About what? Who they are? Who they’ll become? How they’ll adapt to a different culture? Forward or backward? Nobody cares? Why?

It’s about the bottom line. Money.

Globalization is not a feel good movement to get all the people in the world talking to each other. We all speak different languages. Translation services don’t work very well and cause more confusion and frustration than no translator.

It’s about opening new markets to make more money. It’s like colonizing the world all over again.

So get ready for more ethnic-based revenge attacks – from all sectors. It’s not about hate. It’s about crashing and clashing cultures. It used to be called culture shock.

It’s become much more than that. It has become institutionalized by each country’s need to increase their national income to remain viable, whereby governments mock and shame those who resist the manipulation.

It’s not about hate. It’s about governments not properly preparing their people for changes imposed upon them. The social engineering departments failed miserably. You can’t just tell everybody to accept what they don’t understand, because governments don’t want the people to know what they’re doing to them or with them.

Admit it. Globalization is an experiment. It’s not appropriate to punish people who were made into subjects against their knowledge, thus their will.

The media plays a big role in dehumanizing people they don’t like or who don’t fly their way, by humiliating them. They do it to their own elected officials. The elected officials do it. It’s become pathological. It’s like social communication disease, that’s communicable.

It’s already been announced that Facebook will be looking for people criticizing Muslims and will handle them.

You don’t need to take away people’s freedom of speech. That’s already being done by Facebook employees who encourage bullying of anybody whom they think might support President Trump on any issue. Facebook is part of the problem. Their type of social engineering will only make matters worse.

There’s a cultural divide among Facebook employees that they take out on unsuspecting Facebook users.

Besides, people don’t usually mock those who were attacked. If that’s happening, it’s the NSA rearing their ugly social engineering heads in the wrong direction as usual.

The British will be the first ones out, trying to act like the world police. They need to stop instigating problems in other countries. They just can’t get that colonization bug out of their systems.

I can always tell who’s British on Facebook, no matter the colonized country they live in. They call everybody cunts and dicks.

Muslim, Jew, Christian. The axis of terror. Based on revenge.






 

Stop Calling People Cunts

To British people no matter where you reside in the world or whose flag you live under:

Calling a woman a cunt is like calling an African a nigger. Calling a man a cunt is equally offensive.

You don’t get a free pass because you think it’s okay or because you just can’t help yourselves.

No matter how many times you object, it doesn’t change the negative impact it has on women’s equality rights globally – in every culture.

Every time you utter or write or think that word ‘cunt’ you disrespect half the human race and half of the animal kingdom.

You can blame it on Tourette’s Syndrome or remnants thereof or blame the Jews for screwing you; nobody cares the source. Besides, the unpredictable verbal expulsions indicative of Tourette’s Syndrome are always out of context.

Yours are not.

Your incessant use of particularly offensive words used to berate your multiple targets, while giving yourself an emotional release isn’t a neurological disorder; it’s a perversity, especially the release part.

That cunt, dick, fuckwit, wanker, prick, cocksucker and douche all have legal names. How about using them as a negotiated settlement instead of having your lives made a living hell every time you spit the word out for an emotional release. There are many other words and expressions too numerous to add here.

All one has to do is watch a British film or a film from any region that the British colonized and you’ll hear those words interspersed in all of the dialogue. It’s not only the lower class patrons; it’s everybody from top to bottom and sideways. Presidents, Prime Ministers and Queens, more than likely.

It’s all over social media. British Isles, Canada, Australia are the main abusers.

Whenever anybody hears those words escaping like a torrent of anger unleashed from your hot-wired brains everybody knows with whom you slept.

However, instead of releasing those names (also too numerous to mention) I will set the world straight on the truth regarding a similar matter. The Brits, famously known for giving everything that moves and everything that doesn’t move a nickname, coined the nickname nigger. It was not a made in America word.

In fact, Flora Shaw named Nigeria after the Niger River. Neger or nigreos is a Latin derivative of ‘black’.

So nigger is a black African river person.

Niggers are river people – a nickname given by the British themselves.

Now wouldn’t one think that with all the uproar in America regarding that word being a disparaging word in reference to Africans, that the Brits would have told everybody the truth of how it came about?

It’s origin is not derogatory. There’s a country and a river named after the people who inhabit the region.  Blacks have been calling each other niggers since Nigeria was named after the river that was named after the black people who lived on or alongside it.

Actually, if I had to choose I’d rather be called a river person than female or male genitalia.

It might be a good time to also note the similarities in trash talk between those two groups. African Blacks and Brits. Does that mean that genitalia-generated trash talk is DNA related? Or is it a learned response to stress?

Is it a part of a syndrome that the British passed on through their DNA to African Blacks?

What is learned can be unlearned. Stop calling people what they don’t want to be called. And stop ruining someone’s life because they utter a nickname that you call yourselves. I don’t call myself a cunt. I’ve never seen the word used in any context other than a disparaging, under your thumb, boot on your neck kind of way.

So there you have it. The Brits started it all – and they continue to offend while putting the shame on everybody else for following their name-calling lead.

Now that’s arrogance and hypocrisy.

Nobody’s ruining their careers. There’s no money in it.

They get off scot-free (tax-free is what it means, nothing to do with Scotland).


Niger, an African country independent of Nigeria, was also named after the Niger river. Black African river people.






White and Black Nationalists

White is not a nationality. Neither is Black.

Calling a race a nationality is like calling a religion a nationality. It’s highly biased in favor of the designated group the nation is named after.

Referencing people as white or black nationalists isn’t appropriate.

Blacks predominantly populate the fifty-four nations in continental Africa and in some Island communities. Why do they need another nation half way across the world? Are they trying to colonize the USA? It wouldn’t be the first time a group of people did that.

What, anywhere they live they have to make it into their nation?

The Spanish are doing that now, trying to colonize the USA. Except for Portugal they predominantly populate the continent of South America. Central America too. Also the United States of Mexico. Some island communities too.

What’s up with people wanting to change their residences to other nations, then once there, work feverishly to change those nations into their likeness?

I thought the era of colonization was over. All it did was continue under a different name – immigration. The first people to emigrate paralleled the missionaries, scouting out a different place to conquer, then moving, establishing themselves, then moving their families to their new nation, then changing the existing political system to satisfy their needs and values. Next thing you know the transition to a conquered nation is complete and nobody saw it coming. One nation under whom? Pick a nation any nation.

It’s a slower ride, but mass immigration still results in colonization. Occupation is the same process with a different name.






 

We ARE ALREADY A ONE PARTY SYSTEM in the USA

Since the Democrats have a majority in the House of Representatives and they are the so-called compassionate party why aren’t they politicking to abolish the death penalty and for an equal rights amendment (ERA)?

Because they don’t want to abolish the death penalty and they don’t want equal rights for women.

So that makes them no better than Republicans. That’s about all the equal I see in the USA government: on all levels from local to federal: Democrats and Republicans are equal, which makes us a one party system.

Equal pay for equal work is not the same as equal rights. Women are sick of band-aid approaches and short-term fixes used to pacify them as equally worthy citizens. Women’s rights need to be the same as everybody else’s and they are not. Inserting the mirage of equal women under the title of ‘all men are created equal’ did not result in equality for women. If it had, it wouldn’t be a mirage; it would be real.

The USA is supposed to separate church from state according to their Constitution, yet they institutionalize a death penalty based on revenge supported by an ‘eye for an eye’ teaching in the bible – a religious book anonymously written, and anonymously edited a multitude of times to reflect the times.

Sparing a life is liberal. Taking a life is conservative.

Giving all humans the same rights is liberal. Giving certain groups of humans different rights is conservative.

So what are we?

We’re all conservative, except for those few who believe in equality for all.

The masses of people breaking our laws to enter our country claim to have all the answers for us. They do not represent a third party or even a second party. They represent themselves as lawbreakers who can’t even care for themselves, much less their families.

If premeditated murder is wrong, then it’s equally wrong to plan and execute the murder of an offender of that law.

Logic serves better to keep us equal under the law than does religion or laws that empower some groups or demographics over others.

What’s right for one or wrong for one needs to be right or wrong for all.

If a law cannot be applied equally, then abolish the law or don’t make the law in the first place.

Equality needs to be the litmus test of whether a proposed law becomes a law, then it needs a probation period to assess whether it should become a permanent law or a renewable law.






Proud to be an American? Yes I am.

Sure we’ve got our issues, especially being such a new country – only two hundred and forty-three years old. We have lots of areas we can improve on, in fact in every area, and we as a people strive to do that.

We’ve come a long way in only 243 years, especially compared to those countries who have been around for thousands of years, places where women still can’t drive a car or show their hair in public or don’t have running water or electricity, or places where they hang people for being gay or places that stone people to death or set people on fire or conduct widespread amputations as punishment or spiritual practices, those areas that for whatever reason didn’t advance. They didn’t become better for everyone, only a few.

We didn’t have privilege. We all came with nothing into the wilderness and look what was built?

It’s understandable that people around the globe want to come to a place that already has all the upgrades and leave behind a place that wouldn’t progress to where we are in their lifetime or their children’s lifetimes.

But to come with hatred in your hearts for our leaders and the American people? To break our laws to get here, waving the flags of your countries of origin, shouting hateful messages to the President and the people? That’s difficult for all people everywhere to understand.

Your emotional state is not an acceptable excuse. How long will you be giving that excuse as you continue on a crime spree in order to be free? How long do you think Americans will accept that?

You ask a lot and you give nothing in return – whatever you make you spend in another country, so how do you contribute to the American economy? How do you contribute to its culture when you have to live outside the law?

How many legal immigrants assimilate into American culture?

Sure our leaders and people aren’t perfect – not even close – but look where we are and where you are and tell me that all you ever cared about was the personality of leaders and the people they lead. Because once you take the personality away from the leaders and those they lead, you’ve got a bunch of tough, strong-willed intelligent people who know when to say no, when to say yes and when to find a compromise or a new solution altogether to make and keep their country great and safe.

You don’t like the leaders nor the people in your own countries, and instead of trying to work to change what you have, you go to another country and continue the hatred for leaders and the people they lead there. So what’s the purpose? Can’t you see why people call you gold-diggers? You’re coming for gold, not to share an experience of living in the greatest nation on earth.

That you don’t want to come here for the purpose of contributing to that end, and getting along with the citizens and their leaders, but only for your own selfish needs, alarms those families who helped build what we now have.

You’re not coming to contribute to its continuing success; you’re coming to exploit it. You’re coming to turn it into the country and its people that you left – a country and its people that you hated enough to leave both behind.

So why with all that hatred, anger and expectations of entitlement before you even breach the border with no plans beyond breaking the law would you think Americans should welcome you with open arms?

All the countries you could have gone to if you really were in imminent danger won’t allow you to exploit them. You knowing this, go to one that you think will.

You do yourselves no favors by insulting the American people and America’s leaders, before you even get here. Whoever is leading you in that effort does not have your best interests in mind. They are exploiting you, just as you seek to exploit America. It’s important to your survival that you understand that.






 

ISIS BRIDES FOR SALE on the world market

ISIS BRIDES for sale

In my view, they’re all radicalized recruits.

The purpose wasn’t for ISIS to keep and maintain all these women wannabe terrorists. The purpose was to recruit, train, then return them to their countries of origin figuring at lease some of them will actually become bombs or at minimum motivate others to activate.

Hodu Muthana and Shamima Begum specifically show no signs of being de-radicalized. They’re still saying what their handlers tell them to say in all the interviews. Who are their handlers? And why so desperate to repatriate them?

One had three husbands in a very short period of time. No grieving the loss? Opportunistic qualities so sophisticated at such a young ages? Who are their families? How to afford even going to Syria so young? Bank accounts? Rich parents? Where are their parents? Why the international coverage? How does one do that?

Exactly what ISIS wants. Parading their brides for sale to the country they’re going to bomb. That’s not an unfamiliar strategy. Make the enemy country buy the bomb that’s going to kill them.

They’re bombs. What do you do with a known bomb?

Defuse it.

‘I hope I can change. Hopefully’. Both women leave the door open like recruiting tools specifically directed at those undecideds. Yes.

Recruiting tools. If I don’t get what I need, what I want, well then… Too many doors opened up with both women – and I only saw portions of the interviews.

Why would the USA give terrorists an international audience to recruit people?

Get them off television.

Dangle the intel carrot and the FBI does what? Takes the bait. Jesus what’d I tell ya about those carrots?

Activation has already begun. People are rushing to the stores to buy what they need. These ISIS brides are she-heroes.

You see, they defiled a religion, their religion, because they own that religion, which means they can use it however they want to use it for their cause. Of course all is forgiven. They make the infidels continue to hate Islam, which gives them the excuse to continue their terrorist campaigns.

They’ll say they were brainwashed. That’s somebody else telling them what to say. But they’re saying it. They do exactly what they are told to do, and say exactly what they are told to say – how to act, when to lower head, look away, raise eyes, lower eyes, what to wear, what to carry, how to put their make-up on. Where to put their hands.

If they were brainwashed, they still are – only not to an ideology. They do whatever anybody tells them to do.

They’re good, both of them. ISIS sent the best.

Since they disrespected a worldwide religion, remove the hijab. When they do that, you’ll know they’re serious. They’re playing on America’s religious tolerance to get into the country.

Oh, they can’t remove a hijab but they can call for the mass murder of innocent people, and then claim they can’t believe they said it. But they’re still doing it.

They’re playing you. It’s a hustle. The door is open and they act like they don’t know which way to go. They need you and the entire world to tell them what they need to do.

Notice they both have children. They’re using them just as the Spanish border people do, to gain entry into the USA on compassionate grounds.

If they’re truly remorseful; I didn’t see it. If they’re truly cured; I didn’t see it. If they’re no longer the same people and have regrets for their behavior, then I say live where you’re welcome and live a life that proves you are no longer a threat to your neighbors or your country of residence.

That they chose fame for financial gain, while they kept their hijabs on in defense of a religion they used for terrorism, and used children to gain world sympathy shows that they are not deactivated.

They are manipulating the world as I write. Two nobodies go to a terrorist camp and then set themselves loose on the world stage of communications hijacking the media to recruit undecideds while claiming brainwashing as their defense.

They don’t understand the concept of boundaries and how it applies to everyone. Heck, Colin Kaepernick did the same thing. Jessie Smollet did the same thing.

They didn’t get to where they got by being meek, yet that’s the image they want the world to believe. That they’re all victims of oppression. How is it that it’s the rich kids claiming victimhood? They take the money on behalf of poor people everywhere, laughing all the way to their banks. What a scam.

The USA doesn’t buy slaves. We’re not interested.

Close the door. If they’re serious about reprogramming themselves, they’ll do it no matter what the world says. If they’re not, then they would have activated that bomb regardless of actions taken.






 

Lone Black Man Stages Massacre In Aurora Illinois?

STRATEGIC

Black leaders are popping blacks, just like Israelis pop the Jew populace each time they covet something and don’t want to wade through a process to get it.

When Jews commit massacres in America, it’s the Jew psyche in play. Jew leaders know what to say and do publicly to disengage their own assailants from reality.

Blacks figured out how to mimic Jews to get what they want and are applying that strategy to their own populace. They know what to say and do to incite certain people within their group to act on the groups behalf by rising to commit a massacre in the name of revenge. Who murders a bunch of people because they got fired? It’s the psyche they play on that activates the assailant.

They call it social justice. That’s what happens when particular demographics think, speak and act in unison with an agenda based on…

View original post 1,292 more words

You can’t flip a coin when it comes to local and national security.

I don’t want to be part of a system in a country where the rights of criminals are more important that the rights of law-abiding citizens.

You can’t keep blaming law-abiding citizens for the crimes criminals commit, and as a result leave them wide open to more acts of crime committed against them.

Committing crimes might be considered normal behavior for some segments of some groups, but it’s not acceptable normal behavior.

Half the people in the USA think the other half are white and privileged. I don’t know who circulated that fake statistic, but it has a lot to do with flipping a coin and it has done a lot of damage to the average citizen trying to obtain and keep work, to feed, clothe and educate their children, all the while bettering themselves.

A man and/or woman who takes better care of other people’s children than they do their own are not good parents.

The same goes for nations. If you care more about giving to the poor of other nations than you care about raising the standard of living in your own nation, then you’re not fit to be a nation.

All nations must take care of their own first and stop expecting some other country to do it for them so all the cash hoarders and the rich people who want rich nuclear weapon toys, who care only about their own success, can keep stealing from the populace.

When you have children with the intent that someone else will raise them, and keep having them, then you are out of control and not fit to have children. Where does the love, shown through responsible behavior, come in? Lots of people have one child they didn’t count on having. But two, three, four, five?

Nobody wants to legislate how many kids a person can have, like China did to deal with their over-population issues. On the other hand religious leaders aren’t being responsible when they urge the congregation to be fruitful and multiply when the times don’t necessitate that spike in growth.

Increasing procreation using the STRENGTH IN NUMBERS STRATEGY is obscene, when you purposely have babies to raise your numbers thus your particular groups power.

Increased procreation rates of nations is the primary cause of poverty wherever poverty exists.

You take care of your own first and then help other nations, not the other way around.

Why should the USA supplement the income of nations that have nuclear weapons? We supposedly want them to dismantle their programs, but they want money in return – like a forever payment plan called extortion. Countries can’t be fed on nuclear weaponry. Still, Iran is the only nation who did dismantle theirs, but at what cost to the American citizens?

We shouldn’t have to pay nations not to engage in destructive behaviors, yet we do. That’s why they keep expecting it. It’s a forever hustle. Build a nuclear program for the purpose of stealing money from American taxpayers, because America will pay us to shut it down. Why don’t you build some industry with that money, so we don’t have to keep feeding you while you openly hate us on the world stage always throwing your nuclear weapons in our faces.

You have to wonder how India and China got so far out of the poverty pit, yet they still have nuclear weapons programs. Sending jobs to China and India is partly responsible. What did the global planners do, make China the factory of the world and India the telecommunications industry of the world?

What industry does Israel have to support its people along side their nuclear weapons program with 21% living below poverty? Not much that the USA didn’t subsidize in one way or another that ended up coming out of the taxpayer’s pockets.


JANUARY 23, 2018 PEW RESEARCH CENTER

Remittance Flows Worldwide in 2016.

Remittances are not part of any nations GDP, however they do contribute to purchasing power and spending by augmenting individual incomes.

$138,165,000,000 in remittances was sent from United States to other countries in 2016

$6,547,000,000 in remittances was sent to United States from other countries in 2016

That’s a deficit to the USA of 131,618,000,000 (or 132 billion dollars) of wages paid in the USA sent to other countries).

Yet, the USA can’t spend 5 billion dollars to secure our southern border in order to control immigration, which cost the USA 132 billion dollars in essentially lost revenue created by migrant workers year after year. They deplete the country’s social service resources in addition to sending 132 billion of what they make back to their countries of origin.


The USA sinks further into poverty as we help other nations rise up from theirs and we’ve sunk so far into debt that we can’t even afford our own border security to keep the masses of people from illegally invading our country looking to live free on social programs.

Yet we just allocated 250 million to Ukraine alone for their border security. That’s just one country, this year. It’s every year. Yet we can’t secure our own borders. If they were secure we wouldn’t have fifteen million illegal residents from south of our border, sitting ripe for recruitment by any entity who wants to attack us from within. Everybody knows where that 250 million is really going – straight into some rich people’s pockets.

We see nothing but hatred for Americans spewing from all these protestors in the name of illegal immigration. Who in their right mind would want people who hate them flooding the borders with the purpose of invading a country?

No one. Fruit pickers don’t act that desperate. Everyday it’s all over the television, people talking about fleeing death traps from their countries of origin, about not caring if they die along with their children to get here and they certainly don’t care about the people sent out to risk their own lives trying to rescue them.

I don’t want to live in a country where one half of the people want national and local security and the other half want nature to take its course using Jungle Justice to deal with ‘upset people’ who put the populace at risk. What do you do when others invade your land? Let them have it?

Using Jungle Justice is like expecting militias to provide national and local security. No thanks. I’d rather live in the present while moving in the future, not the past.

These people who yearn for the past are the first to cry when they have to use an outdoor toilet or can’t recharge their cell phones.

Nothing the anarchists claim they want is based on any plan that worked in the past. A plan that isn’t reality-based isn’t a plan; it’s a temper tantrum.

Remove your hoods. If it’s not acceptable to paint your face black, then it isn’t acceptable to wear hoods when you’re advocating the murder of border patrol dogs and their handlers while tossing police cruisers and carrying torches used to burn businesses.

If you have to hide your identity by wearing a total head hood during a peaceful protest, then you’re paranoid and I worry about your state of mind. Everybody should wake up to reality.

Terrorists should not be as welcome as they are in the USA. People who use terror as a method to make people submit to their will are not freedom fighters.

They’re terrorists.






This post has been banned by Facebook for hate speech

Banned Post:

Laws People Think Are Theirs’ To Break Are Major Ones

 

Blacks and Hispanics force white people to fight their battles for them. They do it with their dogs and gamecocks too – force them to fight, for the purpose of monetary gain. It’s always about the money.

Blacks and Browns like to watch people and other animals tear each other apart in an arena they control. There is no exit plan for the fighters. They’re put into the ring to fight or die. They know they’re going to die, if not this fight the next one.

Fifty states outlaw the brutal blood sport. But so do they outlaw slavery and trafficking of children for sex.

Blacks and Browns treat white people like their dogs and gamecocks.

Do you know how many white people died or sacrificed everything but their lives to help black Africans gain their freedom from slavery and then supported their efforts to achieve equality? Too many to count?

Yet nowhere during black history month is their sacrifice acknowledged. Now that is an ungrateful demographic of people who are too smug to say thank you for your service to freedom. Yet, the outspoken members of Black Lives Matter Terrorist group admonished the president of the United States for not saying enough about black history during black history month.

An apology for your lapse in etiquette would be appropriate. A sincere recognition and appreciation for white people’s contribution to the abolishment of slavery is in order. If tables were turned as they are in other countries, black Africans would not risk it all to free whites enslaved by blacks. That’s black supremacy in play.

Now who comes knocking again, this time to force white people, through humiliation and life-ruining war tactics, to fight for their causes? Blacks again. Oh yeah, and Browns.

Really, how rude – and selfish. Isn’t the mass exploitation of any race by another race illegal? It should be.

The laws people break as their right are not only the petty theft or grand theft laws, or cheating the social service system, traffic violations, assault, they’re the big laws, the ones outlawing grotesque, despicable behaviors.

Those are theirs to break is their answer proved by their actions which facilitate the practices. They say they don’t support it, but they do nothing to stop it when it happens within their own race in their own neighborhoods. Turning a blind eye = facilitation.

They force white people to politick for new laws and/or to change policy regarding the enforcement of existing laws that favor them financially, rather than do it themselves, which indicates they want white people to think and act for them. But they want to lead.

What kind of people do that? Dictators. Despots. Oppressors. Kings. Queens.





Recently Removed for Community Standards Violations

See recent content that was removed for going against some types of Community Standards. Pages that repeatedly post content that doesn’t follow the Community Standards could be unpublished.

Your post goes against our Community Standards on hate speech.

5 days ago

See details

This post isn’t available right now. Visit the community standards to learn more about what is and isn’t allowed on Facebook.



Note: 5 days ago somebody at Facebook flagged the above post accusing me of using hate speech, which is a hate crime, and not acceptable on Facebook.

Facebook gave me two options: accept their determination or appeal it by requesting that someone review it. The post would still appear on my Facebook page, but only I could see it.

I appealed Facebook’s decision by clicking a box and haven’t heard back, except that now I noticed it’s been banned and they removed the post altogether, saying it no longer is available (my own post).


a little bit of history:

On 25 Aug. 2016:

Facebook just forced me to set up a Facebook page claiming that I was misrepresenting myself on my profile. That I really was a business.

“Keep Growing with a Facebook Page

It looks like you’re using your personal Facebook profile to represent an organization, business, brand or public figure. It’s against the Facebook Terms to use your personal account to represent something other than yourself. In order to follow the Facebook Terms, you should create a Page based on your profile.”

I had no choice. They locked me out of my Facebook account.

I’m a home chef. I’m not a business nor a public figure, nor do I represent an organization. I am an artist, author and animal-free chef. That’s all that I am. And all that I do I share for free with the world. For Facebook to claim that I am representing something other than myself is libelous.

I feel like I’m being enslaved. I guess this way my posts can’t reach anybody.




back to the present:

Well, if they libel you once, they’ll libel you twice.

I’ve been censored in a country that advocates free speech as a cornerstone of its constitution. Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook are responsible for that breakdown in social media culture.

According to Facebook, when the truth becomes uncomfortable, it gets dumped into Facebook’s hate speech and hate crime category, and censorship thus the denial of one’s constitutional protections are the result. It’s because I’m white and being white is not popular right now.

Facebook discriminated against me as a white animal rights person.

Facebook should accept that there are multiple points of views on all topics, not just the views of minorities that matter – and not just the views that make certain demographics feel good about themselves. Perhaps if the CIA working the bowels of Facebook stopped social-engineering everybody, people would feel more free to voice those views, and it wouldn’t seem so startling when someone like myself has the courage to expose and face  uncomfortable truths in a direct, non-manipulative and malice-free way.

The only hate in the post is the strategy used by blacks and browns to make humans and animals fight for them when they don’t want to. They do it by using hurtful and aggressive coercive means – horrible name-calling all over Facebook and the ruining of peoples careers thus lives, and by ruining the lives of the other animals they force to fight.

A British gal once remarked on a bullfighting post of mine that I can’t single out a particular group for animal abuse, since all groups on earth participate.

Although it is true that all cultures abuse other species in grotesque ways, not to call out individual cultures or individuals on those atrocities for fear of hurting their feelings, since everybody does it, results in the acceptance of the behavior.

And nothing ever gets done about it. Nothing changes. One can’t change behavior by accepting as normal what everybody does, when it involves committing atrocities against other creatures.

So no I don’t agree with the British woman who tried to negate the effectiveness of that particular post by claiming me to be discriminating against the Spanish people. The real discrimination was against the bulls but no one wanted to see that truth or the truth of the cause of inaction being normalizing behavior that everybody participates in.

I will not back down on this post. My civil rights have been violated by Facebook in defense of cultures and peoples who commit atrocities against innocent creatures for pleasure and monetary gain.

This same pattern of behavior runs over into the treatment of humans they regard as inferior to them, people they can intimidate into fighting for their causes by using humiliation, aggression and career-destruction tactics – as a means to instill terror into the hearts and minds of the white populace.

We all deserve rights. Forcing people to fight for your causes out of fear of having your life destroyed if you don’t is not one of those rights. Exploitation and extortion is not acceptable and should be against the law.

Facebook committed a hate crime against me, and sought to intentionally ruin my reputation as a writer and an artist, by posting on my Facebook page that I published material that was judged by Facebook to be hate speech.

They also disengaged my connection between Word Press and the above referenced Facebook page without telling me.



PayPal-ME-300x300.jpg






 

Mutually Beneficial?

If we don’t respect and maintain borders, then how do we apply for and disperse social benefits? The world needs to be geographically divided in order to execute/conduct the business of the people.

Take the numbers off the buildings and the street signs down – those are borders too, when you think about it.

In order to organize the facilitation of anything we need to categorize – that’s a border too.

Putting things in boxes creates borders between what’s in the boxes.

Separation of powers – those are borders.

The concept of borderline intrigues the psyche because of the innate constraints it creates – a line in the sand, the red line, take one more step. Remove the borders and freedom ensues. Or so we think, until we cross that line or take that step only to find chaos where we sought tranquility.

It is our nature to count, divide, multiply, subtract, add everything that can be counted. It’s utilitarian by design. It’s efficient. It’s productive. It eases the burdens of cumbersome activities that borders naturally streamline. Counting creates borders.

People should be able to travel where they want, live wherever they choose, and work where there is work available and they meet the qualifications.

But living in a country where you don’t speak the language, thus can’t get a job, thus can’t support your family is reckless and endangers the security of everybody else in that country.

Depending solely on a support network of similarly situated individuals, relying on jobs where bosses who speak the same language assign jobs makes one indebted to those who pull the strings to keep these persons employed. This condition of total dependency created by one’s inability to speak the common language of the country turns the hiring of these persons into a slave-master system of employment.

That the master shares the same ethnicity doesn’t negate the slave-master relationship.

Slave-master employment relationships are designated by borders too. In the beginning, what appears mutually beneficial, becomes grossly disparate as time goes on. Benefits to one compared to benefits to the other produce a condition where the master thrives while the slave merely survives.

Short term this condition may be seen as a necessary or tolerable step toward eventually gaining greater control and freedom. Too often though people get stuck where they’re dropped, having neither the time nor the will to do what it takes to separate and rise from the group. These people end up being enslaved forever. Who can learn a language and become educated when they’re working twelve hours a day in a foreign country picking fruit, then sending most of their money back to their country of origin?

This slave-master employment system isn’t created by the USA government; it’s created for and by their own people for the purpose of settling in a foreign land.

Eventually it takes a social movement to set them free, but even then unless extraordinary measures, that no one can afford, are taken to assimilate them, then the same system of master-slave starts all over again, this time above ground rather than underground.






 

EXPOSING YOUR SKIN

EXPOSING YOUR SKIN

When I write an opinion-piece about what’s going on in the world that involves human beings or specific groups of human beings I am invariably asked ‘why don’t you like brown people; why don’t you like black people; why do you hate Jews; why are you anti-immigration?’.

When you criticize someone or some group that is making news by dumping on white people, and a white person has the audacity to respond, they call it hate; it’s moronic; it’s whatever grotesque and hurtful name that a person could think of calling someone.

Everybody claims to want a conversation, but when the conversation begins it’s always minus the white person. The brown or black want to play all the roles in the conversation – even the white person’s part.

That’s controlling, manipulative, dictatorial, oppressive behavior.

They want to control the entire narrative – from start to finish. It’s discriminatory and fake news when you assign an agenda-driven cable news commentator the role of white person representing the so-called white view. It’s a lie just based on the way it’s all set up. They get paid to do what they do. They are given their opinions by the CIA Media.

I don’t like or dislike a person based on their color. I have never judged a person by the color of their skin.

‘Well then why don’t you support us’?

Does that mean that as long as I don’t care what color you are, I should support you? How does it follow that whatever a brown or black person does, white people should support and if they don’t it’s because of the skin color and if they don’t care about color, then it’s a no brainer, you’re with us?

It appears to me that those who think white people should support them because of their skin color are the prejudicial people. They’re the real racists.

It’s difficult to talk rationally to someone who only sees skin color – theirs.

Hispanics are not minorities in Mexico, the island communities, Central America, South America. They are the majority in all those places. Yet, they still act like the minority, seeking pity from the entire world and anyone who will listen. Why is that? All these years they lived in places where everybody was about the same.

Were they thinking with their skin then? Or is it only when they come to the USA that they’re told to play up their skin color; accuse the white man of hating you for your skin; you’ll get lots of free stuff that way; white people don’t like it when you call them racist or black or brown haters. They’ll give you whatever you want to shut you up.

It’s one or the other: White people are being played, or brown and black people are the real racists, thinking white people should support their skin color; and if they do, then they automatically support the brown and black view – no matter the content of the view.

Actually it’s not one or the other, it’s both.

It’s becoming clear that skin color is used as a DISTRACTION STRATEGY to keep you off-balance, so the real issues don’t get debated. Keep attacking the opponent on an emotional plane, so nobody gets to the substance of the issues. They don’t want to debate; if they debate they could lose. Keep it about the color.

Oh, they’ll debate color, as long as they provide the lines for all sides.

Keep pushing that color button.

How does it work?

FEAR. They use fear of what will happen to you if you don’t cave their way.

And we see what happens all over the news.

It’s scary stuff. They crossed the terror threshold a long time ago. They’re instilling fear across the globe. They want a war.

This is terrorism.






Cory Booker PUNCHES HIMSELF In The Face

STRATEGIC

Cory Booker (Democratic senator from New Jersey) is not fit to serve.

He is not fit to serve as a member of any public entity while holding such bigoted beliefs about white people. He’s too emotional. He’s too angry, too full of vengeance. He keeps comparing himself to Donald Trump and keeps justifying his bad behaviors by saying Donald Trump does it.

Where does that come from,  that ‘monkey see monkey do’ senatorial/congressional strategy?  I certainly don’t want a copycat for an elected official deciding my fate from another state every time he votes on federal issues. That’s a kid thing; why are adults doing it?

For some reason he wants to be Donald Trump. I don’t know what he’s going to run on, except his penchant for doing whatever the Donald does. ‘If he can do it, I can do it’ is pretty weak. Not original. So why would…

View original post 639 more words

Mussolini’s Favorite Daughter And Mossad’s Favorite Son Opening The Door To Mob Debt

Mobsters and organized criminal syndicates take care of their own, no matter their origin or illegally made, stolen or sold product of the day. They take care of their own people and the towns and cities where they operate. It’s to everybody’s advantage.

Would anybody in their right mind want thousands of people who owe money to the mobsters where they live, descending on their country by storming the borders demanding entry on so-called humanitarian grounds, in desperation crying, screaming they’ll kill us?

‘We have no money’. Their clothes and hand-held devices suggest otherwise. ‘If we go back to the cartel they’ll kill us’. Why would they be going back to the cartel unless they worked for them?

If the cartel is set to kill them if they return to their country of origin, then they’ll hunt them down and kill them in the USA. The people here already know who they are. Expect a massive increase in law enforcement budget needs everywhere runners run from the Mob. The Mob doesn’t go after people who didn’t do them wrong. These run-aways owe a debt that the USA will end up paying in increased murders, thefts and all that surrounds corruption.

You can’t run from the Mob. Big people, small people, they’re all the same to them. If they let one person go, then everyone else takes advantage and the Mob loses control, then there’s a war unless every last one of the thieves is dead.

Word spreads, especially in Spanish. They know their own. They get a bigger punishment for betraying the Mob-family. These are people who couldn’t keep their fingers out of other people’s drug pies. Boundary issues. What’s yours is mine.

One side screams get rid of ICE (Immigration Customs Enforcement) and the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). The other side screams protect us, save us; they’re going to kill us.

Get your damn story straight. Yeah. I’d feel desperate too if I stole from the Mob.

Remember: Border people bring their debts with them; they don’t pay their debts before they leave the country. That’s the point; run like hell to the protection of the USA because the USA hates the cartels and they’ll protect us from what happens when somebody steals from the Mob, or when you don’t pay back the money you borrowed. If the cartels were the only bank in town, there’s a lot of debt entering the USA.

Their debts are going to get settled by the middle and middle-lower class taxpayer in the USA. Just what Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer and the CIA (the largest terror organization in the world) wanted.

Bring us your tired, your poor and your debt.

The Border People are acting as if there’s a huge money purse on the other side of the border – like a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. That big purse could only be coming from the cartels.

They’re not coming to pick fruit. Desperate to pick fruit? That’s a tell. It’s naive of congress to fill in the blanks with that kind of nonsense. What are members of congress afraid of? Why are they protecting the cartels in the USA?

Why couldn’t congress figure that one out? Because they rely on other people’s brains to do their own brain work for them. Hey, even the King of Jews Schumer gave his brain to somebody else to fill with data that he repeats like a robot programmed to talk somebody else’s walk.

Yeah, Mussolini’s favorite daughter and Mossad’s favorite son. Negotiating border security? There shouldn’t even be a debate. Jews don’t negotiate. They steal something from you, then return crumbs of what they took, calling it a painful sacrifice for peace.

What did the USA get from Israel for moving the USA Embassy from Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem? Nothing. We got nothing. That’s how they negotiate.

Italians don’t negotiate either. They dictate by issuing consequences if you don’t comply.

The Jews set preconditions that they know can’t and won’t be met. The USA does that with North Korea. Dismantle your entire nuclear program, we say, and then we’ll talk. No we won’t; we’ll want more and more till we own you.

That’s why the intelligence agencies went rogue on President Trump by calling him a liar in public. They want to control the negotiations with Korea. They want total compliance, keeping the target under our thumb, while we expand our nuclear programs. That’s the hypocrisy that keeps the world in turmoil.

We carpet bomb countries; we don’t need a nuclear weapon to do it.

We ‘nuclearized’ our conventional system by the sheer number of bombs we drop, creating the effect of a nuclear weapon or worse. We create tsunamis and earthquakes wreaking havoc on the populations and geography of the regions we strike.

There’s only one precondition – we need border security, which requires a demarcation divider so those approaching will see they have actually reached the border. We need state of the art monitoring systems and a means to process individuals and/or apprehend those not coming through the checkpoints.

That’s it. Should be easy.






 

Laws People Think Are Theirs’ To Break Are Major Ones

Blacks and Hispanics force white people to fight their battles for them. They do it with their dogs and gamecocks too – force them to fight, for the purpose of monetary gain. It’s always about the money.

Blacks and Browns like to watch people and other animals tear each other apart in an arena they control. There is no exit plan for the fighters. They’re put into the ring to fight or die. They know they’re going to die, if not this fight the next one.

Fifty states outlaw the brutal blood sport. But so do they outlaw slavery and trafficking of children for sex.

Blacks and Browns treat white people like their dogs and gamecocks.

Do you know how many white people died or sacrificed everything but their lives to help black Africans gain their freedom from slavery and then to support their efforts to achieve equality? Too many to count?

Yet nowhere during black history month is their sacrifice acknowledged. Now that is an ungrateful demographic of people who are too smug to say thank you for your service to freedom. Yet, the outspoken members of Black Lives Matter Terrorist group admonished the president of the United States for not saying enough about black history during black history month.

An apology for your lapse in etiquette would be appropriate. A sincere recognition and appreciation for white people’s contribution to the abolishment of slavery is in order. If tables were turned as they are in other countries, black Africans would not risk it all to free whites enslaved by blacks. That’s black supremacy in play.

Now who comes knocking again, this time to force white people, through humiliation and life-ruining war tactics, to fight for their causes? Blacks again. Oh yeah, and Browns.

Really, how rude – and selfish. Isn’t the mass exploitation of any race by another race illegal? It should be.

The laws people break as their right are not only the petty theft or grand theft laws, or cheating the social service system, traffic violations, assault, they’re the big laws, the ones outlawing grotesque, despicable behaviors.

Those are theirs to break is their answer proved by their actions which facilitate the practices. They say they don’t support it, but they do nothing to stop it when it happens within their own race in their own neighborhoods. Turning a blind eye = facilitation.

They force white people to politick for new laws and/or to change policy regarding the enforcement of existing laws that favor them financially, rather than do it themselves, which indicates they want white people to think and act for them. But they want to lead.

What kind of people do that? Dictators. Despots. Oppressors. Kings. Queens.






 

BIAS-FREE

BIAS-FREE

Machines have the same biases humans have.

Humans design the machines. Humans design the programs used on computers that provide automated services.

Just because an operating procedure or method is automated doesn’t mean it’s bias-free. It isn’t. Humans insert their biases into the programs.

Is bias-free the same as a lottery system? You have to do something to get into the lottery system in the first place, something that gets the individual or the group noticed and judged worthy enough to participate in the lottery.

This lottery system in a socio-political-economic sense refers to whatever an individual or group seeks and wants or wants more of.

For instance, if only first language Spanish-speaking people born in countries south of the USA border, or by individual countries south of the USA or island communities, or countries in any other continent are allowed legal entry into the USA, then at some point they had to petition for that lottery.

Nobody is going to be included in a lottery system who doesn’t want to be there. Or if by mistake they are included, then they would be given the opportunity to decline whatever it was being offered.

It is at the point of petition that biases are made, just as it is with machines and those who program them. Biases have been petitioned for insertion if they have made it all the way to the consideration process.

Then with the consideration process, comes more bias.

Even if you have a big jar with names in it, whereby the names pulled are by an automated random procedure, there had to be a process of bias to determine which names made it into the jar.

All names?

As many as were provided.

That’s it right there. ‘As many as were provided’, and of course we couldn’t fit them all, the program was designed for a ‘limited number of applicants’ – that’s another bias right there.

Well, we just got overwhelmed, we didn’t think so many would apply. So yes, we just put in as many as would fit, throwing our hands up into the air. It was chaotic in that lottery room.

Everybody is in the prejudicial box. It’s human nature to judge – everything, everybody, all the time.

When we decide who to discriminate against, by petitioning to insert biases, corruption enters the process of selection.

Then there is that question that nobody answers. Who are WE?

The ones who petition on behalf of the petitioners, the ones receiving the petitions and the ones forwarding the petitions.

You mean their names.

Well, could be anybody. Only insiders know and they are the ones who inform their constituencies. And as before, the constituencies have representatives with names only certain people know.

And, what process do these petitions go through along the way? Selection or rubber stamping.

Which Petitioner Representative gets a face-to-face meeting with members of the these socio-political-economic lotteries. And which don’t?

They’re not randomly selected, that’s for sure.

The conclusion drawn is that the socio-political-economic lottery system is filled with biases at every juncture.

When you insert the human factor into a lottery system, whereby the balls you’re picking are humanoids, it’s not the same as a money lottery.

There are always ways to fix the numbers (cook the books) when dealing with machines, and every state does it – legally of course. The laws that govern fixing odds or the equivalent are mostly out of view of the public.

Actually it’s easier than fixing a horse or dog race or sports game, because it’s always done to increase funds that go to the government. Of course they don’t call it ‘fixing’. They make laws that benefit themselves by claiming the laws reduce fraud from individuals.

It’s similar to Facebook, if you post more than a handful of posts in succession, they’ll tell you to slow down or be blocked for a period of time as punishment.

This happens to me often, since Facebook stopped automatically posting my posts from Word Press to my profile page.

They only post by automation to my Facebook business page. Everything else has to be manually posted. So, I wait a bit and do my manual posting all at once – which is more efficient for me, given I maintain eight websites, plus engage in social media, which invariably leads to warnings, then I stop. But then I also forget to get back to it, because I’m doing a zillion other things.

So my posting behavior is corrupted by Facebook, interrupting my free speech rights that they claim to support, based on their machines selecting me to be discriminated against, based on the biases of their programmers’ judgment on what constitutes a spammer. I’m not a spammer. Never have been, wouldn’t even know how to do it. Have no desire to do it.

Bias sounds like a more neutral word and process than prejudice, but it isn’t.

Machines are the middle man from the past. Everything goes through the middle person. There’s the maker of the product (programmer) the distributer of the product (machine) and the buyer of the product (you).

If you program a bias into a procedure the machine or procedure will produce a biased result.

Most biases in business are based on statistics. In trying to make one size fits all, you end up with a size that doesn’t fit anybody very well. ‘IT’LL DO’ is their statistic mantra. It’ll do us fine. We’ll make money on most people not being satisfied, but it’s not so bad. The outliers on the ends of the continuum, well that’s why we have disclaimer labels and instructions for dos and don’ts.

People want to buy and they want to buy cheap. There are so many odd sized humans all over the globe with odd sized multiple needs, that we have to settle.

Everybody settles to get their product out. Many settle too fast in order to beat the competition, but then they have to regroup and redesign a product that was released before it was fully developed.

Sometimes that works if a segment of buyers are forgiving, but just as many times they’re not forgiving until years later when they try the product again. Imagine the sales lost due to the premature release of a product?

I got side-tracked a little here on bias, since it just occurred to me that it is a gentler, kinder way of addressing what we all were created to do anyway: judge, judge and prejudge.

The word prejudice has become loaded and bogged down with everybody’s agendas, to the extent that it’s difficult to discuss its process or access its value in any given situation or condition.

There are values to some biases. Although there are also values to some prejudices; it has become impossible to discuss them without people going off the rails.

So I’m going to shelve prejudice for a while and focus on bias.






The New Regressive Democratic Platform

It’s okay to be racist as long as you limit your racism to white people.

It’s okay to be sexist, as long as you limit your sexism to only males.

It’s okay to be xenophobic, as long as you limit your xenophobia to only Americans and American culture.

It’s okay to be gender-biased, as long as you limit your bias to only heterosexuals.

It’s okay to be ageist, as long as you limit your ageism to old white people.

It’s okay to discriminate against children as long as you limit your discrimination to white children.

It’s okay to dismember without anesthesia live body parts from viable fetuses during a late term abortion procedure as long as the body parts are used for research and as long as the USA government doesn’t pay the cost of the abortion and does not profit from the sale of the body parts to government or private labs.

Where do animal rights come in on this new democratic platform?

They don’t. They’re not on the board. Too much money is made by using, abusing, destroying other species.

It’s okay to abstain from consuming animals, but you can’t interfere with the rights of others to consume them.

So, let me get this straight, humans by laws protected by the USA constitution have a right to use, abuse and destroy other species.

As long as they obtain the required permits.

Like McDonald’s? Does McDonald’s have a permit to use, abuse and destroy?

No. Only the enslavers, torturers and killers need the permits.

So, McDonald’s needs a permit to sell the dead bodies?

No. The processing plant needs a permit to kill and process the bodies for sale. Then McDonald’s needs a permit to sell the processed dead bodies.

So, as long as vegans don’t block the killing and processing of other species, they can abstain from consuming animals without punishment?

That’s about it.

Everybody needs permits to do whatever it is they do to the animals – and it’s not a pretty picture, anywhere along that chain. Vegans won’t be punished as vegans as long as they don’t infringe on anybody else’s rights to consume the dead – as food or other products made from the dead. Enslave, torture and slaughter; that’s all legal with permits.

That’s the New Regressive Democratic Platform. So, the animals did make it all the way to the platform.

Yes, they’re at the table.

No, they’re on the table. They have no rights and the animal rights populace cannot fight to abolish laws that don’t exist.

So other species have no constitutional rights?

No, they don’t. The individual states issue permits.

There is no permit to stop enslavement, torture or the slaughter.

A permit gives permission; it doesn’t take it away, unless there are unclean conditions which would harm the consumer or unsafe working conditions which would harm the employees.

Women’s rights are not protected by the constitution either. So theoretically, we the women could end up on the table rather than at the table.

Well, that’s one way of looking at it.

To sum up, the new democrat can only discriminate against all species, all women, white heterosexual males and anyone who blocks animal-eaters and animal exploiters from their right to consume and exploit non-human species. Administered on a state by state basis.

You nailed it.

I wonder what the republicans will come up with?






 

Slavery Undermines The National Security Of All Nations

I have to chuckle when I hear Black African talking heads on cable T.V. say so glibly, ‘It worked for the Jews; it’ll work for us’.

The Jews destroy somebody’s life for calling them what they call themselves – Jew.

The Blacks destroy somebody’s life for calling them what they call themselves – Nigger.

My question was always, to what end? What did they gain by destroying somebody’s life?

Respect? No.

An ally? No.

An enemy? For sure, for life, the whole family and beyond.

Jews created terror in the hearts and minds of every non-Jew on the planet.

Blacks created terror in the hearts and minds of every non-Black on the planet.

If the Jew population is as they say, which it isn’t, 1/10th of 1 percent of the world census, that makes an extraordinarily small base from which to effectively instill terror into the remaining 99.9 percent of the world population.

And where are their main bases of operations? In the USA.

Anything to do with money in America is controlled primarily by Jews, sometimes out front, mostly from behind the scenes.

When Hitler conducted his factory experiment by rounding up Jews to work his war factories in Europe during World War II he exterminated the sick, the weak and those of low commodity value.

His desire to create a superior race turned out to be a race made up of talented Jews. The ones who survived the factory camps were hand-picked for their intellectual value, their psychological and physical traits as well as their DNA-generated talents. After the defeat of Hitler and after the war, the Jews who survived the factory camps went on to procreate, producing high value offspring.

That is the reason why Jewish families could pick a child any child and assign a profession to that child without any concern as to whether the child could handle the job. They mated among Jews.

Doctor, lawyer, accountant, engineer, architect are all professions requiring high intelligence. Pick a family any family – a Jewish family – and that’s how it went, without any thought given to ability.

Times have changed with the cross-breeding of ethnicities, but that was the end result of Hitler’s experiment on designing a superior race. It started with the Jews as subjects and ended with the Jews as liberated – with a whole lot of brain power with which to go forth and procreate.

With African Black slaves it was a different history. Brain power or DNA-generated talent were not considered of value for slaves. Physical prowess is what was needed to work the fields in America – and elsewhere. Those who sold their children didn’t sell the best of the brains; they sold the physically strongest.

One might think that with all the brains left in Africa, that they would have done more with them, considering their procreation rates and the massive operation of separating  people by physical vs intellectual criteria. The slaves in America actually fared better than the non-slaves higher in intellectual capacity in their homeland countries in Africa.

If slaves who were sold or stolen from primarily the Ivory coast, it would be of interest to see if those regions produced children of higher intellect and lower physical prowess abilities.

I’ve never been to any African country, but in viewing those in America, their physical superiority in areas of strength, stamina, speed and agility are far superior to almost all non-Africans living in the USA.

If they fared better on the intellectual scale, than those left in Africa, then it may be a function of cross breeding, whereas with Jews, crossbreeding long after the war led to a reduction in intellectual capacity – in theory.

We’re at the gates right now, with the social engineering people wanting to create another slave race in the USA – this time made up of Hispanics. Although it already exists, this next wave of development is going to make the first wave seem insignificant in comparison.

These wannabe slaves who are now coming to the USA by breaching its southern border have brains. Of concern to the business people of the world (and this does affect trade everywhere) is whether they are as physically equipped to do slave-type labor as those slaves of the past, and whether they can do it absent an agenda to undermine the economy for the purpose of gaining political power?

When the morality of a slave labor force (regardless of race) is put into the question, it replies that a slave labor force undermines the morale and self-esteem of its workers and their families. History has taught us that these traits of low morale and self-esteem are past from generation to generation, even after the slave camps are dismantled.

If indeed a strong nation is made up of strong individuals, then the slave labor force undermines the strength of a nation – any nation – as well as those nations not participating, but benefiting from another nation’s slave labor force.

So the answer is No.

There’s no way the present-day African Blacks living in America can do it like the Jews did it. ‘If it worked for them, it will work for us’.

I would advise against anybody wanting to repeat the history of the Jews to get to where the Jews are today. That is one of the laziest and most stupid remarks I’ve ever heard anybody say on television to the world, ‘It worked for the Jews; it will work for us”.

No. The paradigms are completely different.

Hitler kept the brightest most talented. Slave-traders took the physically strongest.

There’s a big difference between Jews and African Blacks: Blacks in the USA aren’t systematically exterminated based on value or any other reason.

Humans use extermination techniques to rid the planet of species they deem threatening to their survival or quality of life. They also exterminate for the purpose of consumption or to transform into various other modalities goods which humans use to make their lives easier.

Black people aren’t on either of those menus.

The only thing Jews and Blacks have in common is that they both make white non-Jews pay through the nose for crimes against humanity that they didn’t commit – long after both demographics gained their independence.

That’s a sin that will be addressed in time.

And now, both Blacks and Jews are supporting a new wave of a slave labor force entering the USA illegally from its southern border. Hispanics.






 

THE POLISH HISPANIC BRIGADE is on its way

RE: Drugs

Eliminate The Demand. No one SOTB (southoftheborder) says to Eliminate The Supply.

Dino Martinez says ‘just say no to drugs’ and the cartels will leave the USA. It’s the white folk using them. I say, drugs are addictive and they may not have the will to stop using. DM says, if they’re too weak from addiction, then lock them all up, since buying and using drugs is against the law.

Following that logic, DM should not be opposed to locking up everyone who illegally breaches the border. It’s against the law.

I didn’t know that Spanish people called white people ‘white folk’. I thought that was a kinder term than ‘white trash’ that black people use to reference white people.

POLISH PEOPLE who long ago migrated from Poland to parts unknown (SOTB) want to come to the USA as freedom fighters. They hate president Trump and our system of government and want to change it into something they feel comfortable settling into. Something more akin to their cultural mores. They sound like ISIS terrorists in sombreros to me.

They rationalize that if they call themselves Polish, then the USA will let them in. They’re an men with ‘aim to please’ manners. One must wonder if they call themselves freedom fighters before they get here, what groups via the USA 24/7 cable opinion news shows openly recruited them.

The Polish Brigade is on its way. Friend or foe? They’re a tricky bunch.

Some drug guy testifies at El Chapo’s trial that drugs don’t go through open areas at the border, in other words they all go through check points where there are gates with armed guards and cameras, and those in the media circus who oppose any form of a barrier wall leapt for joy. Imagine that. A person connected to unimaginable torture and killing becomes the hero of the liberal press in the USA. And who would believe anything anyone who ever worked for El Chapo said?

I wonder if there was a gate with armed guards at the end of that tunnel in Arizona that just passed like a political movement 376 illegal immigrants into Arizona under the border. Of course they turned themselves in to the authorities knowing they’d be released into the Wild West Arizona desert to parts unknown.






 

AMBER RENE GUYGER IS INNOCENT of premeditated murder – WHY?

RE: AMBER RENE GUYGER

THE SPANISH have this thing about opening other people’s doors. I live in a building with lots of Hispanics – some speak English, some don’t, some pretend not to. There’s a unit next to mine that the leasing office always fills with Hispanics when the previous tenants move out. And they all know each other. Not just the ones who live here, but the new ones coming in. It’s like a network of people with a common cause.

Invariably, when new tenants arrive they try to enter my unit. Again, and again and again. Not with a key, but by shaking the door knob till I go out and they always act the same way. In a rudimentary sign language with arms flailing and laughing noises and head slapping I get the impression that they did it by mistake. But so often? It’s not a simple twist of the knob and ops, that’s not my door action; it’s an aggressive let me in, who locked the door on me type of action.

Other times as someone walks by, they lean over and twist and shake the knob, just to see if it’s open. Sometimes they bring a bunch of friends, collect outside, shake the knob till I open it, then start laughing and pointing and shaking their heads as if I know what they’re saying. It’s like my Hispanic neighbor wants to show her friends? family? guests? my face? We finally got a security system, since they didn’t speak English and there was no way for us to know what their intentions were.

I believe that Amber Rene Guyger got off at the wrong floor and went into an apartment she thought was hers. She made a huge cultural blunder/mistake by not respecting boundaries. To the Spanish mind they shouldn’t exist. It’s part of their culture and their mindset. They don’t get the line drawn by somebody else’s personal space. They don’t see the line, even when there’s a door.

If not for my experience with Spanish speaking people trying to open my door, repeatedly, over years, I probably would have thought that her shooting a huge body mass approaching her in somebody else’s apartment late at night had sinister roots.

If anything should be on trial here it’s the Spanish/Hispanic culture – a clean up your culture moment for sure. Somebody is dead who should be alive.

However, given that she listed herself as ‘white’ on her police identification card, she is now going to have to address her Spanish roots. A few Spanish news outlets ran this story, which indicates to me, besides her appearance and cultural behavior, that she is indeed of Spanish ancestry, which explains the cultural behavior of opening doors because they’re there, or because they mistook the door for theirs.

I do not believe for a second that the incident right down to the opening of the door was premeditated. It was instinctual.

I’ve seen it – over and over and over and over again. The people are always, in every instance, Hispanic.







BORDER PEOPLE

BORDER PEOPLE

Nobody’s dropping bombs in Mexico, Central America or South America. Nobody is at war.

So why are 15 million people from these regions living underground in America with no plans to assimilate? What war ravaged country, or state in the United States of Mexico are they fleeing?

There are no war-ravaged countries in these regions.

Why are we supporting mass immigration of people who want dual citizenship and if they can’t have it, then they live in one of the countries illegally, and that country is always the USA?

The Nancy Pelosi’s of the country accepted the offer of a slave labor force long ago. Upon getting a conscience and admitting the wrong, a decision was made behind the backs of the American people to compensate the slave labor force off the books by keeping the borders open so as to keep the slave labor force intact.

A slave labor force means fewer social service resources for the remainder of the population, as well as higher taxes for everybody. Rich people can still live a rich life while absorbing the increase; those in the middle and poor classes sink deeper into debt because of it.

A PARADOX

In trying to keep the slave labor force intact by keeping the slaves marginally satisfied, they put the rest of the country’s citizens at a higher risk for crime, disease, a lowering of standards in all areas of life plus the most important being the Arab populations that have sprung up across these regions over decades, posing a potential threat from rogue Arabs wanting a pound of flesh for the sins against Iraq, and breaching our border to commit it.

The rich aren’t the ones paying for their own poor judgments, managerial mistakes and financial blunders made in the past. The poor and middle classes of the present are the ones paying, as they always do, for rich people’s mistakes – in all countries, not only the USA. These are the same people who claim that everyone not as rich as they are must be stupid; so let’s exploit them like the stupid people they are.

Stupid is trying to force-feed a nation and a labor force into accepting a slave labor force by declining to build a security wall and apparatus to keep the slave labor force out.

Now that’s stupid.

You mean, we’re all racist for being against slavery?

Now that’s stupid.

Thirty-two states in Mexico, seven countries in Central America and 12 countries in South America are all proslavery?

Now that’s stupid.

The USA congress decided to leave our entire southern border open to future attack after 9-11.

Now that’s stupid.

Whose feelings are they afraid of hurting?

The potential slaves. They still need them. They even want to make the slaves legal by giving them driver licenses, by giving them social security numbers, but no citizenship. And even if they offered it, too many people say no because too many people want to maintain ties to their country of origin.

So where does the part about ending slavery come in?

Prices will go up if we pay them what we pay everybody else. Or, fifteen million more people will be out of work. Families devastated. Massive numbers of small businesses will go out of business. Well, maybe they shouldn’t have gone into business if they couldn’t make the figures work at the current employment rate. You mean they planned a business around the use of slave labor? That was done behind the American back. They call that freedom?

Now that’s stupid.

BORDER PEOPLE don’t go to the USA for a better life, because living underground is not a better life; it’s a lonely deviant life style.

BORDER PEOPLE go to the USA because they’re told to go.

They’re followers, easily influenced, do what their leaders tell them to do. Yet, when they get over the border, they’re in your face, dominating your every word and move. And then they want to dominate your family and everything they think, say and do. So why didn’t they do that at home? It’s easier to manipulate foreigners? Manipulating foreigners in their own country. Now that’s stupid.

They were told to do it. They know how to manipulate meek people afraid to be called racist.

Offspring of border people grow up to be bitter adults.

BORDER PEOPLE have been underground so long, or have protected others who are underground, that they don’t know how to be sincere. Their minds are programmed to deceive – since birth. They’re actors playing a part. Their whole life is an act.

DECEIT is their HALLMARK TRAIT.

That’s no way to live.

Still, their anxiety and anger levels are off the charts. Worried that they’ll lose their slave labor status and the privileges that go with it, they’re ready to battle for the border.

They strive to make enemies not friends. Without enemies you can’t wage a war.

No, no. We defeat them on social media.

No one is defeated on social media. Those attacked, simply withdraw to regroup and come back to lodge their own attack, that they weren’t even planning on doing till they were attacked.

When you beat someone up you make an enemy. That doesn’t translate into defeating them or into winning anything. It’s a useless strategy that works against those using it.

You can’t make friends if you’re incapable of being sincere.

BORDER PEOPLE claim to be fleeing lawless nations, yet they choose to illegally enter a nation of laws only to reject those laws. They don’t like laws and they don’t like walls. Period.

That’s who they are. Yet millions of them live underground, where I’m suspecting, in their minds, there are no walls. Since they’re anonymous they don’t have to abide by any rules – unless they make them. That’s a sickness, that it appears the USA government exploited. Most humans could not live that way.

Maybe the conditions are ripe for a war that blows the lid off of all of it. I believe that they believe if they can just keep everything as it was, then they’ll be okay. But that’s them thinking only of them. Isolated people tend to be self-centered, while drawing outsiders into their dramas to coerce them into fighting for them.

National security must come first and they’re not getting the ‘being part of a nation’ part. Because in their mind they’re not. Not this nation. Not the USA.

All of their strategies serve the political aspirations of one group. The ones here legally need a rank and file, and these slaves have been chosen by their own people to fulfill that purpose. Only one group with no consideration of how their demands will affect the nation of people whose border they’re attempting to breach – all to be underground slaves in America. It’s an act.

It’s an ideological Trojan Horse.

The USA is supposed to be the home of the brave, not the home of the stupid.






The Border Is An Illusion A Mirage In The Desert

Wouldn’t it be better to stop an attack before it happens by discouraging or at least by making it difficult to accomplish?

Stopping an attack not only protects the country targeted, but protects the country from where the would-be attackers came. Do you think we would have carpet bombed Afghanistan and Irag if we weren’t attacked on 9-11 and consequently caused all that suffering and damage to mind, body and soil?

It’s better to be prepared than not prepared.

We were surprised by the Japanese and twice when the New York Towers fell under the spell of deviated minds.

Better safe than sorry?

Yes, especially since we have a track record of trusting world citizens and entities – friend and foe alike – only to be taken unawares by horrific deeds that force us to fight, to spend our treasure to protect what remains of the rest of us including those souls in lands not connected to ours who only benefit if we fight back when we’re attacked. If the most powerful nation in the world doesn’t fight back, then where does that leave the less powerful countries, except even more vulnerable to the same deviated minds?

The oceans east and west create a natural border protected easily by ships. To the north is a friend and the terrain complicated making the USA not easily accessible, except through established portals of entry.

The southern border is wide open to deceit proven by fifteen million people who simply walked or were driven in to live in the USA undocumented with no plans of becoming a loyal citizen, but instead to reap the benefits of living as outlaws.

The USA is their cash cow benefiting citizens and governments of their countries of origin laying wide open for exploitation and potential harm those who actually built this country. And again, judging by the rhetoric of hate toward our system and our leaders, we have just cause for concern and just reason to expect rapid action to diminish our vulnerabilities at our southern border.

The mentality of those who cross into the USA illegally is one of entitlement, privilege and disrespect for the citizens of the USA and their so-called boundaries.

It’s just a fence. Who put it here anyway? There’s no fence up ahead. What does it mean?

No one demands entry unless there is an unspoken threat that accompanies the demand if not met.

Historically immigrants did not make such demands. They came to build not to tear down. They didn’t come with the purpose of living underground. They helped their neighbor; they didn’t hide from them.

The immigrant from the south is not intellectually capable of respecting a border it cannot actually see, that immediately tells them they are at the border of the USA and physically blocks them from entering unless they meet the criteria of the laws of that nation.

The military cannot effectively protect a border that has no physical structure identifying it as a border. A sign directs traffic it doesn’t stop it. A person will stop only if they fear getting caught. So, a sign absent a physical structure in a wide open space is an invitation to come in, even if the sign says not to.

The USA southern border is unique in that millions of people have over many years flowed unabated into the USA illegally and legally, for the purpose of politically changing the demographics of this country to match their countries of origin and turning the USA into a Spanish speaking nation.

Most countries don’t have that issue to deal with. We have millions of undocumented people in the USA right now, who are being led by political groups and criminal entities down a path that returns our country to the Mafia days, only this time with Spanish roots, because we did not have a physical contiguous structure at the line of demarcation.

An imaginary line in the sand is not a deterrent to people entering the USA illegally. The border thus becomes an abstract idea rather than a tool to aid in legal entry.

The store owner locks his/her doors at night to keep out thieves and those who through a deviated mind seek to do damage for damage sake.

A castle has a moat around it so those within can sleep at night and children can play at day and women can be at peace while working on behalf of their families who want to survive and thrive, not die for an historically proven paradigm that claims to create major social change only through violent means or in conjunction with dialogue.

Those paradigms are obsolete. The reason we still need the moat around the castle and the lock on the merchant’s door is not because we’re cruel and selfish, but because that deviated mindset still exists in humankind. That mind lives to operate for the thrill of disruption and the purpose of destruction.

Wiping everything out and starting over is their game plan. Fair doesn’t enter into the plan. It’s based on disruption rather than cooperation supposedly to make the world a safer place, yet SAFE has never been on their radar or a component of changes they propose.

A huge suffering they always cite as necessary prior to significant meaningful social change. Why? Because they’re too intellectually lazy to devise a new plan, a different way, staying instead with what the world knows from the past.

So I would say, what then did we learn from the holocausts of the past that makes us want to repeat them for the purpose of creating a climate for significant meaningful social change now?

Nothing? How is the world better if we’re still dropping bombs and blowing up theaters and stadiums and massacring children?

The letting of the blood is not the cure for deviated mindsets, though we keep spilling it thinking it worked in the past. It has never been the cure. Otherwise we would not be in the same place. That was a psychological construct based on faulty logic resulting in experimentation that proved ineffective.

It’s an illusion.

The border is an illusion absent a physical structure to prove its existence to the deviated mindset. To them It’s A Mirage in the desert that disappears when approached, whispering to the deviated mindset that God once more parted the sea in the middle of the desert just for them, allowing them to pass without first gaining permission into a foreign land for exploitation purposes. They’re not coming to build a life; they’re coming to build a kingdom. Otherwise they would live above ground. Strength in numbers is their rallying call.

Build with haste and care. Spare no expense.






 

World Memo: Fear Black People. Prepare to Get Kicked

Blacks don’t use metaphors.

When a white person says, “I would have beat the shit out of somebody”, they usually don’t mean it literally. It’s how they feel – what they felt like doing, but they don’t (not usually).

When Lebron James, a black person, says, “I would have whooped his ass”, referring to the Cleveland Browns football kicker Zane Gonzalez after missing four kicking attempts that contributed to the loss of the game, he means it literally.

Zane would have been beaten up by Lebron James and probably by a lot of other players piling on after the game out of site. In fact, Lebron James was giving the order – a basketball player telling a football team to beat up one of their own players. How manipulative and controlling is that?

Blacks use fear to make other blacks perform and then carry out the punishment when they don’t.

That’s an issue for the unions that’s not being addressed – out of even more fear for snitching. Some of those concussions may not have occurred on the field, but instead off the field as punishment for losing a game or otherwise not performing up to par.

Nobody in any workplace setting as the result of poor performance (or any other reason) deserves to be beaten up – physically or mentally – but that’s the way blacks do it. They think that nothing speaks louder than an good ass whoopin’. Who would even refer to a violent act as ‘good’? Now who’s the bum?

It’s common in black households, black schools, black neighborhoods, black playgrounds that look more like fightgrounds, throughout entire black communities – nationwide.

When you see black mothers punching their black kids, they always aim for the head, as if by punching the heads of their kids, it will knock some sense into them. It doesn’t work that way. How many black children show up at their first day of school with a long list of concussion experiences already on their resumes?

This punching to communicate and to force blacks to behave must stop. If you keep saying that’s part of your culture and white people just have to accept us the way we are and all will be right with the world, then don’t call the police out when the violence escalates out of control.

We don’t have to be civilized because you say so. Besides, that is civilized. Our kids don’t listen unless they’re belted. And it’s not your business anyway. We could be shooting each other.

You have a short fuse. Recognize it and work on your other strengths to neutralize that fuse. That short fuse is what gets a lot of you arrested. You can’t turn yourself off. You have the mechanism, you just don’t feel like using it. It feels better to beat the guy/gal or kid till you’re physically and mentally satisfied, than to step back, shut up and take stock of what you just did, why and how it cannot happen again – without assigning blame to make your contribution to it all appear irrelevant.

…Till next time and you start your madness cycle all over again always at somebody else’s expense, and it’s always somebody else’s fault. And the common denominator in the aftermath of it all, while blood is being mopped, is white people. It’s always the ones who aren’t in the room who can’t defend themselves, while all the violent players simultaneously and instinctively come together over their hatred of an entire race of people who have nothing to do with your short fuse or your violent culture.

Now you can make peace with each other, because of the no-fault clause among blacks that you have written like stone into your culture. Always blame the white people – those they deem weaker than themselves. The tears and rants are all a hoax. Blacks do not fear whites.

But that short fuse you all accept as being normal for you, the black rage that frightens your self-proclaimed enemies into submission, lands you in a lot of prison cells where you claim you don’t belong.

If you’re seen as a threat to the well-being and safety of other individuals in society, then you deserve to be separated from that society.

It’s all on you and how well you control that short fuse.

All actions have consequences. An ass whoopin’ to you is assault and/or attempted murder to the ones who live outside of your violent culture.

Eric Holder, Attorney General under Previous President Obama, publicly called for the kicking of white people by the entire black race – a violent act that will only get more of you jailed. It appears that he can’t control his violent urges either, so is giving you all an excuse so he can derive vicarious pleasure and satisfaction when the kicking begins: When they go low, we (meaning the entire black race) kick them.

Yeah, we know what kicking a person when they’re down means. It’s a pile on and most blacks do it. It starts as kids in the fightgrounds of America. One person gets punched and knocked to the ground, and almost all the others pile on this one person, kicking and punching till they achieve their physical release – or as in Somoa, the victim dies. The others stand and watch.

Just how Eric Holder defines what is ‘low’ and how Michelle Obama defines what is ‘high’ is a mystery. Neither can define their ‘highs and lows’ in specific terms. That’s because it’s meant to be generalized, like terrorists do – you never know what they want, because they don’t tell you. The implication is that you figure it out and when you do, the pain will stop. But it never does.

Right now their goal is to turn white people against white people using fear. Using fear is not a new strategy. Their entire culture is built on violence and fear. That’s why the black African race sees with one set of eyes, hears with one set of ears, thinks with one brain and speaks with one voice.

That is a mighty power. One to be feared for sure. The foundation of fire and fists is their call to arm and harm. Everybody knows the destruction that causes.

The world will respond commensurate with the threat.






 

Death Of A Movement Wish

I’m giving you the tagline right off the bat, so you lazy activist readers who like to jump on whatever it is that anybody else is saying or doing that doesn’t line up with your distorted perception of reality can move on to your next target.

Picking the wrong battles to fight, because something pops up on your radar and because it did, it must be designed specifically for you to raise, or because you think you might just be able to make it fit, while the real battles, the ones of substance – the gut-wrenching glory battles – pass you by.

This is called DEATH OF A MOVEMENT WISH.

American women make the same mistakes American blacks make to keep themselves irrelevant, thus enslaved.

They pick up every argument – shotgun approach – whether it fits the discrimination or not. They work it to death trying to force-fit it to their agenda and in the end lose ground.

People see through that. They see the hypocrisy of a goal that justifies any means to attain it, making it look like you’d rather shed somebody’s blood than pursue a diplomatic solution. The activists driving these HATE AND DESTROY CAMPAIGNS to achieve their agendas state as their reason, that all conflict must at some point along the continuum to resolution result in violence and bloodshed and a significant amount of loss in order to bring all sides to the resolution table.

It sounds like war mongering to most ears. Violence and hatred is not a prerequisite for social or any other category of change.

When people see activists exhibit the same behavior they protest, the populace and the shakers and movers turn against the protestors and their message. Any cause needs those people at minimum to agree with your goals. But none have been stated. Women and blacks never state the goal. What do you want? They’re afraid if they say, they might get it, and regret not asking for more? We shouldn’t have to ask? Then why are you protesting? Using that logic, you shouldn’t have to protest either.

Every individual in the movement has a different demand.

Organize.

Who do you think the government is, God? You’re talking to people here, not making a wish to your God. State what you want, the way you want this country, this world to be, detailed. Or they put droves of ignorant talking heads on cable news shows to act ignorant, as if ignorance will make the shakers and movers get for you what you want?

Really? That’s a strategy?

You’re all pathetic. Get off the stage, till you have something of substance to say, then say it in a succinct, positive, good for all, way.

You claim to be better, to know and possess a better way, but you don’t act or show it.

Share it.

You trivialize the woman and the black by focusing on trivial offenses. Using the nigger word, or grabbing somebody’s crotch in a high school party free for all? He tried to kiss me and grabbed at my clothes? Well, he called me the same thing as the nigger word, he bitch me?

You really do have a Death Of A Movement Wish (DOAMW). You don’t even want to be doing this.

Making up scenarios that you think happen all the time, so you ‘Hollywood’ it, like Hollywood does with the news, using actors as the OPINIONS of the people on the street interviewed for news shows. For entertainment purposes or to sway public opinion? Making black waiters scribble “i don’t tip black people’ on the restaurant bill, claiming a white customer did it, then stand all smiles while the cameras click away? And you just happened to have the telephone number of a major mainline news source junkie?

The best move the congressional democrats can make now: Vote YES for Brett Kavanaugh as Supreme Court Justice

You know you wanted him. The others convinced you that they could bring him to his knees, because of his Irish roots, forcing him to change his views to your way of thinking. He was the most malleable. They stereotyped him. He’s Irish – a slam dunk, walk in the park NO. He’s Irish. They drink a lot and when they drink a lot, they womanize – a stereotype that everybody gets regardless of how unfair it is. Democrats are the party of fair for all marginalized groups. Who forgot that? Who started this parade? You went after the IRISH? Hm-m.

Dems Vote YES for Kavanaugh. 

We did our due diligence. We’re convinced he will be fair in matters that concern us – (especially now that we’ve destroyed his family and friends using the Irish stereotype lol. Just kidding BK; we knew you could handle it. Hey, we know where your children go to school. lol.).






 

Is Teen Groping A Crime?

What’s the statute of limitations on teen groping? What country do we live in? Could someone please remind me?


What kind of person goes off to college, then returns to high school parties? What? No new college friends?

Ten times to a place where teen girls were being gang raped? What was she doing there, why return if she knew teen girls were getting gang raped, and more importantly, why didn’t she speak out? There was a lot of speaking out going on in 1972 – about everything. She didn’t tell her new college friends? Her mother? Who did she go to these gang rape parties with? Alone?

She watched these teen girls get gang raped and didn’t try to intervene? What? She likes watching teen girls get gang raped by teen boys? To go back ten times? For the purpose of remaining silent?

This was 36 years ago. 1972. The sexual liberation revolution movement was in full swing. Free love. Make love not war. Everybody was out of the sexual repression closet. Experimenting. High school?

We need the Federal Bureau of Investigation to investigate teen boys groping teens girls in high school in 1972?

The democratic wing of congress has totally lost their compass and their credibility.






 

SOCIALISM vs FASCISM what it means here

Socialism and fascism are to me essentially taking the power of the individual – relinquishing one’s control over one’s own destiny – and handing it over to an oppressive ideology via the state and/or designated groups operating as co-ops to use or neglect as they see fit for the state and/or group.

Everyone looks the same, acts the same, talks the same, hides the same, BUT is equally worthy, equally compensated, equally educated, and pretty much told what to do and how to live being a second class citizen in a second class citizen world ruled by states and/or groups.

Ownership is a relative concept, except when administering to the second class citizenry their rental privileges.

Freedom to express one’s talents and gifts outside the realm of the ruling ideology is forbidden unless dictated otherwise.

We the second class citizens of the world would share the same status as the other worker bees and worker ants, aka citizenry, of third world nations, sitting always at the feet of our ruling appointees, never at the table. I mean, come on, how big a table would you need for each person under a socialist regime, claiming equal power to share their ideas for supplying the world with all that the citizenry needs?

You want the world to be like you, right? If you’re socialist, you want everybody to be socialist? What if they’re not, who do you do business with? You need money to survive. How can you compete globally? If the government is responsible for business, except for the Mom and Pops, you’re going to be all working on plantations just to feed yourselves. What will happen to the ethnic owned businesses? You won’t be getting tax write-offs for rotten produce; you’ll be selling it rotten – it has already begun in the USA.

Who would be in charge of making sure every voice was heard? It’s too cumbersome; it would take years for each person to speak one sentence where all the others hear it. Decades maybe.

So, already a heirarchy is being created. You call it a co-op. Everyone has an equal voice because it’s small, but you need rules for a tie. That’s where a democracy seeps in. And where do you take the final vote if you need to speak to a larger issue to a different body? Representatives emerge to be the voice of the vote. Here we are on democracy lane again.

Both systems create chaos under the guise of calm. People who live in fear can be very quiet, but beneath the surface simmers a desire to break free.

Neither system is conducive to progress, because progress needs organization, highly skilled people and connections to flourish. Both systems isolate the second class populace citizenry – they’re shut off from the world. How can they contribute, except in ways dictated to them by their respective ideological systems of government? There you go with the dictator.

The tenets set forth for fascist and socialist regimes are a farce. Neither is workable as stated, and under the influence of either one, no one is free to be guided by their talents, strengths, dreams, their set backs and come backs to make a stronger, different, better effort. Because under these two systems all is one, and as we’ve seen with the black African race, seeing, hearing, thinking, speaking, acting as one – in unity – does not create harmony; it creates discord.

The human animal is not built to think with one collective mind. Thinking individually gives you the greatest survival advantage protection.

That’s my overgeneralized view of how the ruling factions of such regimes view it’s second class citizenry – operating on the false premises of ‘providing equally for all’.

Equal for all means equal for none.

Both of these ideologies dismiss the emotional component of the human animal, making them behave like machines – as pre-programmed for the so-called good of everybody else. Who decides who does what? Equally important, who rules the state and the co-ops? Where’s the oversight?

Blind trust seems to be the overriding principle that allows for the existence of either or both systems.

Both are evangelical in nature: Trust us with your cash we saw you hide, and we’ll reserve a seat for you in heaven. So what? I can have a seat at God’s table after I die, why not an earthly table while I live? God doesn’t sit there?

Well, it doesn’t work that way sweetheart. Don’t worry your pretty little head about it.

Fascism and Socialism were built by and for men. Make no mistake about that.

Acquisition is based on favor not merit, so all the slackers of the world get a free ride without lifting a finger, which leaves the rest of the second class citizenry to do two and three jobs for the same amount of equally divided goods and services, which makes both systems susceptible to fraud and corruption. All those slackers have to do something all day, so they find ways to game the system. Co-ops become gangs and private enterprise becomes the domain of illicit, but still functional money-hoarding black markets and organized crime syndicates.

Do you think there are no prisons in these oppressive societies? Oh yeah, there are prisons, but you don’t get to run them, like the cartel bosses currently do. I have a question. If Mexico is a democracy, then how is it that the drug cartels are allowed by the government to run you out of your own country of origin? And you let them.

It’s a farce. All of it.






 

The Party Of Pity (POP)

The democrats, upon failure to deliver on promises made to be broken anyway, morphed into the Party Of Pity (POP).


They wallow as they mock those who dared to try a new way – one different enough to be called progressive – one that shakes the status quo, loosening past ideals that no longer work, making way for a more workable approach – shaking to the core those seeking to give to a nation in return for their freedom your right to pity them, can’t stop crying over the loss.

What do we have without pity? We offer you our tears.

Will tears pave roads and build bridges and make peace? Will blame for your failure to work harder, with greater ingenuity, integrity and efficiency toward a better life build your future?

Tears are meant for cleansing souls, to clear the way for a cleaner, crisper, more concise view, not as negotiating tools. What is the world going to do with your tears?

Tears destroy neighborhoods by weakening the will – when you cry too long.


“Lick your wounds too long and you make them worse” ~ Lesson from a dog.

You can’t learn from a dog, from another species? Maybe that’s your problem right there. You limit your possibilities by limiting your view, thus constricting your knowledge. You’re above the dog? Well, maybe that’s your problem right there. You think you’re so superior that you shouldn’t have to do the work required to succeed? Let somebody else do it as you wallow in your self-pity and drown in your own tears?

You’re flooding the Goddamn place.

You hide and cry and let the opportunists slide right in to where you used to be and take your pride? Since when do tears, when publicly displayed as negotiating tools, tell a story about triumph? Since when do tears tell a story about anything except giving in and giving up?

Your will belongs to you. You allow others to steal it, then cry in front of the world for somebody to retrieve what you gave away. How about you set the example for you – with every little detail of your existence – design it, control it, be it.

Show yourself who’s boss of you. If you want a partner, you’d better have something other than tears and blame for a condition you allowed to flourish to bring to the negotiating table.

FIND YOUR SOUL. CLEANSE YOUR SOUL. START BUILDING A BETTER YOU.

Maybe then the world can recognize you as something other than a flood drowning itself.

SHH NEON






 

Colin Connotations

AFC BULL MARKET TEST KITCHEN

Colin Kaepernick puts his name on Nike products – big time sellers of footwear

Nike’s worth sourced from The Motley Fool: 

“The simplest measure of Nike’s worth

The stock market gives the most obvious indication of a simple valuation of a company. Nike currently has about 1.35 billion shares of publicly traded stock outstanding. A price of around $56 per share puts the value of Nike’s publicly traded shares at around $75 billion. However, Nike has non-traded Class A shares outstanding as well. When you add those in, Nike’s total market capitalization rises to about $94 billion.”


Sourced from Forbes: as of June 2, 2018

#39 Nike

MARKET CAP $110.3B


TICKERNKE  $83.49 $0.02 (0.02%)


INDUSTRY Apparel/Accessories


FOUNDED 1964


COUNTRY United States


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Mark Parker


EMPLOYEES 74,400


SALES $35.3B


HEADQUARTERS Beaverton, Oregon


As of Jun 6, 2018



OPTICS 101

SAN…

View original post 727 more words

Culture Clashing

The world needs laws that are enforced. Simply having a law does not guarantee compliance. It should, if we all had integrity, but it doesn’t and we don’t. Some people will skirt the law looking for loopholes, others will outright defy it, if they can get away with it.

When enforcement of laws is down due to budgetary or corrupt reasons, then it’s open season as far as how some people interpret their right to do what they want to do regardless of laws prohibiting certain behaviors.

If it’s not bolted down, it belongs to whoever wants it. Stealing is a word that the entire world understands – even in the most remote areas on the planet, stealing is taking something or someone that or who doesn’t belong to you. Stealing denotes that something or someone is taken without consent – something that is not the property of the one stealing what is not theirs to own.

In America, black pastors tell American blacks to steal whatever they want, just don’t steal from other blacks; steal from white people. This results in rich American blacks feeling justified in not helping less fortunate American blacks out of the ranks of poverty.

Pastors are motivated to comply, because they’ll be financially rewarded by the rich American blacks in the congregation. They earned their money; they’re not going to give it away to anybody – even to help a brother and sister out. Put it on the white man, the white guy. Anything white.  That’s tribal. That’s the tribal culture that Barak Obama when president said was okay with him. “Being tribal is okay”.

They learn this in church. It’s part of their culture.

Hispanics, the same thing. Big on stealing and big on gaming the system. Gypsies, same thing.

All cultures steal. The difference is that in some cultures stealing becomes a systemic problem. And in other cultures, although some engage, they know they shouldn’t. They know it’s wrong. Guilt will prohibit many from engaging at all. With others there is knowledge of guilt, but they do it anyway.

The guilt factor is important in reducing the amount of overall theft within any culture and/or outside of any culture, where guilt is a valid tool of conscience in controlling individual and group behavior.

Many cultures see nothing at all wrong with doing anything you can get away with. That probably explains why so many American blacks are in jail or prison. It’s all a matter of cultures clashing.

So where the conscience begins and ends varies from culture to culture.

Culture clashing – specifically in areas of conscience – creates the most chaos and havoc between and among cultures.






 

To Brits Jews Arabs – and any others who like to dominate the dialogue

TO BRITS JEWS ARABS and any others who like to Dominate The Dialogue

“Do you know what anal retentive means?

It means you’re a hoarder of your own waste.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight

Brits Jews Arabs are impeding progress across the pond as they say, minimizing the size of the ocean as they like to do with every problem they face, while further minimizing the distance between two points, something else they like to do when debating – we’re not that far apart you know?

Africa and Asia aren’t even on the board, that’s how backward moving they are, always wanting to be in somebody else’s jungle though, just to be sure nobody’s mating with the elephants they consider endangered, because they’re killing them all and don’t want to go too far, wanting the species to remain pure, you know how that goes when some group claims it their duty to save another group from annihilation, by killing only half of them. Let’s go in and take what we need for the next decade, before they bring the patrols in to block us.

Fake conversations pop up whenever one group wants to do something they shouldn’t, just to keep the populace settled enough not to riot, they use actors to paint pictures that don’t exist regarding real problems that they want to solve their way as if they were chosen by a higher power who likes money as much as they do and were the only ones on the planet to do it. Out of view of course, so there’s no accountability. Don’t you trust us? Do you really think we would do anything to harm blah blah burp?

Line up – you all have a ticket to success. If you want it. If you don’t, that’s forever on you, nobody else – nothing else matters except that you show up – as you, not disguised as another someone or something else.”

MANIFESTO AGAINST BULLFIGHTING

https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/manifesto-against-bullfighting.html

click link to add your name

“The nature of the planned/staged fight is that each fighter participating has an equal opportunity to succeed. In Bullfighting the bull rarely leaves the arena alive.

~ Sharon Lee Davies-Tight, angry”

The conclusion of a Spanish bullfight is almost always the same: The matador plunges his or her sword between the bull’s shoulders, puncturing the animal’s heart and killing it. Next, a team of mules or horses drag the dead animal out of the ring.

(Rarely, when a bull shows exceptional skill, the animal is pardoned and, rather than being killed, lives on the bull ranch where it was raised.)

But what happens next?

A restaurant ad from the program of a bullfight at Madrid’s bullring, Las Ventas, suggested an answer: A Madrid eatery, Casa Toribio, vaunted its “rabo de toro de lidia” — a stew made of the tails of fighting bulls — and noted that the tails, or some of them, came from the famed bullring.

After the matador kills the bull, it is sent to a slaughterhouse. Its meat is then sold for human consumption, according to various sources, including Martin DeSuisse, founder of the nonprofit Aficionados International, which seeks to educate the English-speaking public about the Spanish bullfight.

(DeSuisse is not Martin’s last name; he asked to use a pseudonymous last name due to the controversial nature of bullfighting.)…

Finish Reading if you need to be convinced of barbarism: https://www.livescience.com/56488-what-happens-to-bulls-after-bullfight.html

MANIFESTO AGAINST BULLFIGHTING THE NETHERLANDS

click link to add your name

https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/manifesto-against-bullfighting.html

https://wordwarriordavies-tight.com/2018/07/30/to-brits-jews-arabs-and-any-others-who-like-to-dominate-the-dialogue/






 

The Giver Of The Gift

People who want to be asked as a precondition want something in return – usually, not always. Governments use it when another government is in trouble. “All they have to do is ask” means you’ll either be perceived as begging or if helped with the problem the giver of the gift will expect compensation of some kind, or both. That’s distressfully manipulative, especially in times of distress. It’s not looked upon with favorable eyes from any sector, yet it continues to be practiced. I wonder why something nobody likes is still practiced.

Nothing’s for free even if we say it is. No good deed goes unpunished means it could work in the reverse. Somebody steps in without being asked and ends up being chastised or blamed for something they had nothing to do with. Anger sometimes gets directed at the giver of the gift. I wonder why that happens? The anger has to come out in stressful situations and the ones helping are the closest to the ones in distress or closest to the ones trying to help the ones in distress.

They won’t ask because they’ll be perceived as weak. The one wanting to offer won’t, because they’ll be perceived as lording over the one needing the help, or they’ll be perceived as weak for appearing to run to someone’s aid, especially if it’s an enemy in other matters.

Even if governments agree to be respectful during this time of offering and accepting or asking and giving help, the media will catch wind of it and blow their diplomatic plans to smithereens.

So let’s blame this on the media people, since they who incessantly claim to be writing and broadcasting in the name of truth seem to be telling a boat load of lies that run like rivers in the foundation of whatever they write or broadcast for public consumption.

Ops, you can’t get away with saying your personal views don’t interfere or enter your thought process while writing or broadcasting. If you are a human creature your views define you. It is impossible to put them on a shelf at any time. Judges who claim to be neutral aren’t. Lady Justice is supposed to be blind? She isn’t. They’re all lies told to make you think whatever is done or said, any action taken by the one thinking doing saying or acting is like a robot. Even robots are preprogrammed.






 

TRICKY BUSINESS

The British are the biggest Anti-Trump offenders of American Liberties across the board on social media and in the press. One must wonder why after all this time British Intelligence – not too smart – seeks to undermine our system of government and control our politics.

Trump hasn’t been in politics long and to be fair and accurate the British have been manipulating the USA since the British first arrived on these shores. I inserted anti-trump, because that’s the channel they use to enter systems – where there is discord they appear seemingly out of nowhere to influence minds in their best interest, under the guise of agreeing with whomever is their target. It’s not that they change minds, it’s that they agree with you, so you won’t change your mind.

It’s a tricky business. It backfires a lot, so one must wonder why continue? Because that’s all they know. Sometimes it works and slow is the way most people in government have been conditioned to think change occurs. Just sit back and relax, go play golf, because this is going to take a few years. That’s the reality that all who participate have come to enjoy.

It’s kind of like the poisoning of British agents always in Britain when it happens. They’re spaced decades apart. They’re a quirky bunch. You never know which way they’re going to turn.

It’s not that we declared our independence from their tyrannical rule over two thousand years ago that bothers them and keeps them looking in our drawers. It’s that we succeeded beyond expectations to surpass our oppressor – Britain. What sticks in their throat is that it was their own who rose up against them from across the pond they like to say making it sound like a mutual arrangement. That’s the British way.

It would be like Palestine surpassing Israel in global influence and wealth once they gain their freedom from occupation.

Imagine that sting if you dare.

Occupation oppresses people – that’s the purpose of it.






 

Religious Doctrine Based On Faith Not Fact

Using religion as a reason and a basis to refuse service or other freedoms afforded others equals discrimination on the basis of religion or creed.

Religion is a creed. Religion is a philosophy. Religion is an ideology.

The provisions of the law must work both ways – to prevent discrimination against one who is practicing their faith and to prevent those who practice their faith, in an otherwise free society, from discriminating against others not of their beliefs, based on that faith.

Imposing religious beliefs upon members of society not of a particular religious persuasion must at all times be discouraged.

American freedoms must exist for all Americans, otherwise we become like oppressive religious regimes. When each faith demands compliance by those not of their faiths in order to be accepted, and when compliance doesn’t occur, isolation emerges robbing people of their freedoms.

In public arenas all people of all religions, creeds, philosophies, and ideologies must be treated equally. For each religion to impose its own rules upon everybody else creates chaos in all sectors.

A view is a view, whether religious, political, philosophical, ideological. A view is a creed.

It is the view under scrutiny that discriminates, not its origin nor the group that worships and espouses it. People worship an idea, not an entity. Religions are based on ideas not facts.

Religion itself equals community. Without a community, there is no religion, except independent thought. As independent thinkers, we can’t all impose our personal creeds onto all other individuals.

Religious doctrine is based largely on faith not fact. To deny someone freedoms there must be a factual component, which by their nature, religions lack.






 

Eating Animals Is Not Natural

There are lots of mistakes in the universe. Recognize them when you see them, then don’t engage, participate or endorse.

Eating Animals Is Not Natural.

People who resist change, thus resist evolution, are those who cling to eating the flesh and blood.

A real progressive would not eat animals, simply because humans have mostly always done it, or for any other reason. Yet, I’ve never met a democrat who didn’t eat animals. So what’s up with that?

It seems that those calling themselves progressive and better than republicans aren’t progressive nor better than anybody else in the realm of prejudice, discrimination, enslavement, torture and slaughter.

Just because something exists doesn’t mean it should, and just because we’ve always done something doesn’t mean the universe demands that we continue to do it.






 

Asylum

I thought a person is supposed to apply for asylum and be accepted before making arrangements to move to that respective country.

Since when did the Spanish speaking people of the world take that to mean just show up and you get automatic asylum? Who said the door is always open?

What if fifteen million non-Spanish speaking people from the USA just showed up in Mexico or any country in South America saying open the door, we’ll work for nothing? We want to be your slaves. How do you think any one of those countries would respond? We’ll do the work your people don’t want to do. We’ll work for low wages. We have very few needs, but we need to send some money back home so our families can eventually join us. It’s a win-win.

There is a huge translation gap between English and Spanish that needs to be closed.

Slavery is always wrong, whether you claim to want to be enslaved just to get your foot in the door or not. It’s wrong. It’s vile. Anyone who engages in that process is responsible for the promulgation of enslavement around the globe.

Spanish speaking people have a lot to answer for by agreeing to be enslaved, by doing jobs they convinced everybody that only slaves would do, so someday they could be free, rich and powerful and overtake those they hoodwinked.

When the black Africans were freed in America, the Spanish speaking people of the world saw an opportunity and seized upon it. Hey, we’ll be your slaves. You still have fields that need tending, crops that need picking; we’ll do it. Just let us in.

The rest is a long sordid history that should have been resolved long ago, if not for those wanting to be slaves in a country other than their own.

If somebody tells you to enslave them, you don’t do it.

There needs to be laws prohibiting enslaving people who want to be enslaved for future financial and political gain, and those laws need to be enforced.

Yeah, I get it alright. You say you’ll do a job only slaves can do, and you do it long enough so eventually the country where you’re enslaved needs you, it can’t function without you, thus has to accept you finally as a non-slave equal to everybody else.

The perversity that Spanish speaking people imposed on countries where they wanted to live, but couldn’t afford to, has grown like a devastating cancer that hurts every person in the country where they made offers to business people that were not refused.

One slave group replaced another slave group in one country and now both groups threaten the well-being and existence of everyone not in those groups.

Those countries of origin are equally to blame, yet they too want to destroy everybody in America not yet enslaved. White people they call them.






 

Prostitutes Pimps Promoters

They’re all predators. They prey on the sexual urges of males for profit. And they leave devastation in their wake.

They spread disease and the adaptation to deceit.

All prostitutes, pimps and promoters should be registered as sex offenders.

Why would anyone want to legalize thus legitimize an entire group of disease spreaders and family wreckers, encouraging the institutionalization of perverts and sex offenders?

Prostitutes, pimps and promoters are a menace to all societies.

Home wreckers, people wreckers, power seekers, gold diggers preying on people’s sexual vulnerabilities. They call this particular category of predators hookers for a reason. Because that’s what they do, they hook, thus addict, you via the pleasure-seeking areas of your brain to physically engage in satisfying those urges that sets up a cycle of addictive behavior.

Yeah, they don’t just work your body; they work your brain and your mind.

Do unto others right? They attack their own gender at their most vulnerable points. Loyalty is not a word in their vocabulary. They’re a disgrace to their own gender and they enjoy that power.

Porn stars are the same as any prostitute working the street. The only difference is Hollywood is their pimp and promoter.

When somebody pays a prostitute for sex or a porn star with gifts, everybody knows they’re paying for sex and silence.

When that trust of silence is broken, the sexual predator who broke it, puts everybody involved in the predatory industry at risk for injury.

When a predator accepts a payment for silence over and above what was expected, they are in effect blackmailing and extorting their prey.

When agents of the preyed upon offer to pay for silence, which should have been a given, then that demonstrates a lack of trust and fear that the predator will not provide what was paid for – the silence that went along with the sex.

Everybody entering into these agreements knows that in advance.

Legalizing predatory behavior won’t change anything. A predator is a predator.






 

 

The English

Let’s debate the English – for a change of pace.

The English always look for a debate.

Pose a statement and they’ll turn it into a question, then it’s open for debate.

Debate. Debate. Debate.

Delay. Delay. Delay.

Deny. Deny. Deny.

Hope you die while we take it under advisement.

Your views have been noted. What does noted mean anyway?

Let’s debate the English for a change in theme.

Anybody with an animal fur coat or a friend or family member with an animal fur coat or anything else made from skinning an animal is excluded from this debate.

Go ahead, get started. I’m not a debater.

I trust my statement, otherwise I wouldn’t state it.

Anything with fur on it, burn it. Now.

Who knows what hides in those fibers? Lurks? Okay. There you go again. Trying to debate which word works best.

That’s not a debate, that’s a delay technique.

Honest debate is not about winning. It’s about fact-finding.

Burn the coats, hats, trims, all of it.

It hasn’t been identified yet, but it’s bad.

It’s killing people. Poisoning them. Dosing them? It’s in the animal, not the process. The animal is the hair is the skin.

It enters through your pores. It loves oil, so oil up and die quicker.

Craves fats/oils. It loves scents – natural, artificial – even scents the human olfactory lobes may and may not be able to detect. All animals smell. There’s something about the human animal though.

Burn them now. Make a public display. No not the live animal you idiot. The fur you took from the once live animal.

Why are the English so sensitive about being called idiots? I don’t know and I don’t care. Always taking offense at everything. Always preaching good manners when they have none. What’s that about?

Then release all the animals on all the fur farms. That’s what they’re called, right? Fur Farms? It doesn’t really matter does it, when you know exactly what I mean? I always feel strange about putting the question mark at the end of some sentences, when clearly in some instances it belongs in the middle.

Torture chamber is more accurate.

Farm conjures up something warm, positive, inviting, safe, about grass, plains, hills, fences, sun, that stays all the way through the torture, and lingers after the slaughter in the mind of the ponderer, that is not appropriate to the deed nor the process.

But they do raise them, meaning breed and feed them while enslaving them till they grow enough hair well for you know what.

The fur animals. The terrorists skin the animals while alive, kicking, trying to screech.

What do they do with the skinned animal?

What does mink taste like? And who are they selling this live flesh to? It’s important that we know where the live flesh is going and who is consuming it. Yes, fox, bear, lion, snake, deer, all of them.

All fur and skin animals.






 

Bleeding Maggots

British Intelligence isn’t very good at what they do.

What? You thought because I didn’t raise you, as I raised the others, that I was oblivious to your presence and workings?

I just wanted to be entertained a while longer before I dropped the Intelligence Bomb – you know, by being a decent person and giving you a chance to do the only decent thing – correct yourself and move in a better direction suited for actual progress, instead of fixating on your penchant for head slamming innocent people just to see how long it takes to bleed maggots.

Yeah, I got it decades ago.

That you didn’t get that I got it is worrisome.

You need to regroup and define the real enemy, instead of playing it safe with proxies you developed to make you all look better than you are.






 

%d bloggers like this: